Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Poll Poll
Question: Should the Ls400 be mentioned in the Site name?

Yes
No
Don't Know


« Created by: paulmarshall on: 04/22/13 at 13:53:45 »

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savage (Read 413 times)
paulmarshall
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 1268
Carterton,New Zealand
Gender: male
Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savage
04/22/13 at 13:53:45
 
The Suzuki LS400 Savage is starting to find its way onto this site.It has been around just as long as the 650. I know this because I own a 87 LS 400.The 400(650 little brother) is identical to the 650 in many ways except for alterations to the engine, to reduce the stroke and bore so the Savage could enter the Asian market.
A few of these machines found there way around different parts of the world due to personal importing, Which is why these machines are very rear in some countries.
I don't know if they are still produced new or when the last one rolled off the assembly line, But these will be things we will find as we invite more 400 owners to the site.
Predominantly I would imagine this site catered for the american market, Which all that is available to you was the 650. Now as the site spreads around the world it begins to evolve, and we can either stay as we are or evolve with it.
P.S. Please feel free leave a reason for your vote if you can.

LS650/400/S40
SUZUKISAVAGE.COM
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
bill67
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

old  tired

Posts: 8517
genoa city wisconsin
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #1 - 04/22/13 at 14:10:59
 
What mpg to you get with the 400?
Back to top
 
 

william h krumpen
  IP Logged
Serowbot
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Offline

OK.... so what's the
speed of dark?

Posts: 28668
Tucson Az
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #2 - 04/22/13 at 14:11:26
 
I'll vote yes... sure, why not?... It shares 98% of the same parts...
... and, we do get members looking for info with them...
We never exclude LS400 members, or turn them away...

... but,... (big but)...
The name, title, and logo of this site, belong to the owner of this site...
It is entirely his decision... (and he may not want to include the LS400 for many reasons,... including just keeping the title looking tidy)...
We might then also have people wanting the RYCA listed as separate,too...

We're all Savagers here, none the less... Wink...
Back to top
 
 

Ludicrous Speed !... ... Huh...
  IP Logged
paulmarshall
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 1268
Carterton,New Zealand
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #3 - 04/22/13 at 14:18:53
 
Serowbot wrote on 04/22/13 at 14:11:26:
I'll vote yes... sure, why not?... It shares 98% of the same parts...
... and, we do get members looking for info with them...
We never exclude LS400 members, or turn them away...

... but,... (big but)...
The name, title, and logo of this site, belong to the owner of this site...
It is entirely his decision... (and he may not want to include the LS400 for many reasons,... including just keeping the title looking tidy)...
We might then also have people wanting the RYCA listed as separate,too...
we're all Savagers none the less...
Wink...

Could this proposal be put before the owner if the vote warrants it., And The site name should only cover the Savages that roll off the Production line.
Of course the site is welcome to all.
I found this site when I was still running the 400 donk. Answered all questions except info on the engine.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: 04/22/13 at 17:22:29 by paulmarshall »  
  IP Logged
paulmarshall
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 1268
Carterton,New Zealand
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #4 - 04/22/13 at 14:20:39
 
bill67 wrote on 04/22/13 at 14:10:59:
What mpg to you get with the 400?

Good question. I don't know as I run a 650 in my 400 frame, But someone who currently owns one might have the answer.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
SALB
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

FSO

Posts: 668
Whittier, AK
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #5 - 04/22/13 at 14:27:23
 
I say yes, but call it the "baby savage"!  Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
bill67
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

old  tired

Posts: 8517
genoa city wisconsin
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #6 - 04/22/13 at 14:31:46
 
paulmarshall wrote on 04/22/13 at 14:20:39:
bill67 wrote on 04/22/13 at 14:10:59:
What mpg to you get with the 400?

Good question. I don't know as I run a 650 in my 400 frame, But someone who currently owns one might have the answer.

My wife had a 1980 400GN and got in the high 60s on trips.
Back to top
 
 

william h krumpen
  IP Logged
verslagen1
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Offline

Where there's a
will, I want to be
in it.

Posts: 28886
L.A. California
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #7 - 04/22/13 at 15:02:46
 
It really depends on the 400 owners, are they a group that'll support themselves?  At the moment, I think we can count on one hand the 400 owners.  And there are alot of question we 650 owners can't answer for you.  Owners manual and other references, differences and similarities.  All need you guys to fill in the details.

Once we get some info, we can add to the table of contents a 400 section.
Or a whole new table.
Back to top
 
 
WWW   IP Logged
Yonuh Adisi FSO
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Savage Jedi (Knight)

Posts: 3622
Pilot Valley NV, aka Tatooine
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #8 - 04/22/13 at 15:46:43
 
I vote yes. For a few reasons.

1: Like stated before it shares many of the same parts as the 650.

2: It was manufactured as an LS just as the 650 was so I consider it a little brother of the 650.

3: If we separate the 400 as a different bike entirely why not separate the S40 boulevard as well because it is under a different badge? If we did that that would be silly wouldn't it?

So yes, I consider the LS400 a Savage just as we consider the S40 a Savage.

Back to top
 
 

Check out Flight of Destiny http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00H9130XC
  IP Logged
WD
Serious Thumper
2005 No Login
*****
Offline

Professional
"scooter
trash".

Posts: 5207
Rosemark TN
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #9 - 04/22/13 at 16:32:11
 
Let them in, the more the merrier. Just don't let the original Suzukis that carried the name in... I don't like 2 stroke bikes.
Back to top
 
 

On 2 wheels since 7/87

Black and Chrome 2003 1950s style custom
  IP Logged
bill67
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

old  tired

Posts: 8517
genoa city wisconsin
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #10 - 04/22/13 at 16:49:31
 
I had a GT 550 and GT750 I like 2 strokes.I did get in a bar fight once with some Harley guys once because they didn't like them.
Back to top
 
 

william h krumpen
  IP Logged
paulmarshall
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 1268
Carterton,New Zealand
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #11 - 04/22/13 at 17:21:04
 
bill67 wrote on 04/22/13 at 16:49:31:
I had a GT 550 and GT750 I like 2 strokes.I did get in a bar fight once with some Harley guys once because they didn't like them.

I too had the 550. 2 stroke 3 into 4 exhaust. Great handling bike for the times.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
paulmarshall
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 1268
Carterton,New Zealand
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #12 - 04/22/13 at 19:37:56
 
According to this site  the 400 was produced for the first 2 years of manufacture. Not alot more info im affraid.
http://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za/model/suzu/suzuki_ls400_savage%2087.htm
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
jcstokes
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com is
very useful

Posts: 2119
Mauku New Zealand
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #13 - 04/22/13 at 21:24:25
 
I voted yes, because the Savage 400 is the lineal ancestor of our bikes. Bill 67 I think there was an English Savage 400 owner who has just got mobile posting in RSD, he might be able to answer  your mpg question, however his answer will be in litres, or imperial gallons if he's an older person.
Back to top
 
 

Completely stock 2010 S40, aftermarket rev counter and back pack, Airhawk seat pad
  IP Logged
wambr
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 610
Russia, Samara
Gender: male
Re: Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savag
Reply #14 - 04/22/13 at 21:33:39
 
bill67 wrote on 04/22/13 at 14:10:59:
What mpg to you get with the 400?

I guess until that only I can answer this question... on his Savage 400 I developed a speed of 140 km/h, the so-showed speedometer
Back to top
 
 

Yeah, it's not bigtwin, but it is the best half of it
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
09/30/24 at 12:37:11



General CategoryThe Cafe › Should the LS400 be recognised as a true Savage


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.