SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Winning?
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1563547329

Message started by T And T Garage on 07/19/19 at 07:42:09

Title: Winning?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/19/19 at 07:42:09

The US posted a $234 billion budget deficit last month, the biggest one-month deficit in history

The US budget deficit hit $234 billion in the month of February, up 8.7% compared to the same month last year.

The February budget deficit was also the highest one-month deficit on record, eclipsing the previous record set in 2012.

The deficit is growing as the GOP tax law slows revenue intake and the bipartisan budget deal drives up spending.

http://www.businessinsider.com/us-budget-deficit-hits-record-february-national-debt-2019-3?fbclid=IwAR10ZrIc5lufxAuVP9x5ChkFvkxYKt1SXl-cPx0LrOaQtRaZz0C8fVhCpKI

This is winning? I seem to remember the republicans getting all bent out of shape about the deficit when Obama was in office.

Gee, they're silent now - how about that?

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by Eegore on 07/19/19 at 07:59:15

An expanding deficit when a President you like is in office is an investment into our economy.

An expanding deficit when a President you don't like is in office is crippling our economy.

An expanding deficit when a President is irrelevant and only numbers are looked at is both an investment and damaging.

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by Serowbot on 07/19/19 at 08:21:28

Everything's different when Trump does it.

Pu$$y grabbing is now a gentlemanly greeting. :-?

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/19/19 at 08:33:32

0727252D3027420 wrote:

Darn you Eegore - why do you always have to make so much sense???

:D

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/19/19 at 08:34:41

6076617C64717C67130 wrote:

Everything's different when Trump does it.

Pu$$y grabbing is now a gentlemanly greeting. :-?

I for one enjoy greeting the ladies that way..... :D

(that was sarcasm)

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by Serowbot on 07/19/19 at 08:45:43

Women, in turn, are now to respond with the curtsy nut crush.

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/19/19 at 09:40:23

2D3B2C31293C312A5E0 wrote:

Women, in turn, are now to respond with the curtsy nut crush.

OOOF!
:o

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by pg on 07/19/19 at 18:44:19

617F70717C617A67150 wrote:

Gee, they're silent now - how about that?

Wrong again, I have criticized the status of the economy and employment figures on numerous occasions.

Best regards,

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by pg on 07/19/19 at 19:03:00

Also, try to be at least a little consistent. In one thread you criticize fiscal policy and in another thread you write f'off to someone who is making decisions based on balancing fiscal policy.

Why am I not surprised?

Chicago's Lightfoot Demands State-Taxpayer Bailout, Then Offers CTU A 5-year Contract, 14% Raise

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-18/chicagos-lightfoot-demands-state-taxpayer-bailout-then-offers-ctu-5-year-contract

Best regards,

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/19/19 at 19:57:47

http://https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EBbqJNG59d4/XTCI8_fiwcI/AAAAAAAAg3U/VMtFne_Eyks2LSwm7Uzah3_vGzmwapiWwCLcBGAs/s1600/Lib12.jpg

Ahh, critics...

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/20/19 at 09:32:50

5F484E424D5D2F0 wrote:

[quote author=617F70717C617A67150 link=1563547329/0#0 date=1563547329]
Gee, they're silent now - how about that?

Wrong again, I have criticized the status of the economy and employment figures on numerous occasions.

Under trump? I don't think I remember seeing that....

Best regards,[/quote]

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/20/19 at 09:34:48

253234383727550 wrote:

Also, try to be at least a little consistent. In one thread you criticize fiscal policy and in another thread you write f'off to someone who is making decisions based on balancing fiscal policy.

No pro golfer, I was criticizing that fact that you republicans seem to think that the deficit is fine, as long as it's under a repub.

Further, under Obama - the deficit shrank - how about that?

Lightfoot is another matter. But this post isn't about Lightfoot and Chicago, is it?

Try to keep things straight, huh?

Why am I not surprised?

