justin_o_guy2 wrote on 07/07/12 at 11:46:40:Well,, heres my thinking,, If a gear is a foot across & I move the perimeter an inch, the # of degrees the center turns will be one number.
If I have a gear only 6 inches across & I move the gear an inch, the # of degrees the center rotates will be quite different,. &
if I have a gear only one inch around the perimeter & I move IT an inch, it will be a full 360, so, diameter matters.,
When you say "1 foot across" I'm not sure if you mean 1 foot in diameter? Because the rotation of an inch along the circumference is based on pi. In any case, for this discussion, the .070 is constant, but would rotate each gear a variable amount (degrees) depending on its size. I dunno and probably don't amount to much anyway, but interesting to think about tho.
One of the things that I have noticed is why the extreme (premature?) wear on the Savage chain in the first place? To me, it constitutes a "problem" that should have been fixed years ago, given the bike's longevity. I've had other bikes that used chain tensioners, and they didn't wear out nearly as easily. Some had "automatic" tensioners and on others you losen a bolt and let an internal spring set the proper tension. My Harley even had a monster tensioner on the primary drive between the crank and the tranny. It provided drive for the whole bike, but lasted longer than the Savage cam chain???