|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Trump trade........well? /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1521760474 Message started by raydawg on 03/22/18 at 16:14:34 |
|
Title: Trump trade........well? Post by raydawg on 03/22/18 at 16:14:34 Before you libs go off thumping Trump, blaming, yada,yada, yada.... Let me refresh your memory..... Senate Dems unveil trade agenda BY VICKI NEEDHAM - 08/02/17 Senate Democrats are trying to seize the reins from President Trump on trade, launching a set of proposals they say will save jobs and boost growth while White House plans sputter. Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.) along with five of his colleagues, unveiled on Wednesday seven trade tenets as part of their recently overhauled economic agenda aimed at reconnecting with voters who bolted for Trump’s ticket in last year’s elections. "The problem is President Trump has talked a good game and done virtually nothing on trade except study it, he even backed off on steel and aluminum" something that is very important for states of those leaders, Schumer told reporters during a press conference on Capitol Hill. "We need action," he said. “If President Trump wants to work with us to get these things done, good, we need a better deal for American workers, period.” Democratic House and Senate party leaders have been working together to sharpen their 2018 economic message and last week unveiled “A Better Deal” aimed at voters in heavy manufacturing and energy-producing states. The five other Democrats Senators — Debbie Stabenow (Mich.), Bob Casey Jr. (Pa.), Tammy Baldwin (Wis.), Joe Donnelly (Ind.) and Joe Manchin (W.Va.) — all hail from states that Trump won in November where his anti-trade message appealed to voters. Trade has been viewed as an area where congressional Democrats and Trump may be able to work together. But any cooperation on that front has largely fallen by the wayside as Trump has publicly slammed Democrats for failing to help push his agenda through Congress. Still, Schumer said he welcomed help from Republicans as Democrats plan to roll out a series of bills in September aimed at chipping away at their trade agenda. “We need to revamp our trade laws from top to bottom," he said. The Democratic trade agenda covers a range of political leanings from tackling currency manipulation, which has been a bipartisan issue in the past, to “Buy America” policies that may appeal to the more liberal wing of the party and also has been touted by Trump. The Democrats argue that their new proposals would reinvent the trading system and make it work better for U.S. workers ahead of big business, who they argue benefit the most from international trade. Raising wages and creating jobs will require a major rewrite of “backward trade laws that have put foreign workers ahead of American workers,” Schumer said. Trump talked tough on trade during the campaign, vowing to revive U.S. coal and steel industries while cracking down on China’s unfair trade polices, a message that clearly resonated with voters throughout the heartland. On Wednesday, Schumer railed against China’s practices, arguing that trade policies must be put in place that stop Chinese companies from taking over vital American industries such as robotics, semiconductors and Hollywood move production. “It’s all over,” Schumer said. “We’ve got to stop it.” "They do not play by the rules," Schumer said of China. The Democratic agenda calls for the creation of the American Jobs Security Council that would evaluate and block, if necessary, the sale of a U.S. company to a foreign entity, notably China, if it is determined it hurts economic security and could lead to the theft of American intellectual property. “China has made a profession of doing this,” Schumer said. “We’re not going to let them do it anymore.” “We’re not opposed to foreign investment but we’re opposed to investment that only benefits the bottom line and leaves workers out in the cold,” he said. Trump is considering a major trade action against Beijing while plans to slap higher tariffs on aluminum and steel from China on hold for now. The U.S. Trade Representative is expected to probe the intellectual property protections practices of China that requires the sharing of technology that flows into the Communist country, according to news reports. Although nothing is expected soon, Trump could potentially use a "Section 301" case to impose duties on countries that break trade rules. Trump has been signaling that he would punish China for what he considers a lack of action on reining in North Korea’s nuclear ambitions. As part of the trade plan, Democrats are pressing for a renegotiation of the the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a step beyond the commitment made by the Trump administration and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer. The U.S., Mexico and Canada are expected to start NAFTA talks on Aug. 16 in Washington. Those discussions will be focused on updating the 23-year-old deal, not performing a wholesale overhaul. There are likely some NAFTA policies that will mesh with Democratic goals, including stricter enforcement. But any rework will likely fall short of a Democratic desire to fully renegotiate the deal. In their plan, Democrats also are pressing for the implementation of an outsourcing tax on U.S. companies that move jobs and factories abroad, while creating tax incentives for companies that relocate foreign jobs back here. Trump has promised to levy hefty new tariffs on products shipped into the United States by companies that move their operations to another country. The plan also calls for an independent trade prosecutor, an idea floated by Hillary Clinton during the campaign, to challenge trade practices the U.S. views as unfair, without relying on the World Trade Organization process. Democrats also are calling for new rules to penalize federal contractors that outsource manufacturing jobs. The agenda also would require taxpayer dollars to be spent on U.S. companies for all federal public works and infrastructure projects and current rules be revised to limit Buy America loopholes. Well, you still wanna what, Chuckie ? ;D |
|
Title: Re: Trump trade........well? Post by raydawg on 03/22/18 at 18:01:45 Trump the democrat now? I think Bot is warming to him now..... Might be a little stormy at first. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/22/clintons-had-at-least-one-way-open-marriage-former-pollster-writes.html |
|
Title: Re: Trump trade........well? Post by raydawg on 03/23/18 at 14:51:47 I guess the duplicity is sinking in, crickets.... But you still can blame Trump, for being, er, Ttump ;D Should we start a new thread in who is being duped? |
|
Title: Re: Trump trade........well? Post by Serowbot on 03/23/18 at 18:18:53 Faux News... get off the make sh!t up channel. ::) |
|
Title: Re: Trump trade........well? Post by raydawg on 03/23/18 at 18:27:23 6771667B63767B60140 wrote:
Are you doubting what I highlighted? Here punkin, read it yourself :-* http://thehill.com/policy/finance/344991-senate-dems-unveil-trade-agenda |
|
Title: Re: Trump trade........well? Post by raydawg on 03/24/18 at 09:58:33 Yes, crickets..... Trump goes democrat and the market tanks, lmao. |
|
Title: Re: Trump trade........well? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/24/18 at 11:12:28 If Trump has some trick up his sleeve that makes this monumental shafting of America somehow Not a shafting, I don't see it. He's going the wrong way. If he's reelected, it's gonna be democrats. |
|
Title: Re: Trump trade........well? Post by raydawg on 03/24/18 at 11:43:41 617E787F62655464546C7E72390B0 wrote:
Well Trump is still on third base.....with Obama, remember being told that, yet I show testimony that this behavior by Trump is exactly what the Dems want. |
|
Title: Re: Trump trade........well? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/24/18 at 12:51:50 Why they aren't chanting Trump,Trump,Trump Is beyond me.. |
|
Title: Re: Trump trade........well? Post by Eegore on 03/24/18 at 14:42:12 I think part of the problem are the astronomical inaccuracies portrayed about what Trade Deficit and such actually are. This nonsense that a deficit value of $150 from every iPad imported is specifically ignoring that most of the product doesn't come from China. In reality to calculate China's portion of a trading deficit we can only use the portion that China actually contributes, not imports themselves. If $100 in parts come from other countries then only $50 is China's calculated portion of the imported deficit. But lets ignore that math and just say its $150 every time. Also I don't think its possible to have a healthy 50-50 take on trade given a global economy. |
|
Title: Re: Trump trade........well? Post by raydawg on 03/24/18 at 16:44:20 You are exactly right.... Would you want to go to the doctor as much as you do to the grocery store? |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |