pg
|
I will cast the dissenting vote. Like I mentioned in my first post, this is a bit interesting:
1) A major international media outlet reported the event 23 minutes before it occurred. 2) Clearly, the BBC had privileged information. 3) How did the BBC obtain this information? 4) Although he did not outright win the case, he was given an unconditional discharge, which is a confirmation or affirmation of sorts. The legal argument had enough merit to hold its ground in a court of law or they would have told them to pound salt. 5) Incidentally, collapse of the WTC7 was not mentioned in the official report.
Best regards,
|