|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> DiFi /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1536940476 Message started by WebsterMark on 09/14/18 at 08:54:36 |
|
Title: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/14/18 at 08:54:36 Wow.....how low can you go?............ She sat there and smiled at his daughters and the girls sports teams he brought in and introduced to all the Senators....all the while knowing she had a bull$hit letter she was going to turn in at the last second to make him look bad...... What a scum Diane Feinstein is. Absolute scum of the earth. If the letter has anything that's genuinely of concern, it would have been brought up then so it's nothing. This is a last ditched effort to make herself look better to her scum leftist base..... The FBI looked at it and simply included it in the background file meaning there's nothing to investigate. Feinstein knew that before she turned it over. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by raydawg on 09/14/18 at 09:48:56 this is suppose to be about when he was 17? |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by faffi on 09/14/18 at 15:24:36 Never heard of her or the case, but found this on top when googling https://www.thedailybeast.com/dianne-feinstein-what-in-the-hell-were-you-thinking?ref=scroll |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by oldNslow on 09/14/18 at 16:54:54 7D7A7D7D721B0 wrote:
You do know that the Daily Beast is nothing more than a fountain of of ultra leftist bullshi*t I hope. What else would you expect to find "on top" of a Google search? This "accusation" is nothing more than a last ditch hail- mary pass by the senate democrats who know that they are losing this one. They can't attack this guy on his credentials, or qualifications, or even, in fact, his morals, so this is what they are left with. "Sexual misconduct" is the political shiv of the day. These as*holes don't even have the imagination to come up with something original. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/17/18 at 04:57:42 Here's the question of the day: How do you know who's telling the truth? He says didn't happen, she says it did. 35 years ago. She didn't tell anyone until she was talking with a couples therapist in 2012. The other guy who was supposedly there says it didn't happen. Kavanaugh swears it didn't happen. She took a lie detector test administered by the FBI and passed. Nothing in Kavanaugh's background points to anything that would suggest he assaults women. Not much know about her non-professional backgrbecause her social media has been taken down I read. If that's true, I'm a little suspicious of that. Women lie about sex more then men do, that's a given. Just because a woman claims an assault took place, doesn't automatically means it occurred. And liberal media hypocrisy is at an all time high given the fact they supported Hilary and ignored they would be putting a serial abuser and flat out rapist in the White House. So, how do you discern who's telling the truth? |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/17/18 at 06:12:18 hmmm....... *does it matter that she gave to HRC campaign? *Marched in a pu$$y hat parade, was quoted in local paper with the usual anti-trump nonsense you'd expect from a lefty liberal professor *Some of her student reviews said she was a loon.... dangerous... all over the board with her comments....don't get her on your bad side... *her parents house was foreclosed on and the presiding judge was...get this... Brett Kavanagh's mother, Marth Kavanagh. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by faffi on 09/17/18 at 06:56:59 635156474051467955465F340 wrote:
Really? You have any figures to support that? Other than that, I think if it's not been out in the open for 35 years, it should probably remain hidden. I think it is reasonable to believe it happened; most teenagers have done silly things they regretted, particularly when intoxicated. That doesn't automatically label them as permanently horrible, though. Personally, I know nothing about the proposed judge other than a few glimpses I've seen on TV. To me, he looks like a sleaze-bag, just like Trump. But it would be wrong to judge a book by its cover alone - he may be honest and kind even his appearance suggest something else to me. I still think it would be wrong to disqualify him over an incident that took place that far back where the damage, if the case is real, was fairly limited. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by oldNslow on 09/17/18 at 07:10:00 132126373021360925362F440 wrote:
Right out of the Alinsky playbook. The ends - in this case sabotaging a supreme court nominee - justify the means. Never mind how patently dishonest and contrived the "means" happen to be. It amuses me how outraged the lefties and the RINOS get when someone plays by the same rules when attacking them. All of a sudden they are non-stop whining about the "lack of civility and decorum." And their media lackeys wring their hands and pi*s themselves. I think the day is rapidly approaching when this kind of sh*t is going to stop being amusing. If folks think things are ugly right now, I suggest they just wait a while. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/17/18 at 08:17:51 I think the day is rapidly approaching when this kind of sh*t is going to stop being amusing. I don't know what would be the impetus to arrive at that. We've seen some pretty ridiculous stuff. the whole Tawny Brawley incident and Sharpton has his own 'news' show so go figure that one. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/17/18 at 10:05:17 And since I saw Crazy Uncle Joe Biden on a video telling me I'm deplorable, it would good to remind everyone about the last time the scum leftist Senators lead by Biden, gave a platform to a wacho (Anitia Hill) in order to stop a conservative nominee. Look at the Dems on the committee. Biden, who gropes women when he says hello and Ted Kennedy who kills them after nailing them. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZURHD5BU1o8 |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/17/18 at 10:06:59 7F787F7F70190 wrote:
