|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Yeah, those Russians are back /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1508254596 Message started by pg on 10/17/17 at 08:36:36 |
|
Title: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by pg on 10/17/17 at 08:36:36 http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-17/fbi-uncovered-russian-nuclear-bribery-plot-obama-approved-uranium-one-deal-netting-c As the mainstream media continues to obsess over $100,000 worth Facebook ads allegedly purchased by Russian spies in 2016 seeking to throw the presidential election, we're almost certain they'll ignore the much larger Russian bombshell dropped today in the form of newly released FBI documents that reveal for the very first time that the Obama administration was well aware of illegal bribery, extortion and money laundering schemes being conducted by the Russians to get a foothold in the atomic energy business in the U.S. before approving a deal that handed them 20% of America's uranium reserves...and resulted in a windfall of donations to the Clinton Foundation. In the run-up to the approval of the deal by the State Department, nine shareholders of Uranium One just happened to make $145mm in donations to the Clinton Foundation. Moreover, the New Yorker confirmed that Bill Clinton received $500,000 in speaking fees from a Russian investment bank, with ties to the Kremlin, around the same time. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by T And T Garage on 10/17/17 at 08:47:27 2631373B3424560 wrote:
;D ;D ;D ;D Hey pg - ever wonder why we know about all these donations to the clintons? I'll give ya a little hint - they disclose their taxes..... Do you wanna know who doesn't? Naw - you don't care..... do you? As I've heard so many times from those who lean to the right - if you have nothing to hide, then why hide it? Comply and there will be no problems, right? All the things you listed are above board. They were reported. There is no "smoking gun". You see, it's all legal... oh, and public! But - we all know why tweety has said he'll never release his taxes, don't we? He's a liar, a poor businessman and a terrible leader. Funny how you can overlook all the grift that tweety's got going on right now, right in plain view. Go find out how his hotels are doing (it's well known that he encourages visitors to the WH to stay there) - go see how his golf courses are doing (he's played hundreds of rounds of golf already with hundreds of folks in tow - wait - maybe THAT'S why you love him so??) . ;D |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by pg on 10/17/17 at 09:09:14 4D535C5D504D564B390 wrote:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-foundation-tax-forms_us_564ae72be4b08cda348a6239 Among other amendments, the foundation now reports receiving nearly $20 million in funds from governments, mostly foreign governments, between 2010 and 2013. Wrong again!! Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by T And T Garage on 10/17/17 at 09:12:14 4750565A5545370 wrote:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-foundation-tax-forms_us_564ae72be4b08cda348a6239 Among other amendments, the foundation now reports receiving nearly $20 million in funds from governments, mostly foreign governments, between 2010 and 2013. Wrong again!! Best regards,[/quote] psst - hey, pg - actually, I'm right... you see, this is all being done in public... just like I said. Maybe you should try posting without your head so far up the GOP's hind-end, huh? |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by T And T Garage on 10/17/17 at 09:18:25 3621272B2434460 wrote:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-foundation-tax-forms_us_564ae72be4b08cda348a6239 Among other amendments, the foundation now reports receiving nearly $20 million in funds from governments, mostly foreign governments, between 2010 and 2013. Wrong again!! Best regards,[/quote] Oh, and by the way - this article is from 2015..... ;D |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by pg on 10/17/17 at 09:41:43 504E41404D504B56240 wrote:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-foundation-tax-forms_us_564ae72be4b08cda348a6239 Among other amendments, the foundation now reports receiving nearly $20 million in funds from governments, mostly foreign governments, between 2010 and 2013. Wrong again!! Best regards,[/quote] Oh, and by the way - this article is from 2015..... ;D [/quote] Wow, imagine that! They understated the taxes by $20M during the exact same time she was Secretary of State (2009-2013). So yeah, they would have to amend them after that.... Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/17/17 at 09:51:57 Burn cream is now available in the marketplace. Special pricing for the Big Tub for lefties who have so much need. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by T And T Garage on 10/17/17 at 10:16:02 293E38343B2B590 wrote:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-foundation-tax-forms_us_564ae72be4b08cda348a6239 Among other amendments, the foundation now reports receiving nearly $20 million in funds from governments, mostly foreign governments, between 2010 and 2013. Wrong again!! Best regards,[/quote] Oh, and by the way - this article is from 2015..... ;D [/quote] Wow, imagine that! They understated the taxes by $20M during the exact same time she was Secretary of State (2009-2013). So yeah, they would have to amend them after that.... Best regards, [/quote] But alas... once again pg - you're telling me something that I already knew.... :D If you pay attention, I stated that it was above board. Whether or not it was a "good thing" never entered into the conversation, you see? Now, if you'd like to discuss our president's taxes... oh, I'd be all over that. C'mon - talk about something with some teeth, huh? |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by raydawg on 10/17/17 at 10:25:48 Yesterday a big powwow was held among media folk. Russia was a big topic. Russia did meddle in our election, this was why Trump even brought it up in the debate. Hillary poo-pooed him and asked him to pledge to honor the result, like her....... After looking at these internet shadow advertising, etc, it is learned they favored nobody, but bought opposing argument even to the stuff they posted previously.... It is believed they wanted to cause division, and tear apart any attempt at a focused and organized America to combat its problems, to sow discourse. Guess what, its working because idiots have taken the bait! |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/17/17 at 10:26:41 Why should he? You don't. But I don't blame you. I've chewed you up and spit you out so many times you must cringe when I reply. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by raydawg on 10/17/17 at 10:40:20 697670776A6D5C6C5C64767A31030 wrote:
