Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Anti Protest Law (Read 46 times)
Midnightrider
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Alliance Member

Posts: 3244
Winston Salem, NC
Anti Protest Law
08/19/13 at 13:20:36
 
Lee Camp
Lee CampComedian and author featured on "Countdown," "Good Morning America," Comedy Central, and Showtime
GET UPDATES FROM LEE CAMP

Like
746
Anti-Protest Law Passes Nearly Unanimously And Is Signed By The President
Posted: 03/14/2012 10:49 am
React
Important

Congress , Obama , Ron Paul , Anti-Occupy Bill , First Amendment , Freedom Of Speech , H.R. 347 , Anti-Occupy Law , Anti-Protest Law , Freedom Of Assembly , Occupy , Protest , Politics News
SHARE THIS STORY

2,212
146
186

Get Politics Alerts
Sign Up
Submit this story
So I have some great news folks! The Republicans and the Democrats in Congress and the White House FINALLY came together and agreed on something. This is HUGE. These guys disagree on EVERYTHING! Getting them to see eye-to-eye is like getting the Jews and the Palestinians to do a trust fall together. Or getting Eskimos and polar bears to play Jenga.

I'm referring to the bill H.R. 347 that was signed by President Obama the other day, passed unanimously in the Senate, and 388-3 in the House. That's nearly EVERY SINGLE lawmaker. The last time they agreed that closely on something, it was a bill raising monthly Congressional pay to include a box of Ding Dongs, two erotic cakes featuring Bonanza star Pernell Roberts, and a gentle yet inquisitive prostate exam every Tuesday.

What did this magical universally-loved bill say? Well some are calling it the anti-Occupy law and it allows the government to bring charges against Americans involved in many kinds of political protest at any location the secret service, quote, "is or will be temporarily visiting." So basically if the government wants to shut down a protest, they just send a secret service officer down there to scratch his balls, and then they can start putting people in jail for a year or more.

This is all lovely except for that bitchy bothersome document, the Constitution. I believe somewhere in the back it says, "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech . . . or the right of the people peaceably to assemble." Aw nuts! That musta sucked when Congress found that out! To get that close to passing it and then shot down? It musta been like getting hired to rub baby oil on the contestants of Miss Universe before the bathing suit portion of the competition and then losing your hands in a freak exploding cell phone accident! So when Congress heard about that first amendment they musta been like, "God darnit! That really f**ks up all our plans. That f**king line in the Constitution says not to do EXACTLY what we just did." That's what they must've said, right? ... They didn't just pass it anyway ... Right?

But the bill doesn't stop there. I mean, when you have the entirety of Congress with the exception of Ron Paul agreeing on something, why not swing for the fences? The bill also says it could be a federal crime to protest near an event of, quote, "national significance." Well, that's not vague at all. So you could be convicted of a federal crime and locked away for a year or more for the following things:

1) Marching outside the Democratic or Republican National Conventions

2) Yelling "C**k-face corporate sleeper" outside a barber shop where Mitt Romney is getting his ear hair trimmed.

3) Marching in front of the entrance of the New York Stock Exchange

4) Sprinkling magic homosexual glitter on Rick Santorum, or even anyone near Rick Santorum, or even just making fun of his stupid sweater vest!

5) Going to the gates of the White House and demanding the President read the Constitution. ...You know, if he gets a chance.

Well, Congress gets to stomp on the Bill of Rights, I want to do it too. I want to bring back cruel and unusual punishment, and then we could demand that every man or woman who voted for the Anti-Protest Law or signed it from the Oval Office be tied up in the town square naked for a week while everyone gets to throw fire ants and bumble bees at their naughty parts. Deal??
Back to top
 
 


"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"
  IP Logged
WD
Serious Thumper
2005 No Login
*****
Offline

Professional
"scooter
trash".

Posts: 5207
Rosemark TN
Gender: male
Re: Anti Protest Law
Reply #1 - 08/19/13 at 15:11:27
 
Grin

And who did not see Congress telling the citizenry to bend over and "take it"...  Angry
Back to top
 
 

On 2 wheels since 7/87

Black and Chrome 2003 1950s style custom
  IP Logged
Serowbot
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Offline

OK.... so what's the
speed of dark?

Posts: 28663
Tucson Az
Gender: male
Re: Anti Protest Law
Reply #2 - 08/19/13 at 17:48:17
 
Somebody should protest that law... Grin...
Back to top
 
 

Ludicrous Speed !... ... Huh...
  IP Logged
RatdogWillie
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Nostalgia isn't what
it used to be...

Posts: 854
Johnstown, PA.
Gender: male
Re: Anti Protest Law
Reply #3 - 08/19/13 at 18:32:13
 
I have said for years that you have the right to free speech in this country as long as you are careful and watch what you say.

Now I have to add and where you say it.
Back to top
 
 

What was the best thing before sliced bread?
Why is it called tourist season if we can't shoot them?
How is it possible to have a civil war?
What if there were no hypothetical questions?
  IP Logged
WD
Serious Thumper
2005 No Login
*****
Offline

Professional
"scooter
trash".

Posts: 5207
Rosemark TN
Gender: male
Re: Anti Protest Law
Reply #4 - 08/19/13 at 21:30:25
 
We've got a letter on the farm from a former WA state governor, in which, he is telling my friend Doug, and I quote directly... "Free speech is ONLY for those people who say the right things".
Back to top
 
 

On 2 wheels since 7/87

Black and Chrome 2003 1950s style custom
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 13126

Gender: male
Re: Anti Protest Law
Reply #5 - 08/20/13 at 05:30:04
 
We had two Ron Paul supporters arrested yesterday for protesting on a highway overpass for "safety reasons".....   We've also had protestors walk on the freeway and shut it down to protest minority hiring practices. Which was more dangerous? Which did not lead to an arrest?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
justin_o_guy2
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

What happened?

Posts: 55279
East Texas, 1/2 dallas/la.
Re: Anti Protest Law
Reply #6 - 08/20/13 at 17:37:09
 
Everyone sees these things done to people who arent POlitically Correct, then they talk down to me when I tell them the goobs are outta control,, well,,WHICH isIT?
Back to top
 
 

The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.- Edmund Burke.
  IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
09/30/24 at 01:30:58



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › Anti Protest Law


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.