“The Benghazi cover up.”

Do your own research.
The truth about the scandal is that there never was a scandal, and certainly not on the part of the Obama administration.

“The IRS targeting of Conservative 531s.”

Along with equal or more liberal 531’s targeted.

“The refusal of the DOJ to investigate and prosecute documented cases of voter fraud.”

You’ve got to be kidding. After extensive investigations over years, 47 documented cases of voter fraud.



As has been said many times before, you're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. The items above are facts, particularly the IRS targeting of conservative organizations which you say the opposite occurred. I'd be interested to see where that info came from......

NC wrote:
Quote:


Oh please, an overseas avowed enemy terrorist planning terrorists attracts on US soil? Why don’t you set up a defense fund for the enemies of America? [/quote]

Read this:
Yeah, I know this link is from fox, but I'm sure the other news outlets are covering it. No doubt you can find one more to your liking.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/21/federal-court-obama-administration...

Pay particular attention to the last paragraph. The legal justification for this is not as clear cut as you seem to think it is. ie. quite possibly criminal activity on the part of the POTUS. Which is all I alleged in my previous post.

The recent amendments to the NDAA allow some pretty wide latitude for the administration to decide who might be a "domestic terrorist" and allows such people to be handled like enemy combatants - regardless of whether their activities take place on foreign or American soil. It's not too far of a stretch to imagine that that power could be used against political enemies instead of legitimate threats to national security. That could someday result in a hellfire into the back window of someones SUV right here in the good old USA.

North Country Girl wrote on 04/20/14 at 18:36:53:


I do have to say North, that I am surprised at this statement. You are certainly entitled to your opinion on the war of Northern Aggression, but I have to say thats the first I ever heard it called that.  

As to the OP and the re-start. I siad before, I was not sure that Bundy was right, but I was dern sure the BLM was wrong in their application.

“The war of southern treason.”

‘The war of northern aggression”

I would say sir that attitudes change with latitude.  

Really? You guys really think that was ABOUT slavery? Lincoln himself stated that he didnt care if slavery was kept or destroyed. There were economic things being done to the south that caused them to be angry.,Im NOT fighting this fight again,, Ive been down this road at least twice. Not doin it again, I suggest people go looking for reasons other than slavery. & WHEN was the Emancipation Proclamation? IF the war was about slavery, wouldnt that have been a founding document for the war?
Yet, its from Jan of 1863? War starts in 61? THINK a little//

"no one who thinks the civil war was about slavery or treason hasn't a brain cell in their head."


What else would you call a rabble uprising of slave owning people determined to destroy the United States of America??

Sometimes I wish the USA would have let the south go. 150 years later the south is still a thorn in America’s side, sucking in more Federal dollars than they pay in taxes. They are welfare states of which the northern states are unfortunately obligated to pay their way.

You tell me sir, I do not live in the south.

The record speaks for itself sir. I am gratified that you appreciate your government benefits.

As for the bliss of socialism / progressivism, that is yours to accept or reject.