|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Re: Kavanau /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1537510972 Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 09/20/18 at 23:22:52 |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/20/18 at 23:22:52 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/former-scalia-law-clerk-drops-pictures-and-evidence-that-blows-christine-fords-case-wide-open/ Title is overly ambitious, but the information worth checking out. The last paragraph is important, the rest is for those who have a desire for justice. This is Bullshit, and could have been resolved much earlier. Funny how she only got upset about something she doesn't remember where it happened. Must have left deep scars. I'll bet Juanita Broderick can walk to the room Bill Clinton raped her in. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/21/18 at 05:05:10 I think its more than likely some event like this took place in that woman's life. Given there's been absolutely zero evidence that Kavanaugh was involved and nothing else in his history even suggests this, he wasn't involved. The most likely thing is this girl was drunk at 15 during a party, a couple boys assaulted her, she might have foolishly flirted and lit their fuse so to speak. Later in life, her marriage was in trouble and this story came out during a session. Still later, she turned liberal activist and at some point, she made the big leap that Kavanaugh was the one who did this to her. She believes her delusional. Lie detector test don't reveal the truth, they reveal the person believes what they are saying is true. Dianne Feinstein should be drummed from the Senate. She took a disturbed woman's story, held it as a last minute bomb and then dropped it not caring that her life would be forever changed. The committee has a procedure for dealing with this and it could have been accomplished in quiet. If evidence was gathered and presented to Kavanaugh, if guilty, he could have withdrawn his nomination. There isn't the possibility of prosecution due to the length of time. If he refused, deal with it publicly. Politics is far uglier than we admit. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. We have no way out of this. Battle lines are laid out, teams are gathered on either side and casualties mount. This woman Ford was a soldier sacrificed on the front line. Kavanaugh is wounded for life, he'll never fully heal. Time magazine already included a line in an article about an attempted rapist on the court. The generals sitting in the high chairs down care. Anything to protect their power. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/21/18 at 07:55:57 Well what I am seeing is grave damage the libs are doing to themselves. Those middle of the road for, the 20 plus percent that voted for Obama in his first term, and then voted for Trump, which really put both men in office, NOT their base...... Are seeing this for what it is. This is a Gestapo technique, and it will have a much greater effect than the ploy and deceit, Harry Reid did to his own party. Not to mention the line of journalism to propaganda promotion, is becoming ever more distinct, with nary a chance to retreat back to intellectually honest journalism. Either way, folks will move on, but many players will have delivered themselves irreverent. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/21/18 at 08:18:51 Trump has publicly vouched for Kavanau's character... :-? He must be a saint... :-? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/21/18 at 08:25:25 Digest this: It’s natural to place this sort of accusation within a criminal-justice framework: the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt; the presumption of innocence; the right to confront and respond to an accuser. If Judge Kavanaugh stood criminally accused of attempted rape, all of that would apply with full force. But those concepts are a poor fit for Supreme Court confirmation hearings, where there’s no presumption of confirmation, and there’s certainly no burden that facts be established beyond a reasonable doubt. It is a giant step backwards to our system of fairness and pursuit to happiness. We have a rich historical diary of of how lowering the bar of PRESUMED innocents on any charge, for whatever reason, will allow prejudice to prevail as a major mitigating factor. You say naught, I say, ask any Black man. Or, reflect back to the Salem Witch Trials when justice was relaxed. BTW, the highlighted part came from a article in the, yep, you guessed it, the NYT. Read the last line, again. It is saying we/they, have no obligation of finding the factual truth. You want to go down this road, again? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/21/18 at 09:37:53 382B332E2B3D2D4A0 wrote:
But you were cool with how Merrick Garland got handled? Please.... The morons on both sides are doing this to themselves. Turtle boy mcconnell was simply afraid that Garland would get confirmed, so they never even had a hearing. With brett, the dems are pushing for a delay until November. Chances are they won't get it, but at least they're showing some backbone for once. I'm 85% sure that brett will be confirmed and on the bench - but the dems won't make it easy, thankfully. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/21/18 at 09:39:00 6274637E66737E65110 wrote:
;D ;D ;D ;D Thanks for that Friday laugh Sero! |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/21/18 at 09:51:40 Actually, Sero brings up a good point. Character. Does character count? Let's say ol' brett's been spot on with everything else. But let's also say that he had a significant character flaw. Would that matter? For those of you on the conservative side, let's say this were a left leaning appointment. Let's say that brett (remember, he's a liberal now) was in college and did pot and cocaine. He doesn't do it anymore, but his friends said he did. Let's also say that his lifestyle led him into a crowd that was far-left extreme. Maybe he was seen at an American Flag burning demonstration. But that was all in his past. As soon as he was out of college, he was an upstanding clerk, lawyer, etc. How would you conservatives feel about that brett? Character means something in this regard. This isn't just any bench we're talking about. This bench helps to form law. This bench enforces and challenges the Constitution. This is serious sh!t. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/21/18 at 10:19:51 No. You're doing this to avoid the awfulness of what's going on. Here, you want a situation to compare to? Let's say I know who you are in the real world. Let's say I happen to call on your company and am speaking with your CEO. Let's say I tell him a story about you in the past, how I'm sure you stole a small amount of money. I did this because I consider your politics to be awful. This incident supposedly happened years ago. The CEO knows and trust me so you are denied a promotion. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by verslagen1 on 09/21/18 at 10:49:59 You say you're unhappy the way Garland got handled, yet you're happy with what the dem's are doing to Kavy. Don't you think G would've gotten the same treatment from the bub's? You really want that? The dem's have made every effort to blindside Kavy with a BS accusation. I'd hate to have to justify my actions 35 years ago, I may have to say I didn't inhale or I didn't have a sexual relationship in presidential terms. But we have only heard rumor about this, a heavily redacted letter. If the assumptions of the article can be further validated and the whereabouts of Kavy be fleshed out, then maybe she'll just say never mind and they can get on with it. And if this was a character flaw, why hasn't it ever showed since? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/21/18 at 11:08:30 687679787568736E1C0 wrote:
But you were cool with how Merrick Garland got handled? Please.... The morons on both sides are doing this to themselves. Turtle boy mcconnell was simply afraid that Garland would get confirmed, so they never even had a hearing. With brett, the dems are pushing for a delay until November. Chances are they won't get it, but at least they're showing some backbone for once. I'm 85% sure that brett will be confirmed and on the bench - but the dems won't make it easy, thankfully. [/quote] He wasn't destroyed. I posted a complete explanation of the legality and propriety of his treatment a week ago. You remain butthurt over NOTHING. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/21/18 at 11:58:40 46595F5845427343734B59551E2C0 wrote:
But you were cool with how Merrick Garland got handled? Please.... The morons on both sides are doing this to themselves. Turtle boy mcconnell was simply afraid that Garland would get confirmed, so they never even had a hearing. With brett, the dems are pushing for a delay until November. Chances are they won't get it, but at least they're showing some backbone for once. I'm 85% sure that brett will be confirmed and on the bench - but the dems won't make it easy, thankfully. [/quote] He wasn't destroyed. Correction - he wasn't even given a hearing. I posted a complete explanation of the legality and propriety of his treatment a week ago. You remain butthurt over NOTHING.[/quote] You seem to be the one that's butthurt. I think it's fair, you don't. You're the one pouting, not me. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MShipley on 09/21/18 at 12:08:32 But you were cool with how Merrick Garland got handled? Not even a comparison. You are right, the Repubs used the system to deny Merrick a hearing, that I understand and I understand the Dems attempting the same thing. The Repubs never claimed that Merrick was anything but a good man However, the attempt to destroy a man, his family and his future with lies that probably never happened 35 years ago is a disgusting act of cowardice. The Dems should be ashamed and so should you. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/21/18 at 12:39:49 736D56574E525B473E0 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/21/18 at 13:45:40 Bork....... Bork....... BORK....... Oh..... "You don't like a particular policy or a particular president? Then argue for your position. Go out there and win an election," The president said. "But don't break it.” |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/21/18 at 14:35:08 6E7D65787D6B7B1C0 wrote:
So, we shouldn't investigate this? Character's got nothing to do with it, right? Please, ray... Go tell it to all your fellow conservatives. Like this has never been done by you guys. Ha! And why the he!! are you quoting Obama? You're no democrat... (oh, maybe only when it fits you... yeah) |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by thumperclone on 09/21/18 at 15:47:07 if ford proves right kavanau will be guilty of lying to congress that's what got billy c impeached the sex act/attack will be secondary |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/21/18 at 17:38:45 7A667B637E6B7C6D6261606B0E0 wrote:
IF........ You can show me some evidence ::) WOW...... Forest Gump ain't gonna pull the wool over the eyes of these zealots. ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/21/18 at 18:10:34 He's not being criminally tried in a court of law... He's applying for a job... The standard of proof is very different. Evidence is not necessary... Are the allegations credible?... Does Kavenau's past behavior show a proclivity to commit such acts?... ...and,.. has he lied in his interview for this or any past job?... This job ain't a right, it's a "Supreme" privilege... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/21/18 at 18:58:47 2533243921343922560 wrote:
You believe your talking point regurgitation?????? Fine, he doesn't get the job based on her accusation then he should sue her for libel and damages, and everyone who participated in this ploy in a civil court where they will now have to PROVE what they say is true. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/21/18 at 20:38:42 5244534E56434E55210 wrote:
Evidence is not necessary...Are the allegations credible? Yes, evidence is. No, they are not. Seriously, what if this were you? what if you were up for a promotion and an unproveable sexual assault allegation were lodged against you? Now everyone at you work thinks you're a rapist. You swear, you swear under oath. And your boss says, sorry there's no evidence and but strictly based on the fact she made a complaint, not only do you not get the job, lets face it, your career has has gone as far as its gonna go. She slides back into obscurity and your screwed. #metoo |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/22/18 at 08:31:18 Web, a job is NOT a right according to Bot's talking points..... but a privilege. Is voting a privilege for being a law abiding citizen, or a right? Is having a driving licence a privilege, or right? Heck, how about living in the United States and availing yourself to all its benefits for contributing to it, a right or privilege? The list is endless, depending on who is in power, and what results they desire.... The libs are twisting themselves into pretzels just because they don't like the man and his beliefs, that is fact..... Has nothing to do with if he is qualified. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/22/18 at 11:00:15 I understand the ridiculous actions of Boker and Harris, that's expected. But after the hearings were done, it was clear they'd lost. No ned to destroy two lives at that point trying a Hail Mary. If Feinstein really believed there was any legitimacy to her claims, she would have acted on it immediately. Here's a question I'd pin Feinstein down with. If you believe Kavanaugh is an abuser (and Feinstein has said she believes Ford) then is Feinstein putting innocent women in jeopardy by not reporting this for weeks giving this abuser more time to act? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/22/18 at 11:13:26 Christine Blasey Ford made her choice. Now she needs to tell her story to the Senate: COLUMN By COKIE ROBERTS Sep 20, 2018, 5:06 AM ET Christine Blasey Ford has either developed a case of cold feet or she’s playing footsie with the Democrats. Neither one of those options is useful if she wants to stop Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court. It would certainly be understandable if Ford decided not to go through the brutal spectacle of a committee hearing. Since she’s told her story, she and her family say they have been subjected to what must be terrifying insults and threats. Any woman in the public eye can tell you about that. In this age of anonymous Twitter postings, a brief appearance on TV can elicit the most hateful and misogynistic messages, some of them downright frightening. So, I can imagine how awful the missives headed Ford’s way must be. But she made the choice to reveal her identity, knowing that it would upend her life. Now, she needs to tell her story to the people who will decide whether Brett Kavanaugh ascends to the Supreme Court -- the members of the United States Senate. Absent that, she has put herself and her family in harm’s way to no end. The confirmation will proceed. If Ford’s lawyers are insisting on an FBI investigation in the hopes of finding some corroborating evidence of a decades-old alleged crime, that’s again understandable, but highly unlikely to happen. And if they are taking that tack because the Democrats want to delay the confirmation process in the hopes of jettisoning Kavanaugh and energizing female voters, that’s likely to backfire. As it is, some Republicans who had said they needed to hear from the accuser before they would vote, are now getting restless, saying that she’s been invited to testify in any way that’s comfortable for her -- in private or public, with senators or staff—and that she should do so. The Democrats’ insistence that the Kavanaugh nomination is being railroaded sounds like politics as usual, rather than concern for a wronged woman. Perhaps they hope that the longer they string this out, the more unlikely it will be for the president to restrain his Twitter finger and that he will say something to outrage women voters. Some Republicans in the Senate are already stepping onto treacherous terrain by suggesting that Ford is “mixed up” or “confused.” Give them a few more days and who knows what they might say. But so far, they and the White House have, by and large, played it smart. They have repeatedly stated that Ford be respected and heard. They have focused their fire on Democrats -- not her. And as the week has progressed, and no other woman or fellow high-school partygoer has come forward, they have renewed their support for Kavanaugh, who has unblinkingly denied the allegations. If Ford took this life-altering step because she believes that Brett Kavanaugh should not serve on the Supreme Court, then she must come forward to tell that to the Senate. And then it will be up to the members to decide what to do. As it is now, without her testimony, it is almost certain that Judge Kavanaugh will soon become Justice Kavanaugh. Cokie Roberts is a political commentator. Opinions expressed in this column do not necessarily reflect the views of ABC News. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/22/18 at 11:50:30 BTW...... I think this crap re: Brett Kavanaugh will speed up Ruth Ginsberg decision to retire. She has already stated that the court has become a extension it was never intended to be, and remarked it was wrong what they did to him in the confirmation/senate hearing. Ruth Bader Ginsburg Slams Senate Hearings As A ‘Highly Partisan Show’ Asked to compare Brett Kavanaugh’s hearings to her own, the justice said: “The way it was was right. The way it is is wrong.” Ginsburg said Wednesday that the “atmosphere” surrounding Supreme Court hearings were “truly bipartisan” when she was nominated in 1993, noting that she won the votes of nearly all the Republican senators despite her work with the American Civil Liberties Union. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/22/18 at 12:04:24 You see this Web? I linked it on another thread. President Barack Obama challenged the GOP to end political brinkmanship and said Republicans should "win an election" if they so badly wish to change his policies. In his first extended remarks since the government reopened, Obama said that the public has grown "fed up" with its government and urged lawmakers to move past the conflict of the past few weeks. "To all my friends in Congress, understand that how business is done in this town has to change," he said. "You don't like a particular policy or a particular president? Then argue for your position. Go out there and win an election," The president said. "But don't break it.” This was his first remark after winning...... THINKING......HE WAS IN POWER WITH A MANDATE. Look now, he lost every election except barely squeaking out a win for himself, but losing power in the process. So, like a politician he now wants to break it, YET, forgetting he said this" "To all my friends in Congress, understand that how business is done in this town has to change," he said. Dude, we get it, you don't, watch the drain as the swamp sucks you out pal. Liberals are hypocrites, that is a fact, I just posted proof. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/22/18 at 12:15:32 Peaceful transfer of power my aching ass. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/22/18 at 13:20:52 4E5157504D4A7B4B7B43515D16240 wrote:
No worry Jog, they have a bit, that will fit your new drill, that will remedy your aching ass. Not sure Harbor Fright carries it :-/ Try looking online under "Liberal Migraine Relief Bit" or External anal sphincter bit........ ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/22/18 at 16:07:48 Naaah, I am gonna soak about five hundred ASSpirins into a mushy lump, then form it into a butt fitting form and dry it, then sit on it, slowly absorbing the pain killing goodness directly onto the area most in need. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/22/18 at 16:54:31 47585E5944437242724A58541F2D0 wrote:
WHOA...... You been hanging out with Bot I see ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/23/18 at 05:27:13 The two scenarios I first suggested are almost certainly the truth. Ford was assaulted at a party while she was in high school and later substituted Kavanaugh into her memory because of her TDS. Or she was never attacked and made up the story completely because of TDS. She's either a disturbed woman in need of help or a criminal who should be punished. Christine Blasey Ford has claimed that four other people attended a small gathering at which she was allegedly assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh. Three of those people, PJ Smyth, Mark Judge, and Kavanaugh, have already denied any recollection of attending such a party. On Saturday night, Leland Ingham Keyser, a classmate of Ford's at the all-girls school Holton-Arms and her final named witness, denied any recollection of attending a party with Brett Kavanaugh. "Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford," lawyer Howard J. Walsh said in a statement sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee. CNN reports that " Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford's." Keyser previously coached golf at Georgetown University and is now executive producer of Bob Beckel's podcast. Keyser is the ex-wife of Beckel, a former Democratic operative and commentator. A search on OpenSecrets.org reveals Keyser's only political donation has been to former Democratic senator Byron Dorgan. Keyser's denial, as a female lifelong friend and Ford's last named witness, is the most consequential development that has occurred since Ford publicly stepped forward last Sunday and detailed her allegations to the Washington Post. Ford's allegation of the 1982 incident was told to no one until a 2012 therapy session, when Kavanaugh was first touted in the media as the most likely GOP Supreme Court nominee. All of Ford's named witnesses of the party, both male and female, have now denied any recollection of attending such a party. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/23/18 at 07:34:24 Nice, however, we know as surely as the rain will fall, none of this matters. You can show me all the empirical and scientific data that supports there is no God, and yet I will not surrender my BELIEF in Him. This is the same mindset the libs, like Bot, have. I believe God has a better way for all mankind. They believe THEIR way is better for all mankind. You saw, and have seen, where religion is forced upon folks, not good. You see where the liberal belief is FORCED upon folks, not good either. Freedom is FREE will. Always will be, no matter who holds the power. If you have to change your beliefs, to match the moment, you fool only yourself, and your life is built upon no foundation at all. Bob Beckel is a interesting guy. He swerved to a more sustainable lifestyle, later in life. He throttled down a lot of his earlier beliefs, and behavior. He had a awakening, he got sober. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/23/18 at 10:09:48 Yeah, I'm sure all those people that were raped by priests (most of them young boys at the time) were lying too. I mean, why did they wait so long to come out? Why did they wait until some of those priests were "chosen for greater responsibility"? I hope you all get the sarcasm here.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/23/18 at 16:35:32 I'll bet those children were warned to shut up Shocking as it may be for you, children are not quite like high school kids. The kids are being abused by authority figures. But, conflate the dissimilar and drop the Mic, believing you're making a point. Blasey Ford. THERE ARE NO WITNESSES WHO HAVE CONFIRMED CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD’S ACCUSATIONS! NOT ONE! ** Judge Brett Kavanaugh vehemently denies the allegations ** Patrick Smyth, a former high school classmate of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, has denied attending the alleged party where Christine Blasey Ford says Kavanaugh attempted to sexually assault her in the 1980s. ** Alleged witness Mark Judge defended Brett Kavanaugh again Tuesday in a letter through his lawyer to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley. ** And now, Leland Ingham Keyser, a life-long friend of Christine’s has denied the accusations. NEWS: Attorney for Leland Keyser, who Dr Ford says was at the party where the alleged incident with Kavanaugh occurred says “Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.” She CLAIMS He tried to get her clothes off. Nobody noticed a change in her demeanor.? Her clothes? So traumatic,, Not a word to her friends? I'm gonna have to replace my BULLSHIT flag. I threw it so high it floated away. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/23/18 at 17:10:22 223D3B3C21261727172F3D317A480 wrote:
Bless your heart Jog....... Hows that drill? ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/23/18 at 19:07:09 4B58405D584E5E390 wrote:
You really don't get it, do you? ::) Thick as a brick... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/23/18 at 20:45:15 You're thick. Depends on who is saying it and to whom it's being said. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/24/18 at 04:42:05 Tell you what, Kavanaugh must have a magic pecker or something because apparently it can identify future liberal wachos..... Another fruitcake decides to come forward with a story from 30 years ago with no witnesses and gets front page coverage. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/24/18 at 04:46:16 Ohhh, Look! The public is almost over the obvious BULLSHIT of Ford! Time to roll out another lodeOshitt. Have the vote you gutless buncha turds. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/24/18 at 05:38:05 https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/09/dear_juanita_broaddrick.html But this time it's TRUE! Honest! No, it's nothing like the Duke lies,, Broaddrick – who, unlike Ford, told friends about Clinton's attack right afterward – was Ford's inability to remember where the party was or who was there. When I went through her accounting of what had happened, I cannot imagine not knowing where you were and who was there and when it happened," she told The DC. "I remember everything that had happened to me. Friends found me immediately after the rape and witnessed the condition I was in. I remember all the specifics, the exact time it happened, 8:30 in the morning." Ford said she can't remember how she got to the party or who drove her home. Women do lie about sexual assault, and false accusations of rape and sexual assault are not uncommon in a media obsessed with the mythical "war on women" by conservatives like Judge Kavanaugh. One need only remember the infamous and false Rolling Stone story about an alleged rape at the University of Virginia, the story a key part of the portrayal of an alleged "rape culture" rampant on college campuses. And then there's the Duke lacrosse team's ordeal after being accused of assaulting a stripper at a party, a story pushed by an ambitious prosecutor, Mike Nifong, and a media all too eager to condemn the culture enjoyed by these obvious beneficiaries of "white privilege." Three Duke players were falsely accused of assaulting a black girl, and Nifong admitted pursuing the false charges for personal political gain. We remember what happened to Herman Cain, successful black American businessman and conservative, the Democrats' worst nightmare. Out came the accusations against the man who threatened liberal orthodoxy and the liberal power structure, unproven and unprovable allegations of misconduct. As soon as he abandoned his presidential run, his accusers vanished back into the woodwork from whence they came, their mission accomplished. Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/09/dear_juanita_broaddrick.html#ixzz5S1RJp32U Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/24/18 at 07:52:12 332C2A2D30370636063E2C206B590 wrote:
Yeah, it would have been nice to have a hearing and vote on Garland too.. oh well... see how that works? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/24/18 at 07:52:54 435C5A5D40477646764E5C501B290 wrote:
Yeah, thanks jog, but I know my audience. Nice try though. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/24/18 at 08:34:02 Yeah, it would have been nice to have a hearing and vote on Garland too.. oh well... see how that works? So let's destroy an innocent man, terrorize his children, make it even harder for woman who are genuinely assaulted to come forward all to extract a pound of flesh for Garland. Way to go Dems! |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/24/18 at 08:57:48 536166777061764965766F040 wrote:
Character. That's all this comes down to. And if you think that the repubs wouldn't have drup garland through the trash, well, I think you'd be mistaken. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/24/18 at 09:16:41 So you're totally fine with Kavanaugh being destroyed as payback? His daughters will probably never look at him the same. They've already been threatened with rape as payback for what "their Dad did". Garland's reputation is 100% intact. Everyone knows why he never got a hearing and it zero to do with his character. This is destroying a man and his family. it's beyond the pale. crossing a linee and no one should go along with this. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/24/18 at 09:26:08 1C2E29383F2E39062A39204B0 wrote:
Since Trump's been in office,... there is no longer a pale, nor any lines... MAGA |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/24/18 at 09:38:42 6375627F67727F64100 wrote:
Since Trump's been in office,... there is no longer a pale, nor any lines... MAGA[/quote] Bull$!t. You're looking for something to justify your party's miserable behavior in this situation |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MShipley on 09/24/18 at 09:55:12 435D52535E435845370 wrote:
[/quote] And this is exactly the problem, you do not see the difference between a procedural move and character assassination. The left has created an atmosphere in this country that ANYTHING is justifiable in the name of stopping the evil conservatives. When will it become justifiable to just kill Conservatives. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/24/18 at 10:18:18 If you're okay with destroying him and his family with obviously BS charges for political payback and you're not ashamed of that, well what's left to say? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/24/18 at 10:40:15 Facts are inconvenient: The two women making sexual misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh claim to have witnesses, but so far, all of their witnesses back Kavanaugh’s claim that nothing happened. It might be difficult to remember this as Democrats and the media throw around phrases like “second accuser” and “attempted sexual assault” and “exposing himself” against the Supreme Court nominee. But the facts are still the facts, and every single witness named so far by both accusers say they witnessed nothing of the sort. The first accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, is accusing Kavanaugh of attempting to assault her at a house party in 1982 when she was 15 and he was 17. She named three people who were at the party: PJ Smyth, Mark Judge, and Leland Ingham Keyser. By submitting their respective statements to the Senate Judiciary Committee, all three witnesses did so under penalty of imprisonment, and all three have zero recollection of the house party in question. The one witness whom Ford said was in the room when the alleged misconduct took place (Mark Judge) denies it happened. Moreover, another witness, a lifelong friend of Ford’s, not only cannot remember the house party, she says she has never met Kavanaugh. PJ Smyth: I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as “PJ” who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post. I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh. Personally speaking, I have known Brett Kavanaugh since high school and I know him to be a person of great integrity, a great friend, and I have never witnessed any improper conduct by Brett Kavanaugh towards women. Mark Judge said, “I have no memory of the alleged incident. Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Dr. Ford’s letter. More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the manner Ford describes.” Leland Ingham Keyser stated, “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.” The above is an email that Keyser’s attorney, Howard Walsh, sent to the Judiciary Committee. Furthermore, Keyser is the ex-wife of Democrat operative Bob Beckel and currently produces his podcast. According to public reports, she has only ever donated to Democrats. The far-left CNN reports that Keyser and Ford are “lifelong friends.” For his own part, and under penalty of imprisonment, Kavanaugh not only denies any allegation that he acted improperly with Ford (or anyone), he denies being at this party — a party no one other than Ford remembers. A second accuser came forward Sunday night in a piece the New Yorker’s Ronan Farrow co-authored. Deborah Ramirez alleges that an 18-year-old Kavanaugh exposed himself to her during a drunken 1983 dorm party at Yale. By any standard, this story is a mess, including Ramirez’s own “recollection.” She admits she was drinking heavily at the party and that there are “significant gaps in her memory of the evening.” When the New Yorker first contacted Ramirez, she said she could not say if it was Kavanaugh who exposed himself. But after “six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party.” The New Yorker added that it “has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party.” In other words, like the Ford allegation, the New Yorker is not only unable to verify that Kavanaugh exposed himself, none of the witnesses can confirm Kavanaugh even attended the party. The only so-called corroboration comes from an anonymous source who claims to have heard the story second hand. He says, “Another student told him about the incident either on the night of the party or in the next day or two.” Another former classmate remembers hearing something about this but has no recollection of who was involved. But the witnesses Ramirez actually named say nothing happened: Witness 1: One of the male classmates who Ramirez said egged on Kavanaugh denied any memory of the party. “I don’t think Brett would flash himself to Debbie, or anyone, for that matter,” he said. Asked why he thought Ramirez was making the allegation, he responded, “I have no idea.” Witness 2: stated, “The other male classmate who Ramirez said was involved in the incident commented, ‘I have zero recollection.’” Classmates 3, 4, and 5: In a statement, two of those male classmates who Ramirez alleged were involved in the incident, the wife of a third male student she said was involved, and three other classmates, Dino Ewing, Louisa Garry, and Dan Murphy, disputed Ramirez’s account of events: “We were the people closest to Brett Kavanaugh during his first year at Yale. He was a roommate to some of us, and we spent a great deal of time with him, including in the dorm where this incident allegedly took place. Some of us were also friends with Debbie Ramirez during and after her time at Yale. We can say with confidence that if the incident Debbie alleges ever occurred, we would have seen or heard about it—and we did not. The behavior she describes would be completely out of character for Brett. In addition, some of us knew Debbie long after Yale, and she never described this incident until Brett’s Supreme Court nomination was pending. Editors from the New Yorker contacted some of us because we are the people who would know the truth, and we told them that we never saw or heard about this.” Ramirez’s best friend at Yale: “This is a woman I was best friends with. We shared intimate details of our lives. And I was never told this story by her, or by anyone else. It never came up. I didn’t see it; I never heard of it happening.” She said she hadn’t spoken with Ramirez for about ten years, but that the two women had been close all through college, and Kavanaugh had remained part of what she called their “larger social circle.” In a statement released Sunday, Kavanaugh called the Ramirez allegation a “smear, plain and simple,” and added (accurately), “People who knew me then know that this did not happen, and have said so.” |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/24/18 at 11:15:34 112324353223340B27342D460 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/24/18 at 11:18:28 08162D2C3529203C450 wrote: And this is exactly the problem, you do not see the difference between a procedural move and character assassination. The left has created an atmosphere in this country that ANYTHING is justifiable in the name of stopping the evil conservatives. Oh really? So I guess I must have missed all the outpouring of love from the republicans to the democrats, huh? ::) When will it become justifiable to just kill Conservatives.[/quote] - Never. Don't be so silly as to conflate to that degree. As I keep repeating - it's about Character. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by oldNslow on 09/24/18 at 11:27:46 If the leftists get away with this, then this country is well and truly fu*ked and ethical behavior and honesty mean nothing. Quote:
When that time comes there will be plenty of lefties taking dirt-naps too. Kick even a nice dog often enough and sooner or later he'll bite you. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/24/18 at 12:29:53 If it's deserved, then yes. Karma. When will it become justifiable to just kill Conservatives. Never. Don't be so silly as to conflate to that degree. You're correct oldNslow. That's what you say now TT, but if you think it's just 'karma' when a man, a father, is destroyed that when a killing happens, you'll justify it the same way. Karma. You'll say it's part of the deal with running for office as a conservative, as a Republican. If all you see out of this ongoing debacle is a valid and perfectly acceptable payback for Garland, then you've got serious perspective problems. I honestly think I need to tune out of here for a while before I get kicked out. Seriously. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/24/18 at 12:39:22 5A686F7E79687F406C7F660D0 wrote:
It does a body good to cleanse once in a while. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Matchless G11 on 09/24/18 at 17:00:59 Well all I can say I don't believe in Karma, But the radical dems are going to shoot themselves in the foot. They wanted at least a judge like Kennedy. There was some grumbling in the prolife camps about the selection of Kavanau, thinking he was not pro-life enough. But by the way dems have treated him, there won't even be a snow ball chance in a hot place for a favorable judgement for Roe for them. Something about "Payback is ………………" |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/24/18 at 17:51:35 40595757010142554455535B030405300 wrote:
Yep, it's a b!tch. That's what the GOP is seeing right now. Karma. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/24/18 at 20:44:35 #LiberalLogic101: 'Every Woman Has The Right To Be Believed': Except Those Raped By Bill Clinton, Beaten By Keith Ellison, Groped By Cory Booker Or Killed By Ted Kennedy |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/25/18 at 05:10:24 That's what you say now TT, but if you think it's just 'karma' when a man, a father, is destroyed that when a killing happens, you'll justify it the same way. Karma. You'll say it's part of the deal with running for office as a conservative, as a Republican. No, never. I've never condoned violence. I never will. Yes you will. You will say what a tragedy it was, blah blah blah.....and then there will be a BUT....after that will be the justification. You're working up to it now. Destroying an obviously innocent man to justify payback for an unequal situation. It's just a matter of time before it happens. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/25/18 at 05:17:57 I would put $100 down in Vegas that Ford won't testify Thursday. Her lawyer has to know she's not telling the truth even if she herself doesn't know it. Lawyers have to protect their clients. Besides, her lies have already done the damage she intended so I think she's satisfied enough to bow out. At least that's what a rational person would think. Those severely infected with TDS are not rational. But if I had to bet, she'll use a flimsy excuse that the looney left will pretend is totally valid. She claim to be scared or that she's not being treated equally or death threats have driven her away..... and the !SM will parrott that 24/7 for a couple days. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/25/18 at 05:19:51 That's MSM not !SM.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/25/18 at 08:28:41 7E4C4B5A5D4C5B64485B42290 wrote:
He's not "obviously innocent". He might be in your eyes, but you are just one person. Again, look at his advice to ken starr against clinton. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/25/18 at 10:27:13 No, never. I've never condoned violence. I never will. Yes you will. No, I won't. You don't know me. Please don't put words in my mouth. Don't assume you can. Oh, I know you. And you absolutely will. Hopefully we'll have to wait a long time. Regarding Starr, at what point in the investigation did Kavanaugh make suggestions? Was it the day after Drudge broke the Lewinsky story?..... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/25/18 at 10:33:49 063433222534231C30233A510 wrote:
Take a look - this says a lot about the man: http://www.cnn.com/2018/08/20/politics/kavanaugh-lewinsky-email/index.html |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/25/18 at 11:35:09 Yea it does. Says he's pretty darn smart. Seriously, what's the problem? Oh.....you think he should face the same thing...... To quote Reagan, 'there you go again...'. You do realize this is another of your apples to oranges comparisons?.... The letter is dated more 3 1/2 years after Paula Jones filed a lawsuit against Clinton for sexual harassment. (Did anyone file a suit against Kavanagh 3 1/2 years ago? no) 1 1/2 years before the letter, Monica Lewinsky's name appears on Paula Jones witness list. Lewinsky signs an affidavit nothing went on between her and Clinton, but a couple weeks later, a full 8 months before this letter, a tape recording was produced, (you're clearly not familiar with what this is but it's ACTUAL EVIDENCE ! The tape revealed Clinton was lying. At the time of Clinton's Grand Jury hearing, mountains of evidence that Clinton had repeatedly lied was available. Again, this was real evidence, not made up evidence. If there were a tape of Kavanagh like there were with Clinton, he'd be toast. If there were numerous other woman with witness's that demonstrated the likelihood of previous acts, Kavanagh would be toast. There's nothing like that. There's 9/11 conspiracy type stupidity that makes Democrats look like complete fools. And now you've got a porn lawyer as your spokesman. Perfectly appropriate... This is my point about the hated of leftist. You think Kavanagh deserves to be destroyed and his children's lives forever screwed up as pay back for punishment Clinton was fully deserving of. You've got serious problems son. But a serious question for you leftist. What this situation has produced is a new legal doctrine. It was best described by that complete idiot of a Senator from Hawaii. Democrats have decided that any woman can make any claim against a man and it's assumed to be the truth and that man must find a way to defend himself or he's presumed to be 100% guilty. This is necessary in order to make up for decades of women being abused. Is that okay with you? Is that what you want to sign onto? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/25/18 at 12:38:24 1A282F3E39283F002C3F264D0 wrote:
This is up for debate. What I don't want is women being second guessed at every turn. Have a look here: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/false-sexual-violence-assault-rape-allegations-truth-rare-international-day-for-the-elimination-of-a8077876.html |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/25/18 at 12:52:10 No problem. He should be held to the same scrutiny. Oh.....you think he should face the same thing...... Yes Ok, 3 1/2 years from now, months after a Grand Jury testimony, you could write a litter to the special prosecutor who was appointed to look into him after multiple allegations with actual evidence. You've got 3 1/2 years to get your law degree so you can be sure he faces the same thing. Again, this was real evidence, not made up evidence. I wonder why/how you figure that this is all made up against brett? Do you know him? Were you there? No. You only wish it was true. That doesn't make it so. Well, let's see. In both cases, all the other people who were alleged to have been there have all said they know absolutely nothing about either incident. By the way, one of these 'witness's' is married to a Democratic strategist and even she denies it. So the question is, why would you think it's anything other than made up? If there were numerous other woman with witness's that demonstrated the likelihood of previous acts, Kavanagh would be toast. Well, more are coming forward... I guess we'll see. When someone comes forward with a credible allegations, we'll discuss that. If you're talking about the creepy porn lawyer's promised witness, I wouldn't bet anything on that. LOL - yeah, that star you mention slept with our married president. How cool, huh? Yea, he probably did sleep with her. He's under the microscope and he's volunteered to it. He can always withdraw. If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen. You mean if you can't take the lying character assignation from scumbag$, stay out of the kitchen. You've got serious problems son. Son? I'm far from being your son... Yeah, ease up on the name calling mark. I know you're frustrated, but try to refrain Serious problems is not name calling. This is up for debate. What is up for debate? The presumed guilt of a man after abuse is alleged by a woman with no evidence other than her word? Are you suggesting that's debatable? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/25/18 at 14:36:17 The letter was in the office and known about by difi, she said NOTTAFUKKINGWORD throughout everything, waited until the last minute. Pure politics. They need to just vote. Bubs need to man up and Be the majority. Waiting for idiots and liars to approve? Stupid |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/25/18 at 15:12:06 5C6E69787F6E79466A79600B0 wrote:
What's the alternative? Not believing a woman's testimony? If the FBI were brought in, maybe they could prove/disprove it. But the GOPers don't want the FBI involved. Go figure. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/25/18 at 15:35:38 You've got serious problems son. Son? I'm far from being your son... Yeah, ease up on the name calling mark. I know you're frustrated, but try to refrain Serious problems is not name calling. - No - don't call me "son". Touchy.... Well, she put herself out there for what? Is she getting paid? This isn't like name calling, this is accusations that carry weight. She's a pu$$yhat, leftist, TDS deranged wacho. Her students said she's a lunatic and scary. She was in therapy to save her marriage and 'blamed' the attack for her inability to have honest relationships with men... oh BS! What a crock! She (and the others) have nothing to gain and everything to lose It's just the opposite. she has everything to gain and nothing to lose. She got caught screwing around and was backed into a corner. This was a great way out. Great excuse for her marriage problems and nail Trump at the same time. What's the alternative? Not believing a woman's testimony? Correct. You never presume guilt based on an allegation. If it's your plan to automatically pronounce guilt on a man based on a woman's allegation, you better stop calling yourself an American and call yourself something else, cause you ain't one sonny boy. And by the way, the Senate Judicial Committee deals with sexual assault allegations all the time. That b!tch Feinstein should have turned over the letter immediately and this would be over. But she held on to as an insurance policy in case they couldn't trip him up during the hearings, which they didn't. So she pulled this letter out and leaked her name to the press and destroyed two people. What a lowlife she is. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by thumperclone on 09/25/18 at 16:20:18 Feinstein held on to the letter at fords' request |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/25/18 at 16:26:47 0C3E39282F3E29163A29305B0 wrote:
See - touchy. Maybe you should have a cookie and a nap. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/25/18 at 16:31:01 7A667B637E6B7C6D6261606B0E0 wrote:
Not sure that's true. She asked not to be identified. Even if true, why did Feinstein leak it after the hearings were over and the vote about to occur? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/25/18 at 16:32:41 Using terms like "son" are obvious attempts at trying to make you look superior. It only does the opposite. But I am. She's a pu$$yhat, leftist, TDS deranged wacho. Gee, great name calling But she is. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/25/18 at 16:33:13 253B343538253E23510 wrote:
See - touchy. Maybe you should have a cookie and a nap. [/quote] You're dodging. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by eau de sauvage on 09/25/18 at 16:56:27 Looks increasingly likely Barbecue Guy is not going to get his lifetime appointment to frustrate the will of the majority... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2018/09/25/daily-202-kavanaugh-s-memory-of-himself-in-high-school-is-very-different-than-his-portrayal-in-the-yearbook/5ba945d21b326b7c8a8d165d |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/25/18 at 17:26:43 073532232435221D31223B500 wrote:
Thanks. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/25/18 at 17:29:13 7E4C4B5A5D4C5B64485B42290 wrote:
Dodging what? The only thing I'm doing is seeing this for what it is. There's nothing to "dodge". brett just might not be who you wish he was. C'est la vie |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/25/18 at 18:11:14 What are you going to do next mark, send me another PM swearing at me and telling me that no one is on my side? I'm sorry, you miss my personal attention. I'll try to work it in. Do you believe Tawana Brawley's accusations? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/25/18 at 19:33:24 0C3E39282F3E29163A29305B0 wrote:
No, because a grand jury found that she was lying. From the start, the cops suspected her of lying. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 04:29:13 You are dodging. I asked you if a man is presumed guilty strictly because a woman brings an accusation of sexual assault against him? That's what your party is saying. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 04:30:57 From the start, the cops suspected her of lying. ...and from the start, every reasonable person suspected Ford of lying. Especially since the witnesses contradicted her accusations. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 05:46:16 122027363120370824372E450 wrote:
No, "my party" is not saying that. Dr. Ford has alleged that brett was more than handsy towards her. He said he was a virgin all throughout high school and college. I guess we'll see what's gonna happen... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 05:47:53 063433222534231C30233A510 wrote:
No, they didn't mark. You did. You are not "every reasonable person" by any stretch of the imagination. Again, we'll see what happens on Thursday, won't we? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 06:02:43 Ahh, such respect from a bunch of old white guys.... http://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/mitch-mcconnell-calls-attorney-question-brett-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford-female-assistant-234518408.html turtle-man should just shut up.... but then again, the cons aren't the smartest bunch, are they? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 06:04:16 Not at all. Is brett in handcuffs? Nope. He must defend himself - as does anyone against an allegation. Wow....are you guys messed up..... I give up. You Dems are driving yourselves over the edge. You think Trump's off the wall but you guys are certifiable with TDS..... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 06:06:12 Kamala Harris is on point: "Dr. Blasey Ford isn’t on trial. This hearing is to determine whether Kavanaugh is qualified to sit on the Supreme Court. By hiring a private attorney to cross-examine Dr. Blasey Ford, Republicans are trying to intimidate her and avoid being held accountable by voters." There you go. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 06:07:51 043631202736211E322138530 wrote:
Meanwhile, trump's laughed at by the world at a UN Assembly. Think about who really has tds... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 06:23:48 574946474A574C51230 wrote:
There you go nothing. Absolute f'ing nonsense. If they hadn't hired an attorney, she'd be saying 'the old white guys are going to question her'. We all know that. No one is trying to intimidate anyone. Harris is lying and you know it. You do know the committed offered to send people out to her and let her give sworn testimony in private in her house if that's what she wanted. She turned them down. They've bent over backwards. She lied, got caught and now she's looking for a way out of the mess she's created for herself. The Dems are counting on the media to twist the news so idiots actually believe they are trying to intimidate her. Bull$hit. She said a man tried to rape her. Said at least two others in the house knew about it. Neither of those did. They gave sworn testimony. She hasn't and probably won't. In the meantime, low IQ Democrats will foolishly post ridiculous quotes like that one from an idiot like Harris. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 06:24:48 Meanwhile, trump's laughed at by the world at a UN Assembly. Think about who really has tds... They laughed because they know it's true and because they're scared the US is not being run by a bunch of emasculated wussies any longer. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 06:30:57 764443525544536C40534A210 wrote:
There you go nothing. Absolute f'ing nonsense. If they hadn't hired an attorney, she'd be saying 'the old white guys are going to question her'. We all know that. No one is trying to intimidate anyone. Harris is lying and you know it. No, I don't. Neither do you. Again, just because you say it, doesn't make it true. You do know the committed offered to send people out to her and let her give sworn testimony in private in her house if that's what she wanted. She turned them down. They've bent over backwards. She wants to be heard in public. So? No matter what is said, this is doing just as much damage to her as it is to brett (if not more). And keep it real mark - he's probably going to get on the bench. Just look at what turtle-man said. She lied, got caught and now she's looking for a way out of the mess she's created for herself. The Dems are counting on the media to twist the news so idiots actually believe they are trying to intimidate her. Bull$hit. She said a man tried to rape her. Said at least two others in the house knew about it. Neither of those did. They gave sworn testimony. She hasn't and probably won't. See my comment directly above. In the meantime, low IQ Democrats will foolishly post ridiculous quotes like that one from an idiot like Harris. [/quote] Yeah, Kamala Harris is an idiot alright.... A lawyer, AG for California and Senator. What a moron.... Meanwhile, what was our president's background? Oh yeah - reality TV game show host.... LOL |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 06:33:04 142621303726310E223128430 wrote:
I see that you're in deep denial. That's ok - that seems to be a major symptom of TDS. When you get laughed at during a UN General Assembly, they aren't afraid, they're amused. Our president is a joke to the rest of the world. He got the laugh as he lied about how great the country has done because of him. Everyone knows the truth. Well, except trump and his stooges. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MShipley on 09/26/18 at 06:54:37 There you go nothing. Absolute f'ing nonsense. If they hadn't hired an attorney, she'd be saying 'the old white guys are going to question her'. We all know that. No one is trying to intimidate anyone. Harris is lying and you know it. You do know the committed offered to send people out to her and let her give sworn testimony in private in her house if that's what she wanted. She turned them down. They've bent over backwards. She lied, got caught and now she's looking for a way out of the mess she's created for herself. The Dems are counting on the media to twist the news so idiots actually believe they are trying to intimidate her. Bull$hit. She said a man tried to rape her. Said at least two others in the house knew about it. Neither of those did. They gave sworn testimony. She hasn't and probably won't. In the meantime, low IQ Democrats will foolishly post ridiculous quotes like that one from an idiot like Harris. Web, you are absolutely correct. It does not matter what the Republicans do that is why they hired her. The Dems could not care less about Truth. Right now they are simply scared to death that someone might try to infringe on their "right" to kill their children. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 07:10:40 She wants to be heard in public. So? No matter what is said, this is doing just as much damage to her as it is to brett (if not more She's had plenty of chances. She's looking for a way out. I hope she takes it. If she does, this will blow over in a bit and she'll be pretty much forgotten. If she doesn't, she's won't face jail because the Congress would never have the spine to charge her with perjury, but she'll be the fool Anita Hill is. Take the out Dr Ford. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 07:13:32 Web, you are absolutely correct. It does not matter what the Republicans do that is why they hired her. Of course. And we all know if they hadn't hired her, Dumbo Harris would have said the opposite and TT would have parroted whatever she said.... I'm trying to see the humor in all of this...... There's a lot of material, but mostly its sickening to watch the Dems. Especially Feinstein, that idiot from Hawaii and one I hope aliens abduct her soon for experiments, Harris. If they did, they'd throw her back. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 07:15:06 Meanwhile, what was our president's background? Oh yeah - reality TV game show host you mean the billionaire international businessman that all these people who say they can't stand him now were kissing his hind end a couple years ago just to get in the camera frame with him?... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/26/18 at 07:35:59 Note Ask yourself WHY he was on a show. Gee, it was about how to run things, Your hate blinds you. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/26/18 at 07:36:08 You should enroll in trump University.... ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/26/18 at 07:39:51 Democrats have their goalposts mounted on a trailer. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 07:54:39 2B343235282F1E2E1E26343873410 wrote:
;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 08:37:41 0E102B2A332F263A430 wrote:
Children? Who's killing children? Oh, you mean how trump's ineptitude has led to the deaths in PR? Well, yeah, that's horrible. I thought you supported the orange-in-chief.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 08:39:39 1F2D2A3B3C2D3A05293A23480 wrote:
I guess we'll see. There are now (4) people corroborating her story, so... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 08:42:38 4A787F6E69786F507C6F761D0 wrote:
LOL - and you talk about my hate of trump? Seems Cleopatra's got competition on de-nial... ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 08:44:25 142621303726310E223128430 wrote:
Funny, you can't prove any of that. He refuses to release his taxes. But hey, how can you not be rich when daddy bails you out, huh? But you're right, people love to watch him. I mean, look at the laughs he got at the UN? ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 08:47:19 3F2026213C3B0A3A0A32202C67550 wrote:
Nah, it's my common sense. It shows me exactly who this idiot in the white house is. A fraud. Did you catch the UN address? Anyone one on this forum could have read the prompter better than him. He. Is. A. Joke. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 08:47:42 4650475A42575A41350 wrote:
[smiley=tekst-toppie.gif] |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 09:03:37 I tried to post something about the creepy p0rn lawyer's witness and it got booted for spam. I'm guessing because of the word p0rn. Trying this as a test. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 09:09:20 Okay, that worked so I guess you can't type that word. Anyway, he's got a new witness with salacious allegations. If true, two three things are obvious. remember, this is assuming what she says is true. 1) The details of her story indicate there should be dozens, if not hundreds of witness' available practically immediately. Within the hour. 2) If story is true, many of these should be able to ID Kavanagh as someone who physically assaulted numerous women. 3) If true, Kavanagh perjured himself and will be put on trial. I'm not saying any of what she says is true. I'm just saying if it is, unlike the other two women, there should be dozens who are able to substantiate it quickly. Regardless, he probably will succeed in putting off the vote. She better be telling the truth and he better not know she's lying. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/26/18 at 10:38:44 http://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-christine-blasey-fords-high-school_19.html |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MShipley on 09/26/18 at 10:41:06 I have discussed before that progressivism , subvert, perverts and destroys everything in it's path. you are watching that unfold. You have to understand the Dems goals here. 1. Get Brett or Trump to just quit or pull the nomination. 2. Delay the confirmation in the hopes of a Blue Wave so they can pick someone else. 3. If he does get confirmed for the rest of his life anytime something goes before the courts they can scream foul and say Brett cannot be a part of the decision If you think 3 is unrealistic just follow some of the people on this forum. You know they will go with ANYTHING the news and the Dems. tell them. These people don't care if they destroy this man, his, family, his marriage his children and his future. He is a conservative. He may actually think that our children have a right to be born, he must be destroyed along with everyone else that thinks like him. I mentioned the other day that the time will come where violence is considered to be justifiable against anyone whom is considered a conservative. Listen to Maxine Waters, watch groups like Antifa. It's not coming! It's here. Conservatives can't even go to dinner without being harassed. Now I honestly believe that most of the leftist on this site wont agree with me and that is fine, I am also sure they do not condone violence or think that it is justifiable. I do think they have been so conditioned to hate conservatives that they can not see the reality of it all. Here is what I want to know? If this is all proved to be false, who is going to Jail? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 11:06:29 As I've read through her accusations more, I'm finding this far to outrageous as to be believable. Again, this is akin to 9/11 conspiracy nonsense. This guy is suppose to participated in gang rapes? Seriously? I think the Democrats and their creepy p0rn lawyer have jumped the shark on this one. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 11:13:52 455A5C5B4641704070485A561D2F0 wrote:
Yeah, all those pictures of Christine drinking and partying.... oh wait.. So, if you're school's got problem kids and "condone" the behaviour, then what? All the kids are bad? See how silly that sounds? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 11:23:59 79675C5D4458514D340 wrote:
Ford should be brought up on charges if she is found to by lying. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 11:41:05 I believe Kavanaugh. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 12:22:53 I don't believe Kavanaugh. But not to worry. The repubs don't care about what these "silly" women might say. They are going to vote him on regardless. Gee, I guess that's women voters preferred democrats by 58% to 33% — a 25-point gap. I wonder why?.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 12:33:00 But not to worry. The repubs don't care about what these "silly" women might say. They are going to vote him on regardless. God I hope those don't listen to these idiotic people. (play the woman card all you want, you're acting like an Al Sharpton style race hustler) Gee, I guess that's women voters preferred democrats by 58% to 33% — a 25-point gap. Cause women like other women plus emasculated men, that's why. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MShipley on 09/26/18 at 12:33:42 382629282538233E4C0 wrote:
Interesting because the Democrats were totally against a woman's right to vote. Only after the Republicans took the House and the Senate was the 19th Amendment able to pass. PS: Every Democrat voted against it. But like I said Progressivism subverts everything including history. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 12:45:20 5D437879607C7569100 wrote:
Interesting because the Democrats were totally against a woman's right to vote. Yeah, and back then, the democrats supported the KKK. Please don't try and pull the wool over our eyes m - we all know that both parties have gone 180 degrees since then. Only after the Republicans took the House and the Senate was the 19th Amendment able to pass. PS: Every Democrat voted against it. But like I said Progressivism subverts everything including history. [/quote] Really? You think so. Funny how Lincoln was one of the most progressive presidents in history - all the while being a republican. The fact is, the republicans started out as a progressive party. But nowadays, they are the party that the KKK, the nazis and the white supremacists cling to - how about that? You should brush up on your history a little. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by hotrod on 09/26/18 at 13:04:19 Buddy Hackett raped me before I was born. I just remembered that. :o |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 13:12:13 Buddy Hackett? That's a blast from the past. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MShipley on 09/26/18 at 13:16:52 4B555A5B564B504D3F0 wrote:
Interesting because the Democrats were totally against a woman's right to vote. Yeah, and back then, the democrats supported the KKK. Please don't try and pull the wool over our eyes m - we all know that both parties have gone 180 degrees since then. Only after the Republicans took the House and the Senate was the 19th Amendment able to pass. PS: Every Democrat voted against it. But like I said Progressivism subverts everything including history. [/quote] Really? You think so. Funny how Lincoln was one of the most progressive presidents in history - all the while being a republican. The fact is, the republicans started out as a progressive party. But nowadays, they are the party that the KKK, the nazis and the white supremacists cling to - how about that? You should brush up on your history a little. [/quote] Sorry it is not me that needs to brush up on the history. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 13:44:52 It will be interesting to watch Democratic Senator walk back from the creepy p0rn lawyer's obviously nutty 'witness'. Senators didn't get to where they are by hitching their wagons to obvious hor$e$hit. They'll be content to let the idiots on CNN & MSNBC treat it like it's valid, but not to many are going to jump on this bandwagon. I haven't seen that yet. Plus, willing to bet his latest woman turns out to be a fruitcake. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 13:54:59 4A545B5A574A514C3E0 wrote:
You're gonna regret typing that.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 15:38:11 4C526968716D6478010 wrote:
Wait, so you honestly think that the democratic party of today is the same as it was around 1920? Seriously?? Please m, for your own sake, learn what happened to both parties since then. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 15:41:30 370502131405122D01120B600 wrote:
You're gonna regret typing that....[/quote] No, I won't. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. There are no regrets. Besides the fact, it looks like there's not going to be a forum to prove things either way. The GOPers are pushing for a vote by Friday. I'm so glad that they're taking these claims so seriously... Heck even trump said that his mind could be changed... Speaking of which- had I voted for trump - yeah, that I would have regretted. ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/26/18 at 15:46:02 Even if the Pub's manage to rush Kavanaugh through,.. it won't be over. True or not,.. these charges are serious and credible enough to warrant investigation. After the mid-terms,... FBI will investigate, and if they are found credible, impeachment will commence. This is a hail Mary pass, in desperation of what the Pub's know is coming. The best they get, is a month to use their "success" as campaign brownie points... Then, the walls will come crumbling down... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 15:47:28 7660776A72676A71050 wrote:
I tend to agree with you Sero. Like we've been saying - it's gonna be a wild midterm. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/26/18 at 15:53:16 or not,.. these charges are serious and credible enough to warrant investigati So important that difi sat on the information for weeks. It's a political hit job. Didn't you check out the link to the year books? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/26/18 at 15:55:40 This 3rd accuser has pretty impeccable credentials, including several security clearances, and degrees from Montgomery College, the University of Maryland in astrophysics and computer science. Not the kind of person to risk 5 years prison and her career for making false statements... https://heavy.com/news/2018/09/julie-swetnick-work-history-security-clearance/ |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 15:56:36 5A454344595E6F5F6F57454902300 wrote:
What did the yearbooks prove jog? That kids other than her partied? BFD. I didn't see any of her drinking or making out... Didn't difi hang on to the allegations at the request of Dr. Ford? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 15:57:41 7462756870656873070 wrote:
Yeah, but Sero, it's a woman... probably hysterical and bleeding from... well, you know... ;D The GOPers don't care. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/26/18 at 16:49:51 One party welcomes investigation and has requested it,... the other party does not want any investigation... Usually,... if you're accused of something bad, you want it to be proven a lie... Unless..... :-? Pretty simple logic I know,... they don't want the nomination stalled,... but wouldn't a innocent person be saying, "Even if I'm confirmed, I want the FBI to clear my name afterward"... He's not saying that.... He's just saying he's a really good guy... so let's not investigate... Mmm Hmmm?.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 17:18:22 7660776A72676A71050 wrote:
Going to ten parties and observing girls being drugged and ganged raped without ever alerting anyone pretty much removes any notion of "impeccable credentials ".... She's deeply in debt and has an interesting legal history. So the credible accusation linee is nonsense. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 17:21:08 If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. There are no regrets. What a scummy attitude..... "Sorry girls, all this stuff about you dad was a lie we made up for political reasons. Sorry 'bout your nightmares. No hard feelings okay?" |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 17:24:50 5046514C54414C57230 wrote:
Jesus Sew, you've turned completely looney. You honestly think he participated in druging and gang raping girls? You seriously think that's a possibility? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/26/18 at 17:59:51 457770616677605F736079120 wrote:
Web,.. try to be a bit logical... Classmates say Judge and Kavanaugh were "joined at the hip" BFF's... Judge was so proud of his prep school escapades he wrote a book about them. I've seen excerpts... I'm sure you have too... Do you seriously think Judge's best bud was the saint he now claims to be?... Get real... Their frat house or whatever they call prep school clicks was nicknamed the "Tit and Clit"... Get real... ...and you're buying his story?... Get real... Jesus, Web... your TDS/KDS is at fever pitch... :-/ BTW... there is now a 4th accuser,.. and this one's from 1998... Who's next?... How many do you have to deny to believe this guy?... The "Tit and Clit"... Think about it... Young women are assaulted... someone must do it. Don't the members of "Tit and Clit" seem even a little suspect?... Jesus, Web... at least have a little suspicion... ... or swallow hook, line, and sinker... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/26/18 at 18:03:54 506265747362754A66756C070 wrote:
Hey mark - welcome to life. Sometimes it ain't fair. In this case we don't know yet. Ol' brett knew what he was getting into. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/26/18 at 18:54:59 Re: Kavanau Reply #136 - Today at 02:03:54 Alert Board Moderator about this Post! Quote WebsterMark wrote on Today at 01:21:08: If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. There are no regrets. What a scummy attitude..... "Sorry girls, all this stuff about you dad was a lie we made up for political reasons. Sorry 'bout your nightmares. No hard feelings okay?" Hey mark - welcome to life. Sometimes it ain't fair. In this case we don't know yet. Ol' brett knew what he was getting into. Back to top That's what you lefties are about. Screw you. May you encounter unfairness. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/26/18 at 18:57:31 Number three eepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti revealed Brett Kavanaugh’s 3rd accuser Wednesday morning–A woman named Julie Swetnick who has brought forth allegations of gang rape. Julie Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend says he had to file a restraining order against Swetnick after they broke up–she continued to harass him after he got married to another woman. Swetnick’s former boyfriend told Politico she threatened to harm his new wife and baby! Politico reported: A Miami-Dade County court docket shows a petition for injunction against Swetnick was filed March 1, 2001, by her former boyfriend, Richard Vinneccy, who told POLITICO Wednesday the two had dated for four years before they broke up |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/26/18 at 19:23:28 be sure, much has changed in the last two decades. But some things don't: Women who accuse Republicans have to be heard and believed because they're "survivors"; women who accuse Democrats are nuts and stalkers who need never be heard. Mark Steyn |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/26/18 at 20:08:54 2F3036312C2B1A2A1A22303C77450 wrote:
Its amazing to see the creatures exposed, as the water drains away from the swamp.... :) Use to be folks knew the value of National Enquirer journalism was strictly entertainment. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/26/18 at 20:10:49 Web,.. try to be a bit logical... Logical? You think its even remotely possible high school kids from high end families in high end neighborhoods were have massive parties with regular gang rapes for 3 years and no one knew about it? You are out of your mind. Seriously, look on the floor next to you, that thing that looks like a big wad of gum is your brain... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/26/18 at 20:26:35 192B2C3D3A2B3C032F3C254E0 wrote:
Yeah..... it would be deplorable ;) Which might explain why the deplorable, feel deplorable, and vote accordingly ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by hotrod on 09/26/18 at 21:19:25 I never met a woman that was not on some form of mental medication. Just saying. :o |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/26/18 at 22:17:42 Welcome to the defenders of the "Tit and Clit" club... Where all women are mental, and the "grab'em by the pu$$y" man is defender and chief.... 30% of voters say they want him confirmed,.. even if he did commit sexual assault... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/26/18 at 22:36:49 When Kavanaus wife comes out calling these liars the Bimbo Eruption All you lefties will have to shut up. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by hotrod on 09/27/18 at 05:16:44 Get in there and do your job. That's all I ask. I don't care one bit what they may, or may not have done 20 or 30 years ago. Those things should have been addressed at that time. Just do your job. :-X |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/27/18 at 05:22:39 BTW... there is now a 4th accuser,.. and this one's from 1998... You mean the one who already recanted? Or was that the 5th? Or the 6th, the one that idiot Harris released; an anonymous email with no date, not location, nothing. Jesus, Web... at least have a little suspicion... when I first heard of the Ford case, my immediate thought was dammit.... another Weinstein. However, when I saw the details, no witness, in fact the witness's actually had the opposite view, and I saw the accuser's political history, I was suspicious. I'm sure she was assaulted, it just seems completely unlikely it was Kavanaugh. No one on a jury would convict him. Every accusation after that has been more ridiculous than the last. So I'd ask you to be a little suspicious. Just what accusation would cause you to pause? The last one I heard was he and others gang raped some woman in the back seat of a car. What story would make you stop and say 'wait a second..., he raped 50 nuns on the alter of his Church...?' Would that make you pause....? All I know is you owe Jog a great big fat apology for your condemnation of his 9/11 conspiracy views because frankly it's almost easier to believe a conspiracy like that than to believe Brett Kavanaugh spent one whole summer when he was 17 organizing Animal House style parties that included drugging and gang raping 15, 16 and 17 year old girls. No one ever found out. Not his multiple FBI background investigation, not the hundreds of boys and girls who would have been involved, not a single parent who wondered why their little girl didn't come home on time last night or why she was acting funny the next day or no one got pregnant or an STD or any of that....... It's ridiculous and I hope to God you tell me this was just a joke and you were trying to get my goat, that of course you're not stupid enough to believe something so impossible etc... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/27/18 at 05:31:57 113834343C2B68590 wrote:
I'd have to disagree a little bit Hotrod. If you got drunk at a party when you were in high school or college and made a fool out of yourself with a girl, that's one thing. Maybe you tried to stick your tongue down her throat or grab a boob. And if that happened 20-30 years ago, I'd agree with you 100%, that's not a big enough deal to end someone's career over. I wouldn't hold that against anyone. Cory Booker famously described exactly that and while some would consider that a sexual assault, I don't. However, if someone holds a woman's mouth closed so she can't yell out... that's crosses a line I couldn't agree with. If you're 17 and grew up in a rough, poor neighborhood, okay, maybe I give you a pass. But Kavanaugh's mom was a judge, not sure what his dad did, but they were rich. he went to the best schools, knew the best people when he was younger, he was being groomed for an Ivy League education. I'm sure by the time he was 10 his parents knew he was a genius and with their connections, was on his way to a career as a top lawyer, maybe in politics. I'm sure by the time he was 15 and in high school, Kavanaugh knew he wasn't like the rest of us. He knew he was head and shoulders above everyone else. He knew the silver spoon that he was born with. So for someone like him, holding a girl's mouth closed while you try to undress her is a death sentence. If it were true he did that, I'd vote no way for him to be on the Court. But I don't think he did it. I think she's lying or is genuinely confused who did that to her. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/27/18 at 05:41:38 2B343235282F1E2E1E26343873410 wrote:
Gee jog, that really hurts.... You're gonna make all us dems cry! |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/27/18 at 05:47:10 5A686F7E79687F406C7F660D0 wrote:
LOL - you don't know much about rich kids and what they get into... In my area, the "great suburban school" has more heroin in it than the CPS schools. That's a fact. Ever heard of "latch-key kids"? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/27/18 at 06:01:26 "I moved on her, actually. You know, she was down on Palm Beach. I moved on her, and I failed. I’ll admit it." "I did try and fukk her. She was married." "No, no, Nancy. No, this was [unintelligible] — and I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping. She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” I took her out furniture —I moved on her like a pregnant dog. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look." "Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything." "Grab ’em by the pu$$y. You can do anything." This is what's called, perspective. This is our president. This is the same guy the evangelicals support. This is who the conservatives have representing them. Hypocrisy 101 GOPers - you all passed with flying colors. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/27/18 at 06:06:56 LOL - you don't know much about rich kids and what they get into... So you think high school students in the relatively close-knit community of the privileged DC crowd, were having huge parties every weekend for an entire summer where organized gang rapes were occurring and no one outside of the participants were aware? That's your belief? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/27/18 at 06:17:06 6B595E4F48594E715D4E573C0 wrote:
No, it's not a belief - Rich kids, on average get in far more trouble than those of working class parents. I've seen it. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/27/18 at 06:20:34 I wouldn't doubt it at all. Wow. There is anything left to say other than wow. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/27/18 at 11:26:00 714344555243546B47544D260 wrote:
Say what you like. I know. I have direct experience. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/27/18 at 12:06:51 457770616677605F736079120 wrote:
After watching the questioning, I'll rephrase my answer to this. Dr. Ford came off as very credible and honest. I'm convinced that kavanaugh is the one that's lying. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/27/18 at 13:16:09 I just watched his opening statement and am convinced he is not lying. He did not do this. Dr Ford was likely molested by someone, but it wasn't him. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by LostArtist on 09/27/18 at 13:44:15 0B393E2F28392E113D2E375C0 wrote:
huh, I listened to his opening statement, he's belligerent and highly defensive, a hot head. yes, he might have reason to be a hot head being "falsely" accused of something, but his actions and now he's filibustering and avoiding actually answering questions... Until now I was actually okay with him being approved, but now, no, he doesn't need to be on the highest bench in the land. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by LostArtist on 09/27/18 at 14:26:22 one thing we know.... Kavanau like BEER..... uggg Beer good! what a jerk. I actually thought he was a decent guy and that the democrats were protesting a bit too much in the original hearings, now, nah, he can go home. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by LostArtist on 09/27/18 at 15:22:59 does this guy know how to answer a question without taking 5 minutes?? these haven't been difficult questions, buncha hot air jerk face. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/27/18 at 23:10:20 Kinda looking like you lefties are about to have another butthurt moment. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/28/18 at 02:40:30 03203C3B0E3D3B263C3B4F0 wrote:
Oh please Lost.....if someone looks at you crossways, you pound out an all caps reply and leave for a couple weeks. Now imagine you're completely innocent of ridiculous charges but you're faced with the next 40 years of late night scum leftist SNL comedians "jokes". You're head would explode into a million pieces! |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/28/18 at 02:42:51 5D4244435E5968586850424E05370 wrote:
The Dem Senator in West Virginia is a yes. I suspect quite a few lost some sleep trying to figure out just how f'ing livid a whole bunch of people are at the Democrats right now. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/28/18 at 02:45:52 Talk about Americans. No presumption of innocence, ZERO, in spite of the specious charges. I can't get there that fast. I'm afraid to fly. LIE, 100% Lie. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/28/18 at 03:38:42 I was struck by how distracted she looked. Distracted probably isn't the right word, maybe a better description would be how little she fit her professional history. She is clearly not a mentally stable person. I believe what people who use their common sense see as the most obvious explanation. She was assaulted by someone in her younger years but for whatever reason, she has inserted Kavanaugh into her memory. It's happened plenty of times before. The other explanation is she's making the entire story up. That's certainly possible if you watched the nutjobs who kept interrupting the original hearings And consider the lengths to which the "gang" rape woman is going to which is all obviously fabricated. I don't think that's the case with Ford, I think it's the first one. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/28/18 at 06:32:20 What I saw yesterday was the instability of brett. This only went to compound my doubt. Now I can see that he simply doesn't have the temperment to sit on the highest court in the land. Argumentative, partisan and a suck up to the white house. It should be noted, he brought up the the 2016 election and the clintons to blame for the hearing/"circus" - not smart - it reflects his own partisanship. His aggressiveness backfired. He scolds his detractors and then sinks to their level. His judgement does not seem to be superior. If anything, he showed just how much his emotions guide him in his statements. Dr. Ford welcomed the FBI or any investigation. For whatever reason, he didn't. Not once. He just wants a vote. That leads to more suspicion. And finally - yeah, we get it - you drank beer in high school, you still like beer. Maybe that's a problem you should address. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/28/18 at 06:42:55 For whatever reason, he didn't. Not once. He just wants a vote. That leads to more suspicion. You know why the Republicans are against an FBI investigation and it has nothing to do with the fear if new evidence. You know why, you're not being honest. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MShipley on 09/28/18 at 06:52:05 It is interesting that the only thing the dems kept asking and pushing was for Brett to say " yes, let's delay and have an investigation to clear my name". A delay is all they want. They don't want truth or justice. LOL, it is the Repubs and Orange hair that are an embarrassment . Just trying to save you some time TT. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/28/18 at 07:16:48 Well, Kavanaugh will be on the Supreme Court for the next 30 years so start getting use to it. Trump will be your President for the next 6 years so start getting use to that. The Congress will stay in Republican hands for the next two years so get use to that. My only problem today is that I disagree with your President when he says we'll get tired of winning. I'm not. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by LostArtist on 09/28/18 at 07:51:18 794B4C5D5A4B5C634F5C452E0 wrote:
Oh please Lost.....if someone looks at you crossways, you pound out an all caps reply and leave for a couple weeks. Now imagine you're completely innocent of ridiculous charges but you're faced with the next 40 years of late night scum leftist SNL comedians "jokes". You're head would explode into a million pieces! [/quote] thanks for reminding me why I keep leaving... because it's COMPLETE USELESS to talk to you or anyone on your side here. bye bye enjoy your ANIMAL HOUSE Supreme Court |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/28/18 at 08:08:39 Kavanaugh temperament fail... He lost it in every way possible. Him on SCOTUS is a joke... Give him a 6 pack and send him home... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by LostArtist on 09/28/18 at 08:22:12 http://https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Vbzh3i_cbcKkXyChMCBZhVjlhXtV2lgGN3-yUor3M9b6Xq8o11cssCF7JXGGeDP-CNGm7GrBdGCnSGRHVJPhyimfv1QtnI5h1vit-K6NMavHXCNjPyra5LgRiCGGIjATNsLa1mOMR7ocOjHPZJYOY4IoUF4BnpEJSMUWMVIfs3F-DNOwI-EbcDLakxsqAVxsXwPtZz6NkLhFdn4eb-zN1lK1BboN0TcPQH0zfRUYyXDuuVW_Voxg9l_xLMIdBUUEuprJkNS-nTZWncB2rnAmcEdDbETZSBy4FMdQMnUpwd1iA4_ca9zU6QUhZLTW_SB4S736Ct5eoNXFV_0C4xVtiTAB5VtIHSB1D31hKL-F4M5uAZkxMXVxNKWrAFYpCk0Qq5rqbIkhD5A7Zc-qoDgwQVh8Wjfa6cIeXio8iB-zOLG2CgsVt8eNXCfSJgkVYcJRJhPNaqiw31VyCWXgYslJH6iK2tlEjEzNRWVeJbyT279QjnAgkctx4JeZp7u3zDxDlG7-YqmFSrhA6qnTRra0nfBEp2WHWaztQu9wgf2VKrKfm5rZ86VC_liFovZMqvz5k5JvW5Ap0T-uIt9AOHVREO3OKSMuUugR9mkxzvHyhqjQTdi15IFxwjkrPQerNo=w300-h360-no |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/28/18 at 08:28:18 I thought you were leaving? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/28/18 at 08:30:29 7D6B7C61796C617A0E0 wrote:
I thought he showed restraint given the lies told about that people like you believe against all common sense. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/28/18 at 08:31:43 " You may defeat me in the final vote but you'll never get me to quit. Never." Does anybody understand what he means?... :-? Other than appointment to the court,... what is there to quit?... Beer?... :-/ |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/28/18 at 08:36:55 7A484F5E59485F604C5F462D0 wrote:
What was he restraining?... Tell me. Without his restraint, what might we have seen?... Rolling around on the floor balling like a baby and screaming?... Would you hire this guy for a job?... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/28/18 at 08:46:26 6472657860757863170 wrote:
What was he restraining?... Tell me. Without his restraint, what might we have seen?... Rolling around on the floor balling like a baby and screaming?... Would you hire this guy for a job?...[/quote] I wouldn't live in a place, I couldn't ride half of the year....... ::) Yeah, smart. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/28/18 at 08:51:23 You live in Oregon for God's sake... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/28/18 at 09:10:03 Without his restraint, what might we have seen?... Rolling around on the floor balling like a baby and screaming?... Funny.... He’s not an emasculated man like leftist. I think he should have challenged Booker to a fight. Can you imagine the conversations he had with his daughters, especially the oldest? Can you imagine knowing what they’re gonna hear or see over the years? (like the photo Lost posted) And only because Dems want to win this particular game? They are worse than what Graham called them. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/28/18 at 09:13:31 Have you imagined the conversation Ford had with her children?... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/28/18 at 09:22:37 5345524F57424F54200 wrote:
You do wrong good..... Do you practice at it? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/28/18 at 09:37:42 3224332E36232E35410 wrote:
I’m sure it was similarly awful. She believes what she said happened. It did not. Someone assaulted her, but it wasn’t him. If there’s anyone to blame, it’s the one who did this. Unfortunately, it altered the course of her life. Ultimately, it was Diane Feinstein who purposely set these events in motion, using her as a pawn. She saw this an opportunity to throw a last minute Hail Mary. If she had genuine concern, she would have immediately notified the committee and confronted Kavanaugh. We don’t know who actually know who assaulted her, but we do know who is to blame for dragging her into the public eye. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by LostArtist on 09/28/18 at 09:42:46 Kavanau's pulling the wool over your eyes, idiots, the fact that you can't see it is shameful, but what else should be expected from a bunch of Animal House idiots |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/28/18 at 09:45:14 1C2E29383F2E39062A39204B0 wrote:
You're right - they just want a vote before the midterms. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/28/18 at 09:45:57 6A744F4E574B425E270 wrote:
Thanks m, I don't need your help. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/28/18 at 09:48:04 1E2C2B3A3D2C3B04283B22490 wrote:
Yeah, he's winning alright. ;D ;D Guess you missed his press conference, huh? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by LostArtist on 09/28/18 at 09:48:19 oh wait, these guys voted for Trump.... of course they got the wool pulled over their eyes.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/28/18 at 09:52:59 596B6C7D7A6B7C436F7C650E0 wrote:
I thought he showed restraint given the lies told about that people like you believe against all common sense.[/quote] If restraint means crying at the drop of a hat, and then practically shouting at the panel then... ok. Like I said, he'll get on, but it won't be pretty. He is so over the top partisan it's pathetic. I doubt that he'll ever judge blindly. I expect him to begin the repeal of Roe v. Wade, the voting rights act and stepping on State's Rights. But hey, welcome to the oligarchy! |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/28/18 at 09:54:57 5E4D55484D5B4B2C0 wrote:
Huh? Are you seriously that dumb to say that ray? Where do you live again??? Wow....smh |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 09/28/18 at 09:57:44 526067767160774864776E050 wrote:
I’m sure it was similarly awful. She believes what she said happened. It did not. Someone assaulted her, but it wasn’t him. If there’s anyone to blame, it’s the one who did this. Unfortunately, it altered the course of her life. Ultimately, it was Diane Feinstein who purposely set these events in motion, using her as a pawn. She saw this an opportunity to throw a last minute Hail Mary. If she had genuine concern, she would have immediately notified the committee and confronted Kavanaugh. We don’t know who actually know who assaulted her, but we do know who is to blame for dragging her into the public eye.[/quote] Enough of the difi accusation. It wasn't her. It was Dr. Ford. I can't stand difi, but the truth is the truth. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/28/18 at 10:41:20 It wasn't her. It was Dr. Ford. I'm starting to understand why you reach your conclusions, you simply ignore reality. Feinstein sat on the letter for something like 5 or 6 weeks right? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by verslagen1 on 09/28/18 at 10:52:17 A bigger question: Can Kavenaugh be impartial after this political hit job? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/28/18 at 11:19:02 If by impartial you mean knowing the law and following it, I hope he can, but he will surely know what Trump is fighting and why he was elected. He won't be supportive of the deep state. Trump should pardon Bill Clinton and nominate him. That should be some entertainment.. I think Juanita Broddrick remembers what happened. He should nominate Hillary too. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by LostArtist on 09/28/18 at 11:37:54 check out the bipartisan compromise that just happened! now if people on this board could be that reasonable... so to summarize for those that aren't aware, Sen. Flake voted for Kavanau, out of committee, only if an FBI investigation, within the span of one week, happens before the final vote in the Senate body. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by LostArtist on 09/28/18 at 11:41:03 2C3F2829363B3D3F346B5A0 wrote:
you thought he was impartial?? when did that happen?? he's as conservative a stooge as Gorsich is. But Kavanau is an not a very nice person too. I wouldn't want a frat boy drunken beer swigging jock jackass on the court, but I'm sure he wouldn't have been the first and won't be the last. Kavanau isn't no boyscout, he should stop pretending he is. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/28/18 at 11:53:01 prediction: The scumbag Dems will claim the investigation wasn't long enough or they'll demand an investigation into the other two liars , anything to delay until after the election. Give them an inch, they'll take a mile. But,....I'm checking out of this for a while I'm off to SoCa for a weekend of golf and then week of company meetings. But Flake is a fool if he thinks they won't use him as a leadfrog to the next delay. He's leaving Senate cause he was gonna lose the election anyway. He setting up his future career. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by LostArtist on 09/28/18 at 11:58:29 5F6D6A7B7C6D7A45697A63080 wrote:
such bitterness and hate from you... at least I don't care what you think so I don't have to care about your hateful diatribe, enjoy chasing a white ball around with a stick.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/28/18 at 12:20:06 bitterness and hate The central supports of lefty behavior. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by LostArtist on 09/28/18 at 13:17:39 4D5254534E4978487840525E15270 wrote:
-------------------- and yet I'm not the one calling an entire political party scumbags and accusing them of "giving them an inch and them taking a mile" . I'm not calling a Senator a fool... that's all being done by someone on YOUR side JOG, listen to talk radio much? you'll hear MUCH MUCH MUCH worse from your dear leaders of conservatism. do you remember your hatred spewing forth in every post you made during the election towards that "bipedal pustule" ???? don't pretend like you're all logic and nice and that you don't have deep seated hatred of "lefties" . |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by thumperclone on 09/28/18 at 16:18:26 well things change.... I for one am naďve enough to believe the fbi will conduct a non partisan investigation the system IS working I will stand behind what the fbi finds |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/28/18 at 19:26:37 Strzok, Page, FBI criminals |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 09/29/18 at 03:15:43 As predicted, which was a difficult prediction because I know the Dem senators are scums, they are already crying about the investigation. Once again the truth has always been they don’t care about Ford, they only care about using her long enough to delay the vote or destroy BK life enough he withdraws. Flack was an idiot for thinking for one second these Dems are anything other than awful, terrible scums. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/29/18 at 07:28:20 Flake put country, and people, over party... We all know Kav was lying his azz off... ...and perhaps unnecessarily... He was a big partier, heavy drinker, and skirt chaser... ...and that would be okay. Unless he's hiding an assault,... or two, or three. Why lie?... That's the question. :-? Boofing,... barfing,... Devil's triangle,... FFFFFFForth of July,... "Renate Alumnius",... "Beach Week Ralph Club – Biggest Contributor",... 100 keg club... "Tits and Clits"... The virgin saint lied his azz off... Why?... :-/ |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by hotrod on 09/29/18 at 15:29:27 The FBI is not magic. He will say No. She will say YES. Result = NONE. If I was a Democrat ,I would have everyone calling saying the guy raped me before I was born. This is funny......in a sick way. :o :o :o |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MnSpring on 09/29/18 at 15:43:00 Been gone a while. Just had a truck load dropped on my desk. Yet see,after reading a Bunch of posts. Nothing has Changed ! The just left of center, and the Right of center, are talking like adults, with reason, and support for their arguments, The UL, Progressive, Fairy Dust Sprinkling, Comic Book character believers. Just Insult. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/29/18 at 16:36:40 547D7171796E2D1C0 wrote:
The FBI does things a little different than the Republicans... The FBI will actually interview other witnesses and seek corroborating evidence... You know,... the way grown-ups do it. Kavanope is toast... He said, she said,... is he lied, she testified... He perjured himself with his drinking lies, and his phony definitions of those slang terms... There is no "Devil's triangle" drinking game, it's a hat-trick sex act. (Google it) ...and he testified that he never drank on weeknights, when his calendar clearly has him goin' for ski's at a buddies house with a group of friends on a Thursday night... ... or were they going skiing in July?... ::) Judges can't be perjurers... He's not only losing SCOTUS,.. he's losing his day job... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/29/18 at 19:23:40 6C7A6D70687D706B1F0 wrote:
The FBI does things a little different than the Republicans... The FBI will actually interview other witnesses and seek corroborating evidence... You know,... the way grown-ups do it. Kavanope is toast... He said, she said,... is he lied, she testified... He perjured himself with his drinking lies, and his phony definitions of those slang terms... There is no "Devil's triangle" drinking game, it's a hat-trick sex act. (Google it) ...and he testified that he never drank on weeknights, when his calendar clearly has him goin' for ski's at a buddies house with a group of friends on a Thursday night... ... or were they going skiing in July?... ::) Judges can't be perjurers... He's not only losing SCOTUS,.. he's losing his day job...[/quote] You do believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Clause too, huh :-* ;D How you get home?..... I doan know. Where was this house? I doan know. Do you remember anything on this tragic night that scared you so deeply? I don't know. Blinded by desire, rage, and stupidity, makes a person look foolish. When the FBI finds nothing you will except the results? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/30/18 at 00:18:07 except Accept |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by eau de sauvage on 09/30/18 at 02:18:06 @Versy "Can Kavenaugh be impartial after this political hit job?" It has now become moot because his outright unashamedly Jekyll/Hyde faux poutraged 'mr angry' display at the hearings just highlighted his already well known misogynistic and manifest unfitness to adjudicate without partisan politics. Especially in this volatile clime when someone stuck in the outmoded past of female suppression, abuse and denial of opportunities, has been set up as the decisive vote by a cunning anti democratic deceitful GOP, who only govern due to gerrymandering and non proportional representation in the Senate. When Roe vs Wade comes up which it will inevitably do sooner rather than later, this is the sort of snotty nose virgin who hung around the big dogs but in reality was just an angry, woman-hating (because of his obvious insecurity) prIck who will be allow yet more subjugation of women, and this at a time when Ireland has just overturned their abortion laws. So they blocked Merrick Garland who Obama put up precisely because he was seen as non partisan and would be sure to get approval, but soon to be dead Mitch's legacy will live on long after he's rotted away. Worst of all is that Bannon will be in orgasmic delight while he watches the political branch whip the judicial branch into line, which throwing a good dose of chaos and unnecessary demeaning of the traditions of government. Meaning in the future, the bar has been set. I would hope that next full elections the Dems have enough majority in both houses, and the will to undo this damage done to the Supreme Court by stacking the Court as it now is surely time to do. They can appoint another 4 judges making a total of 13. And the Supreme Court is definitely a place where women should be given equal representation. It can not be in govt, but it needs to be in this institution. Furthermore it's virtually now 100% certainty that sometime during Kavanaugh's reign he'll be outed for lying under oat, which would be an untenable situation for a lifetime judge. There are plenty of other partisan judges who the GOP could push through without any hassle given their current majority, but no, they really want this asshat. Not matter what the GOP decide (and we already knew that before the hearing) they are going to have to come to the realisation that it's not going to install Bretty. https://youtu.be/9hsPpgxm3U4 |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by eau de sauvage on 09/30/18 at 02:45:14 Impossible to view the first 30 seconds and not conclude that Kavanaugh is lying every nuance of his dazed look, and his stalling confusion and stuttering and every so sly probing, trying to not get tricked into being caught lying. But liars cannot keep this up indefinitely which is why he cracked, it's easy to bluster your way through with a mr angry persona. https://youtu.be/Tsm1GPnlqmU and finally...a great finish from CB https://youtu.be/x6Ng298HXcM?t=4m56s |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/30/18 at 03:05:44 And exactly NOT ONE of her Witnesses support her lodeOshitt story. But you believe her. Phhht |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by eau de sauvage on 09/30/18 at 03:38:32 Narcissist Trump https://youtu.be/SNYZYxLSgPQ?t=44s https://youtu.be/zEhpmh4xVHA?t=3m27s https://youtu.be/7dfAd0IglrA |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/30/18 at 07:13:15 3A252324393E0F3F0F37252962500 wrote:
;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/30/18 at 07:14:41 76647073646260050 wrote:
Where did you get your degree from? Yep, amazing how liars can spot a lie, ain't it bloke ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/30/18 at 07:38:40 Body language experts, if such a thing exists, say he's truthful. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/30/18 at 08:00:11 233C3A3D20271626162E3C307B490 wrote:
Oh, ok..... Well, what does head up azz indicate? :-/ I mean, c'mon..... This guy has been through much scrutiny to get to the point of where he was. Dems and Cons, FBI, etc, have had the chance to look at this guy many times. They voted on confirmations before, etc......and, what, not a peep. We are suppose to disrupt the whole process because of such a allegation with no, like in NONE, collaboration and evidence? Who are the f'n idiots I ask? Not the same as Garland, period. Yes, it was a maneuver to deny a qualified person the opportunity to serve, HOWEVER, it was done within the perimeter of how these politicians use the system to their OWN advantage, like Harry Reid, etc. This crap is off the charts, and has opened up a major avenue that will forevermore be utilized against the opposition, or by sleazy folks, and attorneys, to shake rich dudes down. Ain't a guy alive who can defend himself against such charges if it is strictly a woman's word against his, NO ONE Watch out sports figures, rockers, actors, you are next.... Break out your checkbooks. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MnSpring on 09/30/18 at 09:36:37 [/size] 283B233E3B2D3D5A0 wrote:
A-Yep !!!!!!! Anybody with two nickels to rub together. That is ANYBODY. 68 year old woman: “Remember that night, when you took me to 2001: A Space Odyssey, Then driving home, you stopped by the duck boat landing on the, ‘old duck road’, and kissed me. Well I am going to sue your azz into the ground” If you haven’t read the play, ‘The Crucible’, read it. This is exactly what the tt’s, lost’s, and the UL, Progressive, Fairy Dust Sprinklers WANT. (In the voice of Ed McMahon) “Heeeeer, comess, Abigail’ |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MnSpring on 09/30/18 at 09:54:09 76647073646260050 wrote:
382B332E2B3D2D4A0 wrote:
For those, (especially the ones from, ‘down under’), who do not believe in any, ‘body, face, hands, movement, language’. I want to play Poker with you. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/30/18 at 11:00:10 65467B585A41464F280 wrote:
382B332E2B3D2D4A0 wrote:
For those, (especially the ones from, ‘down under’), who do not believe in any, ‘body, face, hands, movement, language’. I want to play Poker with you. [/quote] Be careful what you wish for.... He might only play strip poker, and folds a straight flush, if you catch my drift ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by eau de sauvage on 09/30/18 at 11:14:57 http://https://i.postimg.cc/C1RS08MT/Screen_Shot_2018-10-01_at_4.15.15_am.jpg |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/30/18 at 11:35:00 Nobody, not ONE of the people she claims were there, have agreed with her. There is no evidence. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/30/18 at 15:09:58 524D4B4C51566757675F4D410A380 wrote:
So, your point? Its not about her, its about denying. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Serowbot on 09/30/18 at 15:38:35 Ford no longer matters,... Kav perjured himself. Reached after the hearing, Lynne Brookes, an undergraduate classmate of Judge Kavanaugh’s at Yale University, said she believed he had “grossly misrepresented and mischaracterized his drinking.” “He frequently drank to excess,” she said. “I know because I frequently drank to excess with him.” "Another Yale classmate, Elizabeth Swisher, now a Seattle physician, said: “I drank a lot. Brett drank more.” “I definitely saw him on multiple occasions stumbling drunk where he could not have rational control over his actions or clear recollection of them,” said Daniel Lavan, who lived in Mr. Kavanaugh’s dorm freshman year. “His depiction of himself is inaccurate.”" |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/30/18 at 16:08:22 LMAO...... You are a nut case...... You went from rape, to a beer guzzler, to what, a Russian spy? ;D He admitted to drinking and liking beer......so? Oh, he was so gawd dang drunk he raped her and forgot, yeah, you get that lil' thingy up when its that saturated with beer, sure tang punkin.... I mean, pretzel man ;D Parkay..... No, butter. Parkay..... No butter..... Its not nice to tease liberals ;D Gawd, I can't stop laughing... Not to even mention the amount of beer it would take to become this way, it would take lots of it, over a period of time, and you would see this behavior A LOT, out of many, many people witnessing it, that is the nature of alcoholism...jeez. next. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MnSpring on 09/30/18 at 16:09:13 4751465B43565B40340 wrote:
WOW, revealing statements. Has anybody, ‘checked’, If they are, ’Trump Haters at all costs’. ?????? When it is shown they are, Da Ya think that has any relevance ? (Oh Wait, that is not relevant) (can you say, DOUBLE DOWN) ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 09/30/18 at 16:45:07 02211C3F3D2621284F0 wrote:
WOW, revealing statements. Has anybody, ‘checked’, If they are, ’Trump Haters at all costs’. ?????? When it is shown they are, Da Ya think that has any relevance ? (Oh Wait, that is not relevant) (can you say, DOUBLE DOWN) ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D [/quote] This is getting so asinine stupid now..... Let see, this 17 year old had such a bad habit, he could drink enough beer, to black out ( HEY..... is calling it "black" racist? ) and try and rape girls because he became belligerent with his excessive drinking, yada, yada, yada..... But it never effected his grades, or any other elements of his life, is that fn it......???? No WAY Jose. I am a drunk, it took years to get that way. And my life suffered GREATLY getting to that point. 17 years was not enough time to pull off such a stunt, and to keep your life together so well that you became a judge, etc..... No mention in any school records of behavioral problems, NONE.... GAWD Bot, you better not fall off your barstool.... One more whack on your head and who knows what you will believe ::) |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/30/18 at 17:23:59 Even her bestie said, Huhh? Whatchew tawkin Bout Willis? NOBODY she has claimed were there remember anything. Talk about support where none is due.. Lefties have great imaginations. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/30/18 at 21:21:27 She's completely destroyed https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/here-is-the-complete-list-of-inconsistencies-and-lies-that-prove-christine-fords-accusations-against-judge-kavanaugh-belong-in-a-trash-heap/ |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Matchless G11 on 10/01/18 at 03:04:41 4D6E537072696E67000 wrote:
A-Yep !!!!!!! Anybody with two nickels to rub together. That is ANYBODY. 68 year old woman: “Remember that night, when you took me to 2001: A Space Odyssey, Then driving home, you stopped by the duck boat landing on the, ‘old duck road’, and kissed me. Well I am going to sue your azz into the ground” If you haven’t read the play, ‘The Crucible’, read it. This is exactly what the tt’s, lost’s, and the UL, Progressive, Fairy Dust Sprinklers WANT. (In the voice of Ed McMahon) “Heeeeer, comess, Abigail’ [/quote] I think the Salem witch hunts come to mind or shades of McCarthyism. I find it funny that Hollywood libs scream how bad this is but they had put out movies like "Risky business, Fast times, Porky's and a slew of so called "teenage" movies prompting the worst in morals, and then they are surprised that we are now here with this mess. :o |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/01/18 at 06:49:19 As I've said before, using antidotal evidence to predict an outcome is somewhat suspect, but it lead me to understand completely that Trump was the likely winner in 2016. This week I'm in California with the entire company. Somewhere around 350-400 people. These are made up of business owners who are our distributors, engineers and sales who work for them, our group of engineers, sales, management along with the corporate people from Sweden. I played golf over the weekend with 9 of these. The level of anger at the Democrats was off the charts. At the initial reception last night with the whole group, the Kavanaugh fiasco came up over and over. Again, the level of anger at the Democratic party as a whole is greater than anything I would have imagined. I spoke with only two who offered a half hearted defense of the Dem's sabotage of a good man's character. While some thought Ford was flat out making everything up, the overwhelming consensus was she was certainly assaulted but is mentally unstable when it comes to her memory and inserted Kavanaugh into the role of her attacker because of her leftist politics. That's exactly what i've thought all along. There will be no blue wave. The Dems over played their hand. Even the most casual political observer has been turned off by their evil tactics. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by thumperclone on 10/02/18 at 05:01:44 he wont be teaching at Harvard this winter as he had planned imo he lacks the credibility and temperament for the scotus |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/02/18 at 08:06:33 Credibility? 12 years in his current position, other legal positions for years before that. Was hired for different positions by two current Supreme Court Justices . Has been on a short list for couple years. What could be more credible? Temperament? Let's destroy your life with lies that will never go away and then check your temperament. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/02/18 at 09:35:05 And besides, even if she doesn't remember getting into someone's car right after the assault, what about the person behind the wheel? Why haven't they come forward? Do we have two coinciding cases of convenient amnesia on our hands? The only way a person might forget about the time they picked up a traumatized 15-year-old girl is if there was no indication in the girl's demeanor or behavior that she was traumatized. But that brings us back to the question of whether or not a girl might conceivably run out of a house after such an experience without giving off any vibes at all that she had suffered such an experience? That is difficult to believe. Especially if the person who drove her home was a friend. Even more so if the person who drove her home was a parent. We must assume that it was either a parent or a friend, unless she hitchhiked (which she would certainly remember), so the story just doesn't add up. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MnSpring on 10/02/18 at 12:58:19 Only 5% of Minnesota Democrats, believe, Ellison is Guilty. According to Stats touted by the UL’s in Minn. “…The Minnesota Star Tribune and Minnesota Public Radio News polled 800 likely voters between Sept. 10 and 12 on the Minnesota attorney general race. In response to a question on whether each voter believed the allegations leveled at Ellison are true, 5 percent of Democrats responded “yes,” 30 percent responded “no” and 65 percent were unsure….” So the UL paper, (nicknamed by many as the, ‘Red Star’), said. A-Yep the UL’s, Progressives, and Comic Book believers, sure are smart ! "MINNEAPOLIS – A second woman has accused Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison( D-MN) of domestic violence, and a 911 report supports the woman’s accusation.” https://www.lauraloomer.us/blog/911-record-documents-claim-of-keith-ellison-s-domestic-assault A-Yep the UL’s, Progressives, and Comic Book believers, sure are smart ! "An attorney hired by Minnesota Democrats to investigate domestic abuse allegations against Minnesota Democratic Rep. Keith Ellison reportedly concluded the accuser’s claim was “unsubstantiated.” A-Yep the UL’s, Progressives, and Comic Book believers, sure are smart ! |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 10/02/18 at 12:58:29 so the story just doesn't add up. According to the almighty moderator, who can censor the TRUTH.... The "story" is immaterial now, so it is a moot point. Ford no longer matters,... Kav perjured himself. It's about beer ;D Like trying to argue with a 2 year old ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 10/02/18 at 13:39:13 574B564E534651404F4C4D46230 wrote:
Field this one sport, will ya? https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/10/02/building_documents_undermine_fords_exit_door_account.html |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/04/18 at 04:21:36 What happened to the Kavanaugh talk on here? Did you leftist finally acknowledged what the rest of us saw instantly? That Ford was a fruitcake liar, the other two, especially the third, was so ridiculous only an idiot would think for a second it real? Odds are we'll have Justice Kavanaugh by Friday or Saturday. In another few weeks, we'll have red congress for next two years. A huge number of people who were casual political observers loathe Democrats now. Loathe them. And they'll vote. And after you lose in November, we'll listen to months of hilarious explanations of why you lost, none of which will be correct. Should be good entertainment for the start of winter. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/04/18 at 04:36:57 Nothing Ford said held up. I'm hoping for a perjury charge for her and another one. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 10/04/18 at 08:29:58 It has already been established and spoken by Booker and Bot, and others..... It never was about her. She was just a avenue, to access, to get to Trump. I mean golly, he lost by 3 million votes, like that horse ain't dead yet either, to some idiots :-[ Like a pimp, pretending to care about his hooker, he only really cares about his pocketbook. Pathetic...... yes, however, some are really that far gone, they can't see their own duplicity, which again I state: IS THE REASON TRUMP IS EVEN IN THE WHITEHOUSE PS: Yes, he is exceeding far more than I ever thought this man was capable of, however, I will not vote for him in 2 years "if" given the chance to elect another viable person. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by verslagen1 on 10/04/18 at 08:51:41 Maybe the dems should get that mayor from Canada to go against trump. ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 10/04/18 at 08:57:30 293A2D2C333E383A316E5F0 wrote:
Why? Hillary won by over 3 million votes. Third time is the charm. Or....... 4th..... ;D Or 5th..... Or when all the white boys are in prison, from sexual harassment allegations :o |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/04/18 at 15:25:48 172522333425320D21322B400 wrote:
As a follow up to this, my Uber driver this morning was a black man born in South Carolina but now living in San Diego. He brought it up, not me. He was pissed at the Dems for what they did to him. I'm thinking a red tide is on the way. Maybe a high tide. Leftist revealed just a little too much of themselves this time....... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/04/18 at 15:29:50 1B292E3F38293E012D3E274C0 wrote:
;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/04/18 at 16:07:13 C-SPAN video surfaced of former Justice John Paul Stevens, 98, criticizing Kavanaugh while speaking to retirees in Boca Raton, Florida. "He’s a fine federal judge and he should have been confirmed when he was nominated. But I think that his performance during the hearings caused me to change my mind," Stevens said. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/04/18 at 17:16:49 Where's the rulebook on How to behave when you're being slandered and your family threatened. Screw that old guy. I’m amazed at the progressives who argue that Kavanaugh should not have expressed anger that he has been accused of being a rapist, and that he shouldn’t have lashed out at such accusations even if they are entirely false. If being accused of being a rapist isn’t a big deal, then rape isn’t a big deal.” |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/04/18 at 17:46:49 7A656364797E4F7F4F77656922100 wrote:
He simply doesn't have the self control. That is quite evident. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 10/04/18 at 18:01:28 Read it again...... It should have been over, period, the FIRST TIME. ::) look here, they are fine people supporting Kav. From 1988 to 2006, I served as a district judge in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, becoming chief judge in 2000. Additionally, I have worked with many judges throughout my career, in private practice and in government service. So the concept of judicial temperament is not an abstraction for me, but one that I have had to give considerable thought to. As it turns out, Judge Kavanaugh is not a newcomer to these concepts either. He had not one but two hearings to become an appellate judge on the D.C. Circuit. His first hearing was in 2004, but his nomination was initially filibustered by Senate Democrats for partisan reasons, based on his role in President George W. Bush’s administration. He was re-nominated and eventually confirmed in 2006, but not before being subjected to another round of intense partisan attacks. With the bitter taste of partisan acrimony still in his mouth, Judge Kavanagh began his tenure on the D.C. Circuit — considered by some to be the second-most important court in the country. He has served in that role with distinction and earned widespread respect across the ideological spectrum. It was no surprise to those of us who know him that Elena Kagan invited him to teach at Harvard Law School when she was dean there; or that he was recently introduced to the Senate Judiciary Committee by leading feminist lawyer Lisa Blatt; or that he has been praised by leading legal liberals such as former Obama Solicitors General Don Verrilli and Neal Katyal. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/10/04/on_the_question_of_judicial_temperament_138257.html But never mind, we got in-house idiots who know otherwise ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/04/18 at 18:10:17 He simply doesn't have the self control. That is quite evident Only an emasculated man would say that. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/05/18 at 05:41:57 073532232435221D31223B500 wrote:
LOL - emasculated? Seriously mark, why do you think you know anything about me? You really don't. Further, why would an emasculated man say that? Would you know anything about that personally, or...? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/05/18 at 05:44:11 744641505746516E425148230 wrote:
Oh, and please tell me how you cons wouldn't be all over this had this been a lib crying at the hearing... Is there an actual class for conservative hypocrisy? Is it online? :D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/05/18 at 05:57:46 I know EVERYTHING about you. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/05/18 at 06:24:06 Below is the Executive Summary of the FBI's report. Supplemental FBI Investigation Executive Summary Background At the Senate Judiciary Committee’s request, the FBI opened a supplemental background investigation into Judge Kavanaugh. It’s his seventh FBI background investigation in 25 years, going back to 1993. The request was for an investigation into current credible allegations against Judge Kavanaugh. In the course of its investigation, the FBI decided to reach out to eleven people, ten of whom agreed to be interviewed. The FBI reached out to all witnesses with potential firsthand knowledge of the allegations. The FBI provided to the Senate 12 detailed FD-302 reports summarizing their interviews with the witnesses as well as supporting materials cited by the witnesses during their interviews. Interview Subjects The FBI interviewed the following ten individuals: Ford Allegations The three individuals identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as having attended the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted. Mark Judge PJ Smyth Leland Keyser Mark Judge PJ Smyth Leland Keyser Two other individuals included on Judge Kavanaugh’s July 1, 1982 calendar entry. Timothy Gaudette Christopher Garrett Timothy Gaudette Christopher Garrett An attorney for one of the witnesses Ramirez Allegations Deborah Ramirez Two alleged eyewitnesses named by Deborah Ramirez (a third alleged eyewitness refused to submit to an interview) Deborah Ramirez’s close friend from college Conclusion The Supplemental Background Investigation confirms what the Senate Judiciary Committee concluded after its investigation: there is no corroboration of the allegations made by Dr. Ford or Ms. Ramirez. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/05/18 at 06:29:05 497B7C6D6A7B6C537F6C751E0 wrote:
Really? What's my name? |
|
Title: Kavanaugh Post by WebsterMark on 10/05/18 at 07:54:33 Did we lose an entire thread? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanaugh Post by verslagen1 on 10/05/18 at 07:59:30 until further notice. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanaugh Post by raydawg on 10/05/18 at 08:39:15 6B786F6E717C7A78732C1D0 wrote:
Can you elaborate any further? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanaugh Post by WebsterMark on 10/05/18 at 08:53:22 interesting. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanaugh Post by WebsterMark on 10/05/18 at 09:31:52 So the vote is set for tomorrow by 5 or something near there. Plenty of time for wachos to get out there and violently protest still. Or if you're a celebrity, you can get carefully arrested. Then go back to your industry which protects real abusers...... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by verslagen1 on 10/05/18 at 09:44:57 demerits issued, thread re-instated. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/05/18 at 10:17:39 What'd TT fo now? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/05/18 at 11:49:22 162423323524330C20332A410 wrote:
I posted your PM to me. (I didn't realize that was a no-no. My apologies to the Mods.) You remember, the one where you swore at me, called me names and tried to berate me? The only PM you ever sent to me... It was in reference to you knowing nothing about me - and me knowing exactly what kind of person you are. So... you get my name yet? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/05/18 at 12:48:48 Collins is laying out an excellent, logical case why she will support BK including how ridiculous the gang rape claims were and basically saying anyone who would believe they had the IQ of a grape. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/05/18 at 12:54:48 You sure bring up that PM a lot. Some bizarre fascination with it. If you ever have a low count and need some material to prime the pump so you can provide a sample, I suppose you could print it out and take it with you.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 10/05/18 at 13:00:29 5E6C6B7A7D6C7B44687B62090 wrote:
It was very well presented.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 10/05/18 at 13:01:15 7B494E5F58495E614D5E472C0 wrote:
No need to, just repackage it, and pretend again..... ;) |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/05/18 at 13:05:22 7A484F5E59485F604C5F462D0 wrote:
Well mark, it pretty much speaks to what kind of person you are. I for one have never, and would never send such a PM. Sending such a PM shows the lack of character and the defensiveness of the person sending it. It shows fear and hate of someone they have no control over. Yeah, I know what kind of person you are - I don't call that out unless it's called out on me. I've refrained from person jabs. But once one is pointed at me, I will retaliate. You say you know exactly who I am, yet you don't even know my name. Now, either drop this, or it will continue. Keep personal attacks out. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 10/05/18 at 13:09:17 resist ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/05/18 at 13:13:35 Dissent is the highest form of patriotism! |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/05/18 at 13:16:00 Still sticking to my 85% chance of confirmation on brett. (NOTE - This is just an exhibition, it is not a competition. Please, no wagering..) |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/05/18 at 13:16:30 132126373021360925362F440 wrote:
Thus my feelings toward donny. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/05/18 at 13:39:17 I think you missed the point. Anyway, you’ll have to do without me for a couple days. Have a good weekend. If you need a PM I guess I can take a little time And sent you one. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/05/18 at 14:26:24 7B494E5F58495E614D5E472C0 wrote:
dissent |d[ch601][ch712]sent| noun the expression or holding of opinions at variance with those previously, commonly, or officially held: there was no dissent from this view. No, I get it. I (and many millions like me) dissent from the conventions of republicans and establishment democrats. Further, we dissent forgiving our president in his inane actions while occupying said position. Lastly, I will dissent brett being appointed to the Supreme Court. As I said, I understand dissent. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 01:37:02 Christine Ford’s friend Leland Keyser said on Friday she was pressured by Democrats to change her story on Brett Kavanaugh and lie to the US Senate. How about that,,,, |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/06/18 at 06:16:08 746B6D6A7770417141796B672C1E0 wrote:
How about that? You believe Leland.... of course you do, it supports your position. Duh! Too easy, too predictable. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/06/18 at 06:55:35 Ford lied repeatedly and implicated Keyser in her scheme. Between the two, you would have to be unreasonable to believe Ford. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/06/18 at 07:11:32 Lied about fear of flying. Lied about door. Lied about reason for door. Didn’t say it was for renting office space. Didn’t say the couple therapist she told story to was the one renting the space. Said she couldn’t remember if the hours long polygraph test was same day as her grandmother’s funeral. (Seriously?) Threw her “friend” under bus by revealing health issues. Those are the obvious lies and flaws. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 10:12:08 3C222D2C213C273A480 wrote:
How about that? You believe Leland.... of course you do, it supports your position. Duh! Too easy, too predictable.[/quote] If someone says their best friend saw something, and the friend says No, I didn't AND Every witness she claimed said the same NOT believing them is idiotic. Hey, her friend is a woman. Gotta believe her. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 10/06/18 at 10:46:31 2D3234332E2918281820323E75470 wrote:
How about that? You believe Leland.... of course you do, it supports your position. Duh! Too easy, too predictable.[/quote] If someone says their best friend saw something, and the friend says No, I didn't AND Every witness she claimed said the same NOT believing them is idiotic. Hey, her friend is a woman. Gotta believe her. [/quote] Jog buddy..... It is a total waste, to even TRY, to argue with a 2 year old....... Even a pimple on your butt, you know, the ones that always get inflamed and painful when sitting, etc..... Will go away, if you just leave them alone. They whine, call names, chant, rage, and challenge, answering their own questions, assigning it as fact, yet, it never satisfies them, and they keep doing the same thing, over, and over, and over again...... Yeah, crazy huh, those darn 2 year olds. ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 11:22:30 Zero substantiation, even from FRIENDS. And now, a friend says, she was pressured to lie. I hope it's investigated. Witness tampering is serious. Leland Keyser and Christine Ford THERE ARE NO WITNESSES WHO HAVE CONFIRMED CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD’S ACCUSATIONS! NOT ONE! Leland Keyser is working with the Judiciary committee and has testified for the THIRD TIME now that she has NEVER been at a party with Brett Kavanaugh. Now this… Christine Ford’s friend Leland Keyser said on Friday she was pressured by Democrats to change her story on Brett Kavanaugh and lie to the US Senate. This is today’s Democrat Party. Yeah, it is.. Ruthless, violent, angry, dishonest, |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MnSpring on 10/06/18 at 13:00:59 7C6365627F7849794971636F24160 wrote:
Be very careful JOG. I just got, ‘called to the carpet’, for calling decisions of the, UL, Fairy Dust Sprinkling Snowflakes, A, UL, Fairy Dust Sprinkling Snowflake decision. Because you are saying things like, ‘Witness tampering”, in describing the, Witness tampering the Democrat Party did. Be careful, you also, may get called to the carpet. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 13:10:53 Evidence speaks for itself. Ford is a liar and perturbed herself. Her BEST FRIEND stands against her and reports attempts to get her to lie. The viciousness of the lefties is on many outlets for all to see. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/06/18 at 13:13:53 4E5D45585D4B5B3C0 wrote:
At anytime, on any subject ray. I will debate you. You're simply not man enough. Keep up the great work. You guys are all going the way of mn. You're all in great company! :D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/06/18 at 13:15:20 5B444245585F6E5E6E56444803310 wrote:
There is no evidence either way. Not to worry , your boy brett will get confirmed - if he doesn't have a mental break down first. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 13:17:32 When four people say your claims are Bullshit, that is evidence you're LYING. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 13:20:00 Everything she said The door Fear of flying Everything she said is discredited And THANK YOU LEFTIES! The not completely insane democrats are ashamed of the rest of you. This is driving people away from the left. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/06/18 at 13:23:58 687771766B6C5D6D5D65777B30020 wrote:
I guess we'll see at the midterms just how "terrible" we are, huh? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 13:27:48 That or how stupid America has become. We did manage to get Trump in office. And you lefties cried about the coming destruction, But nope.. You were wrong then, too. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 14:14:36 boyfriend dropped a bomb! Her former boyfriend wrote the US Senate and told them Christine Ford coached a friend on how to pass a polygraph test. This is in direct conflict with Christine Ford’s testimony under oath to the the US Senate. Ooopsies... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 14:16:26 AAAAAND CONFIRMED!!! Reason over hysteria, Again.. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MnSpring on 10/06/18 at 14:22:06 2B353A3B362B302D5F0 wrote:
Really. Let’s see, you walk down the street, you get stopped, then, someone takes your wallet, then another your watch, then another your (new Nikes), than the shirt off your back. Then your partner says: "Wow, did they steal from you" then you say: “…There is no evidence either way….” That, would be a most definite, UL, Progressive, Click heals together 3 times, Fairy Dust Sprinkling, Kum-By-You, Snowflake statement. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/06/18 at 14:30:03 Another win. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 14:42:55 Snot over miner Magazine, digital edition: In-depth features, top columnists, policy coverage, weekly video from editor - CLICK HERE Digital Magazine Log In | Subscribe Saturday, October 06, 2018 Staffer who 'doxed' GOP senators faces nearly 50 years in federal prison by Kelly Cohen | October 05, 2018 01:31 PM Print this article 00:21 / 01:22 Sign up for News from Washington Examiner Email Address The former Democratic congressional staffer who posted personal information about Republican senators online faces nearly 50 years in prison. Jackson Cosko, a 27-year-old Washington, D.C., resident, was arrested Wednesday by U.S. Capitol Police when he was caught sneaking into the offices of Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., after 10 p.m. Tuesday and using an aide’s computer and log-in. He was charged with five federal offenses: making public restricted personal information, making threats in interstate commerce, unauthorized access of a government computer, identity theft, and witness tampering. Let the proctoscope used against Kav be used again.. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 14:55:38 There is no evidence either way. Except for the fact that every claim has been proven to be false , (afraid of flying, door, )or, refuted by people who she said were there. Yeah, outside of that, nothing. Now you know why I don't CARE about what you think. You decide what you're Gonna believe, and then you ignore the inescapably Obvious, and pretend your beliefs are founded in reality. Phhht. Sour grapes? Really? You're ridiculous. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 16:00:00 » Permalink ^ Oct 06 09:50 Exclusive: Final Report on Kavanaugh Investigation Released by Senate Judiciary Committee Tags: POLITICS/ELECTIONS/CORRUPTION The Senate Judiciary Committee released their final report on the Brett Kavanaugh investigation. The FBI did not find evidence to back up a single charge against the conservative judge. All of the alleged witnesses disputed Christine Ford’s allegations. This is despite the fact that Christine Ford’s friend Leland Keyser said on Friday she was pressured by Democrats to change her story on Brett Kavanaugh and lie to the US Senate. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 16:04:24 But you believe the allegations, pretending there is no evidence one way or the other, in spite of nothing BUT evidence Ford is lying. Your supporting idea? She's got nothing to gain.. In spite of the fact that she's a Never Trumper She would have had I stopped Kavanaugh On her tombstone. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by thumperclone on 10/06/18 at 16:30:18 he's now sworn in but its not over I said it before and say it again perjury/lying to congress is a crime |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 16:35:52 Then Ford is in TRUBBLE... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 16:52:22 No woman makes up phony allegations of sexual assault. Not Christine Blasey Ford, not Deborah Ramirez, not Tawana Brawley, not Crystal Gail Mangum, not Jackie the UVA phony rape victim among many other campus rape hoaxers, not women going all the way back to biblical times like Potiphar’s wife. No one. An obvious takeaway is that these dupes have no idea why they oppose Kavanaugh. Herd animals go where the drovers direct them. The drovers want the Supreme Court — which exists to defend the Constitution — to be corrupted into a tool to override the Constitution by imposing policy from the bench. On a tip from Lyle. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MnSpring on 10/06/18 at 17:08:25 4A564B534E5B4C5D5251505B3E0 wrote:
I equate the, Believing of Ford, to crap like this: “…I write you since I attached a trojan on the web page with pornography which you have viewed. My virus captured all your private data and switched on your web cam which captured the process of your solitary sex. Just after that the trojan saved your contact list. I will erase the compromising video records and data if you pay me 600 EURO in bitcoin. This is wallet address for payment : 1BG7Tq9N5L8PptCDUrH1u9Uv6hUZZKNVFG I give you 30 hours after you open my report for making the payment. As soon as you view the message I'll see it immediately. It is not necessary to tell me that you have sent money to me. This address is connected to you, my system will erased automatically after transfer confirmation. If you need 48 hours just reply on this report with +. You can visit the police office but anybody can't help you. If you try to deceive me , I'll see it right away! I don't live in your country. So anybody can't track my whereabouts even for 9 months. bye. Don’t forget about the shame and to ignore, Your life can be destroyed….” Yep total Spam, only a, UL, Fairy Dust Sprinkling, Kum-By-You singing Snowflake, would believe something like the above. Oh Wait, their ARE some. THAT's why the DFI's send this crap out !!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/18 at 23:11:59 Former CIA Director John Brennan assures us that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, is “a national treasure.” And his former colleague, James Comey, has urged investigators to “dig deeper.” So begin at the beginning of her Senate Judiciary Committee testimony: “I had never told the details to anyone until May 2012, during a couple’s counseling session. The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and I had completed a very extensive, very long remodel of our home and I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand. In explaining why I wanted a second front door, I began to describe the assault in detail.” Powered By Under questioning from Sen. Diane Feinstein, Ford described an agonizing after-effect of the alleged Kavanaugh attack that caused her to demand that second door: “Anxiety, phobia and PTSD-like symptoms are the types of things that I’ve been coping with,” Ford said. “More specially, claustrophobia, panic and that type of thing.” FEINSTEIN: “Is that the reason for the second front door? Claustrophobia?” FORD: “Correct.” The trade-off, apparently, was evident in Ford’s statement that “our house does not look aesthetically pleasing from the curb.” From the view on Google Earth, or Redfin, one can’t see the second door easily and the house appears no uglier “from the curb” than it ever did, if it did. But a glance at the real estate databases about Ford’s house are instructive. The Fords bought the house on June 20, 2007. And the “very extensive, very long remodel,” including the second front door, were completed under a building permit granted in 2008. So a natural question is why, four years after the remodeling, which also added two rooms and a bathroom, is the installation of that second door still such a bone of contention between the couple that it was an issue in the counseling they were undergoing in May 2012? One key may be Ford’s continuing testimony to Feinstein, after describing the aesthetic difficulties “from the curb.” FEINSTEIN: “I see. And do you have that second front door?” FORD: “Yes.” FEINSTEIN: “It…” FORD: “It - it now is a place to host Google interns. Because we live near Google, so we get to have - other students can live there.” Now that she mentions it, the additional remodeling in effect added a self-contained unit to the house, with its own entrance, perfect for “hosting” or even possibly renting, in violation of the local zoning. Perhaps a professional office might be a perfect use, if an illegal one. And in the tight Palo Alto real estate market, there are a lot of games played for some serious income. And that may answer another strange anomaly. Because since 1993, and through some listings even today, there was another tenant at what is now the Ford property. It is listed as this person’s residence from 1993 to July 2007, a week or so after she sold the house to the Fords. Her name is Dr. Sylvia Randall, and she listed this address for her California licensed practice of psychotherapy, including couples psychotherapy, until her move to Oregon in 2007. Currently she only practices in that state, where she also pursues her new career as a talented artist as well. But many existing directories still have Dr. Randall’s address listed at what is now the Ford residence. Which raises other questions. Why has Christine Ford never said a word about Dr. Randall? And why has she been evasive about the transcripts of her crucial 2012 therapy session, which she can’t seem to recall much about either? Did she provide them to the Washington Post, or did she just provide the therapist’s summary? Who was the psychologist? In a phone call, I asked Dr. Randall if she had sold her house to the Fords. She asked back how I had found out. I asked if she was the couples therapist who treated the Fords. She would not answer yes or no, replying, “I am a couples therapist.” So was the second door an escape for Christine Blasey Ford’s terrors or was documenting her terrors a ruse for sneaking a rental unit through tough local zoning ordinances? And if the second door allowed access and egress for the tenant of a second housing unit, rather than for the primary resident, how did the door’s existence ameliorate Ford’s professed claustrophobia? None of this means that her charges against Kavanaugh might not be perfectly valid, but her explanation for the “second door” looks like it could use more investigation. At the very least it appears to be a far more complicated element of Ford’s credibility than it originally appeared. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/07/18 at 05:29:20 The creepy porn lawyer and his unbelievable story of gang rapes exposed two things. 1) There are some people so partisan, they'll believe anything, regardless of how outlandish it is, as long as it's against their opponent. How can you ever take those people serious again? 2) Rational people suspected something happened to Ford but her trauma created some type of false memory. They were going to forgive her mistakes and let it go. After the other set of ridiculous charges, they looked at her again through a more suspicious filter and she's thought to be another partisan liar. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/07/18 at 06:56:30 Trump is THE BEST president I've seen. I am just holding my breath, hoping he can avoid war with Iran. We need out of Syria, well, as far as I'm concerned, out of everywhere. But the reasons for being involved may be to achieve long range security, not just oil, but critical minerals,etc. Libya was not a target Obama chose. It was handed to him, he sold it to the dumbmasses, and the party of peace ate it up. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/07/18 at 07:24:29 786761667B7C4D7D4D75676B20120 wrote:
Ooo.. thanks jog - I needed that laugh!! |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 10/07/18 at 10:31:18 Unemployment rate is the lowest its been since 1969..... Why is this important? Because most of life's problems are centered around folks low self esteem, and lack of self respect. A person with a job, that wants a job, and finds a job, that is a HUGE piece of the puzzle to feeling good about themselves. What it does is free their "outlook" from one of negativity, to POSSIBILITIES ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/07/18 at 10:47:56 Trump is responsible for that. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/07/18 at 15:02:14 425D5B5C41467747774F5D511A280 wrote:
Delusional. How many points did unemployment drop under Obama? How many under trump? Where were all the economic indicators when Obama took office. Where were they when trump did? Housing starts are down under trump. Wages are stagnant under trump. Get ready for war - then tell me how much we're "winning". Seriously, is there a class on hypocrisy that the conservatives run online? Is it expensive?? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/07/18 at 16:00:59 Get ready for war - then tell me how much we're "winning". The war Obama raged, err, waged, wasn't his decision. Check the list. Look at what we've done. Someone is calling the shots. General Wesley Clarke List of countries that we will invade Made public shortly after 9/11 |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 10/07/18 at 16:35:57 In an interview with "60 Minutes" on CBS News, his first since the Democratic drubbing in last Tuesday's mid-terms elections, Mr Obama said that he sometimes gets "discouraged" about the poor economy but realised that it was not entirely his fault. "There are times when I thought that the economy would have gotten better by now," he said. "You know, one of the things I think you understand as president is you're held responsible for everything, but you don't always have control of everything, right?" He insisted he was not worried about another depression or recession but the unemployment rate, stuck at just below 10 per cent, was a major concern. fail. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/07/18 at 19:49:31 617E787F62655464546C7E72390B0 wrote:
Yet trump is so great, nothing will happen without his "greatness"....???? Please... you're transparent. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/07/18 at 19:52:47 24372F32372131560 wrote:
"Fail"? So... that's where the story ended, huh? Please ray - go back and read your other posts - try some consistency, huh? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/07/18 at 23:36:43 435D52535E435845370 wrote:
Yet trump is so great, nothing will happen without his "greatness"....???? Please... you're transparent. [/quote Read what I said. Try it without the venom. Our foreign policy seems to have been decided some time ago. Read the list. Look at what is going on. Forget who is in office. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/18 at 06:11:37 Let's stay on point. The mob foolishly believed an unbelievable story. I think both TT and Sew expressed belief in tales of weekly gang rapes over the summer. Collins herself pointed out the ridiculousness of this story and I suspect it played a role in her decision. The question is how could so many believe such obvious nonsense? On the other hand, mass delusion might be the norm. The real question then becomes who is better at determining reality? And if a delusion is recognized, who is more reliable at calling it out for what it is? Good questions for the day. 506265747362754A66756C070 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MnSpring on 10/08/18 at 07:50:14 4C525D5C514C574A380 wrote:
Don't know. DO Know, their is one for UL, Progressives. It's right here in MN. I thought you were a Graduate of it ? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/18 at 08:44:45 TT's hypocrisy street always runs one way, but the truth is, hypocrisy is a two way street. It's a joke for the Dems to pretend to be all upset over sexual assault less than two years removed from nominating a woman who protected and intimidated her husband's victims. They get away with it because of a complicit media and entertainment culture. That doesn't mean it goes unnoticed however. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/18 at 08:53:18 It's a joke for the Dems to pretend to be all upset over sexual assault less than two years removed from nominating a woman who protected and intimidated her husband's victims. The bimbo eruption... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 09:46:35 596B6C7D7A6B7C436F7C650E0 wrote:
No mark, I just call it like I see it. You're going to tell me that if brett were a democratic nominee and went off like he did that you and your cronies wouldn't be all over that? Please - nobody's that stupid. We all know that the republicans are currently defining hypocrisy every single day that trump occupies the office of president. From his childish tweets to his fake Christianity to his constant stream of lies... you guys made quite a bed for yourself. If the House turns blue - you can count on a vote for impeachment. If the Senate tilts, then you've got huuuge problems.. Until then, I'll just continue to watch the world turn and for trump to dig his hole deeper - with no one but himself to blame. It's quite the show! |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 09:47:34 6D7274736E6958685860727E35070 wrote:
[/quote] Wow - I feel so sorry for the women in your life. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanaut Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/18 at 09:57:29 Really? Why? You should feel sorry for Bill's victims who were destroyed by Hillary. She sure did a number on them. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/18 at 09:58:17 You're going to tell me that if brett were a democratic nominee and went off like he did that you and your cronies wouldn't be all over that? Republican voters would have never agreed with what Feinstein did. Republican voters would have never made up stories like the ones made up to destroy Kavanaugh. We would not have stood by and let lunacy rein. We would not have been stupid enough to believe a story like gang rapes. Seriously, you believed that? Are we perfect? Hell no. But are we as dumb as what was on display from the Democrats these past couple weeks? Hell no. Now, I know you. You'll fall back on the Trump pu$$y grabbing comments and the fake Russian stories, but let's face it, nothing Trump has said or done rises anywhere near what Feinstein and the Democrats on the Judicial committee did. it's not even close. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/18 at 09:59:06 657B747578657E63110 wrote:
[/quote] Wow - I feel so sorry for the women in your life.[/quote] That's kind of an out of line, personal attack. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanaut Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 10:02:24 213E383F22251424142C3E32794B0 wrote:
And you show such respect for women in general.... oh, or is that "wimmenz"? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 10:03:27 645651404756417E524158330 wrote:
[/quote] Wow - I feel so sorry for the women in your life.[/quote] That's kind of an out of line, personal attack. [/quote] Is it? So calling women "wimmenz" is cool? You think the women in his life are cool with that? Let the mods decide. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/18 at 10:05:25 Try to let this soak in. Wimmenz was meant to be derisive AND aimed AT the Lying no good P.O.S. B!tches who chose to destroy a man who did NOTHING wrong. I even typed out a story about an innocent man in Odessa.. But you missed it, right? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 10:06:28 7C4E49585F4E59664A59402B0 wrote:
Wow, your denial is epic! trump has done far worse in just one day! Have you never read his tweets? Have you ever listened to the idiot off-prompter?? Do you know how many out and out lies he's told just in the last month??? Are you really that ignorant to everything that is wrong with the man?? Those are rhetorical questions... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 10:07:34 6F7076716C6B5A6A5A62707C37050 wrote:
Gee jog, back-peddle much? To paraphrase you - "women lie all the time". Yeah - keep going... you'll be just fine. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/18 at 10:20:11 Wow, your denial is epic! trump has done far worse in just one day! Have you never read his tweets? Have you ever listened to the idiot off-prompter?? Do you know how many out and out lies he's told just in the last month??? Are you really that ignorant to everything that is wrong with the man?? Those are rhetorical questions... Can you point to something specific where's he's destroyed an innocent man's life with made up, horrible stores, for week's on end? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/18 at 10:21:12 But, here's a question. A legit question. Do you believe Ford's story that Kavanaugh assaulted her and if so, why? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 14:04:03 724047565140576844574E250 wrote:
Yes, I believe her. She put herself out there knowing full well that it probably wouldn't stop him. Now, she can't even go home because of the death threats - how about that - violent threats from the right?? Gee, never saw that coming.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 14:05:56 132126373021360925362F440 wrote:
First off, ol' beer barrel brett's gonna be fine. Second, just read donny dumpster's twitter feed for a week - you'll find something. Better yet, look at what he said about ted cruz's dad on the campaign trail... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 14:17:51 A sitting Supreme Court justice-Kavanaugh already was sworn in on Saturday by the person who was supposed to do it, Chief Justice John Roberts-is going to participate willingly in a meaningless masquerade of a partisan campaign event. Let me call special attention to this. The conservatives on here would have freaked the F out if this had been Obama parading his choice out to the public like this. Hypocrisy 101 - (see conservatives/republicans in 2018). Mic drop. http://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/wait-judge-brett-kavanaugh-told-181400206.html |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/18 at 14:20:22 617F70717C617A67150 wrote:
[color=#0000ff]Yes, I believe her. color][/quote] Okay, but why? Imagine you were on a Grand Jury and the prosecutor brought you a set of facts for you to decide if there was enough to indict or not. Given the facts you know, would you vote to indict? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 14:30:33 754740515647506F435049220 wrote:
I would have. You see, in a Grand Jury, you don't hear the defense. And even your boys over at fox "news" said it was compelling. They even went so far as to say this looked terrible for the republicans. brett's rebuttal was entertaining, but if anything it showed me how unstable he is under pressure. But you guys on the right think it's all well and good that he got so emotional... Funny how that works.. Most every single lawyer that I know and from everything I read online from former SCOTUS judges to the BAR association agree with my viewpoint. He's not emotionally fit to serve on that bench. But of course, that's now moot. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/18 at 14:51:49 So you would have indicted someone based solely on the emotional testimony of an accuser? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MnSpring on 10/08/18 at 15:17:44 574946474A574C51230 wrote:
Whooooo, their are two, one from Chicago, that say it IS COOL. For you to imply, it is NOT COOL. Well then, YOU must be a Racist ! |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 15:37:57 0B393E2F28392E113D2E375C0 wrote:
Yes. As I said, I've sat on a Grand Jury. (but of course, nothing like this would ever wind up on a Grand Jury - this was not an indictment, there was no felony charge) Her case was compelling and given the circumstances, I found her believable. Talk to chris wallace on fox "news" - he felt the same way after hearing her side. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 15:39:39 14370A292B30373E590 wrote:
Whooooo, their are two, one from Chicago, that say it IS COOL. Their what? What are you talking about? That sentence makes no sense. For you to imply, it is NOT COOL. Well then, YOU must be a Racist ! [/quote] Get back to me when you master basic grammar. Bless your heart. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/18 at 15:48:16 Ford had everything to gain. A never Trumper, stopping a good man from the bench, FFS, she would have been a darling of the lefties And had I stopped Kavanaugh On her tombstone. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MnSpring on 10/08/18 at 15:50:59 5C424D4C415C475A280 wrote:
A Yepper, 'their' is dat ypicial TROLL resspnece. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/18 at 15:51:55 564847464B564D50220 wrote:
First off, ol' beer barrel brett's gonna be fine. Second, just read donny dumpster's twitter feed for a week - you'll find something. Better yet, look at what he said about ted cruz's dad on the campaign trail...[/quote] Again, you conflate the dissimilar What Trump has DONE VERSUS What he said. You're not so bright. Haven't you figured out how he uses Twitter to Jack morons up until they prove how stupid they are? He plays lefties like fiddles. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/18 at 15:55:59 I get it's not a real Grand Jury. But...the facts that we know are: She made an assault claim. At least 5 other people were there including the two who she says attacked her. Throw those two out. That leaves three. One was unidentified. That leaves two. Of those two, neither had any memory of the gathering. Of those two, one was her closest friend at the time and not only didn't she recall the gathering, she said she never heard of Brett Kavanaugh. If any of what I laid out above is incorrect, please correct. Assuming it's correct, you'd still 'indict' Kavanaugh? And if so, based upon what? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 16:08:27 5D4244435E5968586850424E05370 wrote:
First off, ol' beer barrel brett's gonna be fine. Second, just read donny dumpster's twitter feed for a week - you'll find something. Better yet, look at what he said about ted cruz's dad on the campaign trail...[/quote] Again, you conflate the dissimilar What Trump has DONE VERSUS What he said. LOL - OK jog, so then we shouldn't take anything the president says seriously? Yeah - gimme a break. You're not so bright. Haven't you figured out how he uses Twitter to Jack morons up until they prove how stupid they are? Oh yeah, that's exactly what he does... <<<<<sarcasm ::) He plays lefties like fiddles. [/quote] He is a moron who couldn't find his a$$ with both hands and a roadmap. But I guess that's fitting for today's conservatives/republicans... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by raydawg on 10/08/18 at 16:13:01 He is a moron who couldn't find his a$$ with both hands and a roadmap. But I guess that's fitting for today's conservatives/republicans... Calling you a idiot, would be a compliment. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 16:21:25 685A5D4C4B5A4D725E4D543F0 wrote:
I think he's guilty, yes. Why? Her therapy in 2012. Keith Koegler and several others that the FBI didn't interview. His proven lies. His demeanor towards the questioning. But mostly it goes to character. brett is obviously unfit. Now, why are you beating a dead horse? He's on the bench and all this is a moot point now. Maybe you should think how partisan he's going to be - since he's taking part in a meaningless ceremony with our president to show him off to the world. Live by the party - die by the party. jog already said he's voting straight ticket out of spite. I guess that's no surprise given the state of the conservatives/republicans of today. Sad. The only one who's winning (or at least, he thinks he is) is the orange idiot in the white house. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 16:23:33 2C3F273A3F29395E0 wrote:
Wow -again ray, what a comeback! Do you have a Masters in debate??!?? ^^^^sarcasm Get back to me when you have something worth my time. Until then, stay in your hole until it's time to come out to cheer.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 16:26:07 756A6C6B7671407040786A662D1F0 wrote:
Yeah - in other words, nothing. Like I said, go talk to Anita Hill and see how "great" it was for her. Your "peace loving rightes" are now threatening Dr. Ford's life. Tell me again how bad the lefties are?? SMH |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 16:27:03 14370A292B30373E590 wrote:
A Yepper, 'their' is dat ypicial TROLL resspnece. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D [/quote] Still haven't grasped it, huh? Better luck next time mn. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/18 at 16:53:08 I think he's guilty, yes. Why? Her therapy in 2012 The therapy she said was a result from a conversations with her husband after she said she insisted on double front doors during an earlier home remodeling. The doors were a 'symbol' of the trauma she experience at the hands of Kavanagh. However, those doors were actually put in a couple years before and were to allow for renters to enter only a certain section of the home. You heard that right? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MnSpring on 10/08/18 at 17:13:00 170906070A170C11630 wrote:
Who’s are they ? Are they mine, JOG’s, WM’s, raydawg’s, a Moppet’s, someone else’s ? You said: “Your “peace loving rightes” are now threatening…” Please explain, ‘WHO’ the “peace loving rightes” belong to. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 19:36:45 132126373021360925362F440 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 19:46:16 587B4665677C7B72150 wrote:
Who’s are they ? Are they mine, JOG’s, WM’s, raydawg’s, a Moppet’s, someone else’s ? You said: “Your “peace loving rightes” are now threatening…” Please explain, ‘WHO’ the “peace loving rightes” belong to. [/quote] Well mn, once again I find it kind of pathetic that I have to explain a simple concept to you... but here goes... I was addressing jog in my comment (I quoted him, did you see that?). Therefore, given the context, he was the one I was assigning the "peace loving righties" to. You see, in past posts, he (along with mark) alluded to lefties being more violent. So, it was with a little sarcasm that I stated Your "peace loving rightes" Now, if you'd like I can say the same to you. Would you like me to do that? Do you feel left out? But I shouldn't be so hard on you. I know how much all your conservative friends on here love you. They look out for you... You poor thing... bless your heart... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/18 at 19:49:56 so did you hear about the doors? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/08/18 at 19:52:19 152720313627300F233029420 wrote:
Yeah - not a make or break for me mark. I believe her. Get over it. budweiser brett's on the bench and suckling on trump's taint. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/18 at 20:12:52 So she lied about the doors and you're okay with that? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanauy y Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/18 at 20:25:21 She doesn't know Where the house is When it happened How she got there How she got home Or Who was there.. Justice Kavanaugh will probably not be gentle on lefty causes. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/09/18 at 04:57:26 Truth is, he's not the Roe v Wade tool Trump said he wanted. He won't vote to overturn Wade at all. I'm not positive even Thomas would. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/09/18 at 05:05:25 He's big on precedent. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/09/18 at 05:29:39 Great analysis in The Wall Street today. Makes a good case that all those who criticized Mitch McConnell owe him a big fat apology. With the slimmest of majorities, he's got 26 appellate court judges confirmed and a now a majority of constitutional Supreme Court judges. (Ginsburg can't hang around much longer.) The current court might not over turn Roe v Wade, but they will crack down on sanctuary cities, local gun laws that violate recent court rulings, remind everyone of the constitutional authority of the President with regards to boarder enforcement etc.... We've got a good foundation in place to protect the nation against the leftist favorite (only?) place to get their policy enacted, the Courts. They can't win elections and they can't get the country to go along with their lunacy through elections but they've been able to do damage by getting a few in key places. Did Mitch succeed in plugging the holes, at least for a while? Seems so. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/09/18 at 05:51:36 5A686F7E79687F406C7F660D0 wrote:
It doesn't matter to me. Who actually knows why the door went in? Only in her head... BFD. Let me repeat mark - I believe her. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/09/18 at 05:52:49 5D4244435E5968586850424E05370 wrote:
And keg stands! |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by Eegore on 10/09/18 at 05:55:58 I find it interesting that President Trump stated he was "proven innocent" when that isn't at all what happened. He wasn't proven anything, guilty or innocent. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/09/18 at 06:03:46 332D22232E332835470 wrote:
It doesn't matter to me. Who actually knows why the door went in? Only in her head... BFD. Let me repeat mark - I believe her. [/quote] Actually, we know why and when the door went in. She lied. But you believe her. Not surprising. Something about birds of a feather comes to mind..... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/09/18 at 06:05:17 6545474F5245200 wrote:
What do you find interesting about that? Do you find it interesting or are you just looking to maintain your 'middle of the road' persona so you can quietly take shots at Trump? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/09/18 at 06:05:39 182A2D3C3B2A3D022E3D244F0 wrote:
It doesn't matter to me. Who actually knows why the door went in? Only in her head... BFD. Let me repeat mark - I believe her. [/quote] Actually, we know why and when the door went in. She lied. But you believe her. Not surprising. Something about birds of a feather comes to mind.....[/quote] Yeah mark, get over it. But if you're so worried about lies, maybe take a look at your orange saviour's twitter feed... You may only find about 1200 lies there.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/09/18 at 06:13:42 Let me be blunt. You're a liar. You're a habitual liar. So it's not surprising that with zero evidence, you can type the most ridiculous of statements: "I believe her". Why don't you get one of those little buttons and wear it on your blouse at work today? I give up. You're hopeless. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/09/18 at 06:27:42 526067767160774864776E050 wrote:
Good - it's about time. Not everyone thinks like you and you can't define people to fit your needs - good that you accept that. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/09/18 at 06:40:22 Remember the last time you got that way? You sent me a vulgar PM. WTF is it with the PM? Seriously? "I believe her".... good God.... what has happened to this country? Some liar makes up a story and a bunch of pu$$y boys line up behind her, bow their heads and follow her off a cliff? What the hell's the matter with you? She lied...she made up a story to destroy a man. She's no different that Tawana Brawley or that stupid mattress girl. Is that who you want to be associated with? |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/09/18 at 09:12:53 063433222534231C30233A510 wrote:
Look at you go! Even though keg-stand kavanaugh is on the bench, you're still gonna cry like a baby. We believe her. You don't. We get it. Get over it. SMH |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/09/18 at 09:32:46 i don't even recall it, sorry to disappoint you but it wasn't important to me. You believe her based on nothing, let's be clear about that. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/09/18 at 09:40:45 Her BEST friend Nope Everyone else Nope Where did it happen? Uhh, I don't know.. When was it? I don't know.. And YOU BELIEVE HER. I have a bridge for you. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/09/18 at 09:46:19 Sell him that bridge, cut it in half, tell him Ford told him it was fine and he'd drive right off the edge..... He's a good reason why juries can be scary. "I believe her." Why? There's no evidence? "I don't know, I was told to believe her so I do...." |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/09/18 at 09:50:49 And speaking of Kavanaugh, and I'm about done with this thread, thank you Mr. President for apologizing to Judge Kavanaugh on behalf of all of us. Particularly for reminding his children what a good man their father is. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/09/18 at 12:26:27 457770616677605F736079120 wrote:
No, not nothing. I believe her because of what she sacrificed and her sincerity. Look where she's at today versus him. She can't even go home because of death threats from the righties... And seriously mark - get over it, and yourself. Newsflash - not everyone thinks like you do. You are not the center of the universe. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/09/18 at 12:27:45 6B747275686F5E6E5E66747833010 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/09/18 at 12:28:13 1C2E29383F2E39062A39204B0 wrote:
Aww, how cute. Get a room you two... geez.. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/09/18 at 12:31:11 5E6C6B7A7D6C7B44687B62090 wrote:
Yeah, it's great to see a Supreme Court Justice play along in a partisan show on fox "news". You all should be so proud. If only Obama would have done that... oh well. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/14/18 at 05:47:35 Again, leave it to my girl Ann, an American treasure, to expose the truth to the light of day. GOP NEEDS UPDATE TO DEMS’ UFC CAGE MATCH RULES October 10, 2018 It's time to update the GOP's Marquess of Queensbury Rules. If you saw Ruth Bader Ginsburg at Brett Kavanaugh's swearing-in ceremony, you know that we may need to fill her seat in about 4 1/2 minutes. Naturally, I hope she lives to be 300 -- although parenthetically, it seems she already has. The confirmation hearings for Kavanaugh made Robert Bork's hearings look like a day at the beach. At least liberals only lied about Bork's judicial philosophy. They didn't accuse him of being Ted Bundy. The next nomination hearing will make Kavanaugh's look like an ice cream social. Just because it didn't work this time doesn't mean Republicans' work is done. They have to make sure this never happens again. Democrats are already pushing the idea that Kavanaugh's confirmation was somehow illegitimate because of the shoddy FBI investigation. Liberals' beef is that the FBI neglected to interview Kavanaugh's former Yale classmates, who dispute his characterization of precisely how big a drinker he was in college. I wouldn't say he was a belligerent drunk, but more of an obstreperous drunk. No, no! I would say he was a mild drunk with periods of obstreperousness. This is not the stuff of perjury prosecutions. Of course, if true, it's HUGE. Kavanaugh's demeanor when drunk in college sounds nearly as awful as liberals' behavior when sober -- obnoxious, aggressive and argumentative. I refer you to the recent antics we've seen on Capitol Hill, as well as anywhere Ted Cruz stops in for a bite. Since none of the FBI's latest report on Kavanaugh has leaked, the one thing we can be sure of is that the agents turned up nothing unfavorable on him. Except for a colonoscopy, I think we're done with Kavanaugh. It's the accusers who have skirted investigation. Even Republicans have moved on. He's on the court, so who cares if Kavanaugh was falsely accused of "rape" in front of his little girls? That's what everyone thought when the falsely accused Duke lacrosse players were proved innocent and the D.A. was disbarred. Why go after the accuser? Hasn't she suffered enough? Crystal Mangum was not prosecuted for falsely charging she was gang-raped. And see? No harm, no foul! She went on to live a happy and productive -- oh, wait! The next time we heard about Mangum was when she stabbed her boyfriend to death. On reflection, it certainly seems possible that Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick was not being completely, 100 percent honest in her sworn statements about repeatedly attending high school parties in the 1980s, when she was a college student, where underage girls were drugged and gang-raped. Deborah Ramirez's three-decade-old, unsubstantiated, recovered memory of a drunken Kavanaugh exposing himself as a college freshman is the sort of charge that makes feminists laugh! (I know that from reading Gloria Steinem's explanation in The New York Times that Gov. Bill Clinton summoning a female underling to his hotel room, dropping his pants and saying, "Kiss it!" did not rise to the level of sexual harassment. He took "no" for an answer!) Perhaps Republicans could get Steinem to explain under oath why it's acceptable for a sitting governor to do what is disqualifying for a drunk college freshman to do. While no one would question the word of a living saint like Christine Blasey Ford, some parts of her testimony demand the clarity that can be obtained only in a formal legal proceeding -- such as her trauma-induced need for two front doors (when the second front door seems clearly attached to a rental apartment); her fear of flying (but only when it will delay a confirmation hearing); and her claim that she never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph (contradicted by her ex-live-in boyfriend); among other things. Pretending they are the wronged ones, liberals keep yipping about Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland. They believe any attack on Kavanaugh was justified after the dirty trick pulled by Republicans on Garland. The Republicans' refusal to hold hearings on Garland has been called an "unprecedented obstruction" (MSNBC's Chris Hayes), a "violation of traditions in norms" (Hayes again), an "insult and injury" (Sen. Cory Booker) and "remarkable and unprecedented" (MSNBC's Rachel Maddow). The GOP's treatment of Garland showed their "hypocrisy on Brett Kavanaugh" (MSNBC's Ari Melber). The truth is apparently a big secret, inasmuch as even Republicans aren't saying it. You'll read it here for the first time. The Republicans' wily, underhanded, double-dealing trick with Garland was this: Win a majority of seats in the U.S. Senate! I know liberals won't read the Constitution, but can they do math? Garland didn't have the votes. Republicans had 54 seats and, in 2016, Senate rules still required 60 votes for Supreme Court appointments. Democrats would have needed 14 Republican senators to switch sides to confirm a Democratic president's nominee. There was no way that was happening. A Republican Senate simply wasn't going to give "consent" to any Democratic nominee eight months before a presidential election -- even an election that everyone thought Hillary was going to win. The Constitution says "advice and consent," not "advice and rubber-stamp." There was nothing "unprecedented" about a Republican Senate rejecting a Democratic nominee -- other than the fact that Republicans were the ones doing it. Democrats do it all the time. That's how we got Justice Anthony Kennedy -- whom Kavanaugh replaced: A Democratic Senate rejected Reagan nominee Robert Bork. That's also how we got Harry Blackmun, author of the ridiculously lawless Roe v. Wade: A Democratic Senate rejected Richard Nixon's previous nominees Clement Haynsworth and G. Harrold Carswell. It would have been a waste of time and only humiliated Garland to hold hearings. At least Republicans didn't accuse him of gang rape. COPYRIGHT 2018 ANN COULTER |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/14/18 at 07:42:01 LOL - ann coulter.... |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/14/18 at 13:17:21 627C73727F627964160 wrote:
LOL, YOU |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by MnSpring on 10/14/18 at 13:59:03 776966676A776C71030 wrote:
LOL, YAHOOOOOOOOOOO 'news' |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by WebsterMark on 10/14/18 at 16:14:07 Since none of the FBI's latest report on Kavanaugh has leaked, the one thing we can be sure of is that the agents turned up nothing unfavorable on him. The most important and truthful line. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/14/18 at 19:02:34 716E686F72754474447C6E62291B0 wrote:
LOL, YOU [/quote] Wow... ripping retort jog. :D |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by T And T Garage on 10/14/18 at 19:05:10 15360B282A31363F580 wrote:
LOL, YAHOOOOOOOOOOO 'news' [/quote] So, it's obvious that you don't pay attention. I dunno why you don't learn, but for the record, most of the posts from Yahoo come from other news sources. Like AP or The Guardian, etc. I guess it's too much for you to understand.. |
|
Title: Re: Kavanau Post by LostArtist on 10/15/18 at 19:42:45 [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FngaU-CK0Zk[/media] nuff said, better than I ever could |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |