|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards please /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1596209666 Message started by srinath on 07/31/20 at 08:34:26 |
|
Title: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards please Post by srinath on 07/31/20 at 08:34:26 I think I found your coworker here. But maybe not, that doesn't look like its vegan. Put your coffee/drink down before clicking the link. (Trust me) Its under 2 mins - but really dont eat or drink before clicking. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dYk8JOJ8NY Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by philthymike on 08/01/20 at 19:18:44 OMFG someone poke my eyeballs out with hot irons!!!! Egads! Scarily that's not too far off. There's many similarities between my companies zoo animal and that clown gone wrong thing. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/02/20 at 08:37:36 There's like 5-6 of em in a company here that's barely 5000 total in that 1 location, thankfully none of em are that bad, one simple lesbian chick simply looks and acts 100% like a dude that for a month + I thought she was a dude. And I couldn't tell what continent she was from. I thought she was a Black white mix and a guy, no problem with her before and after I found out it was a woman. I had an odd shift, never directly interacted with her team much etc etc but I did see her in the first day or so at coffee machine ... I see her name on her cube and went ... wowwww that's a woman ? I just thought she was a life long devotee of Dollar shave club (cos I never saw her even with stubble) Anyway she was never a problem, I think she preferred that no guys bothered with her, and the only girls that did could feel her "vibe" ... However there were also a full on man -> woman trans who looked like that one - except qhe was not a fat slob (sorry really beautiful on the inside - before sew gets upset), and a few more ... Anyway that is beyond ridiculous, and it has to be funded by tax $$$ per Obamacare ? Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by philthymike on 08/02/20 at 09:06:16 A few years ago at a former job there was trans person and I got assigned to work together with him on a project. Tall skinny white kid with long hair who mostly didn't bother with getting all done up as a woman. On the days he did he'd have fake breasts, close shave, makeup and miniskirt etc. He actually pulled off looking like an actual woman from the distance. He wasn't that hideous thing in the video anyway. Had no issues working with him at all but I noticed how the company made a point of singling him out at every monthly all-hands meeting and every other company events which were all on camera and the videos put on their website. It was soooo important to show the world their token tranny employee. From working with him I got the impression he didn't really like all that extra attention. Then one day he quit. Didn't let them throw a going away party or anything. He contacted me through LinkedIn awhile later and said he could put in a good word for me if I wanted to switch to the new company he went over to but the commute was too far for me. I think that the extra attention given to these people by employers is stupid. Some, like that old coworker, don't even want it. Then there's other's who want that attention so badly it's probably the main reason they chose to come out of the closet. It's so much phoney crap over nothing and it's just opening the floodgates for resentments and the resulting backlash. Same with children, treat one group with more attention than the rest and eventually the rest get nasty to the special group. But that's the divisive agenda behind all this social politics and diversity nonsense. It creates the problems it's supposed to be solving. Turns people against one another more than they were to begin with. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/02/20 at 09:22:32 This man-> woman one I was talking about other than the fact Qhe is like 6' 3 or even taller, would actually pass for a woman - but Qhe had surgery and whatever else and all the required things much like Michael Obama ... I suspect a lot of them dont like the attention regarding workplace, except from their target people. But companies like to do some crap which really doesn't even help IMHO. I'm all for not discriminating - but to me that's just finding the best ones for the job, social image and this and that is garbage. Is there a risk that a company ends up full of white men ??? Well if they're the best at what they do and blast the rest of their competition out of the water, no problem. Judge the action/work etc, not skin color - in either direction. Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by philthymike on 08/02/20 at 10:15:19 When you're lying in the surgery room waiting to have a tumor removed from your brain do you want the brain surgeon hired solely for the sake of diversity or the one that has the proven skill and education for brain surgery but is not from a minority group? |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by Eegore on 08/02/20 at 12:02:32 "When you're lying in the surgery room waiting to have a tumor removed from your brain do you want the brain surgeon hired solely for the sake of diversity or the one that has the proven skill and education for brain surgery but is not from a minority group?" Skill and education of course. Would you want one that says they have completely removed and cured 300 tumor patients and has no proof of that, or one that has empirical evidence? Would you want one that claims they are currently an OR Surgeon but is actually just dropping by a surgery once or twice a year? |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/02/20 at 14:21:25 More hypothetical nuts that makes 0 sense - Like these are the only 2 choices ... Then Eegore will point to - see I said "Skill and education of course" ... See, see see you're so wrong, I'm so superior ... I fly around teh world making paramilitary medical field hospitals attack the rebels in the fight on corona virus and in other cases support the rebels when they fight the Ebol-aids elidemics ... I'm so superior ... Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by Eegore on 08/02/20 at 17:59:20 Why on earth would you think any of that is superior? You don't even need an education to do most of what I do. Oh wait, I asked that question about how a POTUS donates money so now I'm a bad guy that's all anti-Trump libtard zit picker. Not just a guy that asked a question, while, agreeing with you. Noise much? |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/03/20 at 04:28:29 4464666E7364010 wrote:
Yup, how, in what format, when, where - That's the most important factor. He's legally allowed to keep it, he's paying the tax payer and wapo has reported it, that's how important it is ,and your questions need to be answered. Else more crap like this will spew forth. Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by Eegore on 08/03/20 at 08:48:04 "That's the most important factor. He's legally allowed to keep it, he's paying the tax payer and wapo has reported it, that's how important it is ,and your questions need to be answered." Yeah I agreed with you about the downplayed reporting, you won't acknowledge that, so you concentrate on one aspect, like a zit. What a jerk I am for asking a question directly related to the topic. I must be against Trump and trying to make noise by gaining knowledge about how the process is done. Now when someone gripes I can point them to the low-quantity reporting and also give direct reference of law and process to how Trump is doing it legally. Instead of resorting to name-calling, I can provide evidence. What jerk I must be for wanting to have enough information to counter any crying people want to do about his "Hotel Corruption". Knowledge is |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/03/20 at 09:20:51 How is that a question for me ? Or even anyone on this forum. We aren't WAPO, or treasury employees. And you know that. There is a huuuuuuge difference between asking questions and questioning. You are never asking questions when your POV is countered. You are questioning and when some other technicality is mentioned (like I'm sure any govt building will take $$$ in any amount and any form) you jump onto that ... classic questionning and diversion, distraction and diminish the points that dont favor your point of view. Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by Serowbot on 08/03/20 at 09:48:13 475F5E5B435F4E5A5E5C52370 wrote:
I'd have Trump do it,... he's knows more about brain surgery than stupid doctors. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/03/20 at 10:04:51 6472657860757863170 wrote:
I'd have Trump do it,... he's knows more about brain surgery than stupid doctors.[/quote] If my 2 options were Trump or this beauty https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dYk8JOJ8NY Then I must be in a country with socialized medicine ... Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by Eegore on 08/03/20 at 11:14:45 "Can the President give direct funds to the Treasury? I guess he could write a personal check, but then it's personal profit being donated. Is it his business in Trust from his family that writes a check? " That's a question. You call it noise, I call it a question. How dare I have ample information to reinforce a point we agree on. Just keep pretending I don't agree with you so you can keep complaining. "You are never asking questions when your POV is countered." This is incorrect. If I didn't ask pertinent questions I wouldn't consider it essential to provide verifiable references in full when I present material. I would just post links to internet articles and call it a day. "You are questioning and when some other technicality is mentioned (like I'm sure any govt building will take $$$ in any amount and any form) you jump onto that ... classic questionning and diversion, distraction and diminish the points that dont favor your point of view." Except we agree but you won't acknowledge that. I agree with you except for the Government buildings will take cash payments. That is wrong. But otherwise we agree. I agree with you. How hard is that to understand? You argue when people are wrong, you literally just said that in another post. Or were you just making noise? |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/03/20 at 12:10:50 Please find out in what format the 200K a yr has been given from Trump hotels to treasury and post back - I have no means to find out - told you that 40 posts ago. Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by Eegore on 08/03/20 at 12:36:24 "Please find out in what format the 200K a yr has been given from Trump hotels to treasury and post back - I have no means to find out - told you that 40 posts ago." I already did and posted it the first time you said that. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/03/20 at 13:47:19 032321293423460 wrote:
Yup, you did, by asking what format he would deliver it ... That's just as good as the 200K really. Its treated by the govt as the same. Yup. Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by Eegore on 08/03/20 at 14:57:21 "Yup, you did, by asking what format he would deliver it …" That is incorrect. I posted the government website that contains the procedure outline and forms for doing it. I never asked again. You keep bringing this up. I agreed with you, and that was it. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/03/20 at 15:51:08 7555575F4255300 wrote:
