|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Here's your weirdo /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1756404185 Message started by JOG on 08/28/25 at 11:03:05 |
|
Title: Here's your weirdo Post by JOG on 08/28/25 at 11:03:05 “I only keep it [the long hair] because it is pretty much my last shred of being trans,” Westman wrote. “I am tired of being trans, I wish I never brain-washed myself.” ADVERTISEMENT https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/08/major-new-details-emerge-regarding-trans-minneapolis-catholic/ His mommy worked there before. The nongovernmental schools asked that faggoty walsh for help securing their schools. Nope.. Crazy people,, hateful, dangerous people https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1960974876770230341 |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Eegore on 08/28/25 at 11:29:51 He also went to that school, allegedly. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by WebsterMark on 08/28/25 at 15:07:41 774251495255514254300 wrote:
I hadn’t read that part myself, but now I see it. That’s pretty darning. But number one, watch it rarely get reported, and number two, if it does, it will be dismissed. But anyone supporting and even encouraging transition should be forced to deal with that. And he’s not the only one by the way. He might be the only one that shot up a school but he’s not the only one that regrets transitioning now that he’s older. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Eegore on 08/28/25 at 18:51:13 I think religion had something to do with it too. He had multiple anti-religion statements, Jesus on a shooting target etc. and targeted his own Catholic school. Also two of my cousins are literally being paid to make pro-trans anti-Trump posts in reaction to this. They are making well over 100 posts a day. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by MnSpring on 08/28/25 at 19:30:41 0B2B29213C2B4E0 wrote:
Sounds like, Whats his name, neeadel something ? |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by WebsterMark on 08/29/25 at 03:45:07 0020222A3720450 wrote:
He was a walking, talking poster boy for the far left. Anti-Christian, anti-Israel, exploring transgender, etc which means his story will disappear from main stream news quickly. It’s a very disturbing diary to read. I read an in-depth book on the Columbine killers, and it was also disturbing. I sometimes prefer to think people like this are literally demon possessed. Makes it easier to accept. Haven’t seen anything about his home life or upbringing, but not sure how much that matters. That could lead off to a long tangent about nature versus nurture. I tend to think nature is the foundation but nurture keeps serious outbursts in check for 99% of people. But it is a serious topic for debate. Does the easy access to weapons makes those outbursts easier to manifest themselves with catastrophic results? Clearly, I would have to say that answer is yes, but how to balance these very rare catastrophes with everyone else is freedom? |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by MnSpring on 08/29/25 at 08:07:15 Watch for it. The UL, FDS, WOKE, DFI Socialists, lead by Timmy Tampon, will work hard to BAN THE FREEDOM of honest, people. All in the guise of, 'safety'. Which will NEVER, EVER, Protect ANYBODY, from a UL, FDS, WOKE, DFI, Socialist, who is bent on KILLING !!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Eegore on 08/29/25 at 09:47:02 But it is a serious topic for debate. Does the easy access to weapons makes those outbursts easier to manifest themselves with catastrophic results? Clearly, I would have to say that answer is yes, but how to balance these very rare catastrophes with everyone else is freedom? This is pretty much American public debate on most things. Would we have fewer automobile related deaths if we reduced access to automobiles? Yes. The amateur argument to this would be how many used cars are out there, so limiting the incoming number would make no difference. This ignores that newer faster vehicles kill more than used vehicles. But it also outlines the problem of massive amounts of legally owned and operated vehicles. So when does safety from automobile deaths start to infringe on US freedoms? There of course is the primary difference that automobiles typically require some sort of education to legally own and operate where gun ownership does not in many locations. Also the level of Constitutional protections are significantly different. The point however is yes, reducing automobile access will reduce automobile related deaths - but people will try to argue that using flimsy math instead of addressing useable solutions. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by MnSpring on 08/29/25 at 12:35:52 022220283522470 wrote:
(In the interest of being perfectly correct and minuscule about something) Their is NO requirement to 'OWN' or 'OPERATE' any kind of motorized unit. Unless they are operated on public property/roads/ROW's. Their are various, Rules, when one is operated on "PUBLIC" property. And the rules are all different. Depending on what that unit is, and what it is used for, and where it is used. ANYONE, can 'buy/own' a car etc, take it home on a trailer, and drive it around private property all they want. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by JOG on 08/29/25 at 14:08:11 634341495443260 wrote:
I'm sure I'll never meet them, but if i did, I'd hafta ask How much money ? I'm sure it's a fairly complicated scale, how many words,how Powerful is the argument, but Generally, just how lucrative is it? How does someone even find out that opportunity exists? Who should a guyrl call? That is the most surprising thing I've seen since the Rent-A-Mob revelations. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Eegore on 08/29/25 at 14:59:34 (In the interest of being perfectly correct and minuscule about something) Their is NO requirement to 'OWN' or 'OPERATE' any kind of motorized unit. This is why I used the word "typically" and not always or only. You are correct, licensing applies to public roadways. ANYONE, can 'buy/own' a car etc, take it home on a trailer, and drive it around private property all they want. In the interest of being perfectly correct and minuscule about something there are restrictions to purchasing or owning property in the US if you are a minor, however minors can operate vehicles on public roads if properly licensed to do so. So not ANYONE can buy/own a car legally since many States do not allow minors to enter into an ownership agreement on the Title of the vehicle without adult assistance. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Eegore on 08/29/25 at 15:05:02 I'm sure I'll never meet them, but if i did, I'd hafta ask How much money ? Its a highly competitive field being won out by AI and bot-makers so the pay is broad. I do not know what they make, but they take on many contracts per month and are not driving sports cars. I'm sure it's a fairly complicated scale, how many words,how Powerful is the argument, but Generally, just how lucrative is it? How does someone even find out that opportunity exists? Who should a guyrl call? It's lucrative enough to make a living in the US given you know how to use the tools. Keeping up on AI, and social media accounts, managing bans and creating new accounts. That is the most surprising thing I've seen since the Rent-A-Mob revelations. This is nothing more than modern propaganda. Used to be editors at newspapers, marketing teams, etc. Now it's high school kids with phones. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by JOG on 08/29/25 at 18:11:32 Thanks |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by MnSpring on 08/29/25 at 19:44:56 7454565E4354310 wrote:
Yep, for someone not old enough to get get a DL. Usually can not buy a Gun, Booze, Tobacco, Playboy, register a car, getting Insurance for it, Driving it public roads. Please provide the LAW, that says someone under the driving age, (in their State), can not BUY a car/truck. Not registering that car. Not getting Insurance on that car. Not Driving that car on roads. Not having a dealer/private party refuse, just because don't know. Just Buying it. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by JOG on 08/29/25 at 20:39:58 My neighbor bought a Willys pickup with his paper route earnings when he was 14 or 15. No license. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Eegore on 08/29/25 at 21:19:26 Please provide the LAW, that says someone under the driving age, (in their State), can not BUY a car/truck. Not registering that car. Not getting Insurance on that car. Not Driving that car on roads. Not having a dealer/private party refuse, just because don't know. Just Buying it. In the interest of being perfectly correct and minuscule about something, I never said 'just buying it" I said "on the Title of the vehicle" which in multiple states constitutes legal ownership. In general, yes, humans in the US can purchase a vehicle and never take it on a public road and claim ownership. When these vehicles enter things like estate sales or probate court, the ownership has been challenged due to lack of State title. It is not common, but humans purchasing vehicles as a minor with no State Title have had those vehicles awarded elsewhere, like in divorce settlements for example. As indicated, if vehicles were made less available, then yes there would be fewer automobile related deaths. It would however require the vehicles be placed into situations where they would impact other humans. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by WebsterMark on 08/30/25 at 04:20:14 Of course if new gun sales were completely outlawed, there would be fewer gun murders. But 400 kids a year drown in backyard swimming pools which is more than random mass shootings and there are far fewer backyard pools than guns. So it’s statistically more dangerous to let your kid swim at a neighbor’s pool than go to school. Is that a ridiculous comparison? Maybe, maybe not. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Eegore on 08/30/25 at 10:19:37 Of course if new gun sales were completely outlawed, there would be fewer gun murders. But 400 kids a year drown in backyard swimming pools which is more than random mass shootings and there are far fewer backyard pools than guns. So it’s statistically more dangerous to let your kid swim at a neighbor’s pool than go to school. Is that a ridiculous comparison? Maybe, maybe not. It would be less ridiculous if mentally unstable humans were taking pools to schools drowning kids in them, or taking one to a concert and drowning 20 people in it. What you present is similar to humans that are afraid to fly, even though statistically automobile accidents are statistically more lethal. Or parents who are afraid of a stranger in a van kidnapping their kids when most predators are on their phone, or a family member. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Serowbot on 08/30/25 at 10:32:14 6646444C5146230 wrote:
Don't give them any ideas :-? |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by thumperclone on 08/30/25 at 11:27:43 there is no defense for 30 round mags. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Eegore on 08/30/25 at 13:41:07 there is no defense for 30 round mags. Yes there is. shoot first with more accuracy. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by JOG on 08/30/25 at 15:02:05 If it wasn't a Gun Free Zone, which didn't work wurfaschitt,, nowDidItt? And some people had been armed,,things coulda worked out better. It was Only After someone Added More GUNZ to the equation that he offed hizself. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by thumperclone on 08/31/25 at 05:38:19 5D7D7F776A7D180 wrote:
how does having more rounds equal accuracy? |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by JOG on 08/31/25 at 07:17:34 3B273A223F2A3D2C2320212A4F0 wrote:
how does having more rounds equal accuracy? [/quote] Now i get it! Your reading comprehension is exactly Zero. No wonder you are perpetually Wrong. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by thumperclone on 08/31/25 at 07:28:12 794C5F475C5B5F4C5A3E0 wrote:
how does having more rounds equal accuracy? [/quote] Now i get it! Your reading comprehension is exactly Zero. No wonder you are perpetually Wrong.[/quote] STILL not a defence for 30 round mags |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by MnSpring on 08/31/25 at 07:32:21 2B372A322F3A2D3C3330313A5F0 wrote:
The, ‘BLACK’, gun, (and variate) That the DFI, UL, FDS, WOKE Socialists want to ban. Is based on absolutely NO KNOWLEDGE of how any firearm works. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by MnSpring on 08/31/25 at 07:38:54 2A362B332E3B2C3D3231303B5E0 wrote:
WRONG their are MANY Reasons !!!!!!!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by thumperclone on 08/31/25 at 10:23:33 12310C2F2D3631385F0 wrote:
WRONG their are MANY Reasons !!!!!!!!!![/quote] name one! |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by MnSpring on 08/31/25 at 11:17:59 203C213924312637383B3A31540 wrote:
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Because you don't know even one. Says VOLUMES you don't know guns. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Eegore on 08/31/25 at 12:02:21 how does having more rounds equal accuracy? I never said more rounds = accuracy. You made that up. I was responding to the comment: "there is no defense for 30 round mags." My opinion is that there is a defense for 30 round mags. A guy could have 10,000 round mags, but if I shoot first - with more accuracy, I can defend against 30 rounds. 100 rounds, a million rounds, all I need is to shoot them first - AND be accurate. Shooting first but being inaccurate and missing the target is not a defense against a human with 30 round mags. So shoot first AND ALSO be accurate. All you need is to be continually armed and always be faster and better than the murdering psychopaths. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by thumperclone on 08/31/25 at 12:14:22 5C7F426163787F76110 wrote:
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Because you don't know even one. Says VOLUMES you don't know guns. I've been using firearms for over 60 years my first rifle was a 22 short single shot it taught me accuracy you seem unable to name ONE good reason for a 30 round mag |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Eegore on 08/31/25 at 12:36:08 you seem unable to name ONE good reason for a 30 round mag If you already established none can exist then nobody could ever name ONE. What would be your acceptable parameters? Otherwise people could waste their time naming hundreds of "good" reasons and you will just say no to every one of them. I think 30 round mags are useful in combat. Is that a good reason? |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Serowbot on 08/31/25 at 13:34:11 716D706875607766696A6B60050 wrote:
Got one War Maybe police work because in America the bad guys have them Otherwise, if you need 30 bullets, what you really need is practice What are you doing, just flinging in the general direction ? :-? |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by thumperclone on 08/31/25 at 15:15:47 I think 30 round mags are useful in combat. Is that a good reason?[/quote] that is the one not some nut using them to play rambo |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by JOG on 08/31/25 at 16:15:26 You're right. There Is no defense for a thirty round mag. Anything under forty is Bullschitt. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by thumperclone on 09/01/25 at 09:45:55 5E6B78607B7C786B7D190 wrote:
ridiculous |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by JOG on 09/01/25 at 11:49:06 No more so than your assertion that a thirty round mag is somehow unreasonable. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by thumperclone on 09/01/25 at 12:52:02 0F3A29312A2D293A2C480 wrote:
it is for civilians |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by JOG on 09/01/25 at 12:53:04 You don't understand the second amendment. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Needles on 09/01/25 at 14:02:52 Says the OG who knows nothing about the purpose or history of the Constitution... 30 rounds? So, you're ok with the idea that shooting in the general direction is good enough? Something else, an AR15 is .223 Cal. (Within manufacturing spec for a .22.) That makes it illegal, in most states, for anything except small game. Exactly how many rounds do you fire at the typical rabbit or squirrel? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by MnSpring on 09/01/25 at 15:25:01 785353525A5345360 wrote:
And again, no knowledge of firearms ! Just spew, what you are told to say ! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by JOG on 09/02/25 at 05:06:00 6E4545444C4553200 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by JOG on 09/02/25 at 05:11:23 OG who knows nothing about the purpose or history of the Constitution Nope, I've spent plenty of time, not in Skewl, but as an adult, reading about all kinds of things. I KNOW Why the second amendment exists. And War is exactly why it's there. America only Exists Because our forefathers Went to WAR against the tyrants. And they were wise enough to include in our Constitution a way to make Sure that We the People would be able to Own the things necessary to cast Off tyrants. Weapons of War? Dammed Right, Skippy. Anything less? Insufficient! And before you scoff and, as you are wont to do, simply Declare something and it's suddenly True, you know how much you wanted to make Everyone Get the JabS. You and a whole bunch of people wanted to jail everyone who didn't want to get them. The government was salivating to get everyone jabbed. I dare say that without the2A, we would all be jabbed,today. And then You say And that is what should have happened And That is why we Love the 2A. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by WebsterMark on 09/02/25 at 15:27:05 If I, a citizen with no criminal record, wants a 30 clip, I’m going to buy a 30 round clip. |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Needles on 09/02/25 at 15:46:01 WM, what are you going to DO with a 30 round clip? You can't hunt with it. That's illegal, too. You just want to be ready to kill people if you want to? Note the 2nd bullet point: https://www.hunter-ed.com/virginia/studyGuide/Restrictions-on-Firearms-and-Archery-Tackle/20104702_61943/ OG, The government has always had the ability to mandate vaccinations. What, exactly, do you think the CDC is going to do to you with a vaccine? And, vaccines are not just to protect the ones vaccinated; it's to protect "the People", which the whole government is supposed to be doing anyway. As far as casting off tyrants, with 47, MAGATs just showed the whole world that that was just a convenient lie. Notice the NRA has not been in the news, fighting the tyrannical MAGAT rule, with it's countless illegal actions. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: Here's your weirdo Post by Eegore on 09/02/25 at 19:09:10 WM, what are you going to DO with a 30 round clip? You can't hunt with it. That's illegal, too. You just want to be ready to kill people if you want to? I don't know about Webstermark but I want to be able to kill someone if I have to. Wanting to shoot someone for the funzies is much different than wanting to shoot someone before they kill you or a room full of people. That being said, I don't see much value in going out and dropping hundreds of rounds "Rambo" style out on a range either. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |