Aaaaah ... OK so Zimmy didn't beat up trayvon's hands after shooting ... and you know this how ?

Zimmy was well schooled in SYG my friend, and he had plenty of time to make up whatever he wanted, and create the "evidence" for that.

Cool.
Srinath.

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 07/17/13 at 21:27:50:


Yes there were, and they said -

Three residents have told the court that they saw someone who appeared to be Zimmerman on top during the incident.

Even though several were close enough to hear the struggle, the prosecution has highlighted the fact that none of them heard a crude death threat that Zimmerman says Martin made moments before he shot him.

And this -

But Jonathan Good, a former resident at the townhouse complex, told the jury in Seminole County criminal court that he never saw Martin slam Zimmerman's head into the concrete sidewalk, undermining a key element in Zimmerman's defense.

"I did not see that," Good told the court under questioning by a state prosecutor about the racially charged case that triggered civil rights protests and debates about the treatment of black Americans in the U.S. justice system.

Pulled from - http://news.yahoo.com/defense-challenges-testimony-woman-phone-trayvon-martin...

And see - it has a link to Reuters on that article.

Cool.
Srinath.

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 07/18/13 at 15:33:51:


Not collected cos perp was free for 45 days, and could have altered right on the scene, and EMT treated him, not colelct and processed him ...
Cool.
Srinath.

You're always angry after being made a fool of and that pleases me).

You're  incapable of understanding why I'm angry and incapable of understanding just how wrong it was for you to type those words.

Apologize for typing what you did.

Let it be noted that on this day, Saturday 13 July 2013, it was still deemed legal in the US to chase and then shoot dead an unarmed young black man on his way home from the store because you didn't like the look of him.

The killing of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin last year was tragic. But in the age of Obama the acquittal of George Zimmerman offers at least that clarity. For the salient facts in this case were not in dispute. On 26 February 2012 Martin was on his way home, minding his own business armed only with a can of iced tea and a bag of Skittles. Zimmerman pursued him, armed with a 9mm handgun, believing him to be a criminal. Martin resisted. They fought. Zimmerman shot him dead.

Who screamed. Who was stronger. Who called whom what and when and why are all details to warm the heart of a cable news producer with 24 hours to fill. Strip them all away and the truth remains that Martin's heart would still be beating if Zimmerman had not chased him down and shot him.

There is no doubt about who the aggressor was here. The only reason the two interacted at all, physically or otherwise, is that Zimmerman believed it was his civic duty to apprehend an innocent teenager who caused suspicion by his existence alone.

"Apologize for typing what you did."  
Laughing huh? Fine, have it your way.

up, and they were all created by the well schooled in SYG laws Zimmerman.


Really? Witnesses state after hearing the shot one man was pacing back & forth, didnt say he was mashing his face & bvreaking his scalp & stomping on TRays hands, Youre contrinuing to ignore facts in order to continue to live in your fantasy,

Dont ignore the shirt, it states
The wearer of this shirt was on top