justin_o_guy2 wrote on 07/05/13 at 07:13:03:well,, hows the crime rate in those places?
maybe you should start your thinking processes over,
go to where crime is low, use their laws as a model, see how that works.
There is crime a plenty in those places. It just happens to occour in NYC or chicago.
SC is where criminals get their guns.
If we all had SC gun laws across the country, you'd have very little effect on NYC crime.
If we set the whole country to NYC's gun laws, it will create a reduction - that's my theory.
Montana has gun crime, but you have to realise, there are no people to shoot ... 800,000 people in an area just smaller than CA, 4th largest, and 48th in population density. SC has plenty of gun crime too including the "insane woman" who had a failed attempt @ a school shooting after buying a gun.
Tight gun laws dont work when you can get guns without no questions asked right next door.
Loose gun laws dont work, they put the criminals in charge of the second amendment. For second to work for the law abiding, guns need to be kept out of the hands of criminals. They already have the inclination and element of surprise.
Montana Gun laws will only work in montana. You're likely to get killed by a bear collecting your mail over there.
Cool.
Srinath.