Jog, you must understand the dupe is too stupid to even grasp how stupid he is..... He is narcissistic, a very stupid one. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by T And T Garage on 10/17/17 at 12:33:56 7D6E766B6E78680F0 wrote:
Well ray - I hate to break it to you, but this right here is a direct quote from tweety jr's email: “This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.” So, yeah, you keep on doing you and see how that turns out, m'kay? |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by T And T Garage on 10/17/17 at 12:35:13 41524A57524454330 wrote:
Jog, you must understand the dupe is too stupid to even grasp how stupid he is..... He is narcissistic, a very stupid one. [/quote] Gee, I'd hate to be the guy you're talking about.... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Not even man enough to call someone out by name. No surprise. :D |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by Serowbot on 10/18/17 at 14:51:17 5B4C4A4649592B0 wrote:
Righty sites desperately rehashing old rumours already proven false to distract from current events... Once again,.. you get led by the nose... http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/ - The Uranium One deal was not Clinton’s to veto or approve - Despite transfer of ownership, the uranium remained in the U.S. - The timing of most of the donations does not match - "Update On 17 October 2017, The Hill reported obtaining evidence that Vadim Mikerin, a Russian official who oversaw the American operations of the Russian nuclear agency Rosatom, was being investigated for corruption by multiple U.S. agencies while the Uranium One deal was up for approval — information that apparently was not shared with U.S. officials involved in approving the transaction. The Hill also reported receiving documents and eyewitness testimony “indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow,” although no specifics about who those Russian nuclear officials were or how the money was allegedly routed to the Clinton Foundation were given. In any case, none of these revelations prove that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton participated in a quid pro quo agreement to accept payment for approval of the Uranium One deal." |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by pg on 10/18/17 at 15:07:49 Snopes, isn't that the guy who embezzled 100K on personal expenses and prostitutes? Here's your cream!! http://suzukisavage.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1508259361/0#0 Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/18/17 at 16:18:54 Screw snopes.. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html It won't let me cut the relevant information and paste it here. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/18/17 at 16:29:46 http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355937-fbi-informant-blocked-from-telling-congress-about-russia-nuclear Nothing to see here. Gee, Bill got five HUNNERT THOWZUND DAWLURZ for a SPEECH! |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by pg on 10/18/17 at 16:41:48 It is a crime to use a public office to confer a benefit to a foreign government in exchange for money. It is often referred to as “pay-to-play,” but it can be prosecuted under a variety of anti-corruption laws passed by Congress, including the federal bribery statute (18 USC 201-b), the federal gratuity statute (18 USC 201-c), the mail fraud statute (18 USC 1341), the wire fraud statute (18 USC 1343), the program bribery statute (18 USC 666), and the Travel Act (18 USC 1952). Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney, was supervising the case. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/18/17 at 16:53:36 Sessions said Rosenstein can investigate himself. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by pg on 10/18/17 at 16:55:29 http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/18/attorney-fbi-informant-was-blocked-by-obama-administration-from-testifying-on-uranium-one-deal/ Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/18/17 at 17:16:58 https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/russian-nuclear-energy-official-pleads-guilty-money-laundering-conspiracy-involving Referenced the last sentence of above link. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/18/17 at 22:04:40 sions if Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein will be allowed to investigate himself regarding new information on the Hillary Clinton Uranium One scandal. Attorney General Sessions said it was up to him. Attorney General Sessions: It would be his decision. What the hell? |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by pg on 10/19/17 at 05:41:27 "Uranium deal to Russia, with Clinton help and Obama Administration knowledge, is the biggest story that Fake Media doesn't want to follow!" Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by WebsterMark on 10/19/17 at 07:43:45 The Clinton Foundation contributions have nosedived which is perhaps the single most obvious evidence the Clinton's are knee deep in corruption. This uranium deal has the potential to snag Robert Mueller since he was FBI director at the time. Interestingly enough, Atty General Jeff Sessions recused himself over the Russian matter which didn't sit well with Trump. When the uranium investigation makes its way to Mueller's time, all Sessions has to do is say "See, I recused myself so you need to do the same with your Russian investigation". In a funny and ironic way, Sessions recusal might force the end to the non-stop and ridiculous Trump-Russian conspiracy witch hunt which has expanded to include anything and everything. They are not going to do all this without putting someone's head on a pole. I don't know who the unlucky bastard will be, but someone's life will be ruined to justify all this time and money spent. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by raydawg on 10/19/17 at 09:06:11 Web.... This investigation was started with Glenn Simpson, whose Fusion GPS firm has been tied to anti-Trump efforts and pro-Russian lobbying. He will not talk to lawmakers in response to a subpoena, the leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committe report. I remember reading this was the catalyst, and foundation, as to why Mueller was appointed. How odd this company is pleading the 5th against self incrimination. Folks what, throw shiit on the wall, looking to see if it sticks, and then bail when it doesn't? If nothing else comes from this, it sure gives pause as to how big that web of Clinton/Soros, weaved.... No wonder her loss is causing her to go insane. She must really loath Obama for spoiling her real chance at getting the office. He made her wait, and the exposure cost her. How many have felt its entangling, of the Clinton/Soros, web? I bet folks that got caught in it must feel like the girls who Harvey Weinsten invited to a job interview....... Except the effect must feel like a HUGE wang being shoved up their portal as they bend over and spread for the party..... Not sure if Harvey was a buttman. OUCH :o |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by pg on 10/20/17 at 14:13:05 The left is talking about collusion for months, how about this? Slick Willie went to Putin's house in Russia shortly before the deal was finalized!! ;D Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by WebsterMark on 10/21/17 at 06:04:37 Mark Steyn is an acquired taste so his writing is not for everyon, but his points are well made in the link below. The Clinton Foundation may well turn out to be the largest scam (other than the money making monster known as Climate Change) pulled off by figures of in the public eye. It's hard to believe they'll ever be properly investigated but on the other hand, her loss to Trump and the dying out of her political influence means fewer people in power feel the need to be "loyal" to The Clintons. Could it happen? I would have said no way even up to a few months ago, but the way Trump so completely divides people has a benefit. Isolated from any hope of reconciliation with the other side can liberate people also. In other words, could people who have information they would normally sit on because they want to keep all options open, decide since half those options are permanently closed, they are not going to risk themselves to protect a couple who no longer have any value? https://www.steynonline.com/8207/uranium-diarrhea-inc |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/21/17 at 06:28:45 Weinerstain broke the dam. The flood of names and ensuing, hopefully, investigations will connect Hollywood with D.C... The potential for truths about powerful people coming out could lead to a Number of, uhh, " suicide victims ", .. There's Evidence of wrongdoing by the Clinton crime family. And the Dossier that the lefties were cumming in their panties over is such an obvious smear campaign they should have burned it instead of trying to use it. We may see a page in history written. And a purging of Hollywood and D.C. And a new prison built. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by pg on 10/22/17 at 12:32:02 495E58545B4B390 wrote:
You wanted Russian Collusion, you got it! http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10/photos-bill-clinton-met-vladimir-putin-home-russia-uranium-one-deal-bribed/ OWN IT! Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/22/17 at 13:03:57 It's Unheard of for a family member to meet in private with the DA while they are under investigation. Everyone knows Bill met with her in the plane. But they talked about the weather. And in a week. Take a pass.. So, the Dumbmasses didn't see Bill in Russia. So, it's a conspiracy theory. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, those Russians are back Post by T And T Garage on 10/23/17 at 06:22:55 6770767A7565170 wrote:
You wanted Russian Collusion, you got it! http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10/photos-bill-clinton-met-vladimir-putin-home-russia-uranium-one-deal-bribed/ OWN IT! Best regards, [/quote] *Yawn* OK - I own it.... What's the problem? This was all out on public display. He didn't do it behind closed doors. He didn't do it to collude. He did it for the money... so? It's funny that you righties are trying to make a mountain from a mole hill: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/10/26/the-facts-behind-trumps-repeated-claim-about-hillary-clintons-role-in-the-russian-uranium-deal/?utm_term=.1883d2591f61 In case you don't want to click on the link - read on: Some Republican lawmakers in 2010 did raise concerns about the deal — but they sent their letter to then-Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner. (Treasury chairs the CFIUS.) Final approval was given by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which noted that the mines would remain under the control of U.S. subsidiaries. “Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ [the Russian firm] holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC said. (Some uranium yellowcake is extracted, processed in Canada and returned to the United States.) We asked the Trump campaign for evidence that Clinton or the State Department had more of a role in the deal than any of the eight other member agencies of CFIUS, and did not receive a response. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |