SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> This is quite the site
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1515655073

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 01/10/18 at 23:17:53

Title: This is quite the site
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/10/18 at 23:17:53

https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/

Title: Re: This is quite the site
Post by Eegore on 01/11/18 at 18:55:32

This site was useful back in the 90's. They've been on Breitbart for some time now and financed some of Victory Film's projects.

Unfortunately as of the past few years their accuracy has dwindled, I image about 50% of the information is skewed if not completely incorrect however I do not have numbers.

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/06/trump-didnt-bill-obamas/
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/09/obama-didnt-pardon-wendell-callahan/

In this one they are credited for publishing blatantly incorrect information:

http://www.worldtribune.com/u-s-taxpayers-funded-trump-nazi-billboard-in-phoenix/

They also refuse to comment regarding how they did the math for the incorrect California counties that it claimed had more voters than population.

Just an FYI I may not be able to comment again in under 6 hours.

Title: Re: This is quite the site
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/11/18 at 19:23:45

Thanks for the basic info..
The Snark at the end is just a cherry on top.
Glad you were able to reply to ONE of my several posts.

Title: Re: This is quite the site
Post by Eegore on 01/12/18 at 05:18:17

I don't have anything to add to the others, they are topics I do not have information about.

As for the snark, just answer the question. What is an acceptable time frame to reply that wont result in calling us names, such as Pompous Jakkasses?

Title: Re: This is quite the site
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/12/18 at 09:48:31

What's your problem?
If it's not aimed At you, it's for someone else.
Did I Say it's aimed at you?
Did you ask?
Do you have sufficient data to conclude that?
I've been mean to you?

Title: Re: This is quite the site
Post by Eegore on 01/12/18 at 14:46:41

I didn't have enough evidence to conclude it was aimed at me, which is why I used the term "us" as in members of the forum and not I, meaning specifically me.

What is an acceptable time frame to reply that wont result in calling us names, such as Pompous Jakkasses?

Title: Re: This is quite the site
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/12/18 at 20:57:24

If you want to discuss events or constitutionality of some law, I'm ready.

You don't Have to Add to a topic to consider it's constitutionally or merits.
It only requires a desire to understand.