SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Bipartisan agreement
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1772999552

Message started by Eegore on 03/08/26 at 12:52:31

Title: Bipartisan agreement
Post by Eegore on 03/08/26 at 12:52:31

Finally proof that there is a hope for bipartisan action in the US government. My opinion is that there is proof that there is a hope for bipartisan action in the US government.

https://legis1.com/news/house-votes-to-keep-congressional-sexual-harassment-records-sealed-in-rare-bipartisan-move/

Finally. All it took was keeping the truth from the public to get most of them to agree. This is an opinion.

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by thumperclone on 03/08/26 at 13:00:50

they're hiding their sins

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by Needles on 03/08/26 at 13:08:26

The only thing "bipartisan" anyone wants is Trumpedo's entire Klan in jail.

::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by Eegore on 03/08/26 at 13:09:50

The only thing "bipartisan" anyone wants is Trumpedo's entire Klan in jail.

I disagree. The link I provided clearly shows bipartisan support to conceal sexual harassment claims across the board.

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by Needles on 03/08/26 at 13:15:47

Not what I said. Of course both sides of the aisle want to hide their harassment records. HOW MANY AMERICANS NOT IN CONGRESS WANTED IT? the People are who they need to be trying to please.

::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by Eegore on 03/08/26 at 13:26:44

Not what I said. Of course both sides of the aisle want to hide their harassment records. HOW MANY AMERICANS NOT IN CONGRESS WANTED IT?

That is also not what you said.

I've seen a lot of bipartisan AMERICANS NOT IN CONGRESS that vote for lower taxes. So I still disagree.

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by Needles on 03/08/26 at 14:49:22

It's not up to me to make sure you comprehend. You think splitting hairs on irrelevancies scores some sort of points. NONE of your arguments address the issue I mention. You go off on weird, skewed tangents that only SOUND like you're making a point.

::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by Eegore on 03/08/26 at 15:08:09

NONE of your arguments address the issue I mention.

I didn't even notice you mentioned an issue. My assessment is you state the "only" bipartisan thing in existence is "Trumpedo's entire Klan in jail."

I disagree. I have seen bipartisan concerns on issues completely unrelated to Trump by "AMERICANS NOT IN CONGRESS" For that matter I know plenty of people that actually support Trump's idiotic decisions that are not "Republican" on paper.

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by Needles on 03/08/26 at 16:28:06

OK, SOME of the people on both sides NOW want Trumpedo hanged. Happy now?

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by WebsterMark on 03/08/26 at 19:15:03

1B3B39312C3B5E0 wrote:

It’s embarrassing. My congresswoman was one of those who voted in favor of it. They’re going to say they voted no so they could send it off to a subcommittee to review but just like Andor and Star Wars, we know that’s just a delay tactic to kill it. It’s BS. And it’s embarrassing.

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by WebsterMark on 03/08/26 at 19:17:17

1F3434353D3422510 wrote:

The only thing "bipartisan" anyone wants is Trumpedo's entire Klan in jail.

::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

If the election work tomorrow, Trump would be a re-elected and you would be shocked. You have zero ability to grasp reality.

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by zevenenergie on 03/09/26 at 04:30:54

I think it's good to see that it was condemned by both sides, because then we can leave the polarization behind.

It's clear that both parties are guilty of sexual misconduct. The Epstijn affair shows that people were susceptible to blackmail and that they were stuck with it for the rest of their lives.

That's one aspect, and on the other hand, it reveals the sexual frustration that many people struggle with and that they can't control themselves.
This is exploited in business. As a company, you offer to provide your clients with sex at meetings, and you use that to try to get the staff to do business with you.
Where life is most lived, that's where most business is done.

Politics isn't much different.

People are driven by their impulses and desires. There's very little freedom in that.

And there's the frustration that nothing is being done about it. It's good to legislate against this, and it's logical that it's being opposed.

The Epstein affair speaks volumes about this.
That someone like Epstein was able to continue this for years indicates an overarching mechanism that allowed him to get away with it. Many banks contacted the authorities to report Epstein's criminal behavior, yet there was an authority there who repeatedly protected him.

Politicians only stay in power for a short time, but the secret services don't. They stay forever and protect their positions with all the means at their disposal.

I could also discuss sexual frustration in people, but I'm deliberately not doing so now.
I want to emphasize how the secret services exploit all people's weaknesses to exert power.
It is therefore very important to expose sexual crimes, because if all abuses are exposed, how can you still exercise power over people?

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by thumperclone on 03/09/26 at 05:08:31

If the election work tomorrow, Trump would be a re-elected and you would be shocked. You have zero ability to grasp reality.[/quote]

reality?
re-elected with a 36-42% approval rating
me thinks not

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by MnSpring on 03/09/26 at 06:09:11

5448554D504552434C4F4E45200 wrote:

"... re-elected with a 36-42% approval rating
me thinks not"

That would be the % of the FDS, UL, WOKE, DFI Socialists.
That CHOSE to respond, to the UL, 'news', stations.

Your 'opinion', is based on what what you are told to say by SOCIALISTS.

My 'opinion', is based on observed Reality !

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by zevenenergie on 03/09/26 at 06:38:34

Israel just destroyed Iran's oil reserves, and that was not in agreement with the US.

I can very well imagine that the war in Iran, which Israel has orchestrated, could be Trump's Waterloo.

I've done some research on the overthrow of the presidential guard in Iran, and I think a popular revolution has little chance of success. And there's hardly an organized opposition that could take over.

Simply withdrawing from Iran in three weeks doesn't seem like a realistic option to me. An exit strategy is needed, and one doesn't seem to exist.

The whole world is feeling the effects of this war, and Russia is providing information to Iran, so it's involved. China will most likely also be involved in ways that benefit them.

This is a large-scale war, and one with extremely expensive equipment.
Israel can't sustain this for long, and neither can the US.

Iran may have been seriously damaged, but a climate has been created in the world in which peace does not thrive.

This is only a small table, and I can't make an estimate, but I think that in November, when the consequences of the war are more apparent, the mood will be different than it is now.

And November is still a long way off compared to the pace of new developments. (Is the word "development" even appropriate here?)

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by Needles on 03/09/26 at 06:41:11

It's closer to 30% OVERALL now. No way. Why you MAGATs want to defend a criminal pedo imbecile with dementia is beyond me. Y'all can't admit you were fooled? If not, you ARE fools...

::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by thumperclone on 03/09/26 at 13:13:31

51724F6C6E75727B1C0 wrote:

[quote author=5448554D504552434C4F4E45200 link=1772999552/0#12 date=1773058111]"... re-elected with a 36-42% approval rating
me thinks not"

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by WebsterMark on 03/09/26 at 13:29:33

I am out of town attending a conference. Last night at a reception, I struck up a conversation with a man from Cuba. Since we had a few drinks, and we’re pretty uninhibited, I just flat out ask him his opinion of the immigration debate going on right now.

He said he loved Donald Trump. He is absolutely infuriated at those who snuck across the border and are demanding rights. He immigrated 26 years ago, followed all the legal requirements, is now a citizen and absolutely loves this country. Other immigrants like himself tell him the same thing.

His biggest pet peeve is when people talk about how the country hates immigrants. That’s not true. Normal, common sense people are against ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!

This girls back to that concept that politics is like sports. There’s a red team and blue team. Depending upon what jersey are wear, you check your common sense at the door and you cheer for your team.

I do that also, but I am confident that the red team is far more often than not, on the right side of the argument.

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by zevenenergie on 03/10/26 at 02:45:55

I see a country a bit like a company. I wouldn't hire anyone who works just for the money. I'll first hear you out why you're so eager to work here. I politely decline anyone who doesn't fit the company culture. Your staff might be saddled with someone who has completely different habits, but the workplace is a place where they spend more time than with their family.
I also like to make a profit, and there's no place for someone who doesn't put in the effort. I also don't want to spend all day managing my staff or dominating people who play bossy because they come from a macho culture. My company isn't a jungle. I want people to feel comfortable and have enough money left at the end of the month to live on. It's a big job in itself, so I decide who comes in and who doesn't. How would I run a company if I had no say in the matter? And people could just walk in and use the company amenities that my staff and I have worked hard to develop over the past 20 years?
It's a team effort, and if you want to work here, you better show that you're willing to work hard to adapt and climb to our level so you can contribute. If that doesn't work out, too bad, but you can't stay here. I already have people working here who don't perform as well.
If someone in the company struggles with that and says, "You can't do that," because that's not socially responsible, then they haven't gotten it, and I'll see if they're putting in enough effort for the company because apparently, they think the money will flow automatically.

Title: Re: Bipartisan agreement
Post by Needles on 03/10/26 at 06:27:37

Yeah, I have Cuban friends that say that, for them, Trumpedo is a good guy. The problem is, there's no way to affect the Cuban government without harming the people. The CIA tried to assassinate Castro for decades before giving up. Why couldn't they? Well, I worked at the Lower Bruhle Native American Clinic the year Jimmy Carter was honored with the huge PowWow. I was too busy to attend, but one of the engineers as from the Crow Creek res, and showed me a video of Carter, dancing in a headdress with the others. The best thing was when The guy started pointing out the Secret Service agents in the crowd. "This guy here, that guy, that guy, that guy back there, they're all Secret Service." I asked him how did he know who the undercover agents were, in a croud of over 100,000. He said, "They were smart. They sent Native Agents. But, I don't know them. If they were from here, I'd know their whole family." Cuba is a small country. How many people were involved in Castro's inner circle? Probably less than 100,000. It's hard to get real close to someone who KNOWS everybody around them without drawing attention. MY Cuban friends agree, that if the US bombed their children at school, it would just create more people that hate capitalsm and the US. Just like Iran. I don't support the Ayatollah, any more than I'd support ANY religion, but, I understand that the SHAH was worse for the Persians than the Ayatollah. And, once again, when US capitalism is overthrown, the last thing that's going to happen is a continuation of the system the people HATE. BUT, that is THEIR problem, for THEIR people to deal with. How is the US blowing them up supposed to help? What is the goal, if not the oil? It's just a distraction from the Epstein files. You MAGATs have allowed your idiot leaders to wipe their a$$es on the Constitution. Now we are a rogue state, run by a criminal who fuks kids. That will be our designation for the next 100 years. We'll have lots of billionaires that do well in the stock market, though...

:'( :'( :'( :'( :'(.