|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Entertainment/hobby: /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1756667033 Message started by MnSpring on 08/31/25 at 12:03:53 |
|
Title: Entertainment/hobby: Post by MnSpring on 08/31/25 at 12:03:53 Hitting a round rubber-band filled ball, With a club. Counting how many times you hit it, before it falls into a 4” hole. Is a very popular, and accepted pastime. With the approval of Liberals, Conservatives, and WOKE, FDS, DFI, FDS SOCIALISTS. Others like putting a hole/s in a piece of paper. Which the WOKE, FDS, DFI, FDS SOCIALISTS believe there is no use for. And many Ultra Liberal Democrats believe the same. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Eegore on 08/31/25 at 12:08:59 I think if humans were out there killing other humans in a short span of time with rubber band filled balls from a hotel room window, a sidewalk, a nightclub etc. then the WOKE, FDS, DFI, FDS SOCIALISTS might think there is no use for them. This is an opinion. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by MnSpring on 08/31/25 at 12:35:53 7454565E4354310 wrote:
Just a Quick Look. Found, each year. 40,000, emergency treatment from injure, errant balls, flying club heads. Also Golf Carts, 15,000 per year. Elbow - 27%^ Shoulder - 19% Wrist - 10% Lower back - 34% And what, 700 + Golf Clubs used in a 'nefarious' way ? But HEY, that's OK ! |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Serowbot on 08/31/25 at 13:30:49 They should make exploding golf balls That would be fun And then we could take them to schools and public events like we do with paper cutters MAGA |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Eegore on 08/31/25 at 13:35:23 Just a Quick Look. Found, each year. 40,000, emergency treatment from injure, errant balls, flying club heads. So not one person killing dozens in minutes. Maybe if they did WOKE, FDS, DFI, FDS SOCIALISTS believe there is no use for golf balls or clubs. Also Golf Carts, 15,000 per year. Elbow - 27%^ Shoulder - 19% Wrist - 10% Lower back - 34% And what, 700 + Golf Clubs used in a 'nefarious' way ? So no golf carts used by one person to murder school children. Maybe if they did the WOKE, FDS, DFI, FDS SOCIALISTS believe there is no use for them. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Serowbot on 08/31/25 at 13:43:28 Golf clubs are too bendy, I'd prefer a baseball bat but I don't play either, so I'll take a claw hammer The idea of guy with claw hammer scares the bejesus out of me :-? |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by JOG on 08/31/25 at 16:29:30 5741564B53464B50240 wrote:
A woman doesn't? Misogynists,,, ugghhh.. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Serowbot on 08/31/25 at 16:36:29 A woman would use a spatula Ask me how I know :-? |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by JOG on 08/31/25 at 16:38:47 So,you're saying a man and a woman actually operate differently? Does that mean you can explain what a woman is? |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Needles on 09/01/25 at 07:59:31 MAGAT misconceptions again. I LIKE punching little holes in paper. I quit hunting many years ago--- after I killed my first and only deer. (.50 Cal Hawken, at about 40 yards, open sights.) I haven't actually killed anything since then, except for groundhogs, and that's only because my state lets you trap them or kill them, but it's illegal to release them. I've written for Outdoor Life, Sports Afield, and Rifle Magazines. I've shot blowguns, atlatls, compound and recurve bows, crossbows, black powder, and conventional cartridge ammo. My favorite handgun is a Spanish copy of a Colt .44 Navy, converted to .45 LC. The only guns I have complete disgust for are fully and semi automatics, since there is no actual civilian use for them, and the accuracy is sh*t. I still have two powder rifles, a Rossi 92 lever action in .357 and a J-15 Chinese made pre-ban .22 bolt action. I also have several BP and airguns. I punch paper a lot. One question: Why do MAGATs care whether someone identifies as male or female? What's it to you? Why do you think it's anyone's business except those people? ::) |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by MnSpring on 09/01/25 at 09:51:18 2F0404050D0412610 wrote:
Says a lot about your knowledge of firearms. As in, YOU, don't like something, then, NO ONE, should have that thing. What is that thing you always CRY about ? Oh Yea, FREEDOM. Yep, Got it ! |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by JOG on 09/01/25 at 10:16:07 I've shot blowguns, If you're as well equipped with Hot Air in real life as you are with a keyboard I'd be surprised if you could keep a dart subsonic. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Serowbot on 09/01/25 at 11:29:53 Shot a kid once at McDonalds right in the mouth with paper straw cover He nearly swallowed it I am not to be messed with :-? |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by JOG on 09/01/25 at 11:42:07 Once ya get the twist on the end centered and straight, yeah,, fun squared. Bic pens in school.. They were the AR15s of the day. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by MnSpring on 09/01/25 at 13:26:12 (Regarding Golf) “… not one person killing dozens in minutes …” “… no golf carts used by one person to murder school children …” Correct, that did not happen. So, the ‘WOKE, FDS, DFI SOCIALISTS’ are just fine, with ANY OTHER WAY, or ANY OTHER METHOD, humans are injured or killed. Unless it is, GUNS, that gets their panties in a bunch. OK. Got It ! |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Needles on 09/01/25 at 14:00:13 You're just playing dumb, MS. There's no way you don't see that the difference is in how many people can be killed in minutes or even seconds. Question: which side, liberals or MAGATs, made the most noise when a pickup truck was used to kill several protesters? MAGATs? No, MAGATs went to their kneejerk response, clutching their precious semiautos, along with their pearls, and started defending the crazy MF that did it! Within minutes of yet another mass shooting, MAGATs are all over the media, defending gun rights, scared, SCARED, I tell you, that someone will take away their horde of seldom used and always useless firearms! For 250 years y'all have been afraid that will happen. Know what? It WILL happen. Since you pro-gun people will literally do NOTHING to control the violence, you're leaving it wide open to the gun haters, who WILL control the violence, and in ways YOU don't like. Keep doing nothing. It'll bite you on the butts. ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Eegore on 09/01/25 at 14:19:10 Since you pro-gun people will literally do NOTHING to control the violence, you're leaving it wide open to the gun haters, who WILL control the violence, and in ways YOU don't like. Keep doing nothing. It'll bite you on the butts. You mean insulting other people won't work? |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Needles on 09/01/25 at 14:24:58 It's only insulting because it's true. Odd comment, though, coming from a 47 supporter--- he thinks insults are a way of communication... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Eegore on 09/01/25 at 15:04:13 It's only insulting because it's true. Odd comment, though, coming from a 47 supporter--- he thinks insults are a way of communication... Only you think I'm a 47 supporter, but then again any statement that is not in 100% agreement with yours can only be pro-Trump it seems. I don't know why you let him have that much power over you. There are people on this planet that don't care about Trump at all. A lot of pro-gun arguments, at least on here, are about complaining and insulting people, while ignoring how all these laws are getting passed. As if insults are how to get one's point across. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by MnSpring on 09/01/25 at 18:36:40 “…As if insults are how to get one's point across …” The Banning Of Guns, taking away Freedom. Has been completely explained to the Socialist, FDS, FDI, WOKE. Over and Over and Over and Over and Over and Over Yet they refuse, despite the absolute proof, Less Guns = MORE CRIME |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by JOG on 09/02/25 at 04:58:48 If the people In the church could have returned fire,how long do you think that would have lasted. Ohh,but it was a Gun Free zone, |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by WebsterMark on 09/02/25 at 05:34:29 Just speculating but in a room full of a couple hundred children, 2 killed, 19 injured but I’ve not heard if those 19 were shot or hurt during the escape. I think it’s possible that when the killer saw what he had done, he shot himself instead of firing more. If you watched his video, he said he was carrying a revolver for himself just in case. The columbine killers could have killed more but sat down and killed themselves. Would armed teachers had mattered? Hard to say. The only thing to say for sure is it wouldn’t have hurt. In the Texas school shooting, the police didn’t even charge in when they heard shooting still going on. No one knows what they’ll do in a situation like that. Training helps, but it’s still an unknown. But again, if I’m in that spot, I’d rather have a gun than not and I’d rather a few teachers in my granddaughter’s school takes training and have access, rather than not. But that’s not the solution, that’s a response to an event. Would any gun law have stopped this? I read he purchased guns legally. Would a red flag law have worked? Not sure if he was reported as a concern. It didn’t stop the Columbine killers as they had a friend buy them. Clearly the recent rash of kids with gender confusion is something to look at. But remember School shootings are extremely rare even though they get the vast majority of the attention. There were 294 murders in the St. Louis metropolitan area in 2024. 90% were black on black and almost certainly 90% or more or gang and drug related. I’ve read 50% of the murders in the US occur and only 2% of the counties. You leftist can scream and cry about gun crime all you want and the need for more gun laws but the reality is everybody knows where most of the murders are taking place. And now the mayor of Chicago, “Murder-City during a three day weekend, is fighting his hardest to keep Trump from doing in Chicago what he did in DC. If he’s successful, doesn’t that absolutely guarantee a few dozen murders will occur that otherwise wouldn’t? |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by JOG on 09/02/25 at 05:48:36 You leftist can scream and cry about gun crime all you want and the need for more gun laws People who have decided to Murder people,, hmmm, let's Think about that a minnit. So, he's pisstawff, and he have decided to get some guns together, so he Do that. That takes time. Maybe he didn't KNOW there are LAWS AGAINST Killin people. He didn't cool off and Re-Think it. But YOU believe more laws, restrictions for The Law Abiding, would Stop the guy who is willing to Murder innocents?? Seriously? Look at the places where Your Ideas are in place NOW. HowzitWorkinOut? |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by MnSpring on 09/02/25 at 07:42:34 152720313627300F233029420 wrote:
A, 'solution', would be, NOT, declaring a area a GUN FORBIDDEN area. Which the DFI Crazy's see as: (I Can Have, Carry, Shoot ANY kind of gun, at ANY Time, cause NO ONE CAN HAVE ONE and STOP ME) |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by WebsterMark on 09/02/25 at 08:09:56 Look, there’s no denying the truth, which is easy and immediate access to guns absolutely increases the likelihood of someone being killed by a gun. it’s easy to legally buy a gun from a retail store. If guns were outlawed, you would have to go to the black market. And yes it’s true there are 3 to 400,000,000 guns in the US today, so there’s inventory, but that would be much harder for some people to do. Would this Minneapolis guy have gone to the black market to buy guns.? It certainly seems so. If you watch his video, it’s clear he planned this for a long time so he absolutely would’ve found a way. The Columbine killers found away. Would it stop some spur the moment killings? Sure, almost certainly would. But I’m not willing to give up my freedom to own a firearm because of that. I’m sorry, but I’m just not. As I pointed out before, the majority of gun crimes occur in very selective areas by certain demographics. Focus on that. Leave the rest of us alone. And now that it’s clear that this social contagion of gender dysphoria has taken hold of young people, focus on that because it seems clear there’s a violent element associated with it. But leave me alone. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Eegore on 09/02/25 at 08:16:49 If the people In the church could have returned fire,how long do you think that would have lasted. Ohh,but it was a Gun Free zone, I'm not sure places that don't actively arm staff are "gun free" specifically. For instance I don't actively train and arm my shop staff, but they can be armed if they choose to do so. The shop often times is "gun free" but not by policy. Presumably Catholic churches will be absent of firearms but I am not aware of policy that restricts them at Annunciation. Could be though. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Eegore on 09/02/25 at 08:21:26 Would it stop some spur the moment killings? Sure, almost certainly would. But I’m not willing to give up my freedom to own a firearm because of that. I’m sorry, but I’m just not. As I pointed out before, the majority of gun crimes occur in very selective areas by certain demographics. Focus on that. Leave the rest of us alone. And now that it’s clear that this social contagion of gender dysphoria has taken hold of young people, focus on that because it seems clear there’s a violent element associated with it. I agree. The thing is anti-trans humans often times resort to violence or plain uneducated arguments, and in response pro-trans over-reacts to anything that isn't part of their philosophy. Pro-trans also under reacts to their own propensity for violence, and anti-trans exaggerates the scope of factual evidence. Emotions are more important than results. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by MnSpring on 09/02/25 at 10:57:00 2707050D1007620 wrote:
MANY, places, institutions, business, etc, etc, etc, SPECIFICALLY SAY "NO GUNS" And they actually believe it will stop the crazy, DFI, sociopaths from using a gun. (Which has NOTHING to do with whether a place/business/etc, "... don't actively arm staff ..."') |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Eegore on 09/02/25 at 12:32:23 MANY, places, institutions, business, etc, etc, etc, SPECIFICALLY SAY "NO GUNS" And they actually believe it will stop the crazy, DFI, sociopaths from using a gun. Right, those would be, in my opinion, No Gun Zones. A place where everyone chooses to be unarmed, in my opinion, is not a No Gun Zone. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by JOG on 09/02/25 at 13:12:01 In Minnesota, state law firmly prohibits teachers and other school staff—whether public or private—from carrying or possessing concealed firearms on school property, even with a valid Permit to Carry. Here’s how the restrictions break down under current law. Minn. Stat. § 609.66, subd. 1d – Dangerous Weapons on School Property It is a felony for anyone to knowingly possess, store, or keep a dangerous weapon (including a firearm) on school property. This applies to both public and private elementary, middle, or secondary schools, as well as their grounds, buildings, school buses, and areas under temporary exclusive school control. Even with a valid Permit to Carry, possession on school property remains a misdemeanor (if you are a permit holder) or a felony (if you are not). Even though people are allowed to carry permitted concealed handguns on church property, even if a church building is owned separately from a school, if it is used by the school—say, for classes or assemblies—during school hours and is under the control of the school, it legally becomes school property for that duration. That means the usual school carry prohibitions apply. It's DaLaw that You gotsta be Vulnerable. And vulnerable they wuz. Sounds like a Really Good Idea.. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Eegore on 09/02/25 at 13:50:10 Even though people are allowed to carry permitted concealed handguns on church property, even if a church building is owned separately from a school, if it is used by the school—say, for classes or assemblies—during school hours and is under the control of the school, it legally becomes school property for that duration. That means the usual school carry prohibitions apply. So according to Minn. Stat. § 609.66, subd. 1d: The prohibition against carrying a firearm on school property does not apply to: "a person with the written permission of the principal (or director of a child care center)." So the school can authorize staff to carry a weapon on school property. https://www.house.mn.gov/hrd/pubs/ss/ssschfire.pdf It's DaLaw that You gotsta be Vulnerable. And vulnerable they wuz. Sounds like a Really Good Idea.. I disagree. The law clearly indicates authorization can be given to carry. So they don't gotsta be Vulnerable. They chose to be more vulnerable. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by thumperclone on 09/02/25 at 14:30:38 Yet they refuse, despite the absolute proof, Less Guns = MORE CRIME not in the rest of the world |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Eegore on 09/02/25 at 14:47:57 not in the rest of the world Apples and Oranges. In countries where criminals have ample access to firearms, like Mexico, or Columbia, there is more crime in areas where citizens are not able to arm themselves. This is why private security contracts are so lucrative in those locations. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Needles on 09/02/25 at 15:58:07 6B776A726F7A6D7C7370717A1F0 wrote:
The rest of the world is growing into adults. It's the US that has the teenage cowboy/Rambo/John Wick fantasies. The rest of the world treats those movies like what they are: adult cartoons. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by jcstokes on 09/02/25 at 16:55:52 WWW.GUNRACK.CO.NZ HOW TO APPLY FOR A PISTL LICENCE |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by MnSpring on 09/02/25 at 17:49:05 2128383F24202E384B0 wrote:
t is possible to attend a training course at a pistol range in New Zealand without first having a firearms licence (under strict supervision), but many clubs require that you have at least begun the process towards getting your licence. It is also a police requirement that, after 3 visits as a visitor, you must become a financial member of the club in order to progress your training. Basic firearms licence If you don’t have a basic sporting (A Category) licence, you will need to follow the following steps to get one: • Attend a firearms safety course (generally one or two evenings) • Sit a test on the information you have learned at the course (And pass of course) • Pay an application fee (paid at an NZ post shop) • Complete an application form from your local arms office (This application will require you to provide details of at least two character references) • Install security measures such as a safe / strong room • A police vetting officer will then visit you and your chosen character referees to discuss the reasons you would like to own firearms, ensure you are a person of good character, and check your security measures are appropriate • If all goes well, you should receive your licence in the mail. Once you have your licence, endorsements such as the “B” endorsement for pistol shooting can be added to your licence. Or you can apply for endorsements at the same time as you apply for your licence. Applying for your B Endorsement In order to apply for your “B” Endorsement you will need to follow the steps listed below: • Join a pistol club, attend and complete their training programme (which should comprise of at least 12 days supervised training and lessons) • Join Pistol New Zealand • Complete a club range officer examination • Complete a 6 month probation period with the club • Apply to the club to get permission to apply for your endorsement (the club must deem you as a safe and competent shooter) • Visit your Arms officer and get a form (POL67F), or download from the police website (you will need to get it witnessed by a police officer though) • Provide your POL67F to your club who will complete their section and send it to Pistol NZ • Pistol NZ will then complete their section and forward it onto the arms office [Editor’s Note: I am in the process of applying for my pistol licence, and the AO suggested that PNZ might mail the form back to me, and I could electronically submit back to the AO (i.e. via scan/email)] • You will also need to pay an application fee, again via NZ Post • You should then expect a visit from a police vetting officer to discuss the reasons why you would like to shoot pistols, inspect your security (you must have a “B” endorsed safe, not your basic “A cat” safe as there are much more stringent measures set on safes for endorsed firearms which can be found on the police website) • The vetting officer will also contact at least two referees again. Generally these referees will be people who have a reasonable knowledge and understanding of your shooting activities, rather than just character references • All going well you should then receive your new licence with relevant endorsements in the mail Once you have your endorsed licence you may begin looking to purchase a pistol. Hopefully during your training period you will have had the opportunity to shoot a variety of pistols and types of events, and you may have established an understanding of what you want. Acquiring a pistol Once you have decided on a pistol and a place you are purchasing it from, you need to talk with your club and get an Application for a Permit to Procure “Pinky” form which will be signed off by a member of the club executive, authorising you to apply for a Permit to Procure. You take this form with you to your Arms Office and you will be issued two copies of a POL67C Permit to Procure form. Once you have this Permit to Procure you take it with you to the person or store you are procuring the pistol from, and they will complete their section on the forms. You then take the completed forms and the pistol to your Arms Office who will inspect the pistol to ensure it is the same as the one originally applied for. They will keep a copy of the form so it can be entered in their records and you will be allowed to take the pistol, and your copy of the permit for your records. Why is it so much effort? I know that in reading this, it sounds like a long-winded process. To be honest, it is. I would estimate it taking about a year (or longer depending on circumstances) to fully complete the process. There is a reasonable amount of start-up and ongoing costs associated with owning pistols to be aware of (Application fees, Pistol Club joining fees, annual Pistol Club fees, Pistol NZ Fees, not to mention cost of firearms, ammo and equipment). However, after completing the process, I can understand why it is set up this way. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by MnSpring on 09/02/25 at 21:49:58 416A6A6B636A7C0F0 wrote:
Because they are Ultra Liberals, who do NOT BELIEVE IN FREEDOM !!! |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by thumperclone on 09/03/25 at 04:35:42 193A0724263D3A33540 wrote:
Because they are Ultra Liberals, who do NOT BELIEVE IN FREEDOM !!! [/quote] or they're not paranoid? |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by WebsterMark on 09/03/25 at 05:21:59 If American slaves had access to guns, there would have been no need for a civil war. Prove me wrong. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by JOG on 09/03/25 at 08:43:42 447671606776615E726178130 wrote:
Good point. Now that you mention it, I wonder why they didn't just murder them. If there's 20 slaves and the owners, and a few foremen types, surely they could have gotten the jump on Someone and had a gun. Then head off to the next plantation and free them, get the guns,, Did any of them ever try that? |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Needles on 09/03/25 at 09:54:44 7C5F624143585F56310 wrote:
Because they are Ultra Liberals, who do NOT BELIEVE IN FREEDOM !!! [/quote] Literally EVERYBODY "believes" in freedom. It's only in the US that freedom somehow became synonymous with owning war guns. ALL the arguments the gun lovers have come up with refer to the ancient situation of defending against a king, though, as current politics show, when some evil b@st@rd actually tries to become king, they wimp out and hide like tadpoles in a catfish pond. Where are your war guns, now, MAGATs? Why aren't you organizing teams of armed guards to protect US citizens being illegally harassed by ICE? Everybody with a grain of sense knows the pro gun rhetoric is just BS. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by Serowbot on 09/03/25 at 10:28:12 416A6A6B636A7C0F0 wrote:
+ 1 8-) 8-) 8-) |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by WebsterMark on 09/03/25 at 10:56:51 Literally EVERYBODY "believes" in freedom. It's only in the US that freedom somehow became synonymous with owning war guns. Gotta love America for that. |
|
Title: Re: Entertainment/hobby: Post by JOG on 09/03/25 at 13:04:03 ALL the arguments the gun lovers have come up with refer to the ancient situation of defending against a king, What Was that No Kings protest about If there wasn't fear of oppression? And, IIRC, you leftards were completely on board with Forcing Everyone to get The Jabs .. You Are The Tyrants WE are armed and ready to deal with. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |