SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Ferdinand
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1574600605

Message started by WebsterMark on 11/24/19 at 05:03:25

Title: Ferdinand
Post by WebsterMark on 11/24/19 at 05:03:25

The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand is seen by historians as the fuse that lit the WWI power keg that had been building for years. Same for Pearl Harbor. (by the way, there's a site on twitter that "live tweetes" the events of that day, was pretty cool last day)

The Left has manufactured some kind of cult-like worship for Justice Ruth Ginsburg. Why, I have no idea, other than she's a reliable vote for abortion. So if she were to pass away soon, leftist would metaphorically (maybe, maybe not) seize her little body and carry it on their shoulders wailing away with fake tears and sorrow. The timing, should that occur, would be interesting.

If its after impeachment and acquittal, leftist will scream bloody murder and demand Trump wait until after the election "as The America people deserve a voice" despite pushing ahead with this joke of an investigation with the same election on the horizon.

If its before, Republican Senators will need armed guards. Poor little Jeff Flake getting accosted in an elevator or Cruz forced out of a restaurant will seem like child's play compared to what would come.

Trump will appoint a replacement for sure. Mitch will hold a hearing and we may see an uproar like never before.

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by Serowbot on 11/24/19 at 07:24:18

Should anything happen,...
It's too close to an election for a President to nominate a Supreme Court Justice...
It should be held over to after the election.

Let's add that this President is currently being impeached...
No way, Jose'...

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by WebsterMark on 11/24/19 at 07:48:09

.....but it’s not too soon to impeach?
Isn’t that an admission this impeachment charade was to improve the Democrat’s odds to win the elections?

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by raydawg on 11/24/19 at 08:00:08

I can only think of.....Elections have consequences

I love the wisdom, it speaks, and justification......

You too Bot, eh? ;D ;D ;D ;D

You libs started the these games, go whine where people care, or pull up your big boy panties and beat Trump like a good sport.

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by pg on 11/24/19 at 08:01:47

162423323524330C20332A410 wrote:

.....but it’s not too soon to impeach?
Isn’t that an admission this impeachment charade was to improve the Democrat’s odds to win the elections?

WM FTW!!

Best regards,

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by WebsterMark on 11/24/19 at 14:22:09

2B3C3A3639295B0 wrote:

[quote author=162423323524330C20332A410 link=1574600605/0#2 date=1574610489].....but it’s not too soon to impeach?
Isn’t that an admission this impeachment charade was to improve the Democrat’s odds to win the elections?

WM FTW!!

Best regards,[/quote]

To be fair PG, Sew's ridiculous comment left me with a tap in birdie.

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by WebsterMark on 11/24/19 at 14:24:43

But seriously, what has Ginsburg done other than case partisan vote after partisan vote with all the other leftist? Plus, she got drunk and passed out at a State of Union which is pretty freaking funny, I'll give you that, but what else?

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by Eegore on 11/24/19 at 16:29:45

But seriously, what has Ginsburg done other than case partisan vote after partisan vote with all the other leftist?

In what timeframe? To my knowledge she has been involved in many things, but I don't want to research, itemize, reference, and create arguments for each if you are just going to dismiss them as being outside the timeframe you are referencing or do not consider completed actions of a human to be things that qualify as doing, or being done.

What timeframe?

What do you consider "done" in the sentence "what has Ginsburg done"?

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by pg on 11/24/19 at 17:04:11

7E5E5C54495E3B0 wrote:

Can you provide 3 memorable moments during her time on the SCOTUS? Could be an opinion, where she provided a significant influence to an important case, you name it.

Best regards,

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by Mavigogun on 11/24/19 at 18:17:51

There is not yet the technology to explain it to you; someday, maybe, Google Translate will have decent person to douchbag worked out- but today, no.

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by pg on 11/24/19 at 19:20:19

404C5B444A424A58432D0 wrote:

There is not yet the technology to explain it to you; someday, maybe, Google Translate will have decent person to douchbag worked out- but today, no.

I assume that was directed towards me because I had the previous post. That post reveals a great deal about you. You made no effort to provide an argument or to have any discourse whatsoever. It was a just a drive-by cheap shot.

Best regards,

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by WebsterMark on 11/25/19 at 04:54:13

I don't read anything Mavi post any longer, but I did read what prompted PG's response so I take it that douchbag is an accepted word in our TT lexicon now?

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by Mavigogun on 11/25/19 at 04:55:16

7F686E626D7D0F0 wrote:

I assume that was directed towards me because I had the previous post.

Your presumption is consistently wrong.

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by WebsterMark on 11/25/19 at 04:57:29

0D2D2F273A2D480 wrote:

I'm not asking you to spend any time on it, but I would assume the accomplishments of someone whom the leftist hold in such high regard would be common knowledge.

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by Mavigogun on 11/25/19 at 05:02:09

7C4E49585F4E59664A59402B0 wrote:

I don't read anything Mavi post any longer-

Mark learned this lie from Trump, claiming to not read what he reacts to. He has to pretend- it’s the lie he tells himself to save face, avoid the consequences of his behavior. It doesn’t work, of course- the stain is on his soul.

No helicopter noise here to drown out speech that doesn’t flatter you, Mark.

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by Eegore on 11/25/19 at 16:11:49

"I'm not asking you to spend any time on it, but I would assume the accomplishments of someone whom the leftist hold in such high regard would be common knowledge."

My experience is most people know the name but have no idea what she does.

"Can you provide 3 memorable moments during her time on the SCOTUS? Could be an opinion, where she provided a significant influence to an important case, you name it."

What would you consider "important" regarding "important case"?

How are you valuating the cases by levels of importance?

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by WebsterMark on 11/25/19 at 17:06:47

"I'm not asking you to spend any time on it, but I would assume the accomplishments of someone whom the leftist hold in such high regard would be common knowledge."

My experience is most people know the name but have no idea what she does.

Exactly, but it will be treated like a catastrophe.

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by Eegore on 11/25/19 at 19:30:28

What would you consider "important" regarding "important case"?

How are you valuating the cases by levels of importance?

There's a number of cases but if you don't think 4th Amendment upholding for minors is "important" it won't count. If you don't think Federal legalization of same-sex marriage is "important" then it won't count.

How do you assess important when selecting case materials for SCOTUS?

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by eau de sauvage on 11/25/19 at 19:43:27

@WM

Why, I have no idea

Whaaaaat? An intellectual pygmy such as yourself has trouble comprehending why anyone would have some respect for an intellectual powerhouse?!

Title: Re: Ferdinand
Post by WebsterMark on 11/26/19 at 04:34:29

So an intellectual pygmy is someone with a different point of view? :-?

And you're the wise one huh? Sure, ok eau. Whatever floats your little boat.

Title: Demagogue wants to talk about himself
Post by Mavigogun on 11/26/19 at 05:45:24

566463727564734C60736A010 wrote:

So an intellectual pygmy is someone with a different point of view?

Well, yes, certainly- intellectually, your view is occluded, unable to see over or around what is expected of other adults. Here, perspective isn't merely a difference in political values, but integrity of thought, your view chronically lowered to focus on your own contrived conceits.

This entire thread is a perfect example: were you acting in good faith, with minimal effort you might discover for yourself why RBG is so celebrated. Learning what others think and why was not your priority- the lead post was all about insult and provocation.

"What sort of pygmy are you?" is the more apt question. From my contact with you, Mark, your stunted capacity isn't cognitive; rather, your tragic shortcoming are moral and ethical, values. You don't hold truth in high regard. You're not stupid, Mark- you're intellectually dishonest. You stand in a character hole of your own making that affords an emotionally crippled view of the people around you. So isolated, you resent society, want to see it lowered to where you choose to dwell. Again, witness the lead post.

And you're the wise one huh? Sure, ok eau. Whatever floats your little boat.

From my perspective, Eau de Sauvage elevates consideration, humane and honest regard, his voice buoyed by integrity. Where you sink, he floats. Since you've made this a contest of character, yes, he is the "wise one".