Chicago's Lightfoot Demands State-Taxpayer Bailout, Then Offers CTU A 5-year Contract, 14% Raise

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-18/chicagos-lightfoot-demands-state-taxpayer-bailout-then-offers-ctu-5-year-contract

Best regards,

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/20/19 at 09:36:52

647B7D7A6760516151697B773C0E0 wrote:

http://https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EBbqJNG59d4/XTCI8_fiwcI/AAAAAAAAg3U/VMtFne_Eyks2LSwm7Uzah3_vGzmwapiWwCLcBGAs/s1600/Lib12.jpg

Ahh, critics...

What's your point, jog? Ever been to Kentucky?

You wanna see squalor....(and in a republican state - gasp!)

But how does this have anything to do with my OP?

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by pg on 07/21/19 at 06:31:59

3F212E2F223F24394B0 wrote:

[quote author=253234383727550 link=1563547329/0#8 date=1563588180]Also, try to be at least a little consistent. In one thread you criticize fiscal policy and in another thread you write f'off to someone who is making decisions based on balancing fiscal policy.

No pro golfer, I was criticizing that fact that you republicans seem to think that the deficit is fine, as long as it's under a repub.

Further, under Obama - the deficit shrank - how about that?

Lightfoot is another matter. But this post isn't about Lightfoot and Chicago, is it?

Try to keep things straight, huh?

Why am I not surprised?

Chicago's Lightfoot Demands State-Taxpayer Bailout, Then Offers CTU A 5-year Contract, 14% Raise

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-18/chicagos-lightfoot-demands-state-taxpayer-bailout-then-offers-ctu-5-year-contract

Best regards,

[/quote]

Just another fine example how the left is out of touch and has no concept of sound fiscal policy.

Best regards,

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/22/19 at 05:01:28

3F282E222D3D4F0 wrote:

[quote author=3F212E2F223F24394B0 link=1563547329/0#11 date=1563640488][quote author=253234383727550 link=1563547329/0#8 date=1563588180]Also, try to be at least a little consistent. In one thread you criticize fiscal policy and in another thread you write f'off to someone who is making decisions based on balancing fiscal policy.

No pro golfer, I was criticizing that fact that you republicans seem to think that the deficit is fine, as long as it's under a repub.

Further, under Obama - the deficit shrank - how about that?

Lightfoot is another matter. But this post isn't about Lightfoot and Chicago, is it?

Try to keep things straight, huh?

Why am I not surprised? - Not surprised about what, you not staying on the topic of the OP? Yeah, me neither....

Chicago's Lightfoot Demands State-Taxpayer Bailout, Then Offers CTU A 5-year Contract, 14% Raise

Please feel free to start a new thread.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-18/chicagos-lightfoot-demands-state-taxpayer-bailout-then-offers-ctu-5-year-contract

Best regards,

[/quote]

Just another fine example how the left is out of touch and has no concept of sound fiscal policy.

Best regards,[/quote]

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by verslagen1 on 07/22/19 at 08:26:10

243A353439243F22500 wrote:

Further, under Obama - the deficit shrank - how about that?

For what? 5 minutes?

http://https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/US_National_Debt_public_intergovernmental.png

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/22/19 at 09:48:39

5A495E5F404D4B49421D2C0 wrote:

[quote author=243A353439243F22500 link=1563547329/0#11 date=1563640488]

Further, under Obama - the deficit shrank - how about that?

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by thumperclone on 07/22/19 at 10:34:33

223C33323F223924560 wrote:

[quote author=5A495E5F404D4B49421D2C0 link=1563547329/15#15 date=1563809170][quote author=243A353439243F22500 link=1563547329/0#11 date=1563640488]

Further, under Obama - the deficit shrank - how about that?

For what? 5 minutes?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/US_National_Debt_public_intergovernmental.png[/quote]

Well vers, you're wrong. The debt is NOT the deficit - you may want to learn the difference.

[/quote]
come on t don't make fun of the under educated right
if the orange one or fox news didn't say it its not true

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by verslagen1 on 07/22/19 at 12:17:43

756B646568756E73010 wrote:

def·i·cit
/[ch712]def[ch601]s[ch601]t/
Learn to pronounce
noun
the amount by which something, especially a sum of money, is too small.
synonyms: shortfall, deficiency, shortage, undersupply, slippage; More
an excess of expenditure or liabilities over income or assets in a given period.
"an annual operating deficit"
(in sports) the amount or score by which a team or individual is losing.
"came back from a 3–0 deficit"

Let's see... I show a graph that shows a continuing increase in debt and you show me your lack of comprehension.

So can you explain how the left defines deficit under Obama vs. Trump?

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/22/19 at 12:41:30

7E6D7A7B64696F6D6639080 wrote:

[quote author=756B646568756E73010 link=1563547329/15#16 date=1563814119][quote author=5A495E5F404D4B49421D2C0 link=1563547329/15#15 date=1563809170][quote author=243A353439243F22500 link=1563547329/0#11 date=1563640488]

Further, under Obama - the deficit shrank - how about that?

Let's see... I show a graph that shows a continuing increase in debt and you show me your lack of comprehension.

So can you explain how the left defines deficit under Obama vs. Trump?[/quote]

Oh vers - it's so simple, yet you don't know.

Adorable!

If you’re watching the news lately you may have seen politicians yelling words like federal debt and federal deficit. You may have also seen someone bang their first on a podium screaming debt ceiling. Well if you don’t know what these terms mean sit back and relax and prepare to learn.

The federal deficit is the amount by which the government’s expenses exceed its tax revenues. The national debt is the total of all deficits in the past, minus the amount the government has repaid since.

The federal government has run a deficit in 45 out of the last 50 years. There are many factors that determine the size of a budget deficit in any given year. Two main ones are the health of the economy and the tax and spending policies that congress decides.

For example, during The recent recession, many American’s become eligible for mandatory spending programs like food stamps and unemployment benefits, which lead to an automatic increase in spending. Simultaneously during this time tax revenues decrease because American’s and corporations were making less and paying less in taxes.

Additionally, during a recession congress may intentionally increase government spending in order to stimulate the economy. In 2009 at the time of the Great Recession, the federal deficit spiked to 9.8 percent.

Tax policy another main factor in determining whether the US runs a deficit or surplus. If the government raises taxes it increases the amount of money it brings in. In 1993 congress raised taxes for the highest income taxpayers, which contributed to the US running a surplus from 1998 to 2001.

So the next time you see politicians talking about the debt and deficit, know that if the government keeps over spending, you may get stuck with the bill.

http://informationstation.org/video/federal-deficit/?utm_source=google_grants&utm_medium=cpc&gclid=Cj0KCQjwvdXpBRCoARIsAMJSKqL3tkJDs_wb7CW27VOjlk1Cu48N8xWSAIb8yhBdsVY_e368E9LxsPUaAswsEALw_wcB

You know, to find that it took me literally 7 seconds.

;D ;D

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by verslagen1 on 07/22/19 at 13:14:20

Oh I'm sorry I missed the key weasel words.

Quote:

under Obama - the deficit shrank - how about that?

Which it did, down to $430 billion from $1.5 Trillion or so under a republican congress.

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/22/19 at 13:27:58

160512130C0107050E51600 wrote:

Oh I'm sorry I missed the key weasel words.

No, you got it wrong. No "weasel words".

Quote:

under Obama - the deficit shrank - how about that?

Which it did, down to $430 billion from $1.5 Trillion or so under a republican congress.

And... how do you explain it now?

Seems the only thing that's changed is your orange idiot in the white house....

Gee, how about that?

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by thumperclone on 07/22/19 at 13:42:32

slagen
next month you owe $1200 for rent
$210 electric bill $160 water,sewer and trash

that is a DEBT of $1570 you owe

your income for next month and all your reserves total $1500 you have a $70 DEFICIT for the month

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by verslagen1 on 07/22/19 at 15:12:11

706C716974617667686B6A61040 wrote:

You left out my tab for weed. ::)

Title: Re: Winning?
Post by thumperclone on 07/23/19 at 05:02:11

You left out my tab for weed. ::)

explains a lot about you