justin_o_guy2 wrote on 11/12/14 at 05:52:48:You may not LIKE the source, but until you can SHOW me where the content is Factually Incorrect, This IS what is being planned. And, based on the history of the actions From DC, not just now, but in the recent decades, This IS what they DO. And, he is a lame duck, and, the mid terms are over, so, he is gonna DO what collectivist, global elite operatives DO. Nakedly, in public, unashamedly, AND still garnering the support of the same idiots who believed Obamacare was a good deal.
Some people Just wont learn.
http://www.infowars.com/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-p... Paragraph2; Instead of me proving this false.. IW needs to prove anything in this is true. its not. Obama stated that he was for net neutrality and that if title II was neede to do so he would support that. IW cannot prove that Obama mandated anything they wrote in the paragraph.
Paragraph 3: Obama did not say he would use EO, not even hint at it. Obama is severly limited in controlling Wheeler ( Chair FCC). Of course bill was drafted, but no EO was drafted either.
Paragraph 4: "there are no gatekeepers... there are no toll roads" Incorrect. Comcast and other ISP have FORCED netflick to PAY them to allow their content. Thus in a very real sense ISP are gatekeepers and do charge a toll. What they want now is the abilty to determine speeds based on packet data. So yes they want to be gatekeepers, that is what has been deadlocked all this time.
Paragraph 5: Really "good sources state" reveal the sources or get lost. Oh as to:" Obama has already passe a law that if your site..." sorry that was BUSH. Mill Digital Copyrights act.. I worked in a library at the time, so yeah... We still have to teach students and faculty about that. It also let Disney keep rights to Mickey Mouse even though time is way over due.
Paragraph 6: OMG so silly... net neutral means that packets move with out regard to content or address. how fricking twisted to now say neutral means to packet sniff.
Paragraph 7: Really?? "The public at large are totally ignorant of how law is made. It is not crafted by Congress but politicians." OK .. right there.. this is why you dont quote IW. So congress doesn't craft laws? However, they are correct in that non-elected agenies then do go on to make "law" via regulations.
I could go on but lunch is loong over. This piece is not a good place on which to base judgement for net neutrality.
I suggest you lok at this vid and see if we cant find some common ground. To be honest the vid is from July and I cant recall if he is for or against Title II or if he even speaks to it. Remember Net Neutral and Title II are NOT the same.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Z_nBhfpmk4