Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Savage compared to SV650 (Read 262 times)
Bear_Rider
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 289

Savage compared to SV650
01/02/08 at 18:21:17
 
I'm still learning about motorcycles and the Savage's place in the scheme of things. How does the Savage compare to a "standard" bike like the SV650? I'm not so much concerned about the speed and power issues. They appear to weigh about the same, and I assume that the SV has more top end than the Savage.

I'm more interested in the controllability, seating posture, suitability for travel (camping), and the learning curve moving up from a 250 Rebel.

If this has been discussed before, accept my apologies. I have searched using several terms, but found nothing.

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
JakeB
Junior Member
**
Offline

I love YaBB 1G -
SP1!

Posts: 76
NE Ohio
Gender: male
Re: Savage compared to SV650
Reply #1 - 01/02/08 at 18:34:12
 
Just my opinion but the SV would probably handle better at higher speeds and the LS would be better at lower speeds due to its low center of gravity. Seating posture I guess would be recliner (LS) or bar stool (SV). Neither would be incredibly comfortable for travel but I'm leaning towards the LS because of the seating posture and other comfort mods that can be done (gel seat, highway pegs). The LS would be much more natural moving up from the Rebel than the SV because of the low center of gravity and the seating posture.

Hope that helps some!
JakeB
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Max_Morley
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

LT650 Luxury Touring
& sidecar rig

Posts: 1490
Moses Lake. WA
Gender: male
Re: Savage compared to SV650
Reply #2 - 01/02/08 at 18:47:01
 
Kinda like comparing apples to oranges, they are both motorcycles but different types. The sv650 is a highly rated (by most) sport/sport touring bike, they even make those fancy aluminum panniers for them now for the dedicated traveling crowd. With the right tires-understand it is passable for off road use.  The LS 650 is a highly rated thumper (just ask us) that also handles well and is just enough different to keep us happy. It is all about "smiles per smile" or "whatever spins your crank". Max
Back to top
 
 

Max at Thumper Acres. '96 Savage bagger, '03 Savage w/Cozy sidecar for wifeni.
  IP Logged
barry68v10
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline



Posts: 955
Maryland
Gender: male
Re: Savage compared to SV650
Reply #3 - 01/02/08 at 19:22:53
 
There is a strangley lop-sided comparison:

HP:  SV650 wins by 35hp+
Top speed:  SV650 wins by 40+
Suspension travel:  Really?!?  The LS650 has rear suspension travel?
MPG:  LS 650 wins by 10-13 mpg
Cost:  LS 650 wins by factor of 2
Looks:  Hmmm, you're own opinion?
Comfort:  LS 650 wins just as a Turkish prison wins over the stocks  Undecided
Simplicity and ease of maintenence:  LS650 WINNER!
Acceptance on this site?  Advantage LS650   Cheesy
Oh, wait...I don't seem have that one  Embarrassed

And yet, despite all this, I still own one and won't part with it until I've thoroughly driven it into the ground, so to speak.

BTW, still have the title of "rounder" going.  Haven't missed a single month of riding since I bought it!   Grin
Back to top
 
 

petc0ck mod, white spacer removed, 150 main jet, 12.5" shocks, 16" turnout muff, oil cooler mod, chain conversion, Tkat brace, external fuel filter, fuel screen removed...
  IP Logged
Paladin.
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Hamster

Posts: 4929
Sunny Southern California
Gender: male
Re: Savage compared to SV650
Reply #4 - 01/02/08 at 20:59:30
 
Bear_Rider wrote on 01/02/08 at 18:21:17:
... How does the Savage compare to ... the SV650?
... They appear to weigh about the same, and I assume that the SV has more top end than the Savage.

I'm more interested in the controllability, seating posture, suitability for travel (camping), and the learning curve moving up from a 250 Rebel.

Last first:  the change from a Rebel to a Savage is near nothing -- same basic size, position, etc..

The Savage is a "cruiser" with the "rocking chair" seating position you are used to from the Rebel.  The SV has you sitting much higher, with a forward lean that puts part of your upper body weight on your wrists/hands, knees bent to place your feet under you.  A position I find very uncomfortable, especially the knees, YMMV.  If you're young you might be able to get use to it.

In my humble opinion, NOTHING is more important than being comfortable on the bike.  Everything else can be made to work.  The "controlability" of the motorcycle depends greatly on how you and the bike fit together.  If the fit is perfect you will have greater control than on a "better" bike that does not fit you.

For travel/camping: http://suzukisavage.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1177262289 -- http://paladin.savageriders.com/LA-OKC/RestStop-Flagstaff.jpg  --  I have a pair of 18-quart hard bags, the 21"x 14.5"x 7.5" Airline-Carry-On suitcase, and a roll on the pillion with the camping gear.  I'm planning on building a trailer hitch (3/16" x 1.5" x 18" steel bars mounted between the saddlebags and the side rails, sockets to take the dropdown/back hitch) and a trailer (using Savage front wheels!).  Seeing what people haul in sidecar configuration I see no problem with hauling 300 pounds of gear on a 100 pound trailer.  Ya know how comfy you can be camping with a 300 pound payload!

The Savage, with very little effort, cruises at 85.  Going to OKC I ran 65-70 very comfortably.
Back to top
 
 
WWW   IP Logged
Bear_Rider
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 289

Re: Savage compared to SV650
Reply #5 - 01/02/08 at 21:36:31
 
Paladin,

Your points on posture are well taken. I'm not young, and I have a ruptured lower disk. My knees don't like to bend, and although I can handle just about any sort of ride so long as I can maintain the arch in my lower back, bending forward can take out that arch very quickly.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
PerrydaSavage
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

Riding "The
Rock"!

Posts: 3522
Republic of Newfoundland
Gender: male
Re: Savage compared to SV650
Reply #6 - 01/03/08 at 02:08:42
 
The move from a CMX250 Rebel to an LS650 Savage/S40 is as natural as breathing! Cool
Back to top
 
 

Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self-esteem, first make sure you are not, in fact, just surrounded by arseholes!
WWW   IP Logged
smokin_blue
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

From Cafes to
Streetfighters! I
build them all!

Posts: 830
St. Paul, MN
Gender: male
Re: Savage compared to SV650
Reply #7 - 01/03/08 at 03:01:23
 
Bear_Rider wrote on 01/02/08 at 21:36:31:
Paladin,

Your points on posture are well taken. I'm not young, and I have a ruptured lower disk. My knees don't like to bend, and although I can handle just about any sort of ride so long as I can maintain the arch in my lower back, bending forward can take out that arch very quickly.


With your back you might want to think long and hard.  For me a crusier style is very hard on a back.  My dad is 76 and the surgeons that look at his MRI don't see how he still functions.  He still rides an SV (2001 model) and has done some very long days (300-400 miles).  What you need to watch is what year you are looking at.  He has an '01 standard so the bars are slightly higher than the SV650S model which had clip ons.  I don't know if the standard bar option is available any more.  As long as the bars are about 1-2" above the triple clamp you end up with a comfortable seating positision.  On the standard model the pegs were in a very low position but yet under you and a slight lean to the bars.  He was always a GS rider and afraid of that position but I rode that style for years and assured him he would like it.  Like I say, as long as the bars aren't too low you really don't put much weight on your rists and at highway speed it is very neutral.  The key will be what year you are looking at buying.  There are a ton of older models (look at the frame difference (round tube vs angular)) if you want to pick up a used one and save the depreciation.

As far as power and handling it will out rock a savage in the twisties and top end but if your style is slightly more relaxed (which it sounds like it is) the savage does wonderful.   The key of course to power is usable power.  The savage has tractor pulling low end.  The SV is more low to mid with a solid hit on top.  My '86 GSXR is all top end.  I drag raced my dad on the highway from a stop light up to 70 mph (my '86 GSXR750 to his '01 SV650).
Back to top
 
 
WWW   IP Logged
smokin_blue
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

From Cafes to
Streetfighters! I
build them all!

