SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> moving forward
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1794242333

Message started by thumperclone on 11/09/26 at 08:38:53

Title: moving forward
Post by thumperclone on 11/09/26 at 08:38:53

revenge and retribution should not be the focus of the congress
they need to focus on undoing the insane actions of the past two years

Title: Re: moving forward
Post by WebsterMark on 11/09/26 at 10:14:33

Could be specific? To encourage discussion, name five insane actions you like to see reversed.

Title: Re: moving forward
Post by MnSpring on 11/09/26 at 11:51:49

"... To encourage discussion, name five insane actions you like to see reversed..."

I would like to see the reverse of,
the Ultra Liberal Democrats, who filled their pockets with money, by giving tax payers money to, LEARING, centers, for a KICK BACK !!!

Like the Gov, AG, lieutenant Gov, and others did in Minn.

Title: Re: moving forward
Post by thumperclone on 11/09/26 at 12:46:20

083A3D2C2B3A2D123E2D345F0 wrote:

Could be specific? To encourage discussion, name five insane actions you like to see reversed.

just a few items that need review
tariffs
DEI policies
presidential emergency authority
using DOJ as private law enforcement
ACA
SNAP
DHS and ICE
stock trading ethics

Title: Re: moving forward
Post by Needles on 11/09/26 at 13:29:05

Justice feels like revenge for criminals.

Title: Re: moving forward
Post by WebsterMark on 11/09/26 at 15:52:38

3E223F273A2F38292625242F4A0 wrote:

[quote author=083A3D2C2B3A2D123E2D345F0 link=1794242333/0#1 date=1794248073]Could be specific? To encourage discussion, name five insane actions you like to see reversed.

just a few items that need review
tariffs
DEI policies
presidential emergency authority
using DOJ as private law enforcement
ACA
SNAP
DHS and ICE
stock trading ethics
[/quote]

Ok, tariffs.
The objection is tariffs are taxes that are passed along to the consumer Which harms the economy.
The Democrats are requesting a significant increase in corporate taxes.
If you suspended all the tariffs, but increased corporate taxes, aren’t you just basically robbing Peter to pay Paul?

Ok, DEI. What’s specifically are you objecting to? I honestly do not know what specific DEI policy. The Trump administration has actually implemented it, and if there was an actual tangible, and noticeable effect.

Let’s just start with those two.

Title: Re: moving forward
Post by Eegore on 11/09/26 at 16:02:43

If you suspended all the tariffs, but increased corporate taxes, aren’t you just basically robbing Peter to pay Paul?

Yes. However taxes are more stable than a tariff change whenever Trump gets offended. I paid 100% tariff - double the cost of the parts one week, and 20% the next. If I am going to pay more, I prefer it to be through a system i can at least project expenditure in.

I honestly do not know what specific DEI policy. The Trump administration has actually implemented it, and if there was an actual tangible, and noticeable effect.

For me it I had to re-phrase my Federal contracts to remove words like "diversity" within the program material even though it the word "diversity" applied to the training methods and not staff. Multiple contractors and Federal employees lost their jobs due to revocation of DEI programs.

Not DEI nonsense where an underqualified person gets a job based off skin color, or gender, but other nonsense where humans of specific national origin consult on government actions in that specific nation.

Title: Re: moving forward
Post by Needles on 11/09/26 at 16:28:05

They STOPPED DEI. And, no, DEI did not discriminate against white guys.

Title: Re: moving forward
Post by Eegore on 11/09/26 at 16:29:43

They STOPPED DEI.

Right but Webstermark is asking for specifics as to how that has negative impact. Complaining is not specific examples.

Title: Re: moving forward
Post by WebsterMark on 11/09/26 at 18:32:29

Actually I was ask Thumper….