JOG -

He's got a one track mind.  I've quit arguingwith him - it's pointless and will only get you more frstrated.  While you and I disagree on many points, I always enjoy the intellectual contest.

I agree with Srinath he has some common sense.I have 4 kids with kids in school,None of them want guns in their schools.I have 14 guns I never thought about getting them for protection.I bought them because I like them.All 22s and 410s.

I agree that i dont want guns in school, the problem is they are already there so how are we going to protect our kids? Even if you banned all guns and sent the military out to collect them all it would take decades to stop them and this country would probably be at civil war and if you raise the tax to $100 per bullet it would take decades to use up what is out there. So what are we willing to do to stop these guys tomorrow. No one on either side of the aisle likes what is hapening. If we cant put armed gaurds in the schools then give me another answer that will protect the kids next week and not some crazy philisophical answer that will take decades to implement.

I am not talking about controlling anything.
We tax the bullets.
We take that $ and put armed guards and guns and training in schools.
Trachers want to be armed, and have concealed permits. OK you really now have to see what percentage of that is the result of the shootings in the school in CT. Its a reaction .. .cos if they were already gun enthusiasts, why do they not have guns already ?

Seriously I dont want to infringe upon any self defence or any freedom.

I'd rather have bullets locked away. Not hoarded in the future, and have something better to secure them than the flimsy "background check only for stores, not shows" type of crap.

Cool.
Srinath.

YOu dont think the citizens should be protected? YOu think the banks get bills from the cops for having On Duty Patrolmen assigned in them?

You ACT as if your assumptions are correct. WHY do you assume the teachers dont already have guns, at home? & What is it about your brain that demands these teachers already BE gun enthusiasts? Some may be Very REcent converts,

What does it matter if they never wanted to own a gun before? Maybe some have them, maybe not,, I have a hard time believing out of an entire school No One owns a gun,,but, so what? Who cares if they believed in having a gun 3 weeks ago? If they want one NOW, its their RIGHT.,.

Again, I wonder how many retired cops would happily spend a day a week at the schools?

Look up
Intellectual Dishonesty

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 01/11/13 at 07:11:59:



Anyone who wants to "volunteer" first needs to be evaluvated ... they may be criminals or psycho's ... otherwise, anyone who is unpaid is fine to sit @ a school when they are able to (as long as they clear the check).
The cops posted @ schools are nto retired. They are active, they need to be paid. If teachers want to spend the extra time and $ getting guns, and training etc etc to retain proficiency and do all that for free, they are welcome to, I am just not for dumping the costs onto the regular tax payer.

And, I dont need to look up anything. I know what it is and I see it often in you, webster and a lot of others. Like the cartoon posted by parquat. Good. Thanks.

Cool.
Srinath.

Jerry Eichenberger wrote on 01/11/13 at 07:21:07:



Its worse than pointless,,he believes himself to be honest & he isnt,

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 01/11/13 at 09:43:08:



Yes losing an argument always brings out regret via comments like this.
Cool.
Srinath.