OK where is the post with the procedure website you made ??? Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by Eegore on 08/03/20 at 16:48:42 "OK where is the post with the procedure website you made ???" Where you said it was. You even replied to it. Why is this even an issue? I asked a question and instead of you just saying you don't know you went off on this "Noise" thing, even though I agreed with you, so I made some calls and looked it up myself. http://suzukisavage.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1594915944/45 |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/04/20 at 02:54:23 Yes that outlines the possible ways it could be donated. Not how Trump donated +200K in 18, 19, and 100K+ in 20 ... That was the zit you were picking. How did he do that - Like this post of yours page 2 or 3 of that thread - 1A3A38302D3A5F0 wrote:
Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by Eegore on 08/04/20 at 06:55:21 "Yes that outlines the possible ways it could be donated. Not how Trump donated +200K in 18, 19, and 100K+ in 20 ..." There is only one way according to the US Government and the Treasury. The way I posted using the link I provided. Why quote a different post of mine? If Trump is using a different method it is one that is not disclosed to the public, and the records released are fabricated, however there should be no reason to do that. Why are you still picking this zit? I agreed with you. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/04/20 at 08:42:47 6545474F5245200 wrote:
Oh you were just looking for some link to some govt website ??? Not if cash was dropped off ? Or check personal or business ? The link even says they take other monetary value ... Maybe he donated it in gold bars ? You didn't want to know that ? You're doing exactly what republicans do when facing evolution questions. Just randomly pose questions like who said that, when did he say it, did he say that in past tense or present tense, what's his evidence for saying it ... irrelevant noise, and the instant you say I dont know ... see see see its a failed theory. Anyway - one of those methods in that link was used give 200K+, 200K+ and 100K+ to treasury to reduce tax payer burden by Trump - and if that was all the detail you wanted, there that is. Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by Eegore on 08/04/20 at 14:40:06 "Oh you were just looking for some link to some govt website ??? Not if cash was dropped off ? Or check personal or business ?" I'm not the one saying any government building will take cash so no I would never think to see if cash can be donated since I already know that's wrong. I was asking if you knew. Thats it. You were offended by that. "the link even says they take other monetary value ... Maybe he donated it in gold bars ? You didn't want to know that ?" Incorrect, it clearly states these options: Bank account (ACH) Amazon account PayPal account Debit or credit card ". irrelevant noise, and the instant you say I dont know ... see see see its a failed theory." Except I agree with you. I Agree. I don't agree with failed theories. You just refuse to acknowledge I agree with you so you can keep picking that zit. I agree with you. "Anyway - one of those methods in that link was used give 200K+, 200K+ and 100K+ to treasury to reduce tax payer burden by Trump - and if that was all the detail you wanted, there that is." Yeah I looked it up. All this other stuff is you just complaining. I agreed with you a long time ago. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/04/20 at 16:15:55 Oh yea, how much was put there by bank account, how much via paypal, how much on others ??? Come on man, that's the kind of detail Eegore would want put year by year, and if 2 or more any of these like 2 different paypal accts were used - then PII would have to be protected and the acct #s encrypted, what kind of alien are you masquerading as Eegore ?? Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by Eegore on 08/04/20 at 19:52:22 All this other stuff is you just complaining. I agreed with you a long time ago. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/05/20 at 05:01:46 1B3B39312C3B5E0 wrote:
Nice try. But eventually yes. Like always watch mainstream media get bad information. Or no information, or omitted information, or suppressed information. They edit Trump mid sentence to make him sound like he's only trashing Mexicans, they cut out the few words in the middle where he says good things. They edit footage of him calling out a handicapped reporter on a lie and make it look like he's mocking the reporter for being handicapped. That's the standard hand flailing and waving Trump does to anyone he catches on a lie - look for it. That's why the #walkaway campaign started. He tells a reporter ask china about the whatever virus BS she asked about, promptly she takes off her mask to reveal .... tada ... she's chinese and immediately Trump is a racist against chinese. BTW I really hope he's racist against chinese, I would try to do the standard democrat thing but vote for him many times ... Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by srinath on 08/05/20 at 07:23:40 This is also why Kayleigh Mcenany is such a bad ass. 1 sentence take down of this crap - no emotion, no hand movements, bru - fcuking - tal. Looking like she does, and boom. Reporter asks now that europe is lower death toll and US is higher death and this and that why travel ban from europe - Trump would have gone on and on beating around the point, flailing arms and got more flak from them ... Kayleigh goes - Because we'll always put america first, next question. Simultaneously calling him an Idiot, unpatriotic and appealing to the american people in 1 shot. She didn't even bat an eyelid. Try memeing her and you just look lame as a mofo ... Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Philthymike - This is for you - No libtards pl Post by Eegore on 08/05/20 at 16:19:23 "Nice try. But eventually yes." I never disagreed with you bout trump making donations through his hotel business. I asked a question directly related to that topic, you got offended. That's it. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |