|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1568826651 Message started by T And T Garage on 09/18/19 at 10:10:51 |
|
Title: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/18/19 at 10:10:51 Nicely done Greta! 'This is science': Teen climate activist Greta Thunberg testifies before Congress Appearing on Capitol Hill for the second straight day Wednesday, Swedish teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg told U.S. lawmakers she did not want them to listen to her. “I want you to listen to the scientists,” Thunberg said in her testimony before the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, where she appeared with other youth leaders. “I want you to unite behind science. And then I want you to take action.” Instead of prepared remarks, Thunberg submitted a 2018 report on global warming by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which warned about the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C that researchers say is likely between 2030 and 2052 if it continues at the current rate. “This is not political views or my opinions,” she said. “This is science.” The hearing was part of a series of events intended to raise awareness of global warming before a planned “climate strike” on Friday, when students around the world are being encouraged to walk out of schools and jobs to demand action on climate change before the annual United Nations General Assembly later this month. Thunberg chastised members of the Senate Climate Change Task Force on Tuesday for inaction. “Please save your praise. We don’t want it,” Thunberg said. “Don’t invite us here to tell us how inspiring we are without doing anything about it because it doesn’t lead to anything.” Jamie Margolin, a 17-year-old climate change activist from Seattle, also scolded committee members on Wednesday for empty praise. “You’re promising me lies,” Margolin said. “Everyone who will walk up to me after this testimony saying I have such a bright future ahead of me will be lying to my face. It doesn’t matter how talented we are, how much work we put in, how many dreams we have. The reality is, my generation has been committed to a planet that is collapsing.” President Trump and his administration have been widely criticized for rolling back Obama-era environmental protections, withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord and resisting the conclusions by the vast majority of scientists that global warming has been caused by humans. On Monday, Thunberg met with former President Barack Obama at his Washington, D.C., offices. “No one is too small to have an impact and change the world,” Thunberg said in a video posted to Twitter by the former president’s charitable foundation. “So do everything that you can.” Thunberg, who has been nominated for a Nobel Prize for her work raising awareness about climate change, has become an inspirational figure for fellow teens. Last month, she sailed from Europe to the United States on a zero-emission yacht. Arriving in New York City after her 15-day trip across the Atlantic Ocean, she was asked if she had a message for Trump. “My message for him is listen to the science,” Thunberg said. “And he obviously doesn't do that. http://www.yahoo.com/news/greta-thunberg-climate-teen-capitol-hill-testimony-science-154045651.html So, the right wing has "mini-AOC" and we have girls like Greta. I'm great with that! |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by WebsterMark on 09/18/19 at 18:38:05 Child abuse. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by MnSpring on 09/18/19 at 18:45:48 647A757479647F62100 wrote:
Did she get all of the, 'threats', From the DFI, UL, FDS Socialists just like, "mini-AOC" did ? |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by WebsterMark on 09/19/19 at 05:07:33 Seriously, why didn't those freaks just find a cute little Muppet or something....... |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/19/19 at 06:18:03 1F2D2A3B3C2D3A05293A23480 wrote:
LOL - that's funny. But your favorite "mini-AOC" was cool, right? Nice try - swing and a miss.... |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/19/19 at 06:18:51 13300D2E2C3730395E0 wrote:
Did she get all of the, 'threats', From the DFI, UL, FDS Socialists just like, "mini-AOC" did ? [/quote] No, I'm sure all her threats came from the right wing lunatics and white power a$$holes. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/19/19 at 06:20:35 724047565140576844574E250 wrote:
Because these are the kids we're leaving the Planet to. You think it's bunk, but she knows better than you. You'll be dead and your grandkids will live with your apathy. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by MnSpring on 09/19/19 at 06:23:32 677976777A677C61130 wrote:
Which threats were those. Or are you just making stuff up again, and repeating, Made Up Stuff ? |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/19/19 at 06:37:53 6B487556544F4841260 wrote:
Which threats were those. Or are you just making stuff up again, and repeating, Made Up Stuff ?[/quote] Hey genius, ever hear of context? My ENTIRE quote was "No, I'm sure all her threats came from the right wing lunatics and white power a$$holes." I INFER that any threats she would get would be from right wingers and white power a$$holes. Do you have any powers of communication? I'm asking this seriously. Do you? I don't think you do. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by MnSpring on 09/19/19 at 06:46:50 4F515E5F524F54493B0 wrote:
No you did not infer, you denied and deflected. Your statement was: "No, I'm sure all her threats came from the right wing lunatics and white power a$$holes." If you were inferring that would have said: "No, I'm sure all her threats, would have, came from the right wing lunatics and white power a$$holes" Defer, Deny, Move the goal posts, and LIE. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/19/19 at 07:07:25 1635082B2932353C5B0 wrote:
No you did not infer, you denied and deflected. Your statement was: "No, I'm sure all her threats came from the right wing lunatics and white power a$$holes." If you were inferring that would have said: "No, I'm sure all her threats, would have, came from the right wing lunatics and white power a$$holes" Defer, Deny, Move the goal posts, and LIE. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D[/quote] LMAO - look at you - trying to give me advice on sentence structure!! Hey mn - how's it coming with your understanding of "there", "they're" and "their"? BWAAAHAAHAAAA!! But hey, speaking of threats... do you have any proof other than the family just saying they were threatened? I haven't seen any online. I've seen comments like mark's saying "child abuse", but I've seen no actual death threats. So.... is this little back and forth moot? Are you actually making sh!t up? Hmmm? |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by WebsterMark on 09/19/19 at 07:21:57 475956575A475C41330 wrote:
Because these are the kids we're leaving the Planet to. You think it's bunk, but she knows better than you. You'll be dead and your grandkids will live with your apathy.[/quote] I totally understand that by speaking at your level, you and other leftist have connected with her. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by MnSpring on 09/19/19 at 07:49:44 140A050409140F12600 wrote:
Deflect, Deny, move the goal posts, and Lie ! |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/19/19 at 08:30:28 566463727564734C60736A010 wrote:
Because these are the kids we're leaving the Planet to. You think it's bunk, but she knows better than you. You'll be dead and your grandkids will live with your apathy.[/quote] I totally understand that by speaking at your level, you and other leftist have connected with her. [/quote] So, you've listened to her I take it? Have you heard how well she presented herself? It's funny, you try to put me down by saying "she speaks at your level".. Well thanks mark - that's actually a compliment. And hey, to return the favor - I'll concede that trump talks at your level. How's that? ;D |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/19/19 at 08:32:05 52714C6F6D7671781F0 wrote:
Deflect, Deny, move the goal posts, and Lie ! [/quote] So, that's a 'no' then, huh? BTW, mn - do you even know what the phrase "move the goalposts" means? I ask because in this instance it doesn't apply. You should really try harder not to look so foolish. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by Serowbot on 09/19/19 at 09:15:38 I don't think you can be a public figure anymore without getting threats from somewhere. It's become part of our culture. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by WebsterMark on 09/19/19 at 09:21:58 True dat... |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by WebsterMark on 09/21/19 at 05:33:23 ‘The Earth is dying’, ‘the world is on fire’, we’re undergoing an ‘environmental extinction’: just three of the sentiments which have been expressed by today’s climate ‘strikers’ and which, unlike even moderate expressions of skepticism on matters of climate science, seem to escape without challenge. While it is tempting to think of today’s climate ‘strike’ by schoolchildren around the world as a case of truants finding an ethical excuse to skip lessons, I think many are acting for genuine reasons: they are traumatized. They are the reflection of the hyperbolic coverage of climate change by Al Gore, Hollywood and even, latterly, David Attenborough – films where footage of fires, hurricanes and calving glaciers is stitched together to give the impression of impending doom. How many of these kids know that hurricanes, typhoons and cyclones are a natural part of the tropical climate and were going on many millennia before significant man-made carbon emissions? I rather wonder. Any principal who values his or her students’ education will not turn a blind eye to today’s absences, still less join the kids for a march, as some are reported to be doing. They will keep them behind after school and set them two papers to research and write. The first should answer the question: ‘Does scientific evidence support the notion that “the Earth is dying”?’ As for resources to answer that question, I point them towards the latest IPCC report as well as the data sources which feed into it. That would include Nasa data on sea ice in the Arctic, which shows a sharp retreat in recent decades, as well as satellite data from the same organization on wildfires – which shows a fall in the acreages burned in recent decades. They might also like to look at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Organization’s report on hurricanes which last month concluded: ‘it is premature to conclude with high confidence that human activity – and particularly greenhouse warming – has already caused a detectable change in Atlantic hurricane activity.’ ‘The Earth is dying’, ‘the world is on fire’, we’re undergoing an ‘environmental extinction’: just three of the sentiments which have been expressed by today’s climate ‘strikers’ and which, unlike even moderate expressions of skepticism on matters of climate science, seem to escape without challenge. While it is tempting to think of today’s climate ‘strike’ by schoolchildren around the world as a case of truants finding an ethical excuse to skip lessons, I think many are acting for genuine reasons: they are traumatized. They are the reflection of the hyperbolic coverage of climate change by Al Gore, Hollywood and even, latterly, David Attenborough – films where footage of fires, hurricanes and calving glaciers is stitched together to give the impression of impending doom. How many of these kids know that hurricanes, typhoons and cyclones are a natural part of the tropical climate and were going on many millennia before significant man-made carbon emissions? I rather wonder. Any principal who values his or her students’ education will not turn a blind eye to today’s absences, still less join the kids for a march, as some are reported to be doing. They will keep them behind after school and set them two papers to research and write. The first should answer the question: ‘Does scientific evidence support the notion that “the Earth is dying”?’ As for resources to answer that question, I point them towards the latest IPCC report as well as the data sources which feed into it. That would include Nasa data on sea ice in the Arctic, which shows a sharp retreat in recent decades, as well as satellite data from the same organization on wildfires – which shows a fall in the acreages burned in recent decades. They might also like to look at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Organization’s report on hurricanes which last month concluded: ‘it is premature to conclude with high confidence that human activity – and particularly greenhouse warming – has already caused a detectable change in Atlantic hurricane activity.’ Paper number two should be on the question: ‘What would it mean for the global economy if governments really did eliminate all carbon emissions by 2025?’ Given that this is the central demand of many of the climate strikers, this is a rather pertinent question. Resources for this essay might include, for example, data on the steel industry, which accounts for around seven percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, for which there is as yet no known means of decarbonization – and without which we cannot, for example, build wind farms, construct tractors to till the soil and many other things. Children should also be invited to consider how we might store energy generated exclusively by intermittent renewable means, how we would maintain global food production – for which they will need to look beyond the livestock industry, given that 13 percent of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions come from fertilizers and 10 percent comes from rice production. In addition, the students must answer this: if global food production did fall as a result of efforts to eliminate carbon emissions, which groups of the global population would suffer most? How we deal with climate change is, of course, a serious issue and deserves to be treated as such in schools as anywhere else. I challenge principals to set striking children essays along the lines I have described. I would be genuinely interested in reading the results. This article was originally published on The Spectator’s UK website. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/21/19 at 13:51:08 It's been fifty years of End of the world Predictions. NOT ONE, NOT ONE SINGLE OHH SO TERRIBLE THING HAS ACTUALLY COME TRUE. SHUT UP ALREADY,, Flopping Aces Home Active Discussions Authors Submit Post About Search Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions By Curt 2 Comments Thu, Sep, 19th, 2019 2 SHARES 53 VIEWS Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today. None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true. What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and science. More than merely spotlighting the failed predictions, this collection shows that the makers of failed apocalyptic predictions often are individuals holding respected positions in government and science. While such predictions have been and continue to be enthusiastically reported by a media eager for sensational headlines, the failures are typically not revisited. 1967: ‘Dire famine by 1975.’ Source: Salt Lake Tribune, November 17, 1967 1969: ‘Everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue steam by 1989.’ Source: New York Times, August 10 1969 1970: Ice age by 2000 Source: Boston Globe, April 16, 1970 1970: ‘America subject to water rationing by 1974 and food rationing by 1980.’ Source: Redlands Daily Facts, October 6, 1970 1971: ‘New Ice Age Coming’ Source: Washington Post, July 9, 1971 1972: New ice age by 2070 Source: NOAA, October 2015 1974: ‘New Ice Age Coming Fast’ Source: The Guardian, January 29, 1974 1974: ‘Another Ice Age?’ Source: TIME, June 24, 1974 1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life’ But no such ‘great peril to life’ has been observed as the so-called ‘ozone hole’ remains: Sources: Headline NASA Data | Graph 1976: ‘The Cooling’ Source: New York Times Book Review, July 18, 1976 1980: ‘Acid Rain Kills Life in Lakes’ Noblesville Ledger (Noblesville, IN) April 9, 1980 But 10 years later, the US government program formed to study acid rain concluded: Graphs and articles All wrong http://www.floppingaces.net/most-wanted/wrong-again-50-years-of-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions/ Why should anyone listen to it anymore? You believe it, because why? NOW they are right? Cry wolf again. And handing Children a microphone? Really? She knows WHAT exactly? Ahhh, she knows what she's been told. Like you lefties. She knows nothing. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by MnSpring on 09/21/19 at 17:11:32 https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/71385122_10218657016277100_1635082852607459328_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&_nc_oc=AQlECt9O_pXOUhqZRneAaiJuLkZnWNgnBU-lKe7z0E3MfIKg1YxDAC-UZE_gGbpsgwU&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-1.xx&oh=3145e803a95e85542f4dac7077881cb5&oe=5E325F90 |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/21/19 at 18:21:48 So these very scientific children who believe that same line of Bullshit that has been a constant stream of dire predictions, Of which NOT ONE HAS ACTUALLY COME TO PASS, and all you lefties keep believing it, so, using your circular logic, she's correct. Why? Why do you people Keep Believing after NOT ONE PREDICTION has come true? On a happy note I hear David Hogg has tweeted her a marriage proposal. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/22/19 at 10:03:42 Love to see all the squirming. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/22/19 at 10:29:31 Call it what you need. Name ONE thing,, go for it. Here's your Consensus Totally debunked As if the fact that nothing you lefties have been convinced was coming has actually happened wasn't enough,, https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/09/l-reichard-white/climate-change-eat-drink-be-merry/ Consensus my eye.. A well paid vocal minority https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/09/l-reichard-white/climate-change-eat-drink-be-merry/ turns out, the current super-hyped and highly ballyhooed scientific consensus that human behavior is causing — or can cause — significant global warming, when honestly traced, originates with 53 IPCC writers — not necessarily scientists BTW, with 40 of them climate speculators, ah, climate modelers — plus five reviewers. The Deliberate Corrupt... Tim Ball Best Price: $16.37 Buy New $10.22 (as of 06:10 EDT - Details) On the other hand, there are at least 31,000 American Scientists — over 9,000 with PhDs — who have each arrived at an informed opinion and very definitely, by signing this petition, reject the hypothesis