SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Like I said /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1573705168 Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 11/13/19 at 20:19:27 |
Title: Like I said Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/13/19 at 20:19:27 It's harder to pull the wool off of someone's eyes Than pull the wool over [/url] Why do people keep trusting the democrats to actually Do what they promised after Frikken DECADES of lies? https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-qjNzBobjt38/XcvgPuOzFdI/AAAAAAAAiWU/q-yjkumSLssZ8wrfsKzysHtPPuhX5hvAACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Last%2BRepublican%2BMayors.gif Look at the ShiThoLES.. And look at who has been running them. And THAT'S WHO WANTS TO DESTROY TRUMP AND AMERICA.. |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by Eegore on 11/14/19 at 10:07:32 Where's the reference material? |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by Serowbot on 11/14/19 at 11:22:08 091610170A0D3C0C3C04161A51630 wrote:
You like Trump... The lyin'est man on the planet. I'm stunned you can post this with a straight face... |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by WebsterMark on 11/14/19 at 12:59:41 5147504D55404D56220 wrote:
You like Trump... The lyin'est man on the planet. I'm stunned you can post this with a straight face...[/quote] Why can't we all just get along?... Let's be the better man, people... Serow |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by pg on 11/14/19 at 16:01:26 WM FTW!! Best regards, |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by Serowbot on 11/14/19 at 16:32:01 546661707766714E627168030 wrote:
You like Trump... The lyin'est man on the planet. I'm stunned you can post this with a straight face...[/quote] Why can't we all just get along?... Let's be the better man, people... Serow [/quote] What?... :-? |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/14/19 at 16:46:02 Hit the link. Look at the cities. Note when the last republican was in charge. Look at the conditions. Deny democrats are responsible. |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by Serowbot on 11/14/19 at 17:16:34 Sure,... and there were no computer scams in the 1920's... ::) |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by thumperclone on 11/14/19 at 17:45:23 so the most current one is when YOU were twelve you just love your dead horses |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by raydawg on 11/14/19 at 17:50:48 7660776A72676A71050 wrote:
Yeah...that's right, or global warming........ ::) |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by Eegore on 11/14/19 at 18:33:01 This is cherry-picking data from what I can tell. Why only those specific cities and why are all other ones left out? First what does "In charge" mean? A mayor? Then every city without one is automatically exempt no matter how severe public unrest might be. So what is "in charge" specifically? What is "unrest"? Specifically, Not this it's just what I want it to be versus what you want it to be. Useless measuring tool unless its defined. Couldn't anyone just select some Democratically controlled cities since 1776 and just make the same graphic? Yes. Because there is no comparison, just cherry-picked locations. |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/14/19 at 18:43:54 Show me that many big cities, run by republicans, for that number of years That are such shitholes. You lefties deny the obvious. |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by raydawg on 11/14/19 at 18:56:47 1434363E2334510 wrote:
Cherry picking is all GW is......HELL-O. |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by Eegore on 11/15/19 at 04:40:55 "Show me that many big cities, run by republicans, for that number of years That are such shitholes." Look I'm not saying you are wrong, I am saying you are not giving enough information for anyone that wants more information than that one graphic you linked to say either way. You want people to agree based off an easily fabricated graphic, that uses strictly opinion over an unknown period of control years. What is "major city" to you? Population, and for what years? What is "that number of years"? How many years? 4? 20? What is "unrest"? Specifically, what are the parameters? You deny the obvious - that your one picture is nowhere near enough information for someone to make an educated assessment. |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/15/19 at 11:34:38 your one picture is nowhere near enough information for someone to make an educated assessment. Bullshit Look at those places. Deny which party has been in control. Lefties are a shitshow. |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by T And T Garage on 11/15/19 at 11:42:31 LOL - wow, what logic!! |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by Eegore on 11/15/19 at 14:46:15 "Bullshit Look at those places. Deny which party has been in control. Lefties are a shitshow. " Bullshit. See I can do that too. Still means nothing. Again we will go through this and again I will try to explain that "I am not saying you are wrong." My statement here is not one that would indicate you are incorrect, not correct or otherwise inaccurate. The problem is you refuse to acknowledge that "unrest" is an open term, that especially in that graphic is not clearly defined. What Is Unrest? Specifically, how are these locations being compared to others? Its a garbage graphic because it doesn't define Unrest, or how "Leadership" was assessed. We all know the real answer, nobody that made that graphic knows, its just a cheap way to prove a point by omission of evidence. |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by verslagen1 on 11/15/19 at 14:53:21 undefined terms means you can define your own. How would you compare them? |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/15/19 at 14:53:45 You know, you're CORRECT. All those places are great. Because lefties have been running them for decades. |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by Eegore on 11/15/19 at 15:13:34 "undefined terms means you can define your own. How would you compare them? " That's the problem with graphics like JoG linked, they only prove one thing - that anything can be put into a graphic. What I would want to know is how, whoever put that together defined "unrest". Is it a percentage of population engaged in public display? That percentage could be compared. The point is I could select any 10 cities from the existence of the US, put down any type of information I want then dare people to deny it. I will choose 100 cities that have had above average birth mortality rates, not define what "above average is, find out which ones had Democrats in charge, not define what "in charge" is and then put 10 of them in a graphic. Then I can say "Deny that those cities have not had high birth mortality rates!!" Anyone can do that, its a cheap way to prove a point. |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by Serowbot on 11/15/19 at 15:17:41 9 out of 10 dentists use Crest.... I choose the dentists... :-? |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/15/19 at 23:10:09 Why my involvement has come to almost nothing. Lefties are lying bastards. They lie to themselves. Criticism, facts, nothing matters. America is better off than before Trump. No , Obama didn't set the stage. And you idiots want Trump gone. Iiidiots. |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/15/19 at 23:11:11 46595F5845427343734B59551E2C0 wrote:
Yeah TT, Perfect logic. |
Title: Re: Like I said Post by thumperclone on 11/16/19 at 04:12:46 4A555354494E7F4F7F47555912200 wrote:
Yeah TT, Perfect logic. [/quote] the shitshow is in the white house ;) |
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |