|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Excuse me? United States Agency for /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1739878550 Message started by JOG on 02/18/25 at 03:35:50 |
|
Title: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by JOG on 02/18/25 at 03:35:50 Global Media? Just Exactly why would America need that? I'm guessing it's kinda like how we Need the gender fluid stuff in Peru.. https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgj0gYcybdRo9cHaKlSGyiuYxgpnwzxE3L4B7zKusm4JB0raXakR7TjfUEYgcazHhFUk5mlQZn-5_Ha9OKOcuY5xnvPLMVaFcOwSnQrSV75t6bNVhmt_uWMeGIxKO-9S72t2EEuTeZthu3zdSvNOs8kqPn3kYPigQSdaKn3xolpXGYE4uWQ6myAaB4vfw7A/s810/90milesdf92e0fca354f27fd359594e86bb470a_96298761_540.jpg Ohh,and $400,000.00 to,, ohh,I'm sure it's debunked.. You know, like when everyone said FJB had lost his marbles and it was really just a right wing conspiracy and some fancy video work. You people are never wrong, are you? |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by thumperclone on 02/18/25 at 03:46:25 [quote author=5267746C7770746771150 link=1739878550/0#0 date=1739878550]Global Media? Just Exactly why would America need that? so we don't become brain washed by one source 1st amendment... |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by JOG on 02/18/25 at 04:07:53 796578607D687F6E616263680D0 wrote:
Ohh,AMERICA needs to create a GLOBAL NETWORK to protect us,here, Duude, you're an idiot. Please, excuse me,, I forgot to point out Our GOVERNMENT has exactly ZERO BUSINESS creating or supporting Any media outlets. Those are things that May Confuse the commies. We call them Private Enterprise. |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by thumperclone on 02/18/25 at 04:26:30 radio free Europe, Voice of America... you suffer from eristic syndrome disagreeing with you does not make me an idiot your bellicose personality makes you one ! |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by JOG on 02/18/25 at 04:34:55 That explains 400k to Gallup? I'll let someone else explain it to you. |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by thumperclone on 02/18/25 at 04:46:15 6D584B53484F4B584E2A0 wrote:
because you cannot |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by JOG on 02/18/25 at 06:10:09 No. Because you're unable to hear anything I say. |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by MnSpring on 02/18/25 at 06:22:24 6C706D75687D6A7B7477767D180 wrote:
Like believing every word from people like; Rachel Maddow Eugene Daniels Anderson Cooper Robin Roberts Dan Kloeffler Thomas Roberts Eden Lane (To name a tinny few). |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by Serowbot on 02/18/25 at 07:44:29 5C7F426163787F76110 wrote:
Like believing every word from people like; Rachel Maddow Eugene Daniels Anderson Cooper Robin Roberts Dan Kloeffler Thomas Roberts Eden Lane (To name a tinny few). [/quote] as opposed to TRUMP Sieg Heil MAGA |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by JOG on 02/18/25 at 07:50:43 Yeah, stopping the ASSRAPE of America is So Hitlerian. He's Doing EXACTLY what he promised. Your Side voted for it. Black MEN, the ones who still have testicles, have joined. He Told us what he was going to do AND we voted for it. |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by Eegore on 02/18/25 at 08:58:29 Ohh,AMERICA needs to create a GLOBAL NETWORK to protect us,here, Duude, you're an idiot. It's called propaganda, which there should be zero debate as the whether that works. There's a ton of data and intelligence collected by means of "Global Media". Remember those exploding pagers? Structured and acceptance structure provided by GMNUS intel. When we posted Billy Idol faces in Iraq over posters of Saddam to track infiltrate and destroy IED shops, - GMNUS intel. Global Media Network funding should be audited, some of it is waste for sure, but to discount it entirely is ridiculous. Of course someone sitting at home that has never used any of it, seen or used it overseas, or can access the intel obviously knows more. Kind of like a guy that reads about oil fields from one Political Ideology internet websites and social media knows more about oil fields than the guys that worked there right? That guy wouldn't be biasedly informed right? |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by MnSpring on 02/18/25 at 13:33:28 6B4B49415C4B2E0 wrote:
Don't have to be experts. to know that when money is given to studies like, ' two pecker billy goats,' Is is just lining someone pockets. |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by Eegore on 02/18/25 at 16:04:33 Don't have to be experts. to know that when money is given to studies like, ' two pecker billy goats,' Is is just lining someone pockets. That would be true if it were a study, and was about two pecker billy goats. But if it is about genetic mutation studies to treat diseases in humans, then the couch expert would have decided how useless it is without bothering to look or educate themselves because they don't need to. The issue is the willingness to just discount anything that is titled in a way someone doesn't agree with. Global propaganda is extremely useful, but as a couch expert is seems one already decided that the GMNUS is private media funding in exclusivity. Even more ridiculous is years of claiming private media is influenced by government then all the sudden arguing as if a global media program would not be. This really is no different than you thinking internet neutrality was free internet. Don't need to be an expert to know free internet should not be funded by the Government, but also not at all what it really is. |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by MnSpring on 02/18/25 at 17:34:04 5D7D7F776A7D180 wrote:
Don't recall me saying that. Could it possibly be that you, just made it up !!!!!!!!!!! I guess you don't realize the reference to, 'Two Pecker Billy Goats', was a reference to most of the DFI 'give away' money of Tax Payers. For absolutely stupid things, which will NEVER be of any value, except for the, 'KICK BACK' ! |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by Eegore on 02/18/25 at 20:16:43 Don't recall me saying that. Could it possibly be that you, just made it up !!!!!!!!!!! I definitely dumbed it down but basically your initial responses were about access and control and not what NN was about. I guess you don't realize the reference to, 'Two Pecker Billy Goats', was a reference to most of the DFI 'give away' money of Tax Payers. For absolutely stupid things, which will NEVER be of any value, except for the, 'KICK BACK' ! I guess you don't realize the reference to looking at the name of some program and deciding everything it is about without bothering to look. JOG decided a program isn't beneficial to national security based off an uneducated assessment of what it is, presumably based off the name. All I am saying is that one program has been used for national security, simply because propaganda is effective. A ton of the Government programs need to go, especially the KICK BACK ones. I assume one's Kicking back to Starlink or Tesla probably aren't being addressed. |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by JOG on 02/19/25 at 07:22:35 JOG decided a program isn't beneficial to national security based off an uneducated assessment of what it is, presumably based off the name In what way would it Be beneficial? How would this possibly work? I can't imagine any benefit. If you can, please, share it. |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by Eegore on 02/19/25 at 10:37:24 In what way would it Be beneficial? How would this possibly work? I can't imagine any benefit. If you can, please, share it. I will refer to the examples I already offered. Do you disagree with them? Propaganda has been proven effective for decades and decades, why is this different? |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by JOG on 02/20/25 at 10:14:36 Some things are just wrong. I know, nuance,, Opening a faucet of money is a conduit for kickbacks. Have your Opinion. I have mine. Mine is every bit as valid as yours. And so far I've been more often correct. Not opinion. Just the batting average. Safe and effective? |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by Eegore on 02/20/25 at 11:24:29 Just the batting average. Safe and effective? As long as you keep lying about what I say, like repeatedly claiming I ever said the vaccine was "safe and effective" your batting average will remain as high as your selective Observations allow. I never said the vaccine was safe, I said 8 million kids didn't die in 2021. Your overreactive nonsense makes it impossible for you to comprehend that just because I don't think miscarriages went to over 1400 per day as your lying source claimed - that I can only think the vaccine is safe. If you were capable of having an adult conversation you would be able to accept a person can think a vaccine is potentially harmful, AND ALSO think your source claiming millions of kids died is wrong. Again, something you refuse to Observe: Why did I work to create an alternative count method in CO if the CDC guidance was accurate? Why change something that is correct? |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by JOG on 02/20/25 at 13:43:58 You argued against every criticism of the jab. Every fukkin one. You quoted WHO, FDA, Every Official Source. The very ones that have been proven corrupt. You acted like your every word was law. |
|
Title: Re: Excuse me? United States Agency for Post by Eegore on 02/20/25 at 13:58:08 You argued against every criticism of the jab. Every fukkin one. You quoted WHO, FDA, Every Official Source. The very ones that have been proven corrupt. Incorrect - I posted multiple batch numbers and demographics impacted by the vaccine, primarily cardiac issues - You just refuse to Observe it because I don't agree with all the other nonsense you post. I argued against blatantly false criticisms you refused to even look at. 8 million dead kids, 70,543 dead soccer players, 1400 miscarriages a day, 960 million "disabled" US military, etc. etc. Just admit you post tons of things without looking at any of it. You simply refuse to Observe that one can say CDC guidance is different than your lying sources. You just can't comprehend that I can think the CDC is wrong AND ALSO think your lying source lied to you. You just can't handle it for some reason and have to over-react claiming I said jabs are safe and to trust the CDC - all while ignoring I literally changed State law due to CDC inaccuracies. There's a reason you continue, for years, completely refuse to acknowledge or answer any questions related to that. Your inability to have an adult conversation beyond absolute agreement prohibits you from understanding that most of the "Official" sources were nothing more than me reading your own source for you. You use WHO documents, then tell me I'm wrong for telling you what they said. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |