|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Actual debate is required to be based in /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1499377303 Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 07/06/17 at 14:41:43 |
|
Title: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/06/17 at 14:41:43 LOGICAL ARGUMENTS. The arguments I've presented are, IMO, rational and logical and unimpeachable. I am tired of the pretense that I haven't addressed the lame points. There is NO way to logically pretend that CNN is not totally busted. I'm tired of pointing out the obvious difference between Jones getting recorded while he's running the mouth and when he is promoting the lie. Lie about LYING? WTF? It's Time for others to get involved. If I have failed to make the point, say so. If he's as broken and empty and in the ditch as I think,, Plenty will be posting. Any honest debate would have been shut down long ago. You're laughable. And A Troll I do suspect you're paid. |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by T And T Garage on 07/06/17 at 14:47:43 2B343235282F1E2E1E26343873410 wrote:
What does Van Jones have to do with the investigation? You see jog - you going on and on about one small piece of media doesn't mean squat. Once the investigation is complete - then we'll know. As it should be. |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/06/17 at 15:16:36 Actually, not so much. You have been pointing and screaming about the perpetual load of BULLSHIT coming out of CNN and USING IT as If it was a Meaningful Accusation. You have been using THEIR LIES as a foundation for your criticism. Your FOUNDATION For the criticism is undermined. Destroyed. By the very people you have been quoting. The DOSSIER total BULLSHIT the Russia crap Under investigation by the establishment that hates him. With the Snowflakes demanding blood. I'm sure it won't be politicized much. The Big Proponents have been CNN. They admit they have NOTHING. Like GW scienTISTS, they continued to get support from the rubes JUST REPEATING THE SAME WORDS, that Convinced the left. It's not Just the media who is to blame. The people who So desperately NEED to believe Trump is illegitimate will swallow the garbage, and, Using the Very Same Discernment that drove the logical conclusion that Assad didn't do it,, Ohhh, no, sorry, the government position, that is what you called Reasonable.. I'm the one who said he didn't. More evidence exists that supports my position than yours. I don't GET TOLD what to think. Try it. Wake UP. |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by raydawg on 07/06/17 at 15:40:25 Jog, Comey said, If.... The democrat leadership said they will shift their message away from Trump, to their own agenda, why, because it is not getting them any traction for its still based on spin, assumptions, possibilities, maybes, "IF's"..... No red meat to feed the hungry mass that just wants Trump GONE! Bot can say its still in the infancy as reason, but his liberal gods are leaving that field of dreams and panning other streams. You won't get any acknowledgement from them, cause they don't "believe it". Its that simple. Re: CNN, they have ALWAYS been about ratings, they ALL are, are spin accordingly. Lots of folk blamed CNN for giving Trump too much air time, that resulted in him getting a message out, and benefited greatly by that chance.... I dunno, as those "folks", the deplorable, do they watch CNN? But the argument is made, and it has just as much validity as any other explanation, and CNN did it for, RATINGS, as the other leftwing media outlets produced the outrage, by their reporting, then CNN was able to extort their viewers without having to get muddy.... It worked GREAT, now they can't sustain that viewership, and have taken to trying to orchestrate it, but as you see, the timing has changed, as have the viewers, and that element no longer producing liked they hoped. NEWS hasn't been about reporting news, for a long time now. |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/06/17 at 15:53:51 It's NOT just the fault of the LIars. We've all been LIED to. Assad DIDN'T do it. I knew almost immediately. Trumps ADVISORS told him not to retaliate because they had no reason to believe he gassed them. THINKING, instead of hyperventilating. Learn DISCERNMENT. It's really not a strong point for atheists, non Believer types. |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by pg on 07/06/17 at 18:32:50 6B757A7B766B706D1F0 wrote:
Will you own it then? Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/06/17 at 19:31:07 Sununu has the same problem I do. Can't pry a straight answer out of these people. http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/john-sununu-cnn-crow-russia/2017/05/30/id/793128/ |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by T And T Garage on 07/07/17 at 08:16:55 233C3A3D20271626162E3C307B490 wrote:
I'm wide awake here pal. You should try living in the real world and stop blaming everyone else for your problems. |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by T And T Garage on 07/07/17 at 08:17:32 6F787E727D6D1F0 wrote:
Will you own it then? Best regards,[/quote] Yep - why wouldn't I? |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by Serowbot on 07/07/17 at 08:22:50 7067616D6272000 wrote:
Will you own it then? Best regards,[/quote] Sure,.. like the Right owns the findings of the Hillary investigations... No crimes there... Own it... ;D |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/07/17 at 08:49:46 She wasn't Prosecuted. That's just proof of what I have been saying. Completely corrupt. Comey read a list of reasons to prosecute. |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by T And T Garage on 07/07/17 at 08:57:31 6D7274736E6958685860727E35070 wrote:
No, that's not what he said - sorry. You should know the whole story. I'm not going to post it here, but the outcome of her email investigation was that mistakes were made, but classified information was not passed along for nefarious reasons. She should not have handled her emails in such a way, and if she worked under Comey, she would have been let go. But that's the extent. While we're at this - what about the Benghazi hearings? Do the righties own the outcomes of all 9 hearings? (or was it 10?) I wonder..... |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/07/17 at 09:18:56 She got email from her friend, apparently none of the request for help made it to her. |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by Serowbot on 07/07/17 at 09:29:24 ...and?.... :-/ |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/07/17 at 10:02:11 Just like I had to prove my point twenty times to even get a partial admission to the points I'd made. I dissected this mess a long time ago and I won't do it again. I said what happened. Later, it got printed, people posted it and pointed out I was right from early on. It was an arms deal. Stephens didn't want to go along. |
|
Title: Re: Actual debate is required to be based in Post by pg on 07/07/17 at 18:53:20 584E59445C49445F2B0 wrote:
Will you own it then? Best regards,[/quote] Sure,.. like the Right owns the findings of the Hillary investigations... No crimes there... Own it... ;D[/quote] Absolutely, I have no problem saying she is a criminal of the highest magnitude. Best regards, |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |