SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Shooting in Canada's Parliment
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1413994639

Message started by Paraquat on 10/22/14 at 09:17:19

Title: Shooting in Canada's Parliment
Post by Paraquat on 10/22/14 at 09:17:19

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/breaking-news-oct-22/article21217602/

I'm tired.
I really don't want to jump to the paranoid tin foil hat but nothing in this article makes sense.
Unnamed witnesses, unconfirmed kills being praised by officials, it goes on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzNhaLUT520
THIS is how witnesses comment.

No one goes unnamed anymore. Everyone wants their 15 seconds of fame.
I don't know. I'm trying to not find the angle here.

--Steve

Title: Re: Shooting in Canada's Parliment
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/22/14 at 12:30:22

Well, my radar goes UP when the "Investigators" start saying "Dont post pics of or videos of the people in the area who may have been involved."

Title: Re: Shooting in Canada's Parliment
Post by old_rider on 10/22/14 at 21:46:11

I kinda agree with them though... if you post the pictures of "suspected" people, and they are actually the ones involved, they will go deeper down the rabbit hole.

I also agree, the news should not post names or photo's.... IF THEY ARE CAUGHT... why give them the fame they want?

They killed people to get it...post their picture on the table getting the injection, or better yet, post their picture when they pull the floor switch and the noose tightens on their broken neck.

I am a firm believer that the criminals that are convicted should be given 3 reprieves to prove their innocence (all within 3 months). After the third trial, if they are proven guilty again, then the next morning, they are marched out to the hangmans noose in the jail yard, and a camera is focused on them, let the news stories post the link, pull the handle (weighted shoes) and snap, all done.
Think the crime rate would drop? I do.....

Title: Re: Shooting in Canada's Parliment
Post by Paraquat on 10/23/14 at 06:09:33

30333B2D363B3A2D5F0 wrote:

I kinda agree with them though... if you post the pictures of "suspected" people, and they are actually the ones involved, they will go deeper down the rabbit hole.

I'm saying all the "We are Trayvon", "Hands Up for Mike Brown", Westboro Baptist Church follower people usually can't wait to get on the news, voice their opinions, and make arses of themselves. So it strikes me as extremely odd when witnesses don't wish their names to be made public.

The verbiage just seems off to me also. Like they needed a clean AO and found a reason to shepherd people away.

--Steve

Title: Re: Shooting in Canada's Parliment
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/23/14 at 07:17:29

Well,, first, there was

We are looking for 2 others who we believe were involved.

BUT, did they release ANY info about the dead guy that would allow a thinking person to look for who his likely associates might be? NOPE.. Not a word about any kind of descriptive term.

Then they quell any potential assistance by telling people NOT to Be onThe Lookout..

Thats Backwards thinking,, It would drive them underground,, Theyre ALREADY as underground as they can GET,, The cops NEED every eyeball they can get,, Thats WHY historically Bad GJys had wanted posters,, Americas Most Wanted Works..