Posts: 830
St. Paul, MN
Gender: male
Re: Savage compared to SV650
Reply #8 - 01/03/08 at 03:05:00
 
(Continued)   He ran right with me from 0-70.  He went through 3 gears to my 2 up to 70.  Of course from there to 130 I would have had the upper hand but now you are out of "streetable" range.

All said.  go sit on some.  Better yet find someone that has one if possible and ride it.  One question I would ask is how are you doing with the rebel?  Is that comfortable?  If not I would go find an older style standard SV (not the sport) to sit on and see what you think.
Back to top
 
 
WWW   IP Logged
barry68v10
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline



Posts: 955
Maryland
Gender: male
Re: Savage compared to SV650
Reply #9 - 01/03/08 at 04:45:52
 
I agree with Smokin_Blue.  There is soooo much preference and give and take involved.  The most comfortable position to me is a dirt bike.  Naturally I should prefer a dual sport right?  On the road, the high profile is a curse.  Cross-winds and semi's blow you all over the place.  Not so with the LS650.  Although I've known a couple riders to take several thousand mile trips on a dual-sport riding two-up...

I took a 200-mile trip with a combined weight of rider, passanger and gear of around 450 lbs.  Still cruised at a part-throttle 70mph on the highway and got around 60 mpg.   Cool
Back to top
 
 

petc0ck mod, white spacer removed, 150 main jet, 12.5" shocks, 16" turnout muff, oil cooler mod, chain conversion, Tkat brace, external fuel filter, fuel screen removed...
  IP Logged
Polar_Pilot
Junior Member
**
Offline

I love YaBB 1G -
SP1!

Posts: 64

Re: Savage compared to SV650
Reply #10 - 01/04/08 at 15:02:33
 
Hate to say this but there really is not comparison.between the LS650/S40 and the SV650.
The two bikes are aimed at entirely different styles of riding/
The s40 is a cruiser - you do not want to be on it for hours at a time. This is not to say you cannot, just add a Lazyrider or Protac backrest and an Airhawk seat pad and you are good to go for an Ironbutt if you choose.

But if you want to travel - several long days in a roll with thousands of miles to cover - go for the SV650. The riding position lends itself to hard highway running and the wind helps keep the pressure off your shoulders neck and spine.

The bikes are really not comparable so there is only one real solution.

Get one of each and then you have the best of both worlds!!!!

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
drharveys - FSO
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Greetings from San
Luis del Norte!

Posts: 1776
St Louis MO
Gender: male
Re: Savage compared to SV650
Reply #11 - 01/04/08 at 20:53:51
 
Gotta clear up a misunderstanding -- you should not have any weight on your hands when riding anything short of an all out race or track bike, and I'm not sure if you should even on them.  The correct riding position on a sport or sport/touring bike is actually the basic athletic position -- knees bent, body bent at the hips (not the waist), back straight or slightly arched.  On the bike, when you raise your hands, the bars should fit right there.  This is very much the position used when riding a horse with an English saddle.  It's also, except for the hands, close to the position of an outfielder, or a golfer addressing the ball.

When I had my BMW R1150RS, if my hands started tingling, I knew I had to arch my back.



Killboy caught me in good form last May!  In that wet, I had zero weight on the handlebars.
Back to top
 
 

Every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. Thomas Jefferson

When I look fast, I'm not smooth and I am going slowly. And when I look slow, I am smooth and going fast. Alain Pros
  IP Logged
Bear_Rider
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 289

Re: Savage compared to SV650
Reply #12 - 01/05/08 at 12:29:37
 
Thanks to all.

I'm beginning to understand part of my confusion. I have two bikes - a TW200 Dual Purpose, and the Rebel. The Rebel is a MUCH better road bike than the TW200. It's enough faster than the TW that it's comforatble in traffic, and quieter -- thus much less stress. However, around town and on secondary roads, the TW is more comfortable to sit on for long periods. I've been blaming this on the Rebel's saddle, which even many of the most diehard fans detest, but this may not be the real problem. You have given me a good deal of food for thought concerning my intended use and my physical limitations.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
09/22/24 at 00:25:04



General CategoryRubber Side Down! › Savage compared to SV650


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.