Really? You have any figures to support that? . [/quote] Every man knows that. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by Eegore on 09/17/18 at 10:20:44 My experience is that both men and women lie equally about most things. I have no reason to think sex is any different. I have no data or references, this statement is based off of my own interactions and when compiled and posted represents my opinion. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by faffi on 09/17/18 at 12:49:51 764443525544536C40534A210 wrote:
Really? You have any figures to support that? . [/quote] Every man knows that. [/quote] A lot of men I've met brag about how many women they've fekked, with the numbers being heavily exaggerated more often than not. Also, what the majority of women consider an assault, a surprising amount of men will consider mutually agreed sex. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by T And T Garage on 09/17/18 at 13:15:40 So, instead of just shutting up about it, one of the trump boys (I forget if it was beavis or butthead) felt the need to tweet about the accusation and brought more ire from everyone. Like idiot father, like idiot son. http://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/youre-repulsive-human-donald-trump-jr-receives-harsh-criticism-seemingly-mocking-kavanaughs-sexual-assault-accuser-instagram-170737485.html Maybe someday they'll learn to shut up (but I doubt it). Talk about your thin-skinned snowflakes... |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/17/18 at 15:01:50 6545474F5245200 wrote:
Lying about having sex when you didn't is one thing, lying about having sex when you did is quite another. If you don't know women lie way more than men about the latter, then you've missed out on some interesting adventures.... |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by raydawg on 09/17/18 at 17:13:25 0F3D3A2B2C3D2A15392A33580 wrote:
Lying about having sex when you didn't is one thing, lying about having sex when you did is quite another. If you don't know women lie way more than men about the latter, then you've missed out on some interesting adventures....[/quote] Do sheep count? :-[ |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/17/18 at 20:26:43 1A2425293B2726480 wrote:
Right out of the Alinsky playbook. The ends - in this case sabotaging a supreme court nominee - justify the means. Never mind how patently dishonest and contrived the "means" happen to be. It amuses me how outraged the lefties and the RINOS get when someone plays by the same rules when attacking them. All of a sudden they are non-stop whining about the "lack of civility and decorum." And their media lackeys wring their hands and pi*s themselves. I think the day is rapidly approaching when this kind of sh*t is going to stop being amusing. If folks think things are ugly right now, I suggest they just wait a while. [/quote] She's a nut. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by faffi on 09/18/18 at 01:21:54 If I understood you correctly, only a nut would call her a nut. The issue was brought forward in 2012, 6 years before the nomination, hence not a plot to ram the candidate. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/18/18 at 02:41:00 Students who are subjected to her say she's scary. Regardless of when it was first spoken of, if someone thought it was real, why did it take till now to get the publicity? He didn't need to be destroyed until the supreme court opportunity? She's a nut. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/18/18 at 03:42:15 Nothing. Zero. Nada. Zilch. “She didn’t say anything in the confirmation hearing, she didn’t say anything in our confidential session with Judge Kavanaugh when the senators and the nominee met privately. And now, after it’s all over, she produces the letter.” Sen. John N. Kennedy, (R-LA) |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by oldNslow on 09/18/18 at 04:03:53 The woman making the actuations may be a nut, and she is most assuredly just a useful idiot, but Senator Feinstein is not. She knows exactly what she is doing. The senator is perfectly well aware that these allegations are bogus, and the the accuser will be destroyed if she has to testify at a hearing. Feinstein doesn't care. The point of all this is to delay the confirmation vote. If possible delay a vote until after the midterms in the hope that the dems will retake the senate. Or maybe get a couple of wobbly RINOS to vote against Kavanaugh if the vote can't be pushed off that far. Feinstein is an evil bit*h, but she is not nuts. It's a long shot, but right now it's all the dems have got. It might even work. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by raydawg on 09/18/18 at 05:39:45 Nuts is.......using more that one screen personality to post. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/18/18 at 06:13:15 3A3D3A3A355C0 wrote:
Not exactly. See below. Which I don't believe by the way. Are you telling me in 2012 during a therapy session to save their marriage she speaks for the first time about an incident (she says later screwed her up for 4-5 years) and she speaks up because she's feaful a Republican President will get elected in the future and make him a Supreme Court nominee? How about a more likely scenario. She was screwing around and got caught. They went to therapy. She makes up a story about some imaginary incident that happened in high school as a way to explain her self-destructive behavior with men. Skip forward a couple yesrs. She's a hard core liberal, professor, donating money to Hilary. Trump gets elected. She goes full looney left, starts participating in pu$$y marches, donating a lot of money to other lib causes, etc... Marriage suffers more and now she sees the opportunity to come up with the story that explains all her behavior and hurt Trump as much as she can. A rich, entitled, white, Republican is nominated to the Court and she either imagines the story completely or substitutes Kavanaugh into the role someone else played in a real life event from 35 years ago. part of a Washington Post story below. "Her husband Russell verified that she told him about the incident at that time in an interview with the Post and “recalled that his wife used Kavanaugh’s last name and voiced concern that Kavanaugh — then a federal judge — might one day be nominated to the Supreme Court.” Russ Ford also told The Post that he thinks the allegation is relevant to Kavanaugh’s quest for the Supreme Court even though it dated to high school. “I think you look to judges to be the arbiters of right and wrong,” Russell Ford said to The Post. “If they don’t have a moral code of their own to determine right from wrong, then that’s a problem. So I think it’s relevant. Supreme Court nominees should be held to a higher standard.” |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by verslagen1 on 09/18/18 at 08:28:59 76657D60657363040 wrote:
Lying about having sex when you didn't is one thing, lying about having sex when you did is quite another. If you don't know women lie way more than men about the latter, then you've missed out on some interesting adventures....[/quote] Do sheep count? :-[/quote] You got sheep? I thought you only had crabs. :-? |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by raydawg on 09/18/18 at 09:30:57 5D4E5958474A4C4E451A2B0 wrote:
Lying about having sex when you didn't is one thing, lying about having sex when you did is quite another. If you don't know women lie way more than men about the latter, then you've missed out on some interesting adventures....[/quote] Do sheep count? :-[/quote] You got sheep? I thought you only had crabs. :-?[/quote] Good one ;D |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by MShipley on 09/18/18 at 10:20:04 112F2E22302C2D430 wrote:
Exactly. And what is real sad is that they will destroy people with NO Remorse what so ever. And then there are those that go along with it..... |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/18/18 at 11:58:23 Do sheep count? Embarrassed You got sheep? I thought you only had crabs. Huh Good one Grin I am not ever going camping with you guys... |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/18/18 at 12:01:37 It's a long shot, but right now it's all the dems have got. It might even work. Exactly. And what is real sad is that they will destroy people with NO Remorse what so ever. And then there are those that go along with it..... On one hand, they 'own' much more of the media now than then. Or at least the partisanship is far more out in the open. On the other hand, thanks to Rush Limbaugh, Fox News and a few others, they can't quite get away with outright lying and basically censoring unflattering news on the Democrats to the degree they did in the past. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/18/18 at 19:24:38 Below is a previous post. I just heard the woman in question wants a "full FBI investigation" before testifies. I'm 99% certain my theory below is correct. She made up a story, got carried away with her TDS and wrote her letter which was a lie. Once she began to realize the can of worms she'd opened, her and her lawyer cooked up this great FBI investigation request. The FBI won't investigate and she gets to back away. Democrats get the Oscar for "Best Supporting Scum". How about a more likely scenario. She was screwing around and got caught. They went to therapy. She makes up a story about some imaginary incident that happened in high school as a way to explain her self-destructive behavior with men. Skip forward a couple yesrs. She's a hard core liberal, professor, donating money to Hilary. Trump gets elected. She goes full looney left, starts participating in pu$$y marches, donating a lot of money to other lib causes, etc... Marriage suffers more and now she sees the opportunity to come up with the story that explains all her behavior and hurt Trump as much as she can. A rich, entitled, white, Republican is nominated to the Court and she either imagines the story completely or substitutes Kavanaugh into the role someone else played in a real life event from 35 years ago. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/19/18 at 10:39:22 The other unnamed person who was supposedly at the party came forward and he said nothing like this occured. Said he'd go under oath if need be. Also, a woman who said she went to school with the allegedly assaulted woman posted on Facebook the incident was common knowledge and spoken about at school the next few days. Holy cow! Proof...... BUT..... One problem, it was pointed out the allegedly assaulted woman specifically said this incident occurred during summer break so the were no next few days at school. The Facebook post was taken down shortly after this was pointed out and the liar who put it up tweeted some nonsense about not being prepared for the media request it generated..... But we're suppose to 100% believe woman who make allegations with no evidence...... |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by raydawg on 09/19/18 at 12:34:51 Web, what I don't understand is this...... The woman said she didn't want to come forth, that her identity being withheld was of grave concern. This was why Difi held onto it so long, as did other entities like the Washington Post, who were privy to this information, including other "democrats" with months available to look into this matter, but chose not to, why? Because this was a last ditch attempt that carried HUGE consequences to our system of justice? Then this Dr. Ford decides to come out, after ALL she said was her reasoning not to, why? Because the "charge" wasn't having the effect they hoped for? She states she felt compelled to come out to correct misinformation, and other falsehoods, but where are those? I see no corrections to the original intent or charges, or where folks were reporting erroneous stories....... Do you have any facts that would suggest that as her true motivation? I read the therapist reported that it was 4 boys, that were involved in this, but they claim now the therapist was in error, that is all I can find that might have needed clarification...... Seems to me if her intent was to get the truth out, then she would look gladly STILL to testify in front of the committee, for that is why she "outed" herself, yes? |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by oldNslow on 09/19/18 at 14:21:26 Quote:
I deleted your question mark and replaced it with a period. There's the answer to all your other questions. We can argue about the details, the process, the "he said", "she said" until we lose interest or just leave in disgust, but at the end of the day this is just the classic monkey wrench tossed into the reduction gears to render the ship dead in the water. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/19/18 at 14:29:18 Seems to me if her intent was to get the truth out, then she would look gladly STILL to testify in front of the committee, for that is why she "outed" herself, yes? She was a woman in a troubled marriage and 'found' a way out by making up a story about an assault to explain her issues with men. Later, she became infected with a serious case of TDS. So serious, she took the bold step of injecting Kavanagh into her made up story and sending it to congress in an attempt to damage Trump by derailing the nomination. Now that the consequence is becoming clear, that's she might have to testify under oath, her lawyer cooked up this perfect idea to have the FBI investigate. The FBI will not and the lawyer knows this so now this woman can have her cake and eat it too....albeit not as tasty as she might have first thought it would be. But she'll be a hero to a few nut jobs on the left. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by raydawg on 09/19/18 at 14:57:32 754740515647506F435049220 wrote:
Web, even if it WAS true...... It doesn't rise to the occasion of eliminating this mans accomplishments of who he became, and is, from a really dumb thing IF he even did it. Who can honestly say they didn't do things they regret and have since grown from? |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/19/18 at 20:29:07 Her story is lame. People she said were there are calling her a liar. Old girlfriends have said he was cool. It's Bullshit. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by WebsterMark on 09/20/18 at 04:58:29 If the Democrats can nominate a woman who used her power to intimidate her husband's assaulted and raped victims and if 63 million voted for her, then yes, this one drunken incident shouldn't derail his nomination. |
|
Title: Re: DiFi Post by raydawg on 09/20/18 at 07:30:32 Jus say’n...... With all the headlines about high school activities, and trying to bring the distant past, into the present, without regards to how life WAS then, is very disingenuous at best, to extremely deceitful.... No, of course not was life perfect, and yes, we have grown wiser in so many ways over a vast numbers of topics..... Isn’t that the very goal and nature of civilization. I know how it was then, and what was expected of guys, and girls.... The movie “The Summer of 42’ “ captures one aspect of it, as did the hit movie that spun off a TV sitcom, American Graffiti..... Just to name a few. To judge anybody on what was, under today’s enlightenment of many subjects..... Is a grave miscarriage of what justice represents. Be forewarned, you will be judged accordingly. I am not even talking about if someone is lying or not, that is NOT the point. You want to bring back the mentality and emotions that spawned McCarthyism.... Then just keep going down this avenue, we will be there before you know it. Also, how many times have we seen the snare laid for others, trap the very one who deployed it? Difi has had a distinguished career in politics, yet has run up against some hard scrutiny and challenges within her party. Will this last ditch effort of desperation be the final nail in her coffin? She should have known better. Like a superstar quarterback, who lets his need for attention, accolades, direct his decisions of when to retire..... Gets creamed and can't even finish his last year, a winner in, a loser out... He will remember that most, on those cold lonely nights, I bet. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |