SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> FBI question.....
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1452832001

Message started by raydawg on 01/14/16 at 20:26:41

Title: FBI question.....
Post by raydawg on 01/14/16 at 20:26:41

More and more reports/stories are beginning to surface about the FBI and its investigation into Hillary.
My question is this, 'Does anyone know the criteria it takes to initiate an investigation?
I understand it is not a court of law, and I am not sure where their powers are vested to carry on such a inquiry, but it ( reasons ) must be substantial to warrant this type of activity, yes?

Really going out on a limb with this scenario, however, that has never stopped me before.
If I understand the reports of that night, Obama's whereabouts have never been revealed.
Is that true?
If yes, maybe it was him who stopped any action and not Hillary, and this is where it all gets tangled :-?
Personally I see him pulling such a stunt with all that we have learned since.
I believe Hillary would have a pretty easy time of giving a go ahead, if it falls within her jurisdiction.

Title: Re: FBI question.....
Post by Serowbot on 01/14/16 at 21:52:43

By Jove,.. I think you've got it...
Clearly,.. intentionally allowing the deaths of 4 people in Libya, furthers the secret agenda of the Secret Diabolica...

...and do you see an end game?...
What furtherance of whatnot this forwards?...

Geez!,... you're deep... :-?

Get past the minutiae... and think...

Title: Re: FBI question.....
Post by raydawg on 01/14/16 at 22:00:15

7264736E76636E75010 wrote:

If that what you do, then no thanks.....
But I sure like the way you reason the NRA, and every law abiding citizen, who owns don't care if someone else gets killed, as long as they get to keep theirs.....

Nope, I'll stay the village so I don't have to pretend I know everything ::)

But hey, I didn't expect you to answer the question anyway, your attacks are predicable.
I will wait for a real scholar to school me, you can go out on the schoolyard and bully now......

Title: Re: FBI question.....
Post by thumperclone on 01/14/16 at 22:51:50

back on topic

me thinks the fbi is a police force
so the "director" of the fbi would chose?
as far as prosecutions that would be the attorney general?

darn I only raised more questions :-[

Title: Re: FBI question.....
Post by verslagen1 on 01/15/16 at 07:56:18

From the last article about the FAST response being held at the border, only the pres can authorize it. So if he was too busy to deal with it... it would not be in the secretaries authority to ok it.

Title: Re: FBI question.....
Post by Serowbot on 01/15/16 at 08:07:44

7C6F776A6F79690E0 wrote:

More and more reports/stories are beginning to surface about the FBI and its investigation into Hillary.
My question is this, 'Does anyone know the criteria it takes to initiate an investigation?

The investigation is into security protocols and the use of a private server,... not a criminal investigation, and not of Hillary...
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jan/14/jeb-bush/heres-whats-wrong-jeb-bush-saying-hillary-clinton-/

Title: Re: FBI question.....
Post by WebsterMark on 01/15/16 at 14:16:42

Of course it's a criminal investigation, that's what the FBI does. They don't investigate allegations of good conduct......

Biden is still being held in the wings in case Hilary takes up residence in Martha Stewarts old cell....

Look, we all know what happened with respect to Benghazi. Obama wanted to play down any allegation that Islamic terrorist were growing under his policies so request for additional security was denied because he didn't want attention drawn to it. When the $hit hit the fan, they rolled the dice hoping everyone would get through this unharmed. Unfortunately, didn't work out that way. They under-estimated the situation on the ground. They needed a way out of this and the video was a convenient happenstance so they all agreed to blame the video. I'm sure it made sense at the time and who knows, maybe it was Hilary's idea to use the video as cover. Maybe it was Obama's. I tend to think it was Hilary or someone on her staff. Regardless, that was the cover plan they came up with.

However, when it was clear the video had nothing to do with it, they reaffirmed their deal that they were all gonna stick with that story no matter what. They figured, correctly for the most part, their liberal media friends would provide them cover. (the cover they never provided to their now deal ambassador by the way....) Fox News wouldn't let it go and eventually, even the media wearing the same color jersey as Obama/Hilary had to turn on them a little bit.

Now, Hilary is in the position she's in because she followed her bosses orders. She could have thrown him under the bus which leads me to believe she or her staff came up with the idea of blaming the whole thing on the video.

Lucky for them, the congressional hearings were run by Republicans who are dumb as a bag of hammer. Plus, even after clearly lying, the media touts the 11 testimony she gave as some kind of success.

And that children, is the story of Benghazi. The moral of this story is if your life depends upon the honor of Obama or Hilary, make sure you've got a good insurance policy to pay for your kids college....

Title: Re: FBI question.....
Post by pg on 01/15/16 at 15:57:54

6E5C5B4A4D5C4B74584B52390 wrote:

Of course it's a criminal investigation, that's what the FBI does. They don't investigate allegations of good conduct......

[smiley=thumbup.gif]

Best regards,

Title: Re: FBI question.....
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/15/16 at 20:19:07

They needed a way out of this and the video was a convenient happenstance so they all agreed to blame the video. I'm sure it made sense at the time and who knows.

It would only make sense to a narcissistic personality who sees the Dumb Masses as so stupid that they would believe such crap.

Which one was it?
At this point in time, what difference does it make?

Title: Re: FBI question.....
Post by raydawg on 01/16/16 at 11:23:35

Well we have seen how SC, etc, hear cases and rule on matters that are of a national emergency.
That is what prompt my question, I understand they investigate crime, but I must assume they also find where the original concern of a crime is without merit too, yes?
I was wondering if that might not be a reason they took on this investigation, with the hope of settling the facts before any major election and all the other problems it could spawn...

I realize, the "loser" of this outcome with cry bloody hell, so either way, we can expect that regardless ;D

Title: Re: FBI question.....
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/16/16 at 13:42:22

That's what an investigation IS. Having probable cause to go and See IF a crime has been committed, or, seeing that a crime has been committed, then investigating to see how, etc, build a case.
No idea what percentage of FBI investigations result in no indictment. This may be one. Which, IMO, wouldn't be an indication of innocence,necessarily.