I am not sure if all the "exploiters of immigrants" are republicans ... I can however assure you this ...

The day you give legal status to the illegals, is the day you will need to let in that many more illegals to do their job for the wages they are being paid ...

I'd use my own example ...
I was an immigrant, 92 I land in the US on a fresh new H1 visa. I work for a few companies till 96, when I start the green card process. @ that point I can not leave the company I worked for ... I was literally doing a lot of jobs that made them $$$ but left me barely breaking the cost of living etc ... I went to canada cos at the end of 98 the 6 year limit on H1 was up. I came back to work for the same company end of 99 still living in hideously expensive places and making barely enough to get by.
I am getting closer to getting my GC when my company lays me off ... that is nearly a death sentence. @ the start of the 01 recession I find another job, a new employer that will get me a H1 and I manipulate my previous employer by dangling the names of people who can hire their consultants ... all of that postpones the death sentence till I get my GC interview in India (where I scheduled it cos it was much much faster that way) and I go to India and come back with a GC and I get laid off from my current employer.
That was perfect, I now can make 2 X as much, or move to a village "like Charlotte NC" and make the same $$$ which is what I did.
Yea I also stopped doing the boring POS work and started doing some other stuff I prefered ...
I had never been illegal, however I was exploited a few years ... I cannot imagine any illegal will ever want to do that once they are not illegal.
Cool.
Srinath.

See they want to be politically correct.
And the fear is that when one side takes up that stance (the fire the illegals and toss em out) the other side will adopt the opposite and they fear that will get them the votes ...
So the 2 sides are both taking up the same side ...

I've got an Idea ... Cheif Joe Arpaio for president.

Cool.
Srinath.

Starlifter wrote on 11/13/12 at 17:53:26:



In the absence of a real enforcement of laws we already have on our books and enforce rather sloppily ... he looks like the outlier ... and in deed he is, what with throwing people in tent city style prisons, but see the state and federal giovt needs to actually enfore the law. When they dont, the people that assume the laws are there and will be enforced are the losers ...

Lets try this in simple terms.

There is a posted speed limit say 25 mph in a school zone ... But there is a small section of the population who knows they dont enforce it. They're running along clocking 55. Guess who is the loser in this scenario. Yes the people who run 25 and the kids who need to really really be careful to not get run over. Now here comes a cop who against all the rest of his precinct will ticket the 55 mph people. The rest of the system doesn't care ... That makes his only option to be to impound the car, cos for 30 over that is a possible penalty. There are you gonna blame that cop for following the law ... I wont. The letter of the law ... I'd easily vote for Arpaio if he wont give up that type enforcement on a national scale.

Cool.
Srinath.

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 11/14/12 at 09:18:26:



Dont forget you and I are against Monistat (monsatan) too ...

You're done for JOG ... we Librull's have surrounded you ... we now are going to put in the blood sucking tubes into you and ... well try not to think about the pain. It will only feel like an eternity.

Cool.
Srinath.