Forget it Jef; a few unelected bureaucrats decided your fate while attending some overly-feminized university 15 years ago, you just didn’t know it ‘til now. The ironic part is we gave them that power over us.

Clearly you are too stupid, selfish and Neanderthal-like to make decision for yourself so someone ‘smarter’ than you will have to step in and make decisions based not on your needs/beliefs, but based on their view of what’s good for the little people….

Reminds me of a few years ago when some Californian bureaucrat decided to ban minibike sales to kids because they had lead in them…

These are the things that happen when we voluntarily turn over our lives to the State. Get used to it.

& Ohh Yea,, the little gutless types who prostrate themselves in front of every petty "authority" figure & fall in line & obey every little dictate & buy into the whole concept that man must be watched & directed constantly for his own good will Rat you OUT if you decide you dont want to play by every stinking rule.

WebsterMark wrote on 07/03/12 at 05:27:21:

Yes and we can take it back. Due to outcry, some states repealed their helmet laws or heavily modified them. Laws can be changed.

However, I use a brain bucket out of concern for my own personal safety, a full face at no less. I don't need to be legislated to know it is in my best interest to wear one.

I also wear a proper jacket and overpants with over the ankle boots and leather gloves.

And I wear them even if I don't look as cool as one with a doo-rag, knuckle gloves, wife beater T-shirt, leather vest and chaps.  

Starlifter wrote on 07/10/12 at 19:06:09:


IDK if more laws are needed,, reckless behavior is already a legally noted act.


Recklessness usually arises when an accused is actually aware of the potentially adverse consequences to the planned actions, but has gone ahead anyway, exposing a particular individual or unknown victim to the risk of suffering the foreseen harm but not actually desiring that the victim be hurt. The accused is a social danger because they gamble with the safety of others, and the fact they might have acted to try to avoid the injury from occurring is relevant only to mitigate the sentence.


IMO, texting & driving is as reckless as putting on mascara or reading the paper..

Im guessing this is what you were talking about?