of significant human-caused global warming. So we have 58 IPCC folks who we can be sure officially espouse AGW climate change, 31,000-plus informed American scientists who very specifically disagree, and then, especially given those seriously conflicting figures, we have the astonishing claim that 96% of scientists agree with IPCC’s AGW. So, AGW folks, to get your 96% agreement figure — just to balance those 31,000 scientists who diss AGW — the math says you need at least 744,000 (96% / 4% x 31,000) scientists who specifically agree with your version of AGW, preferably ones that have signed an equivalent petition or other proof of agreement. Where are they? Or did you only ask a small group of copasetic folks to get that 96% figure? Or did you just make it up? In any case, consensus in science — if there is one and even if it’s arrived at honestly — is the least useful level of scientific confidence. Sounds strange to the non-scientist — and probably heresy to those steeped in “the majority rules“ — but here it is in concentrated form: Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results.” –Michael Crichton So, prove your point. Point to Something that supports the constant fear mongering. Then lay out the plan to avert this Certain disaster .. You know, the one that has already missed its time when it was gonna happen, over and over.. Follow links in the article Oooh, here's one now 31,487 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs http://www.petitionproject.org/index.php Some of it won't paste.. Like facts Just can't transfer them to the willfully ignorant |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/22/19 at 12:35:03 Don't worry jog, you'll be dead before there's any real problems. Suffice it to say, the rate at which global temperatures are rising will indeed pose huge problems. But go ahead and don't believe. B!tch and moan about "how much this will cost". I guess money's all you cons care about anyway. Because, hey, the more money you have, the better afterlife, right? SMH |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/22/19 at 15:29:28 I didn't say anything about cost. It's FREE! No problem to solve No cost. And how do you know I'm gonna be dead in , what?, Ten, eleven years? Or are we gonna get ANOTHER twelve years after This Final Countdown fails to do anything, like EVERY OTHER ONE? Address the article Your consensus never existed And science doesn't care about consensus anyway. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by WebsterMark on 09/23/19 at 04:36:47 I have no intention of letting a bunch of little kids, who've sadly been brainwashed, yell at me to "get back in line." |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/24/19 at 05:47:02 Nicely done Greta! You've triggered the righties to the point of them attacking you! The Nobel is fitting. (meanwhile, trump is pouting about it - I love it!) |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Miytni-AOC" Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/24/19 at 06:45:15 Pretty revealing TT. Wrong, but revealing. WTF are we supposed to do? Bow down to a child who is getting used? She's gonna have the same trajectory as Hogg, fade to irrelevancy, only she's gonna go faster. She shouldn't have admitted she's doing it to ditch school. Lord knows she NEEDS school. Maybe the history of Being always wrong in the predictions Would help her. The clowns here don't care how often they are wrong That absolutely NOTHING they have said would happen has actually happened. Everyone is supposed to be afraid and change their lives so tomorrow won't be bad. STFU already. What is going wrong? Point to Something that was gonna happen That's actually happened.. Or STFU.. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Miytni-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/24/19 at 07:43:26 4E5157504D4A7B4B7B43515D16240 wrote:
Again, what do you care? All you're doing is pounding sand and complaining about something that probably won't affect you because you'll be dead. At least my grandkids will know that I did what I could and didn't just b!tch about the politics. So you can rest easy and stop yelling about it. No one will think you ever gave a sh!t. Just as you wish. Now, go find out all you can about the "false flag" of Sandy Hook, m'kay? |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/24/19 at 14:53:28 You're doing all you can To solve a nonexistent problem. Show me ONE THING that we were told was gonna happen. And Obama, that FOOL, bought a fifteen MILLION dollar place, right at sea level. He's obviously convinced.. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by Serowbot on 09/24/19 at 15:06:34 Yes, I'll go look that up, and post it with links,.. so that you can deny it. ::) |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/24/19 at 15:54:38 WTF you talking about? |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by MnSpring on 09/24/19 at 18:33:55 Bot, were you looking for something like this ? "Thirty years of data have been collected since Mr. Hansen outlined his scenarios—enough to determine which was closest to reality. And the winner is Scenario C". "...He called Scenario A “business as usual,” as it maintained the accelerating emissions growth typical of the 1970s and ’80s. ... Scenario B set emissions lower, ... Mr. Hansen called this outcome the “most plausible,”... He added a final projection, Scenario C, which he deemed highly unlikely ..." https://www.wsj.com/articles/thirty-years-on-how-well-do-global-warming-predictions-stand-up-1529623442 "Thirty years of data have been collected since Mr. Hansen outlined his scenarios—enough to determine which was closest to reality. And the winner is Scenario C." 30 years, that's 3 decades right. "Why should people world-wide pay drastic costs to cut emissions when the global temperature is acting as if those cuts have already been made?" |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by raydawg on 09/24/19 at 18:45:57 "Why should people world-wide pay drastic costs to cut emissions when the global temperature is acting as if those cuts have already been made?" I'll field this one boss..... FEAR They use, fear, sorta like Jesus does, you going to HELL, if you sin ;) Ever hear of a sin offering boss? Its kinda like carbon offsets ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/24/19 at 19:06:01 Hey, deniers - why do you all have your panties in a bunch? Just live in ignorance and keep your sand-pounding to yourselves. Those of us who are smart enough to realize what the science means will do what we can to help those like Greta. Just sit down and don't do anything.... that's what you're best at. Thanks..... |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by MnSpring on 09/25/19 at 06:39:55 213F30313C213A27550 wrote:
Fine, YOU, keep KILLING babies, Just do Not ask me to keep paying for it, And, “keep your sand-pounding to yourself” Fine YOU, keep filling Al’s Pockets so he can buy more Jet fuel, Just do Not ask me to keep paying for it, And, “keep your sand-pounding to yourself” Unless, YOU, (and Bot), want to BUY ME A GUN, and a whole bunch of 50 round clips. Don’t have one of dem AR-15’s, YET. THEN, You can, ‘Pound Sand’ ! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/25/19 at 06:47:03 In 1989 we had TEN YEARS to get it right. https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0 We didn't Nothing happened How many Doomsday predictions have to be proven BULLSHIT before the brainwashed cult members figure it out? WHY should I listen to the people who have always been Wrong? |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/25/19 at 07:36:34 It's too late. Our fate is sealed, again. So the deadline predicted by the scientists ran out around May 2015. https://bigleaguepolitics.com/moseley-on-june-29-1989-u-n-predicts-disaster-by-2000-if-global-warming-not-stopped/ https://bigleaguepolitics.com/moseley-on-june-29-1989-u-n-predicts-disaster-by-2000-if-global-warming-not-stopped/ |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/25/19 at 07:39:18 And yet, exactly NONE of the Dire consequences predicted have actually come to pass. But, I'M the moron for not believing. Phhht. KMA you brainwashed idiots. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/25/19 at 07:54:23 6F7076716C6B5A6A5A62707C37050 wrote:
LOL - yet you keep coming back. Guilty conscience? Hey, if we're so brainwashed, WTF do you care? Just sit back and do nothing.... as always. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/25/19 at 07:55:44 44675A797B60676E090 wrote:
Fine, YOU, keep KILLING babies, Just do Not ask me to keep paying for it, And, “keep your sand-pounding to yourself” Fine YOU, keep filling Al’s Pockets so he can buy more Jet fuel, Just do Not ask me to keep paying for it, And, “keep your sand-pounding to yourself” Unless, YOU, (and Bot), want to BUY ME A GUN, and a whole bunch of 50 round clips. Don’t have one of dem AR-15’s, YET. THEN, You can, ‘Pound Sand’ ! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D [/quote] Yep, another unintelligible, slightly frightening post from mn. Just another Wednesday. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/25/19 at 08:13:37 6F7076716C6B5A6A5A62707C37050 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/25/19 at 08:25:12 6B747275686F5E6E5E66747833010 wrote:
[/quote] No one cares, jog. Go ahead and deny all you want. Like you said, it doesn't cost you anything. So you must just like to read your own posts....lol Whatever. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by MnSpring on 09/25/19 at 09:03:33 554B444548554E53210 wrote:
LOLOLOLOLO. Just because you lack the ability to understand and comprehend, it is NOT, someone else's fault. LOLOL Even though you believe it when people from, one of the stricter Gun Control places in the Nation, keep, Telling YOU, one of the Highest Murder Rates in the Nation, is the FAULT, of the Surrounding area. Just can't wait for those, 'Red Laws' can ya. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/25/19 at 10:02:16 4F515E5F524F54493B0 wrote:
[/quote] No one cares, jog. Go ahead and deny all you want. Like you said, it doesn't cost you anything. So you must just like to read your own posts....lol Whatever. [/quote] The question is Why do you continue to believe what has been demonstrated false? It's not about me, it's about you and your kind. You can't EXPLAIN why you believe lies. So you pretend I should not CARE. Well, because of you and people like you, children live in Fear of the future. You're guilty of child abuse, imo. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/25/19 at 15:19:22 4A555354494E7F4F7F47555912200 wrote:
Good! They should live in fear. Look at what we've done. Tens of Gigatons of pollution in the atmosphere every year. How can anyone think that there'll be no consequences? How can anyone be ignorant? Here's an idea jog, you wanna help those "children in fear"? Then fukcing do something. Stop calling it a hoax and doing nothing. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/26/19 at 14:48:15 Current https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/09/24/500-scientists-write-u-n-there-is-no-climate-emergency/ |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by MnSpring on 09/26/19 at 16:36:19 6B757A7B766B706D1F0 wrote:
Interesting this: "pathogens and other contaminants from untreated human waste entering nearby waters. San Francisco, Los Angeles, and the state do not appear to be acting with urgency to mitigate the risks to human health and the environment " Why are you not screaming and stamping your feet about this. Something that can be fixed, now. Not in decades. ? https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/09/26/epa-warns-gavin-newsom-piles-of-human-feces-on-street-violate-clean-water-act/ And their is this: "Chicago Among the Country’s Most Polluted Cities, Study Finds" https://news.wttw.com/2019/04/24/chicago-among-country-s-most-polluted-cities-study-finds So why are you not, fukcing doing something. Stop ignoring it, and doing nothing WAIT, I Know, It's SOMEONE ELSE'S Fault !!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by Serowbot on 09/26/19 at 16:46:54 Don't both problems require the same measures?... Cleaner air, less pollution?... |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by MnSpring on 09/26/19 at 16:50:46 7B6D7A677F6A677C080 wrote:
I wonder if all those people, $hitting on the street, letting it just run down the gutter, Are anything like, farting cows ? |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/27/19 at 05:28:39 504F494E53546555655D4F43083A0 wrote:
LOL - first off, breightbart... Second, these "scientists" are nothing but a conservative collective. Nice try, but no.... |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/27/19 at 05:31:28 00231E3D3F24232A4D0 wrote:
I wonder if all those people, $hitting on the street, letting it just run down the gutter, Are anything like, farting cows ? [/quote] No. Your post is simply finger pointing at the obvious. Like I told jog - do something instead of pointing fingers and b!tching about it. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by WebsterMark on 09/27/19 at 05:35:58 But you'll hang on every word a sixteen year old brainwashed kid reads and bow to her like she's Madonna! Yea, lets listen to you! |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/27/19 at 05:50:53 695B5C4D4A5B4C735F4C553E0 wrote:
Yeah, because she's gutsy enough to stand up. It's the "kids" like her that will really be fixing our mess. But again, it's no skin off your taint - why do you feel the need to comment? Guilty? IDGAF if you listen to me or not. I'm just putting it out there. I can lead the ignorant to school, but I can't make them learn. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by WebsterMark on 09/27/19 at 06:39:24 Gutsy enough.......geez you're delusional. She has no f'ing idea what she's repeating. Reminds me of so e little kid raised in a cult. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by MnSpring on 09/27/19 at 07:06:36 796768696479627F0D0 wrote:
