|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Of course Ann's right /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1552055445 Message started by WebsterMark on 03/08/19 at 06:30:45 |
|
Title: Of course Ann's right Post by WebsterMark on 03/08/19 at 06:30:45 http://www.anncoulter.com/ MEDIA MAGIC: HOW A DEMOCRAT PEDOPHILE BECAME A 'TRUMP SCANDAL' |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by Serowbot on 03/08/19 at 08:47:06 Epstein is a bad guy and deserves what he gets. That don't make Trump a good guy. Trump has admitted to gawking at undressed teenage girls at his pageants. ...and that's what he's admitted to... What would you be saying about that if Trump were a Democrat?... You Pub's have lost the moral high ground you never really had. Grab 'em by the pu$$y... Epstein is not the President. |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by T And T Garage on 03/08/19 at 09:41:05 Oh mark, you're love of ann knows no bounds, huh? Of course epstein will get what's coming to him, but how does that make trump any less a terrible person/idiot/bigot/crook? But hey, while you're lovin' on ann - look what she said about your beloved trump: ann coulter after trump's order: ‘The only national emergency is that our president is an idiot’ http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/02/16/ann-coulter-donald-trump-national-emergency-order/2890714002/ Guess she's right on both counts!! LMAO!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by thumperclone on 03/08/19 at 09:46:43 ann is a rush Limbaugh with a girl thingy |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by WebsterMark on 03/08/19 at 09:54:08 You geniuses missed the whole point.... |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by Serowbot on 03/08/19 at 09:56:26 435F425A475245545B585952370 wrote:
I thought Rush was Ann with a girl thingy... :-? |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by T And T Garage on 03/08/19 at 10:04:24 487A7D6C6B7A6D527E6D741F0 wrote:
No mark, it's you who quotes ann coulter - that makes you the "genius".... |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by Eegore on 03/08/19 at 10:16:40 I think Webstermark was trying to indicate that pretty much anything that can be tied to Trump will be, especially if it's negative. I'm pretty sure this is true of any President. |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by T And T Garage on 03/08/19 at 10:48:29 4565676F7265000 wrote:
I'd say you're somewhat right Eegore. However - trump is not just any president. He is, by far, the worst president in terms of scandal, demagoguery and outright lying I've ever seen in my lifetime. Those who support him baffle me. |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by Eegore on 03/08/19 at 11:06:18 "Those who support him baffle me." I wonder this myself. I do ask a lot of people why they support X or Y candidate and when it comes to Trump it seems most the people I have asked just don't like Hillary and Obama. Demographically very few women I have asked support Trump, as they have less forgiving viewpoints on things like healthcare. They may not like his personality but typically females will offer policy-driven reasons for not liking Trump. As for males I have asked they just like, or more accurately are more willing to accept his personality. For instance infidelity isn't much of an issue to most guys I have asked unless its their wife or girlfriend, otherwise its not an issue. If you like someone it's easier to overlook their shortcomings. If you label their competition as enemies its even easier because the guy you like may not be the best but he's waaay better than that other jerk. That's why politicians spend more time attacking the opposition than they do laying out framework for policy ideas. People will hate someone sooner than they will read. |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by WebsterMark on 03/08/19 at 13:30:58 426260687562070 wrote:
Close but not quite right. |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by WebsterMark on 03/08/19 at 13:50:01 People supported Trump because: 1) Hillary could not be trusted, hated by more people than any national politician. The media had to create a hatred of Trump but most people intuitively knew she was a dirtbag. 2) Trump puts America first. Obama was like a boss you felt like would throw you under a bus rather than back you. People felt Trmp was the most patriotic candidate, certainly more than Sanders or Crooked Hillary 3) A protest vote against the scums who said a vote for Trump rather than Hillary proved you were racist, misogynistic, etc.... it was a middle finger or punch in the nose to CNN, Bruce Springsteen, Katy Perry etc...(or TT and Sew for that matter) People will vote for for him again. right now I'd say he wins again because of many of the same reasons plus two critical ones. 1) The Democratic Party is as unAmerican as you can get. They can't even kick a Jew hating freshman Congesswoman off a committee. The others say they want reparations paid, support childish Green New Deals etc.. what a bunch of f'ing losers. 2) The basic question; are you better off? The answer right now is yes. So leftist, prepare for nothing to come out of Mueller report, a good economy continuing and your President Trump through 2024. |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by T And T Garage on 03/08/19 at 14:00:50 457770616677605F736079120 wrote:
LOL - yeah mark - you're the king of wishful thinking! |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by Eegore on 03/08/19 at 14:18:11 "The basic question; are you better off? The answer right now is yes." I agree that this is a good question however I do not agree that the answer, for me, is yes. Given the field of work I am in now, and the one I was in prior, the outcome is no. This is based exclusively off of financial decisions and the re-defining of certain legal terms such as domestic violence. The medical field, not medical insurance but actual practice is for the most part going to suffer in quality of care and distribution of care. Women see the majority of the impact because they tend to be exposed to things we don't think about. For instance taking HIV preventative medication after being raped creates an open door for a pre-existing condition status where Healthcare Insurance can now deny related future care. Same thing goes for future mental healthcare if a child receives therapy due to years of being abused. These people don't feel better off. Its no longer domestic violence to control someone's phone access, vehicle access and ability to gain employment. If some jerk was doing this to your daughter wouldn't it be nice for there to be legal repercussion so you don't have to commit a crime yourself? Victims of domestic violence, and there's a lot of them, do not feel better off. So I would say some people are better off, and some are not. |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by WebsterMark on 03/08/19 at 14:47:47 "The basic question; are you better off? The answer right now is yes." I agree that this is a good question however I do not agree that the answer, for me, is yes. You are in the minority then. Given the field of work I am in now, and the one I was in prior, the outcome is no. This is based exclusively off of financial decisions and the re-defining of certain legal terms such as domestic violence. The medical field, not medical insurance but actual practice is for the most part going to suffer in quality of care and distribution of care. That's a ridiculously broad comment. Medical care and distribution as a whole is going to suffer? Not your individual piece of the pie but medical care as a whole? How so? |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by WebsterMark on 03/08/19 at 14:54:14 Who do you think knows more about Trump voters; me or you TT? You're a walking, talking replay of MSNBC. Think how many times you said this is it; Trump won't win, Trump won't get the nomination, Trump will never beat Hillary, Trump won't take office, the electors won't vote for Trump, Trump won't finish the week. Trump will resign. Trump will be in jail by such and such date which is long since past. You don't know $hit. You're batting below the Mendoza line so you should probably just shut up rather than weigh in on a topic you've proven you know nothing about. But hey, have a good weekend friend.... |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by T And T Garage on 03/08/19 at 16:37:35 526067767160774864776E050 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by Eegore on 03/09/19 at 08:42:55 "That's a ridiculously broad comment. Medical care and distribution as a whole is going to suffer? Not your individual piece of the pie but medical care as a whole? How so?" My individual piece of the pie is relatively fine. If you do some research you might notice almost all ACA repeal is about cost to government, Medicare, and taxpayers - not about patient care outcomes. I originally prepared a response referencing the ACA guidelines with CMS and Joint Commission regulations and guidance showing the short and long-term preventative care processes, evaluations for funding and correlating patient-outcome documentation but realized nobody is going to read through it anyway. So here's the short version and I will provide references if you want. ACA injects more money for preventative care which costs the taxpayer less in the long run because Public providers can not refuse care in most situations, incidentally preventative care is also healthier than treatment only after symptoms arise. Patient care outcome has improved, even with opioid abuse because people can afford to be treated prior to their issue becoming emergent or debilitating. A person who can manage diabetes before the prolonged expense of insulin, or disabled due to amputation is considered healthier. ACA era emergent amputations show an all-time low. High risk OB costs a fortune to detox infants, its cheaper if the mothers can afford care prior to premature birth. ACA era premature birth is at an all time low. ACA provides incentive (money) for increased care outcomes. The better a facility, provider or institution performs the more funding they receive. Private insurance provides no such incentive. These are three primary examples. Pre-existing coverage denial is now open to return, and I have asked this before multiple times with no response: What part of allowing insurance companies to deny medical coverage is beneficial to the consumer? |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by MnSpring on 03/09/19 at 11:57:53 415F50515C415A47350 wrote:
Any comments on Carter, or LBJ ???? And of Course, LBJ, did NOT make any, racist Statements. LOOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL (EDIT) And Oh Yea, tell us ALL, how fantastic Ford was ! |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by MnSpring on 03/09/19 at 13:44:10 617F70717C617A67150 wrote:
Your kidding, Don’t be so LAZY ! Look up the, MANY, yourself. By your statements, you love people that want to KILL you because you don’t believe the same thing as them. You believe it is perfectly OK, to Kill a un-born human Baby, yet not OK to Kill a un-born Bald Eagle, or Sea Turtle. You believe honest, upstanding, Citizens should NOT have a Gun. You believe the POTUS, is a POS. Well guess what, Ilhan Omar has proven, (many times, many ways) her pattern of anti-Semitic comments. (As well as the fact that she is a complete LIER. How many, ‘accounts’, ALL of them, with very different details, did she say about her Cab ride in D.C.?) So deal with it. (As you have told so many, so often) |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by WebsterMark on 03/10/19 at 06:33:23 But hey, have a good weekend friend.... You are not my friend. Now that hurt my feelings... |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by Serowbot on 03/10/19 at 08:02:29 Ann is a nutjob... Trump says so. ...he also says he's building the wall as we speak... ;D Quote:
|
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by T And T Garage on 03/10/19 at 15:53:18 74576A494B50575E390 wrote:
Any comments on Carter, or LBJ ???? And of Course, LBJ, did NOT make any, racist Statements. LOOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL (EDIT) And Oh Yea, tell us ALL, how fantastic Ford was ! [/quote] trump is far, FAR worse than any of them. What about that don't you understand? |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by T And T Garage on 03/10/19 at 15:59:05 774542535445526D41524B200 wrote:
Aww... poor mark. Hey, I'll bet this hurts more: donald j. trump [ch10004] @realdonaldtrump Wacky Nut Job @anncoulter, who still hasn’t figured out that, despite all odds and an entire Democrat Party of Far Left Radicals against me (not to mention certain Republicans who are sadly unwilling to fight), I am winning on the Border. Major sections of Wall are being built... 87.8K 5:04 PM - Mar 9, 2019 Twitter Ads info and privacy ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Of course Ann's right Post by T And T Garage on 03/10/19 at 16:00:15 00231E3D3F24232A4D0 wrote:
Your kidding, Don’t be so LAZY ! Look up the, MANY, yourself. By your statements, you love people that want to KILL you because you don’t believe the same thing as them. You believe it is perfectly OK, to Kill a un-born human Baby, yet not OK to Kill a un-born Bald Eagle, or Sea Turtle. You believe honest, upstanding, Citizens should NOT have a Gun. You believe the POTUS, is a POS. Well guess what, Ilhan Omar has proven, (many times, many ways) her pattern of anti-Semitic comments. (As well as the fact that she is a complete LIER. How many, ‘accounts’, ALL of them, with very different details, did she say about her Cab ride in D.C.?) So deal with it. (As you have told so many, so often) [/quote] So then you have no proof? I didn't think so. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |