Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
porting the intake? (Read 27 times)
klx650sm2002
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

The more I learn the
less I know.

Posts: 2041
Cumbria,England
Gender: male
Re: porting the intake?
Reply #15 - 04/23/07 at 00:58:31
 
Savage_Greg wrote on 12/31/69 at 16:00:04:
Now what did I do with those measurements?  Hmmm..

Here they are...

Intake = 33 mm or 1.3"
Exhaust = 28 mm or 1.1"

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b277/gmdinusa/HeadChamber_2528.jpg


KLX has inlet = 37mm
       exhaust = 32mm

Clive W  Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
barry68v10
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline



Posts: 955
Maryland
Gender: male
Re: porting the intake?
Reply #16 - 04/23/07 at 02:17:27
 
Quote:
KLX has inlet = 37mm
  exhaust = 32mm


100mm bore with bigger head does give you more area to play with...I guess that's one of the reasons for the 13hp difference for stock configuration.
Back to top
 
 

petc0ck mod, white spacer removed, 150 main jet, 12.5" shocks, 16" turnout muff, oil cooler mod, chain conversion, Tkat brace, external fuel filter, fuel screen removed...
  IP Logged
Savage_Greg
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

Don't go around your
ass to reach your
elbow...

Posts: 7844
SW Washington State
Gender: male
Re: porting the intake?
Reply #17 - 04/23/07 at 05:18:30
 
klx650sm2002 wrote on 12/31/69 at 16:00:04:
KLX has inlet = 37mm
       exhaust = 32mm

Clive W  Cheesy


5 MM difference between valves in both engines....
Back to top
 
 


  IP Logged
Savage_Greg
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

Don't go around your
ass to reach your
elbow...

Posts: 7844
SW Washington State
Gender: male
Re: porting the intake?
Reply #18 - 04/23/07 at 05:21:26
 
Reelthing wrote on 12/31/69 at 16:00:04:
Well there's been classic cases where D ports worked far better than O - the case of the 351 Cleveland factory 4-bbl heads we had ship'd to the US from the Aussies - see ford never sold such a thing in the US. Great big dang valves and ports - turned out the exhaust port was too big for lower rpms if you had the least bit of over lap on the cam - the D port plates made a big difference.

On the intake side much work is done around swirls and such - but also the velocity of the intake mixture - you want it as big as you can get it until the intake velocity slows down - then it's too big -  the cam overlap effects it as well - anyone have a flow bench handy?  


The velocity will slow down if the intake is larger than the carb throat.  Right?
Back to top
 
 


  IP Logged
LANCER
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

Savage Beast
Performance Parts

Posts: 10661
Oklahoma
Gender: male
Re: porting the intake?
Reply #19 - 04/23/07 at 06:48:10
 
klx650sm2002 wrote on 12/31/69 at 16:00:04:
KLX has inlet = 37mm
       exhaust = 32mm

Clive W  Cheesy



What is the stroke on the KLX?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Reelthing
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

Fish or ride that is
the question

Posts: 5397
Houston,Tx
Gender: male
Re: porting the intake?
Reply #20 - 04/23/07 at 06:51:59
 
I believe so - as well as bigger than the valve area needs to keep it high - I have read the magic rate was around 300 ft per second.

The other area was always to back cut the intake valves - go from a tulip shape to a quarter on a stick this opens more valve area sooner - but too much back cut will cause the valve head to pop off.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
verslagen1
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Offline

Where there's a
will, I want to be
in it.

Posts: 28884
L.A. California
Gender: male
Re: porting the intake?
Reply #21 - 04/23/07 at 09:24:44
 
Not that I do anything with flow dynamics...

I installed a superquiet bathroom exhaust fan recently.  At first, I ignored directions and slapped it in with available ducting.  (Manual? we don't need no stinking manual!)  Huh, louder than the one it replaced!  So I read the manual.  For optimum performance, it needs 2 to 3' of straight ducting before turning to exit.  OK, did that.  SOB, it's quiet.  I suppose it needs the straight to achieve laminar flow and possibly momentum.

OK, to reduce resistance to the intake you need to reduce surface variation.  Micro pockets of vacuum and pressure causes areas of high velocity and low.  Read friction.  you want gradual change not sudden.  HTHS.   Grin
Back to top
 
 
WWW   IP Logged
klx650sm2002
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

The more I learn the
less I know.

Posts: 2041
Cumbria,England
Gender: male
Re: porting the intake?
Reply #22 - 04/24/07 at 01:06:51
 
The bore and stroke on KLX is 100 x 83.

Clive W  Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Savage_Greg
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

Don't go around your
ass to reach your
elbow...

Posts: 7844
SW Washington State
Gender: male
Re: porting the intake?
Reply #23 - 04/24/07 at 05:14:10
 
The bore and stroke on LS is 94 x 94.
Back to top
 
 


  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
09/25/24 at 02:19:41



General CategoryRubber Side Down! › porting the intake?


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.