Now, who woulda had the insight to see this? OHH,, wait.,,I know,, It was ME! I SAID the sarin was dumped by the rebels,, Uh Huhh,, Of course, I was a crazed tin foil hat wearing idiot,, BUT now,, seems I wasnt so crazed after all,, Of course, that was just a fluke & there is absolutely NO reason to believe anything I say about whats happening,
This wont change anything for the hypnotized among us,

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m-hersh/whose-sarin

Yea, Its those people who laffed at me for saying it that Im rubbin on,,
OHH where are they NOW?
Dont hafta even be smart to see who would benefit,

Well,, tell me, what makes more sense? For someone who has seen our willingness to invade doing exactly what we said would bring an invasion or their opposing force pulling a false flag to make it appear they did in order to bring us in & do the invading for them? Its a sad & brutal fact that military leaders use their forces sacrificially in order to gain a position. Allowing a few hundred to be killed in order to put the opposition in a position of defeat quickly instead of a protracted war which will kill thousands? Not really a hard question to answer. Killing a few hundred civilians to make the opposition look like the sorriest person alive? Think about that a while,,

"Seymour M. Hersh is writing an alternative history of the war on terror. He lives in Washington DC."
This is a quote the London Review,... from the page JOG linked...  
The book is an "alternative version" of history...

Here's another "alternative history" for you...
"Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter"... ...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1611224/?ref_=fn_tt_tt_4