Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Merch
Donate
Welcome, Guest. Please
Login
or
Register
::
View Members
SuzukiSavage.com
›
General Category
›
Rubber Side Down!
› WAR -- Belt vs. Chain (facts & sources)
(Moderators:
verslagen1
,
Dave
,
Serowbot
)
‹
Previous topic
|
Next topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
WAR -- Belt vs. Chain (facts & sources) (Read 466 times)
Gyrobob
Serious Thumper
Offline
Posers ain't
motorcyclists
Posts: 2571
Newnan, GA
Gender:
Re: WAR -- Belt vs. Chain (facts & sources)
Reply #30 -
12/16/12 at 11:22:55
One of the reasons the belt has such a large dorky looking pulley on the back is because there has to be a gear reduction from the drive pulley to the driven pulley, and the minimum pulley size for belts like these is about 3.5 to 4 inches.
It would seem that if manufacturers would change the gear ratios in the transmission such that the drive pulley were geared lower (meaning the output shaft were turning slower for a given gear at a given rpm) the driven pulley on the rear wheel could be smaller, therefore not so dorky looking, and even lighter for the unsprung weight issue.
Not needing such a large gear reduction for the final drive would result in smaller lighter rear wheel pulleys.
Back to top
If you think there's good in everyone, you haven't met everyone.
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
‹
Previous topic
|
Next topic
›
Forum Jump »
» 10 most recent posts
» 10 most recent topics
General Category
»» Rubber Side Down!
- Technical Documents/Reference
- The Marketplace
- The Cafe
- Politics, Religion (Tall Table)
- Forum Upgrade Issues / Tests
« Home
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
10/02/24 at 07:30:33
›
General Category
›
Rubber Side Down!
› WAR -- Belt vs. Chain (facts & sources)
SuzukiSavage.com
» Powered by
YaBB 2.2
!
YaBB
© 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.