SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Remember the Hat ! /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1752504419 Message started by MnSpring on 07/14/25 at 07:46:59 |
Title: Remember the Hat ! Post by MnSpring on 07/14/25 at 07:46:59 The green “Boarder Control” Hat. Sold to Anybody that wanted one. When Worn, advertised as; “ When entering a crowded Laundromat, or fast food place, the crowd will suddenly thin. “ And how many years ago was that ??? And why DID THOSE PLACES empty so fast ???? Where were the MALC people, then ????? |
Title: Re: Remember the Hat ! Post by Needles on 07/14/25 at 07:56:31 Now when they see a red hat, EVERYBODY leaves. Some establishments refuse to serve anyone in a red hat. |
Title: Re: Remember the Hat ! Post by JOG on 07/14/25 at 09:37:05 Some establishments refuse to serve anyone in a red hat. He says gleefully As he promotes suing the baker for a f*g cake. |
Title: Re: Remember the Hat ! Post by MnSpring on 07/14/25 at 13:34:09 113A3A3B333A2C5F0 wrote:
"... they see a red hat, EVERYBODY leaves. ..." Totally MADE UP "... Some establishments refuse to serve anyone in a red hat ..." Again made up. (If not, state exactly who/when/where) Cause if that happens, anybody with a brain would suing those establishments faster than a humming birds heart can beat. |
Title: Re: Remember the Hat ! Post by Eegore on 07/14/25 at 13:55:27 Again made up. (If not, state exactly who/when/where) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjWA_RgYOXU https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/427917-california-restaurant-owner-wont-serve-customers-wearing-maga/ https://vinepair.com/booze-news/bar-bans-maga-hats/ Supporting reference: https://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/chicago-bar-bans-maga-hats-face-tattoos Cause if that happens, anybody with a brain would suing those establishments faster than a humming birds heart can beat. They can try but they would lose. Just like all humans that have tried in the US so far. Political affiliation is not a protected class and as such is not protected under discrimination laws. In 2018 Manhattan Supreme Court Justice David Cohen dismissed a case specific to a human wearing a MAGA hat that was refused service. Until MAGA hats are a recognized religious article, you can legally be refused service for wearing one. https://apnews.com/article/new-york-lawsuits-377d1585c0eb4d2bb869d10ddf428615 https://nypost.com/2017/03/19/guy-wearing-trump-hat-sues-bar-for-refusing-to-serve-him/ |
Title: Re: Remember the Hat ! Post by Needles on 07/14/25 at 17:40:09 https://www.foxla.com/news/judge-rules-bar-can-refuse-service-to-trump-supporter-wearing-maga-hat https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/ub0jug/eli5_what_does_it_mean_when_a_business_has_right/ |
Title: Re: Remember the Hat ! Post by MnSpring on 07/14/25 at 18:46:33 A Yep, If I walk into some place with a hat, hairstyle, pants, shirt, shoes, tattoos, numbers above knuckles on a hand,etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, And am refused what ever they are selling, BECAUSE of above. NOT abusive or threatening behavior, or something like. That place will pay. Well unless it about someone baking a cake. , |
Title: Re: Remember the Hat ! Post by Eegore on 07/14/25 at 18:56:34 If I walk into some place with a hat, hairstyle, pants, shirt, shoes, tattoos, numbers above knuckles on a hand,etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, And am refused what ever they are selling, BECAUSE of above. NOT abusive or threatening behavior, or something like. That place will pay. No they won't. Political affiliation is not protected. The statement: "Cause if that happens, anybody with a brain would suing those establishments faster than a humming birds heart can beat." is in correct. Sexual preference is protected. Refusing to bake a cake for a customer because of, a red hat is not illegal. Refusing to bake a cake because of someone's sexual preference is, in many but not all cases. Businesses can refuse service to humans wearing MAGA hats and not be sued. |
Title: Re: Remember the Hat ! Post by MnSpring on 07/14/25 at 19:15:17 5171737B6671140 wrote:
That is your opinion it is not a fact |
Title: Re: Remember the Hat ! Post by Eegore on 07/14/25 at 19:28:35 That is your opinion it is not a fact Agreed. Cause if that happens, anybody with a brain would suing those establishments faster than a humming birds heart can beat. That is your opinion it is not a fact The difference is my opinion includes facts as referenced. It is a fact that political affiliation has not been recognized by US courts as a protected class. That is my opinion. |
Title: Re: Remember the Hat ! Post by JOG on 07/15/25 at 05:38:28 It is a fact that political affiliation has not been recognized by US courts as a protected class. That is my opinion It's either a fact or an opinion. Pick one. |
Title: Re: Remember the Hat ! Post by thumperclone on 07/15/25 at 05:53:58 " We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" |
Title: Re: Remember the Hat ! Post by Eegore on 07/15/25 at 06:03:51 It is a fact that political affiliation has not been recognized by US courts as a protected class. That is my opinion It's either a fact or an opinion. Pick one. My opinion is that it is factual, as in I have provided evidence using cases in US court, while the counter argument has provided zero evidence, that political affiliation has not been recognized by US courts as a protected class. A business can, and have, legally refused service to humans wearing a MAGA hat. I have personally witnessed a sporting goods store refuse service to 2 humans wearing Obama "Hope" shirts. This was legal, they called the police and law enforcement informed them that they can be refused service, and would be trespassed. I could find no additional information in regard to a successful lawsuit. This means I have Observed these actions and as such exist as part of my Observed Reality. However I can not say all data about political affiliation and refusal of service are accurate or not based off my Observations - instead I refer to the empirical evidence over my very limited personal experiences. This should clarify that my intent is not to imply that personal Observations are not really real - but instead means that my Observed Reality is a poor qualifier for data or reference. |
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |