I have a '96 which most likely is the same as a '95.
I say that because there's one here who really complained that the bike couldn't get up to what everyone else could, maybe cause the bike was geared different. Thinking back, I'm guessing it was a tranny or perception problem. Don't know which, it would take a tach and a ride to figure out.
my '96 would do 70 easy, I think it went up to 80/85 stock before the knuckles went white.
So let's talk thru the simple stuff and narrow it down.
Everything on your bike is stock? (muf w/holes understood)
Nuthin' replaced?
I'm asking point blank cause I know there's a dif in carb's in the early years. I got an '02 with an '88 carb, it has a 155 main, it should pull like a raped ape. It's better than the '96 w/a slipping clutch, but not awsome. And the top end up my favorite hill is slower. (Don't worry I got a fix for it already,
Boohaha)
The '96 ran best with a 150 and a supertrapp w/12 disks... 87 up my favorite hill.