SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Huckster n' Chief...
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1594915944

Message started by Serowbot on 07/16/20 at 09:12:23

Title: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Serowbot on 07/16/20 at 09:12:23

Replace this face with Obama's and tell me what you would think.

http://https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/07/15/20/30807196-0-image-a-4_1594840129628.jpg

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/16/20 at 09:22:52

CEO of Goya said something in support of Trump.
Lefty cancel culture immediately declared war on Goya.
Now,, that yu would see TRumps standing with Goya as some nefarious deed doesnt shock me,, but it is tiresome to have to drag you, again, through the logic and reason that proves you a knee jerk, well, jerk..

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/16/20 at 09:40:00

Why anyone would eat this diabetes causing crap I dont understand, but well, its atleast 90% better than the other crap mexicans eat.
BTW he's Puerto Rican ... stupid AOC should know that, ofcourse she doesn't cos she's too busy selling out her podunk Island along with the rest of the country.
We should put up a banner on the wall facing Mexico - we dont need you, we got puertoricans who already speak spanish and they're already US citizens and have been hammered by libtard politics and a bunch of storms in the last 20 yrs.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Matchless G11 on 07/17/20 at 03:20:00

Odd, It seems like there are tones of company that are screaming leftest leaning corporations, Like Target, Starbucks, Ben and Jerrys. The list seems to go on forever. No one seems to care, but if you have one Goya foods that at the moment leans right,  the left looks like it wants to be a lynch mob.  

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by philthymike on 07/17/20 at 05:30:35

The Communist left is trying to reenact Lenin's October Revolution of 1917. They're turning the peasants against the landowners and bourgeois. Lenin promised the peasants they could keep the land and riches of those they displaced or killed. He invented the concentration camp so to have a place to keep the bourgeois hostages. Anyone who owned a business, or had managerial job, or higher education or loyalties to other leaders or competing government entities were sent there and then their families were forced to give all they had to the mob to keep their hostages alive.

Then just 2 years later all land and industry was to become the property of the state. The peasants that did Lenin's dirty work now revolted against him for taking away what he promised them. But he'd saw this coming and had rebuilt the Red Army and put it under control of the fanatically loyal Cheka. The Red Army was then deployed against the peasants. The death toll was astronomical and in the end made the Nazis and their holocaust look like a warm up band. In only the 1st few years of the revolution Lenin had killed more innocent people than the past 90 years of corrupt Tsars ever had.

If the left has its way in this country we can expect the same. And all these lefty leaning companies will see their management executed or sent to camps and the state taking control of the company. And the country will become an atrocity theme park for the next couple generations until the population has had the will to resist beaten out of it and people resign themselves to being good little proletarian robots.

Viva la revolution!

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/17/20 at 05:43:14

Aoc employee of the month @Goya foods LOL.
Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by philthymike on 07/17/20 at 05:54:20

Lenin's secret police, the Cheka, considered themselves an antifacsist organization. Just like a similar modern day organization inciting minorities to riot.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Matchless G11 on 07/17/20 at 09:01:06


637B7A7F677B6A7E7A7876130 wrote:
Lenin's secret police, the Cheka, considered themselves an antifacsist organization. Just like a similar modern day organization inciting minorities to riot.


but scarily, old Lenin could not hold a candle to Mao.


Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/17/20 at 09:54:27


3E2729297F7F3C2B3A2B2D257D7A7B4E0 wrote:
[quote author=637B7A7F677B6A7E7A7876130 link=1594915944/0#6 date=1594990460]Lenin's secret police, the Cheka, considered themselves an antifacsist organization. Just like a similar modern day organization inciting minorities to riot.


but scarily, old Lenin could not hold a candle to Mao.

[/quote]



Oh Trust me, neither of them hold a candle to Mother Teresa -
And guess who has Mao And mother Teresa as her heroes -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCtpLbSIko0

Yea bonehead Anita Dunn. Prize ducking Idoit. That and the world's hottest AOCialist - she needs to lose her pretend Cuck boyfriend and hook up with a real guy with working parts. A brain possibly and others too.

Look up Mother Teresa, or better yet, ask an Injun who lived in that region in that time - I didn't but I had a set of close cousins that did. She let people suffer and die from simple stuff like scrapes and cuts as well as pneumonia (which was a simple cold that she put in in an infection pool and let a few suffer and die - cos suffering = closer to god). Ofcourse when she was dying, she got on a plane and transported to a high end covalescent hospital in LA and died in comfort filled up with drugs to alleviate her pain when she was 3 million years old.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by philthymike on 07/17/20 at 09:55:09


51484646101053445544424A121514210 wrote:
[quote author=637B7A7F677B6A7E7A7876130 link=1594915944/0#6 date=1594990460]Lenin's secret police, the Cheka, considered themselves an antifacsist organization. Just like a similar modern day organization inciting minorities to riot.


but scarily, old Lenin could not hold a candle to Mao.

[/quote]

True. Scarier still Pol Pot holds the record for highest percentage of the population exterminated in the shortest amount of time. 1/4 of the entire population in 2-3 years. Made Hitler look like a half-assed underachieving noob.

Yet they only teach about Nazi crimes against humanity in school. All the genocide in the name of Marxism are glossed over or swept under the rug. Funny thing that...

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/17/20 at 10:04:28


362E2F2A322E3F2B2F2D23460 wrote:
[quote author=51484646101053445544424A121514210 link=1594915944/0#7 date=1595001666][quote author=637B7A7F677B6A7E7A7876130 link=1594915944/0#6 date=1594990460]Lenin's secret police, the Cheka, considered themselves an antifacsist organization. Just like a similar modern day organization inciting minorities to riot.


but scarily, old Lenin could not hold a candle to Mao.

[/quote]

True. Scarier still Pol Pot holds the record for highest percentage of the population exterminated in the shortest amount of time. 1/4 of the entire population in 2-3 years. Made Hitler look like a half-assed underachieving noob.

Yet they only teach about Nazi crimes against humanity in school. All the genocide in the name of Marxism are glossed over or swept under the rug. Funny thing that...[/quote]



Genocide ???
You do know Libtards believe Trump is commiting "Genocide of a bunch of people" right ???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30rMFEJgULw

Forward to ~7.25 min.

Prize Idoits. Seriously, prize Idoits.

Ask a libtard how many people someone has to kill before they are committing genocide - I'll bet you'll get numbers like a million or a billion.

I can commit genocide killing 1 person entirely by accident and not even be found guilty in the most liberal court of law. Lets say I got in an accident where the other driver was running a red light and gets under my truck and gets decapitated ... If he was the last one of whatever sub ethnic group ... boom, I've committed genocide. Really ??? Yes genocide. Would I be spending any time in jail ? Not if my light was green and I was following the rules per the book.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Matchless G11 on 07/17/20 at 14:24:25


3B3A2126293C20480 wrote:
[quote author=3E2729297F7F3C2B3A2B2D257D7A7B4E0 link=1594915944/0#7 date=1595001666][quote author=637B7A7F677B6A7E7A7876130 link=1594915944/0#6 date=1594990460]Lenin's secret police, the Cheka, considered themselves an antifacsist organization. Just like a similar modern day organization inciting minorities to riot.


but scarily, old Lenin could not hold a candle to Mao.

[/quote]



Oh Trust me, neither of them hold a candle to Mother Teresa -
And guess who has Mao And mother Teresa as her heroes -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCtpLbSIko0

Yea bonehead Anita Dunn. Prize ducking Idoit. That and the world's hottest AOCialist - she needs to lose her pretend Cuck boyfriend and hook up with a real guy with working parts. A brain possibly and others too.

Look up Mother Teresa, or better yet, ask an Injun who lived in that region in that time - I didn't but I had a set of close cousins that did. She let people suffer and die from simple stuff like scrapes and cuts as well as pneumonia (which was a simple cold that she put in in an infection pool and let a few suffer and die - cos suffering = closer to god). Ofcourse when she was dying, she got on a plane and transported to a high end covalescent hospital in LA and died in comfort filled up with drugs to alleviate her pain when she was 3 million years old.

Cool.
Srinath.
[/quote]

Srinath
I have heard this stuff about mother Teresa before  it come out of the woodwork every so offen  usually by some group with some ax to grind with the church.
It has less credibility then those who think we never reached the moon or they that believe the earth is flat..  
Cheers

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/18/20 at 03:47:21

I dont think it was an axe to grind at all. However there is likely something else that could be a factor.
In the 70's and 80's India was a poor poor country (it still is but the disparity in income is the latest issue). And she was relatively unknown.
Its very possible that a hope and prayer was all she could offer. Cos even the hospitals you would pay a good bit of $$ for were missing equipment, supplies etc etc, forget a free charity based one in the poorest and most crowded part of the country.
Now she died in 1998 or something. Well into the more prosperous time frame in India. Maybe someone funded her stay in the hospice type of resort in LA. Or by then Nobel prize etc etc had caught the eye of many big $$$ philanthropists like Soros, Koch bros or Gates.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/18/20 at 04:59:27

Ironically this is one of the very reasons that US citizens will chuck him out in 3.5 months, he's made a complete mockery of the office of the President. I mean look at those photos, and the dumbass look on their faces. And people are looking at this fool carrying on like this while the country he's supposed to be leading is in the middle of an emerging Covid-19 c0ck up of epic proportions.

Basically Trump is just a brain dead has been and colossal bore, his show will cancelled.

When Biden is inaugurated I predict he will have the largest crowds ever, to both express relief that the madness is over, and also to troll trump.

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9VeNB5ili8[/media]

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/18/20 at 05:21:17

Biden will have the biggest inauguration, that's when we are sure we're getting fcuked.
Seriously I want an inauguration with like 3 people. There were too many in Trump's 2017 one to my liking, 3000, 12,000 whatever it was was just about that number too many, and I was mainly hoping they were there to get their last glimpse of Obama.

The swamp creatures will rally around their mentally retarded stooge. We know that. That's for sure.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/18/20 at 05:58:50


7563746971646972060 wrote:
Replace this face with Obama's and tell me what you would think.

http://https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/07/15/20/30807196-0-image-a-4_1594840129628.jpg





Much like the libtard media's bogus crap about Trump hotels - where he gets foreign delegates/dignitiaries to stay and they pay for it - cash for value is not illegal, and he is donating that $$ to the treasury - as in he's not even profitting from it, he's sending $ to the american people instead of to Hilton or other private corporations - this crap is nothing illegal. He's not profitting and he's certainly not going to eat those crappy free beans, cos he eats cheese burgers.
This is a classic example of libtard fail on top of libtard fail on top of libtard fail ad nauseum.
Cool.
Srinath.


Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/18/20 at 15:46:20


" and he is donating that $$ to the treasury "

 Can the President give direct funds to the Treasury?  I guess he could write a personal check, but then it's personal profit being donated.  Is it his business in Trust from his family that writes a check?

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/18/20 at 16:23:27


1636343C2136530 wrote:
" and he is donating that $$ to the treasury "

 Can the President give direct funds to the Treasury?  I guess he could write a personal check, but then it's personal profit being donated.  Is it his business in Trust from his family that writes a check?





Wow, were libtards this dumb - I mean seriously - always ?
I was one from maybe 2006 through 2014 ... I'd like thin think I was much smarter than the average "woke libtard" of 2020.

Simple google delivers this from wapo of all - your favorite wapo says this -

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/03/09/trump-foreign-profits/

Was it a personal check ???
Was it a cashiers check from a nigerian prince ???

Who the fcuk cares except woke libtard soy pu$$ies. Please look it up if you do care so much.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/18/20 at 18:20:10

 Cry more?

 I am wondering about procedure.  Back when the donate to build a wall thing started people thought they could give money directly to the building of a wall.

 They can not.

 US citizens are limited in how they can contribute money to the US Government, and while this is managed by the Treasury, they can not assign how or if the Treasury utilizes those funds.  

 So I am asking, and not meaning to offend the oversensitive to anything related to Trump, what is the process?  Can Trump directly donate funds to the Treasury?  Maybe you know.  Maybe you don't.

 Obviously you can't say without being offended by the question.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/18/20 at 19:44:02

I'm pretty sure any government building will readily gobble up a big sack of $$ just the same regardless of delivery mechanism. Dollar bills, gold bars, copper ingots, iron, steel, gasoline, oil, canned food, body parts etc.

wapo says some crap in there -  read it, I am not terribly concerned by that exact technicality.

BTW Wapo doesn't say he gave it to them to build that wall so your particular soy pu$$y "concern" isn't offended.

I am just mad that in 3+ yrs of listening to NPR I have never heard this fact, and finally heard a passing statement in a youtube clip. Then had to google it - and I come to know, In fact he's been donating it for 3+ yrs and apparently in May it fell to the lowest - obviously due to the declining popularity and the cluelessness of Trump and nothing to do with the china virus. Obviously.

Really the press is attempting to bury the greatest president we have had in centuries. And all we hear is the garbage spewed by the clueless and corrupt swamp dwellers. Hide and lie about this fact, and I immediately think, Oh WTF else are they hiding/lying about.

Its almost like someone spews a 1000 high sounding theories all of which I cant prove or disprove and they end with a statement that no savages leak oil from the factory. Immediately their credibility drops to 0.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/18/20 at 20:39:47

"I'm pretty sure any government building will readily gobble up a big sack of $$ just the same regardless of delivery mechanism."

 Not true.  That would be illegal in the US.



 NPR is biased I would say, but they have covered this.

https://www.npr.org/2018/02/26/588984309/trump-pays-treasury-undisclosed-sum-for-hotel-profits-from-foreign-governments


 Other news sources have too.  All with varying opinions of course but I find it hard to consider all this public information to be a cover-up.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/03/09/trump-foreign-profits/

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-org-reports-191000-profit-foreign-governments-cuts/story?id=61303571

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/25/trumps-company-says-it-donated-nearly-200000-to-us-treasury.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-org-says-it-donated-151470-in-profits-to-u-s-treasury/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/feb/26/trump-organization-hotel-profits-treasury-accountability

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-26/trump-organization-says-it-has-donated-some-profits-to-treasury


Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/19/20 at 03:43:00


7555575F4255300 wrote:
"I'm pretty sure any government building will readily gobble up a big sack of $$ just the same regardless of delivery mechanism."

 Not true.  That would be illegal in the US.




Wow, you never heard of the IRS or the wonder of wonders we all know and love called the dmv have you ?
BTW those fools in SC dmv have implemented a $250 fee for any vehicle from out of state to register in SC. Like WTF ??? Seriously any govt building stands ready to gobble up any amount of $$ you can even bring in. Say I went there with a $100K check. They will put it in their general expense budget - which they claim fixes the roads. OK That would be allocation, so I would guess they would send it to treasury (or ask me to make it to treasury and mail it there) IRS and treasury will take anything you give them - Obama said that to Warren Buffet. Look it up.

The average vehicle in SC likely is 5-10 yrs older than national average which I believe is pushing 10 anyway. The combination of mild weather, flat and 1/2 decent roads as well as a lot of backyard mechanics, rural country and a lot of good, big junkyards for the population probably puts SC in a better position than AZ and NM. So a 20 yr old car will clock you @$250 @ the dmv if you happened to move - so would a 20 yr old bike. In fact I am switching back to NC for my license cos I have too many vehicles to register.

Now the profits to treasury - Its easy to give them $$$, not allocate it - which he's not been doing. Trump has been doing that every year for the last 3+ per wapo, npr did 1 little one yrs ago with a whole lot of I'm not sure its legal or if it absolves him etc etc (sorry didn't read your links but in 3+ yrs of listening when I am in my car -(which has also been pretty low cos 1 it was on its last legs for a few yrs, 2 I'm a biker, and my commute through winter was pretty short etc etc) anyway I did find it in a libtard site cos the rapebuican sites were wholly claiming Trump walked on - not even water, but air ...

Anyway the goya trolling is not even that category. Its the equivalent of touring the Ford factory, or Harley factory and posing with the bikes. He didn't profit by buying up and reselling = Nothing to worry about.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/19/20 at 04:22:16


"regardless of delivery mechanism"

 This is illegal.  There are specific approved methods each agency has to abide by.  They vary, but they can't all just take bags of cash.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/19/20 at 06:32:44


0424262E3324410 wrote:
"regardless of delivery mechanism"

 This is illegal.  There are specific approved methods each agency has to abide by.  They vary, but they can't all just take bags of cash.




Oh wow, just simply wow. That's what you're objecting to ???
OK it was delivered in an acceptable format per the rules set forth in Tax law 12543p9e4, section 997385 of Treasury $$$ collections act of 1831, amended in 1852, 1923, 1949, 1999 and finally in 2012 (to accept bitcoin). Happy now eegore ??? Yea.

Though I'm sure Treasury and IRS will take a bag of cash regardless of the above mentioned constitutional amendment.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/19/20 at 06:37:22

quote author=08282A223F284D0 link=1594915944/15#20 date=1595129987]"I'm pretty sure any government building will readily gobble up a big sack of $$ just the same regardless of delivery mechanism."

 Not true.  That would be illegal in the US.



 NPR is biased I would say, but they have covered this.

https://www.npr.org/2018/02/26/588984309/trump-pays-treasury-undisclosed-sum-for-hotel-profits-from-foreign-governments


 Other news sources have too.  All with varying opinions of course but I find it hard to consider all this public information to be a cover-up.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/03/09/trump-foreign-profits/

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-org-reports-191000-profit-foreign-governments-cuts/story?id=61303571

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/25/trumps-company-says-it-donated-nearly-200000-to-us-treasury.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-org-says-it-donated-151470-in-profits-to-u-s-treasury/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/feb/26/trump-organization-hotel-profits-treasury-accountability

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-26/trump-organization-says-it-has-donated-some-profits-to-treasury

[/quote]



OK wapo is from 2 months ago. The rest are all from 2018 and the abc one is from 2019 but doesn't mention the 2017, 18 and 19 - just the totals.
Lying by omission, minimization, obfuscation and legalese.
AKA the standard methodology when Trump does something good or when Obama did something bad.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/19/20 at 07:06:23


"Tax law 12543p9e4, section 997385 of Treasury $$$ collections act of 1831, amended in 1852, 1923, 1949, 1999 and finally in 2012 (to accept bitcoin). "

 This is grossly inaccurate.  These tax laws do not exist.

 

"Though I'm sure Treasury and IRS will take a bag of cash regardless of the above mentioned constitutional amendment."

 I disagree.  This would be illegal.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/19/20 at 08:54:46

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn1bjfOFICY[/media]

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/19/20 at 08:55:24


0424262E3324410 wrote:
"Tax law 12543p9e4, section 997385 of Treasury $$$ collections act of 1831, amended in 1852, 1923, 1949, 1999 and finally in 2012 (to accept bitcoin). "

 This is grossly inaccurate.  These tax laws do not exist.

 



Woweee really, that's the zit you want to pick ?

And again Trump giving the $ from hotel stays of foreign dignitaries instead of the $$ going to private companies like Hilton affects this how ???
I get it, doesn't fit the soy pu$$y libtard orange man bad narrative OK OK you win. Happy ...

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/19/20 at 09:00:59



Can't wait to see Trump debate Biden, I wouldn't be surprised if the orange buffoon, bails.

https://twitter.com/RealDonalDrumpf/status/1279783081407393799

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by philthymike on 07/19/20 at 09:51:46

I wouldn't be surprised if Biden dies of old age.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/19/20 at 11:00:30


60726665727476130 wrote:
Can't wait to see Trump debate Biden, I wouldn't be surprised if the orange buffoon, bails.

https://twitter.com/RealDonalDrumpf/status/1279783081407393799




Oh wow, you're pinning your hopes on - "You know the thing" Biden ???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvWV5jLqc5k

LOL, Its constitution Joe, Y'know that pesky piece of paper some fathers wrote all them years ago ... yea CONSTITUTION -

I know it, and I am a foreigner ...

This fool knows it - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ASv_z6fUzk - Though he seems to say it as Connistipation ... and he even has a copy in his pocket.

Yea Joe, you need to know what its called, before you're allowed to shred the parts of it you dont like.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/19/20 at 11:22:47

He thinks biden is more intellectually acute than Trump,, with what is obvious,, and he still believes that,, so,, arguing with him is really a little sad..
Look at ALL the people who Blame Trump,, and theyve been in DC for decades,, TRump,, less than 4 years,,
Its taken the CV19 Virus, economic lockdown and riots to get America back to Obama economic eqaulity,,
Insufferable lefties,, Keep pushin,, when the people who just wanna be left alone get involved,, its gonna be fast and hard from there..

SOP TRump From Cheating!!

Demand Voter ID!!!

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/19/20 at 12:10:22

Biden will get shredded in any face to face with a 9 yr old.
They claim trump has the vocabulary of a 12 yr old, but vocabulary and cognitiveness are very different things. A 9yr old has no vocabulary, but knows when someone's snuck in to your house to steal chit. A dog knows that.
The "age of great Orators" is so freaking overdone - Hitler was a great orator. That chit is so over.
Bush - W was a similar simpleton. Bush 1 was almost as bad. Reagan and slick willy Clinton may have been the last of the OK ones. Its now almost mandatory to be folksy and have the vocabulary of a 12 yr old.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/19/20 at 12:33:21

Ill bet that TRump Has a better vocabulary,, he just knows what using it on todays public would do..


Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/19/20 at 15:37:44

Great orators like hitler have like a 90%+ approval rating.
Hitlers inauguration in 1932 or was it 33 January (yes freezing cold) brought out over 1/2 of germany to watch the inauguration.

In short, inauguration crowds are often a forecast of how big a fcuking the people are gonna get.
I've seen victory parades and the indian equivalent of inaugurations where pallets and truck loads of 1/2 bricks "appeared" and every thing public and private was broken, broken into and robbed.

BLM is doing their little victory parade now.
The inauguration crowds of Joe Biden will tell us how much we owe to china. That's all I would predict. I dont know that Trump can fight a 96 to 2 press bias. With 2 being neutral. But a Biden presidency will bring us to being slaves to Xi, Merkel, Greta, Soros, Gates, the Zuck, Google Twins and just looks like Musk may make his trillions on the backs of these fools, but would slowly distance himself from them over a few years - but remains to be seen and England will be on its own.
It wont be BLM, it would be that B are the only L that M.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by philthymike on 07/19/20 at 16:18:14

If Biden stays alive long enough to win at least the leftovers will get what they love most - a privileged white male from an affluent family that loves to violate women. That's the best thing they could come up with despite all their diversity and inclusion and brainwashed political correctness. Wow their pushing the boundaries now. Instead of Trump they have the same thing but older and more inclined to follow the bogus narrative that the only lives that matter are black.
But he's still a privileged WHITE WASP.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/19/20 at 17:45:35

Biden is gonna stay alive - just brain dead, which he was 8+yrs ago.
Ruth Bader Ginsberg OTOH, I think she's being hept alive with jumper cables onto her chest, a forced oxygen onto her nose and mouth, tubes out all other openings and eyes propped open by toothpicks.

Seriously I dont know which is a bigger case of elder abuse. Brain dead but functioning body trotted out to the highest office in the land or body dead but brain OK being jump started, flushed and drained and cut and sewed to manage appearing alive till - well the first elder rescues her and sends her to meet her maker (who I believe is the same age as her)

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/19/20 at 18:11:57

You guys are so amusing. I only visit Trump's twisted twit feed out of a morbid fascination for his vacuous and bottomless idiocy. No one takes him seriously any longer and the GOP, have their balls tied to his sinking ship, so it's either get dragged along or drown.

Similarly this forum now that the true nature of the Trumpsters is apparent, has driven off anyone with better sense than to wade into the sh!thole that it is. Nevertheless I occasionally will visit for the exact same reason that I'll visit Trump's maniacal, weird, car crash of a twitter feed.

And just like Trump is imploding so the Trumpsters on this forum also sensing the reality that the bulk of Americans will not be fooled again by such an embarrassment of a buffoon, appear to be having conniptions at the prospect.

Trump is only running against himself not Biden. I said at the beginning of the Trump presidency that this is a good thing for the world because it's a massive wake up call. There could not be a Black Lives Matter movement without Trump, and now there will be a massive correction.

Biden is just the calm middle man to bridge the change. The bulk of the US just wants the madness to end, the once mighty US is a laughing stock and they know it, they've been exposed like never before and it will take a generational change. There's no little irony that Biden first came into the presidential sphere after Bush's economic collapse, which Obama/Biden fixed, and now he's going to come in again, after Trump against crashed the economy after inheriting the upward trend fixed by Obama.

It was all for nothing. Gorsuch is not the gift that the evangelicals thought, and Kavanaugh will grow into his roll hopefully. Ginsberg just needs to hang on for a few more months and the dream of the Conservative takeover of SCOTUS, will have a reality check.

I laugh at the media taking the bait when Trump says he may not accept the election. It won't matter whether he accepts it or not because it's written into the constitution that come 20th January his presidency ends if Biden wins. There's no ifs or but, he will have no power, the military will listen to their commander not him. Maybe the media are just humouring him so they can enjoy watching him have a man-baby tantrum.

I tipped Warren to be the presidential candidate over a year ago but she'll probably need to be groomed first and thus I'll tip her to be the veep. And she'll be running for the presidency in 2024 after being in the public eye for four years.


Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by philthymike on 07/19/20 at 18:17:02

Leftys are all without exception a bunch of brainwashed zombies. It's no wonder their political champions are animated corpses bloated with maggots and an unquenchable hunger for living human flesh.

We may be facing the zombie apocalypse this election.

Regarding the madness the US just wants BLM to end. What a sickening disgrace they've become to their own cause. It's a pity how they've turned nobile sentiments into total criminality.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/19/20 at 19:06:10

What about Trump's Fox interview, it's Bidens ready made campaign ad. Trump boasted of being able to identify a camel. And when Wallace pressed him on his absurd claim on Covid, that "it's going to disappear". Trump said "I'll be right eventually". lol.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/19/donald-trump-fox-news-sunday-chris-wallace-interview
Trump, 74, responded by asking that Biden, 77, immediately take a cognitive test. The president said last week that he “aced” an unspecified test. It is assumed he is referring to a cognitive assessment from 2018. Wallace, 72, said he had also taken the test, after seeing the president had.

“It’s not the hardest test,” he said. “They have a picture and it says ‘What’s that’ and it’s an elephant.”



http://https://i.postimg.cc/yxPgZq6W/3066.jpg

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/19/20 at 20:02:20

"And again Trump giving the $ from hotel stays of foreign dignitaries instead of the $$ going to private companies like Hilton affects this how ???"


 I didn't say it did.  I was just asking if you know what the procedure was specific to a sitting US President but your hypersensitivity to Trump related topics has created an argument that never existed.

  I asked if he would write a personal check, but that doesn't make sense, so there must be some other procedure.

 So when you tell me any government building will take bags of cash I am not going to agree to that.  I don't think this is the procedure they are using.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/20/20 at 05:49:52

All the government buildings I've been in seem to take large sums of $$ from me just the same. DMV, IRS, court system and best to never go near them unless you can really really afford it.

You pick that zit if you like eegore - I know Trump hotels donating the $ to treasury is real and its coverage has been minimized, and even pseudo criminal legalese smeared even when mentioned. That is how 96% of the media does it these days, I am now more aware than before.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/20/20 at 09:48:26


"I know Trump hotels donating the $ to treasury is real and its coverage has been minimized, and even pseudo criminal legalese smeared even when mentioned. That is how 96% of the media does it these days, I am now more aware than before."

 I agree.  Mainstream media is typically biased and rarely accurate which is why I don't use it.
 
 I am wondering if you knew what the procedure for a sitting President to donate large sums of profit was.  You don't, that all you had to say instead of creating an argument over something I never said.


Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/20/20 at 11:36:48

You're a big boy Eegore. Look it up. I'm not in the business of finding crap you are interested in. That's why libtards made google.
Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/20/20 at 12:35:43

"You're a big boy Eegore. Look it up. I'm not in the business of finding crap you are interested in. That's why libtards made google."


 I never asked you to look up or provide anything.  I said this:

"Can the President give direct funds to the Treasury?  I guess he could write a personal check, but then it's personal profit being donated.  Is it his business in Trust from his family that writes a check? "


 And somehow you turned that into a tirade of nonsense arguing a stance that was never challenged.  You read up on this, I was asking if you knew.

 Watch how this works...


"I don't know."


 There, you could have said that and saved yourself the argument that never existed.  Or are we going to go the route of not asking other members questions anymore and adhere strictly to only looking up things for ourselves?

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/20/20 at 13:15:57

Eegore - I dont give a fcuk - Look it up if that exact little zit is bothering you so much.
Never made an argument that didn't exist - was just pointing out there is a zit - feel free to pick your zit, I'm sure media is lying, obfuscating, confusing and minimizing any good Trump does/did - more than before.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/20/20 at 17:29:49

Eegore, see what happens, just like I said. You're just offering yourself up as fodder, as the saying goes, 'lie down with racists, get up with zits'.


Meanwhile there's not a single mention of Trump's spit roast and grilling on Fox on his twitter account. He was sweating like a crackling pig, someone should have shoved an apple in his mouth and pronounced him done.

Bits of that pathetic comical performance are going to re reappearing regularly on The Lincoln Project ads. Meanwhile Trumps is brainstorming a new nick name for Biden.

After four years of his narcissistic malfeasance and incompetance, watching him meltdown sort of makes it all worth it. Imagine what it's going to be like for him once the protection of his illegitimate so called presidency is gone.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/20/20 at 20:57:13


"Eegore - I dont give a fcuk - Look it up if that exact little zit is bothering you so much"

 I did.  Again, I was just asking.  Just asking a question since you had information on a topic I had interest in.

 This is what I call reverse TDS.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/21/20 at 05:31:11

Who watches Faux news ??? 96% corrupt to the left (CNN, ABC etc) and 2% corrupt to the right (Faux news)

Atleast he did a 1 hr long speech a few days ago still standing on the podium and taking open quesitons from all the quacks. Brain dead Biden is limited to 3 min at a time in his basement and cherry picked reporters asking pre vetted question, and he still stumbles over the answer.

And Eegore this seems to be really hurting that soy Pu$$$y of yours. If you have interest find from your preferred source yourself, you know you wont accept anything like wapo I posted 2 pages ago.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/21/20 at 06:52:11


"And Eegore this seems to be really hurting that soy Pu$$$y of yours. If you have interest find from your preferred source yourself, you know you wont accept anything like wapo I posted 2 pages ago."


 Again, I am not arguing what the Washington post article, or what you are saying.  The Washington Post article appears accurate and cites references.

 I just wondered if you knew what the process for donation was.  You said every government building will take any form of payment.  I disagreed specifically with that, and not with the overall content of your post.


Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/21/20 at 06:55:54


1A3A38302D3A5F0 wrote:
"And Eegore this seems to be really hurting that soy Pu$$$y of yours. If you have interest find from your preferred source yourself, you know you wont accept anything like wapo I posted 2 pages ago."


 Again, I am not arguing what the Washington post article, or what you are saying.  The Washington Post article appears accurate and cites references.

 I just wondered if you knew what the process for donation was.  You said every government building will take any form of payment.  I disagreed specifically with that, and not with the overall content of your post.




Wow, Just wow. Just simply ... wowwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

Yea the most important part of Trump donating $200K-100K to the treasury is this. Your soy pu$$y happy now ???

Classic libtard minimalization, but whatever makes you happy and you can have the last work on this topic just so your soy pu$$y doesn't start hurting again.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Serowbot on 07/21/20 at 07:13:00


494853545B4E523A0 wrote:
Your soy pu$$y happy now ???

Classic libtard minimalization, but whatever makes you happy and you can have the last work on this topic just so your soy pu$$y doesn't start hurting again.

Cool.
Srinath.

Not cool, Srinath...
Besides that,.. Eegore doesn't take that kind of bait.

Serow

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/21/20 at 07:53:38


Classic libtard minimalization,


 Except I didn't minimize anything.
 
 I agree with you about Trump and media coverage, but you won't accept that because I don't think all government buildings take all forms of payment?

 Wow.

 I literally only asked about the process and you got all worked up over it.  People ask questions here you know.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/21/20 at 08:35:58

Stupid question Eegore and stupidity is bait enough for 2+ pages Sew.

IRS and Treasury will take any amount of $ in any format. Obama said to Warren Buffet - you know the address send any $ you want (in response to Buffet saying his secretary paid a higher % in taxes than he did).

The other govt buildings (like DMV, courts etc) I guess take only the exact amount owed in the most inconvenient format possible, you have cash or check, they want its exact equivalent in gold (This is A JOKE, NOT TO START YOUR STUPID TRAIN AGAIN).

Feel free to claim you're not minimizing anything, the next time you pay $200K to the govt in a payment that's not even unethically sourced, let me know and I'll question you on how many pennies, and what the years of those pennies were - Y'know some were real copper and hence worth 4c so I'd want to know if you evaluated them at 4c or as 1c.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/21/20 at 09:07:15


3D2F3B382F292B4E0 wrote:
Meanwhile there's not a single mention of Trump's spit roast and grilling on Fox on his twitter account. He was sweating like a crackling pig, someone should have shoved an apple in his mouth and pronounced him done.




This was 40+ mins - I found it, but didn't watch it. And I am not wasting 40 mins of my life to that buffon on buffon slime slug fest.

However I saw a 30 sec excerpt where Trump responded by calling out to Kayleigh Macenany and debunked his point right in real time. The more important thing is, Trump is taking open ended questions any any and all reporters and do so for hours on end. Hidin brain dead biden gets pre selected questions from reporters and takes a select few for 3-5 mins and stumbles on the answer.

Really they should transplant Ruth Bader Ginsberg's brain into Biden's body, and put that Joe Bider Ginsberg into the ticket, and put the Biden brained RBG into an induced coma till the election then pull the plug.

The 2 problems they have may just be solved in 1 swoop. I'm a problem solver, and I am actually a liberal but this spectacle is hard to watch on both these fronts.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/21/20 at 09:12:32

 How am I minimizing by asking about the process?

 I agree with you about Trump's donations and media coverage.

 I

 Agree

 With

 You

 But asking a question minimizes what exactly?  

 If you cite an article tucked away in the far back reaches of the internet about Millionaire X donating 12 bazillion dollars to the US Government and I ask, "How does he do that?" I am minimizing the fact that Millionaire X donated 12 bazillion dollars?

 I agree he did it, I agree the coverage was poorly done and biased, but if I ask about the donation procedure then I all the sudden don't agree, and am minimizing.

 Is that what you are saying?

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/21/20 at 09:40:58

By asking me "how" when I didn't do the investigative journalism essentially you're trying to make some noise to take away the legitimacy of that post.

The - How should be directed to wapo or wherever the post was made or not made (3 yrs of npr, 2 yrs of abc etc)

So ask them, I'm not a journalist or a tax lawyer or a IRS/Fed employee. Ask Them and post back.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/21/20 at 09:49:28

"By asking me "how" when I didn't do the investigative journalism essentially you're trying to make some noise to take away the legitimacy of that post."


 How would I know that?  I don't know if you knew how the funds were donated, so I asked.

 How that minimizes anything is beyond me.  




"So ask them, I'm not a journalist or a tax lawyer or a IRS/Fed employee. Ask Them and post back."


 I did.  The Bureau of the Fiscal Service may accept gifts donated to the United States Government exclusively to reduce debt held by the public.  This is done as part of the Treasury.

 - Money, only on the condition that it be used to reduce debt held by the public.

 - An outstanding government obligation, only on the condition that the obligation be cashed and the proceeds used to reduce debt held by the public.

 - Other intangible personal property only on the condition that the property is sold and the proceeds used to reduce the public debt.

 
 This process can be done by any US citizen here:

https://www.pay.gov/public/form/start/23779454/

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/21/20 at 11:46:03

As long as you're Happy Eegore, that's all that matters.

For me, the wapo of 20, the ABC of 18 and npr of 17 articles tell me everything I need to know about both Trump and the news media themselves.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 07/21/20 at 12:35:40

"For me, the wapo of 20, the ABC of 18 and npr of 17 articles tell me everything I need to know about both Trump and the news media themselves."

 Yeah I agreed with you on that a long time ago.  I don't think it's a cover-up by any means but the information is either downplayed, or limited.

 

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/21/20 at 17:54:35

yup, minimization downplaying, confusion, obfuscation and burying under 100's of layers of irreleveant crap ... AKA standard libtard media practice.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: HaTrEd
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/22/20 at 00:09:45

Does the red hat symbolise hatred.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/22/20 at 05:19:57

Finally Trump comments on his disastrous interview with Chris Wallace...

@realDonaldTrump
Thank you for the good reviews and comments on my interview with Chris Wallace of @FoxNews. We may have set a record for doing such an interview in the heat. It was 100 degrees, making things very interesting!


"Thank you for the good reviews..." Lol. It will go down in history as the most pathetic pile of gobshite ever broadcast, universally mocked. The biggest self own in history.

In order to distract attention he's now trying to create more chaos with his secret unidentified secret police dragging people off the street without probable cause, without arrest and throwing them into unmarked mini vans. the tinpot dictator.

When Wallace reminded him about all the times he's been saying 'it will disappear' Trump responds in all seriousness "I'll be right eventually" and Wallace laughs not realising right away that Trump is being serious. Funny thing is that it will probably never disappear anyway.

What are the odds that Trump will debate Biden. None.

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6XdpDOH1JA[/media]

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/22/20 at 05:35:45

What he said didn't matter, how he said it is even less so, the fact that's important is, in 100 degree heat he said it for 40 mins.

That's only 37 mins and 30 degrees more than Hiding "ooooooo my melting brain" Biden has managed in the last 3 months.

These 2 septagenarians are both unfit to govern. The left just hopes to show how bad Trump is without showing how dead Biden is so the "woman of color VP" takes over and tosses the hand puppet in the trash on day 1.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/22/20 at 15:00:00

Welp here's the inevitable ad from the disastrous interview, perfectly sums up the lunacy...

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsaO3v4SvwA[/media]

Trump is going to reduce the GOP to a putrid rotting husk in two months.

The test that Trump is boasting about and says the last five questions were 'very hard' is a standard test to help professionals detect the early onset of alzheimers disease, it's not meant to be hard.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/22/20 at 15:23:46

Trump is going to reduce the GOP to a putrid rotting husk in two months.

Dont you ever tire of proclaiming the end only to be wrong again?
I read your posts, because I get a kick outta you, always frikken WRONG,, But always Just so Certain,,
So, when he doesnt crash
again,, will you shut UPP?

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/22/20 at 16:22:38

Don't you ever tire of watching Trump be wrong on everything. I know you love him as you've said, and I suppose love is blind so I guess that explains it.

You mean for example when I said that the entire N.Korea Kim/Trump summit was a sham and that Kim was using Trump and that the US would get nothing in return? Well that happened. You call all that bullshit at the time too. By the time Trump has eviscerated the GOP, you'll have moved on.

You're like Trump just pretend the truth is a lie and play it with a dead bat, look at the ad created from his Wallace interview even Wallace is smirking at Trump's idiocy.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/22/20 at 18:46:30

You act like anyoe expected Kim to not keep being crazy..
Nobody said
Ohh, TRump will have him straightened out in a short while,,
Nobody expected it to work,, WHO has won in negotiations with the Norks?
Pbama??
Phhht,, Nobody is winnin that,, Theyre CRAZY,,frikken commies,,

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/22/20 at 20:27:54

But you yourself said that we had to give Trump the benefit of the doubt, meaning you had some exceptions that Trump could swing it. Everyone else said that he's being played like a skin flute. The White House is giving Kim massive prestige and propaganda, by being honoured with a Presidential visit but the US is getting nothing. Nada. Nothing at all except being used, which is how everybody, from Putin to Erdogan to Jinping sees Trump, as a useful idiot, including to the GOP.

Kim fcuked trump up the ass and gave him a used condom to take back home with him. It's amazing that you still buy the puff from the flim flam man himself.


Title: Re: HaTrEd
Post by MnSpring on 07/22/20 at 20:37:57


57455152454341240 wrote:
Does the red hat symbolise hatred.

Not for, sane, rational, intelligent people.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/22/20 at 20:43:52

This is what you said in this thread...http://suzukisavage.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1524280111


But, back to Kim..

It's looking like he's [Trump] winning to me.


Nup, Trump got utterly screwed by Kim. Thing is though that Trump didn't care, it was all just for a photo op. He gave away the kudos and prestige that comes with a presidential visit, just for a photo op. Like a junkie selling the family silverware to a single hit of smack, except the smack was just sugar.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/23/20 at 08:45:03

Benefit of the doubt | Definition of Benefit of the doubt ...
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/benefit-of-the-doubt
noun. a favorable opinion or judgment adopted despite uncertainty..

It ended, unsurprisingly, in Kim proving he's crazy. Nobody got surprised.
Trump could Try to engage him, pay attention to him, remember, he was slinging rockets around, scaring people.
So, everyone screams
Trump isn't presidential
Yet, what he did was very presidential,  
He knew going in Kim would be crazy and wouldn't stop being crazy, but, what did you want?
Should Trump have bombed them?
Or TRY diplomacy?
Or ignore the fact that rockets are going towards Japan and places?
We've seen your criticism..
How about you tell us what smart looks like.
How would you have handled it?

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/23/20 at 16:15:38

You only give the benefit of the doubt when it's warranted. You're a mini Trump, you're never wrong, and the more wrong you are the more you're never wrong. That's why you make predictions that are way into the future, hoping everyone will forget by then while you've moved on saying how everyone but you is always wrong.

Meanwhile... Here's a good read, which I read way back in May and it's illuminating in the light of current events to see why Trump was so upset about his confirmation at Charlotteville being cancelled. Now his beloved Jacksonville convention has been cancelled too and it's all due to his own incompetence. So a just result.

‘This Is What I Want’

“So we went down there, and the speeches were made,” Gay recalled, and Bush capped his remarks by placing his hand on his heart and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance, and then Barbara Bush joined him on the podium, and the rest of his family, and their families, and Dan Quayle, his pick for vice president, and his family, “and there’s 25 people out there, and with that, the band strikes up, the confetti starts to fall, the balloons are rising and falling,” 150,000 of them, red, white and blue, and there were 15-plus minutes of sustained, ecstatic sound.

And in the middle of this scene, Trump said something, not quite to Gay, who was immediately to his left, but loud enough for him to hear.

“This is what I want.”

“I’m sorry,” Gay said.

Trump looked at Gay.

“This,” Trump said again, “is what I want.”



https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/05/28/donald-trump-convention-1988-285832

Ya cain't always git what ya want, but sometimes you get what you need.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/23/20 at 18:45:56

Here's some top quality huckstering.

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2i4JxWkSYzU[/media]

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by MnSpring on 07/24/20 at 15:03:15


11100B0C03160A620 wrote:
 ... minimization downplaying, confusion, obfuscation and burying under 100's of layers of irreleveant crap ... AKA standard ...


A-Yep !!!

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by srinath on 07/24/20 at 15:34:45


33213536212725400 wrote:
Here's some top quality huckstering.

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2i4JxWkSYzU[/media]





Thanks for posting that sausage.
So what's the problem, he seems to be speaking in rather street folksy rich guy but common and in simple words with complete sentences. Let see Biden do that. Yea bias and spin and whatever ... we're well past that with both sides dishing it out in spades, and 96% of the spin is on the left with 2% right, so bias and spin are everywhere.
Trump has set the bar very very low.

Biden is running into it repeatedly and tripping over it and his own words constantly. Spin and bias a plenty as well but by all his handlers. Cos biden doesn't remmeber what office he's running for or who he wants to beat.
That lying dog faced pony soldier may have actually been his best moment.

Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/24/20 at 16:05:01

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-H9BOIYhgc


Enjoy Huckster Hillary,,

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/24/20 at 20:33:50

It's true you are a mini trump, Hilary's not running for election, Trump is.

Title: The format $$$ was delivered to treasury.
Post by srinath on 08/03/20 at 13:51:51

Eegore - This is the thread in case you were still searching where you claimed you posted how Trump delivered 200K to treasury.
Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: Huckster n' Chief...
Post by Eegore on 08/03/20 at 15:01:09

"Eegore - This is the thread in case you were still searching where you claimed you posted how Trump delivered 200K to treasury."


 I know it is.

 You must have issue with it.  What is your concern or issue with the fact that I wanted to know how US citizens donate directly to the US Treasury?

 What part of my post do you have issue with?  Besides not acknowledging I agree with you and you are obviously at this point just trying to be argumentative.

SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.