SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> ANOTHER MAGAT PERVERT /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1749590415 Message started by Needles on 06/10/25 at 14:20:14 |
Title: ANOTHER MAGAT PERVERT Post by Needles on 06/10/25 at 14:20:14 Republican State Senator Justin Eichorn has just been arrested for solicitation of a minor for sex, after filming a self righteous video accusing Democrats. Nobody is surprised it is a MAGAT. ANY MAGAT that accuses ANYBODY of ANYTHING is really confessing. |
Title: Re: ANOTHER MAGAT PERVERT Post by JOG on 06/10/25 at 15:12:29 exchanging text messages with an undercover officer who posed as a 17-year-old girl Wanting to get in a girls pants isn't perverted. Age of consent is different from state to state. 17 is fine in places. Unlike the buttfukkin leftards making movies in federal buildings, this guy was the target of a sting. I wonder what the pictures he was likely sent looked like. You seem to have disdain for perverts. Maybe try looking that word up. The ENTIRE LGBWHATEVER and Tranny WORLD is composed of Nothing BUTT Perverts. |
Title: Re: ANOTHER MAGAT PERVERT Post by Serowbot on 06/10/25 at 15:27:38 I can see you're preparing yourself to defend Taco Don against Epstein charges Work your way down to 14 year olds |
Title: Re: ANOTHER MAGAT PERVERT Post by JOG on 06/10/25 at 16:51:49 Deal with The Topic Now. I won. The entire LGbWhatever thing is in support of Nothing BUTT perversion. And IF EVIDENCE EXISTED that put Trump in any illegal situation with a child, it would have been USED already. |
Title: Re: ANOTHER MAGAT PERVERT Post by Needles on 06/11/25 at 06:00:10 Except, the evidence is being withheld. If this were a courtroom, 47 would be ordered to turn over evidence, and he'd be proven to be the pedophile he is. 47 accuses everyone ELSE of pedophilia. That's good enough for me. It follows the rule I put into my original post: ANY MAGAT that accuses ANYBODY of ANYTHING is really confessing. |
Title: Re: ANOTHER MAGAT PERVERT Post by Needles on 06/12/25 at 14:44:17 4C796A72696E6A796F0B0 wrote:
So where are the Epstein files? Why do YOU think 47 won't release them? |
Title: Re: ANOTHER MAGAT PERVERT Post by JOG on 06/12/25 at 17:13:28 Kash and Bongino SAID Epstein killt himself. It's Bullschitt. They are compromised. You act like Trump is in control. If EVIDENCE existed that would put him away, it would be used already. |
Title: Re: ANOTHER MAGAT PERVERT Post by Needles on 06/13/25 at 05:00:03 No, because Don TACO would just pardon himself, illegal though that may be. Still, the Epstein files WILL show that he was a regular. Where else would a rich pedophile go for kicks? You can tell from the photos that leaked out over the years. Don TACO can deny it as long as no one sees the files... so can you. Neither is truth. |
Title: Re: ANOTHER MAGAT PERVERT Post by zevenenergie on 06/13/25 at 06:07:01 lets grab it by the horns and look at child abuss as as a phenomenon in itself. It's good that you're starting about pedophilia we never had a good discusion about that here. I think that's the most under-the-table subject that society struggles with. There is an enormous denial about it, both among victims and perpetrators. And of course it's not tied to a political preference. Most perpetrators are known to the victim and in the family. Then comes school and sports. And only then the predators who abuse children on a large scale. But that's the smallest group. The official figures don't lie: 1 in 2 girls and 1 in 5 boys experience some form of sexual abuse before they turn 18. As said, most victims know their perpetrator, and a significant number experience repetition. These facts emphasize the urgency of prevention, signaling and adequate assistance. But what about the number of men who abuse children? :oThat has never been officially investigated :o. There are only figures of how many men are convicted of child abuse. Here it comes 1:9000 men are convicted of abuse each year. The estimates of agencies that deal with detecting child abuse show a completely different figure and that is 1-3% of adult men have a sexual preference for children under the age of 13. And that too does not match the official number of victims. Just go to a group of mothers and ask them what they think the figures are. A realistic estimate by phygologists and sexologists is that one in 4 men abuse children and 25% of them are under the age of 21. And that figure is correct, with the number of victims. That means that if you see a group of 16 men standing somewhere, there are 4 men among them who abuse or have abused children. Discuss that at a birthday party and watch the reactions of the men in the room. I assisted Tantra trainings for years. That is actually a spiritual course. But we could better speak of a course on how to deal with sexual trauma. Because almost all participants and certainly all women had been victims of insest, abuse or rape. The impact that this has on society is also greatly underestimated. |
Title: Re: ANOTHER MAGAT PERVERT Post by thumperclone on 06/13/25 at 06:31:58 abuse comes in many forms not just sexual women are child abusers also I survived an abusive stepmother |
Title: Re: ANOTHER MAGAT PERVERT Post by Serowbot on 06/13/25 at 07:48:22 607F6C7F747F747F687D737F1A0 wrote:
And which one of those 4 is the President... with the power to pardon himself? |
Title: Re: ANOTHER MAGAT PERVERT Post by Needles on 06/13/25 at 08:19:04 To child sexual predators, their defense is that different states have differences in the age where it's automatically rape. Even on this site, one MAGAT stated in another thread that a state senator was not guilty of child sexual solicitation, because he fell to a sting where the officer pretended to be 17. He alluded to the fact that, in other states, it was 16, or even 14. Like that matters! They are still children. It's like some men can't look at a pretty girl without some kind of hormonal idiocy. Sure, I can say a 16 year old girl is pretty, attractive, etc. That doesn't mean I want to shag them. In fact, by the time I was in my late 30s, I considered 20 somethings to be too young, but then, I've never looked for a partner I wanted to dominate. If you're in your 30s or 40s and don't see anything wrong with having sex with teenagers, there is something wrong with YOU. |
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |