WebsterMark wrote on 08/29/12 at 10:59:37:[i]
Not true. Half the babies chopped to pieces before they are born or have their brains sucked out are little girls…[i]
WebsterMark wrote on 08/29/12 at 10:59:37:Not true. Half the babies chopped to pieces before they are born or have their brains sucked out are little girls…
This is true and hilariously mis-stated ... 1/2 of all aborted babies are girls ... that's cos the other 1/2 are boys and those are the only 2 randomly provided options possible ... sorta like the Dilbert joke that says "I've noticed that 40% of your "sick days off" appear to fall on monday or Friday. Duh ...
Anyway since you dont want anyone to have an abortion, you are holding up the rights of women because 1/2 of aborted babies are girls ... is that your stance ... that is likely the truest and the dumbest thing I may have ever heard.
This is particularly why its dumb ...
A baby boy or girl has certain pre requisites regardless of gender on the bearer of said baby who in 100% of cases is a woman. Limiting rights of women is limiting rights of women. There are 2 scenarios in case you consider the gender of the baby.
Limiting rights of women when there is a baby boy in the womb.
Limiting rights of women when there is a baby girl in the womb.
If you read it close, it still is limiting the rights of women.
And really referring to abortions as "chopping little babies to pieces" lets me know that you really have no valid point. Its using dramatisation to rant and rave and spew religious rhetoric ... it was cool and accepted when there were 2 billion people on the planet most of whom weren't bible thumpers, but pushing 9 billion with a majority thumping the bible its really obvious you have no point. BTW I also am pro gay, cos I dont want to have 10 billion, being gay is a good way to have people self birth control ... good. We would rather have that instead of being forced to like china.
Cool.
Srinath.