Most on here, have Been dare, done dat ! And in your case tt, they know, it is not possible. In the case of firearms, You know so well that Banning, Restricting, Confiscating, making Requirements, Extensive waiting periods, Regulating # of rounds, Controlling what and how much Ammo, that the Law Abiding CITIZEN, has to, have/do/etc. Works SO WELL, Because of Chicago, NY, Calf, Because YOU, (and Bot), know all about them, cause you, 'say', 'you have one' ! Here is a idea, go in and Confiscate, all the ILLEGAL firearms, in the, 'bad' places, in the major Cities. Gee, I'll bet even the NRA would be behind you on that. Call up AOC, BS, and CU. Call up the 10 on the Stage that want your vote. Call up ALL the UL FDS Socialistic people, and give them pitchforks. What are you waiting for ? "...fukcing do something..." Go to those places, and Confiscate, all the ILLEGAL firearms, |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by MnSpring on 09/27/19 at 07:11:07 764443525544536C40534A210 wrote:
That's it. That is Exactly it ! |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 09/27/19 at 08:25:10 417374656273645B77647D160 wrote:
Yeah, you're right mark - it takes no guts to stand in front of thousands and speak your mind and share your passion.<<<<sarcasm What a pathetically, small thought.... |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 10/07/19 at 12:49:24 So... here's how one of the triggered haters (you know, just like a few on this very thread) react to Greta: Iowa Teacher Placed On Leave After 'Sniper' Comment About Greta Thunberg Visit A high school teacher in Iowa has been placed on administrative leave after he posted a threatening comment on Facebook in response to a news story about the local visit of 16-year-old climate activist Greta Thunberg. Waterloo West High School science teacher Matt Baish on Thursday posted “don’t have my sniper rifle” next to a story about the Swedish student’s trip to Iowa City the next day, The Des Moines Register reported. Others responding to Baish were horrified by his comment. Screenshots of his remark, later deleted, were posted on the Waterloo Community School District Facebook page, according to the newspaper. Parents emphasized to a local news station that Baish made the threatening comment about a child the same age as students he teaches. That means students can enter a classroom “where they don’t feel safe, where they don’t feel they can share their opinion, where they don’t feel respected” said one mother (see the video above). “We as parents have to stand up against that.” Parents, teachers and students at Waterloo West High School received an email from Waterloo Community School District officials Friday about Baish being placed on administrative leave. “We are aware of a social media situation involving one of our employees,” the statement said. “The nature of the content shared rose to the level of putting this employee on administrative leave pending an investigation. We appreciate your patience as we sort through the details and thank you for respecting the process.” A police spokesman told the Des Moines Register that law enforcement is also investigating Baish. Baish could not be reached for comment. Waterloo Schools’ social media policies warn staff to “think twice before posting” and advise not to post or approve comments that include “threats of physical or bodily harm.” Thunberg joined more than 3,000 activists at a “climate strike” Friday in Iowa City. Demonstrators demanded that the University of Iowa and the city agree to a climate accord which calls for both entities to achieve 100% renewable energy by 2030 — and demands the university to cease burning coal at its power plant. http://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/matt-baish-greta-thunberg-iowa-school-sniper-040803916.html This is proof positive that the mentality of the triggered leads directly to this type of behavior. |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by MnSpring on 10/07/19 at 13:25:02 392728292439223F4D0 wrote:
A threatening comment/statement is disciplined. Totaly understand. YET why, do you make absolutely nothing of, someone making a bloody severed head, creating threatening/disparaging window art, making verbal threats. (and on and on and on) |
|
Title: Re: She Ain't No "Mini-AOC" Post by T And T Garage on 10/07/19 at 13:39:22 7F5C6142405B5C55320 wrote:
A threatening comment/statement is disciplined. Totaly understand. YET why, do you make absolutely nothing of, someone making a bloody severed head, creating threatening/disparaging window art, making verbal threats. (and on and on and on) [/quote] I don't think I made "nothing" out of it. I'm fairly certain I condemned Kathy Griffin for it. A better question is - Why is it you can never address the topic at hand and always bring up a "whatabout"? |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |