Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
WAR -- Belt vs. Chain (facts & sources) (Read 466 times)
Gyrobob
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Posers ain't
motorcyclists

Posts: 2571
Newnan, GA
Gender: male
Re: WAR -- Belt vs. Chain (facts & sources)
Reply #30 - 12/16/12 at 11:22:55
 
One of the reasons the belt has such a large dorky looking pulley on the back is because there has to be a gear reduction from the drive pulley to the driven pulley, and the minimum pulley size for belts like these is about 3.5 to 4 inches.

It would seem that if manufacturers would change the gear ratios in the transmission such that the drive pulley were geared lower (meaning the output shaft were turning slower for a given gear at a given rpm) the driven pulley on the rear wheel could be smaller, therefore not so dorky looking, and even lighter for the unsprung weight issue.  

Not needing such a large gear reduction for the final drive would result in smaller lighter rear wheel pulleys.
Back to top
 
 

If you think there's good in everyone, you haven't met everyone.
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
10/02/24 at 07:30:33



General CategoryRubber Side Down! › WAR -- Belt vs. Chain (facts & sources)


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.