SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Dec 11
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1574172351

Message started by pg on 11/19/19 at 06:05:51

Title: Dec 11
Post by pg on 11/19/19 at 06:05:51

Better get moving with the sham impeachment, that won't remove Trump from office regardless.  FISA report coming out and Horowitz is scheduled to testify on Dec 11.  

The announcement of the Dec. 11 hearing is a clear sign the report on FBI intelligence-gathering activities related to the 2016 presidential election is slated to be released to the public in the coming weeks.

Best regards,

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by T And T Garage on 11/19/19 at 07:48:17

OK....

Minor distraction is all that is, IMHO.

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by Serowbot on 11/19/19 at 08:07:44

Foil hat retaliation... ::)

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by pg on 11/22/19 at 11:42:29


6F796E736B7E73681C0 wrote:
Foil hat retaliation... ::)



Are you sure about that?

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/21/politics/fbi-fisa-russia-investigation/index.html

Best regards,

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by Mavigogun on 11/22/19 at 12:04:19

It seems so, since even the agent charged with investigating the investigators concluded whatever the changes were to the correspondence  wouldn't have impacted the judge's ruling.    Is it concern-worthy? Perhaps.   We might even discover conclusively what they are actually talking about after the report is submitted, next month- or maybe not.   If egregious or inconsequential, I hope the facts are made clear.

Trumpians would like to make an argument that, somehow, lawlessness on the part of investigators somehow undoes Trump's crimes.   Even if this turns out to be a trivial transgression, followers of the President will not apply any sort of discernment or consideration.   Just like "pg" here, however petty, they'll leverage this to excuse their complicity in Trump's wrongdoing.

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by pg on 11/22/19 at 12:52:15


5854435C525A52405B350 wrote:
Trumpians would like to make an argument that, somehow, lawlessness on the part of investigators somehow undoes Trump's crimes.   Even if this turns out to be a trivial transgression, followers of the President will not apply any sort of discernment or consideration.   Just like "pg" here, however petty, they'll leverage this to excuse their complicity in Trump's wrongdoing.



Try to stay on topic, your petty insults and insinuations don't reflect well upon you.

Best regards,

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by Mavigogun on 11/22/19 at 13:06:20


786F69656A7A080 wrote:
Try to stay on topic, your petty insults and insinuations don't reflect well upon you.


Those are direct observations.   If they reflect poorly on you, attend to your character.   The topic, ultimately, is that you've chosen a crook as your champion, you denounce hearings you haven't spent time to review, and flatter yourself with the unearned label of "conservative".

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by T And T Garage on 11/22/19 at 13:13:33


293E38343B2B590 wrote:
[quote author=6F796E736B7E73681C0 link=1574172351/0#2 date=1574179664]Foil hat retaliation... ::)



Are you sure about that?

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/21/politics/fbi-fisa-russia-investigation/index.html

Best regards,[/quote]


Yet the situation did not sway an independent Justice Department watchdog from finding the surveillance was valid, sources said.

Yep, pretty darn sure.

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by T And T Garage on 11/22/19 at 13:15:37


4C5B5D515E4E3C0 wrote:
[quote author=5854435C525A52405B350 link=1574172351/0#4 date=1574453059]
Trumpians would like to make an argument that, somehow, lawlessness on the part of investigators somehow undoes Trump's crimes.   Even if this turns out to be a trivial transgression, followers of the President will not apply any sort of discernment or consideration.   Just like "pg" here, however petty, they'll leverage this to excuse their complicity in Trump's wrongdoing.



Try to stay on topic, your petty insults and insinuations don't reflect well upon you.

Best regards,[/quote]


LOL - says the person who said I "wear cake on my face"....

Well, in your defense, petty insults and insinuations probably do reflect your character.


Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by pg on 11/22/19 at 13:41:43


5B454A4B465B405D2F0 wrote:
Well, in your defense, petty insults and insinuations probably do reflect your character.



The cake comment was more so getting a leg up on that particular exchange.  A significant difference exist from thinly veiled insults.  

Best regards,

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by Mavigogun on 11/22/19 at 13:49:42


445355595646340 wrote:
The cake comment was more so getting a leg up on that particular exchange.


It ain't about principle- smearing you was done for a perceived advantage, so is OK by "pg".  A degree of moral flexibility we'd all do well to eschew.

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by T And T Garage on 11/22/19 at 14:01:56


3225232F2030420 wrote:
[quote author=5B454A4B465B405D2F0 link=1574172351/0#8 date=1574457337]
Well, in your defense, petty insults and insinuations probably do reflect your character.



The cake comment was more so getting a leg up on that particular exchange.  A significant difference exist from thinly veiled insults.  

Best regards,[/quote]


LOL - really? OK, good to know.....
::)
To be clear - is that one of those "conservative values"?

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by pg on 11/22/19 at 14:12:06


716F60616C716A77050 wrote:
[quote author=3225232F2030420 link=1574172351/0#9 date=1574458903][quote author=5B454A4B465B405D2F0 link=1574172351/0#8 date=1574457337]
Well, in your defense, petty insults and insinuations probably do reflect your character.



The cake comment was more so getting a leg up on that particular exchange.  A significant difference exist from thinly veiled insults.  

Best regards,[/quote]


LOL - really? OK, good to know.....
::)
To be clear - is that one of those "conservative values"?[/quote]


No, that was more of a maneuver or artifice.

Best regards,

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by T And T Garage on 11/22/19 at 15:12:33


6077717D7262100 wrote:
[quote author=716F60616C716A77050 link=1574172351/0#11 date=1574460116][quote author=3225232F2030420 link=1574172351/0#9 date=1574458903][quote author=5B454A4B465B405D2F0 link=1574172351/0#8 date=1574457337]
Well, in your defense, petty insults and insinuations probably do reflect your character.



The cake comment was more so getting a leg up on that particular exchange.  A significant difference exist from thinly veiled insults.  

Best regards,[/quote]


LOL - really? OK, good to know.....
::)
To be clear - is that one of those "conservative values"?[/quote]


No, that was more of a maneuver or artifice.

Best regards,
[/quote]


From what I saw, it was neither.

But you go ahead and sell yourself on it....LOL

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by pg on 11/23/19 at 10:24:25

Their is a difference between calling someone a sociopath and them saying they are wearing cake....

Best regards,

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by T And T Garage on 11/25/19 at 05:34:49


455254585747350 wrote:
Their is a difference between calling someone a sociopath and them saying they are wearing cake....

Best regards,



True... but where are those "conservative values"?

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by Mavigogun on 11/25/19 at 06:13:37

He chose a crook as his champion, denounces hearings he hasn't spent time to review, and flatter himself with the unearned label of "conservative".  

"How many hours of testimony have you watched?"  

Silence.  

"How can you stand with a man who has swindled swindled students?"

He doesn't care.

"How can you stand with a man who stole from a charity for veterans?"

He doesn't care.

"How can you stand with a man who cheated on his pregnant wife and committed campaign finance violations in attempt to cover it up?"

He doesn't care.

"How can you stand with a man who schemed to violate our Constitution and corrupt an ally state?"

He doesn't care.

"How can you stand with a man who stood before the world and denounced our own intelligence agents' reports in favor of the murderer Putin?"

He doesn't care.

"How can you stand with a man who sided with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and denounced our own intelligence after the Prince's agents hacked Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi to pieces?"

He doesn't care.  He's a "Conservative" in name only- wears the t-shirt, has the bumpersticker, enjoys the the status, but doesn't walk the walk.   It's an unearned titled; by wearing it, "pg" cheapens it, devaluing the Conservative brand.   A cheep knock off made in Russia.

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by pg on 11/25/19 at 10:56:38

More hyperbole from the left, LMFIFY:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/trumps-list-289-accomplishments-in-just-20-months-relentless-promise-keeping

Trump decimated the liberal agenda and hopey-change's legacy.

Best regards,

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by Mavigogun on 11/25/19 at 11:04:12

"pg" throws more crap at the wall hoping once everything is so smeared his smell will be indistinguishable.   Instead, you could just clean yourself up, dude- your choice.

Title: Re: Dec 11
Post by T And T Garage on 11/25/19 at 11:09:54


392E28242B3B490 wrote:
More hyperbole from the left, LMFIFY:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/trumps-list-289-accomplishments-in-just-20-months-relentless-promise-keeping

Trump decimated the liberal agenda and hopey-change's legacy.

Best regards,




LOL that's a funny post!

SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.