Oldfeller--FSO wrote on 11/09/12 at 13:23:39:I also think I've paid more attention to the new developments in that industry than you have.
So, you can be the voice for Intel and Microsoft and I can be the voice for the future of computing.
First test for my "future" is that Intel gets dumped out of Apple laptops (time: next year).
Now Cavi, what is your future like? Can you explain what the future is going to be (other than water cooled cell phones that is)?
Water cooled cell-phones? Seriously? That's what you go out of my post?
Anyways...
I don't think anyone ever saw it coming that Intel would even be considered for making Apple processors but when the rumours went flying around, people were pretty blown away. Intel doesn't need Apple like you seem to think. Intel already has 80% of the CPU market. Something you probably didn't know.
The future of computing will be pretty much exactly where it is and has been for quite some time. Intel vs AMD with the overclockers, Apple with the artists, and a bunch of little children running around playing with their shiny toys (google, android, whatever else pops up).
Sure, I'd love to see ARM jump into the real PC market but I'm not ignorant enough to believe it will happen in 10 years considering ARM is already 20 years old. I'd be more apt to believe Linux would be in the market especially considering almost every major player develops drivers and whatnot to keep compatibility but alas, Linux only holds 2% of the market.
I think it's you that needs to do a bit more research or maybe join a decent computer forum like
http://www.overclock.net so you can keep real tabs on what's going on. Obviously you're only paying attention to the technology and not the real life points.
*edit*
I know what I just typed sounded like I was directly comparing ARM and Linux but I wasn't since one is obviously hardware and one is software. I was simply stating how good both are yet neither of them can get a real foothold in the real PC market.