SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> 1st amendment
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1734876066

Message started by thumperclone on 12/22/24 at 06:01:06

Title: 1st amendment
Post by thumperclone on 12/22/24 at 06:01:06

the orange [thin skinned] FELON is raging war on our free press
suing any outlet that publishes anything he disagrees with
like the fiasco he and musky created against the budget this too is doomed to fail

Title: Re: 1st amendment
Post by JOG on 12/22/24 at 06:22:20

You do realize that Suing someone for No Reason yields Nothing, right?
So, suing little George and GETTING MILLIONS means
He had a reason. And the courts agreed. So, what are you upset about? If little George hadn't LIED there would have been no lawsuit.

You still have a coupla amendments to analyze.

Title: Re: 1st amendment
Post by thumperclone on 12/22/24 at 07:08:04

ABC decided to settle for Georges' miss speak
George said rape when in fact the crime was sexual assault
semantics
doesn't change the FACT that the orange FELON has a king complex
he and his immigrant rich boy are already trying to ruin our democracy
I am sure there is more absurdity to come like going after Chaney total waste of time and money

Title: Re: 1st amendment
Post by thumperclone on 12/22/24 at 07:10:21

You still have a coupla amendments to analyze.[/quote]

WTF are you talking about?
what makes you think I have to answer to anything you say?

Title: Re: 1st amendment
Post by Serowbot on 12/22/24 at 07:19:04

Not even President yet and the daily shitshow has started

Title: Re: 1st amendment
Post by MnSpring on 12/22/24 at 07:26:46

“… Journalists already expect to be very vulnerable during Donald Trump’s next term as president. …”

YET

The same Journalists, HID, the cognitive fitness/mental decline, and total Incompetence of the last POTUS.

Which is which ?

“…banned-book event organized by the Boston Coalition for Freedom of Expression after the musical West Side Story was canceled at a local high school because of its demeaning stereotypes of Puerto Ricans… .”

“… Daily, we hear about another book pulled from a school; another protest closed down on a college campus; another university president bowing to alumni pressure; another journalist suspended over a post on social media; another politically outspoken artist denied a spot in an exhibition; another young adult novel canceled for cultural insensitivity; another drag-queen story hour attacked at a library; another parent demanding control over how pronouns are used at school; another panic over the dangers lurking in AI; another op-ed fretting that even a passing acquaintance with the wrong word, picture, implication, or idea will puncture the fragile mental health of young people. …”

“… I’m finding perspective elusive in the aftermath of the latest disastrous election, …”

Sure does feel like,
someone is stating a FACT,
RATHER than a OPINION.

Title: Re: 1st amendment
Post by JOG on 12/22/24 at 07:39:57

766A776F726770616E6D6C67020 wrote:

You still have a coupla amendments to analyze.

WTF are you talking about?
what makes you think I have to answer to anything you say?
[/quote]

You asked. I responded. You can't answer basic questions, BUT you are, as usual, Smarter and better educated than i.
Aaand, you can't answer the questions.
OK, I'm good with that.

Title: Re: 1st amendment
Post by thumperclone on 12/22/24 at 07:50:08

I choose not to play your arsine games
you used to claim your 140 IQ (garnered from an online quiz)
your assessment of my intelligence is a product of your brain worm not any boasts on my part
if you feel stupid there is nothing I can do for you

Title: Re: 1st amendment
Post by JOG on 12/22/24 at 07:56:34

Trust me, you don't ever make me feel intellectually inadequate.
It's not 140. High 130s.
My games? You ASKED, I responded. If you can read,you should be able to answer.
Who is The Militia?
What does Regulated, as used in that context mean?
It's not the way Regulated is used today.
Is it all too complicated for you?
Why?
You are The Superior intellect,right?
I mean, you spotted The decline of Joetato ahead of everyone, right?

Title: Re: 1st amendment
Post by WebsterMark on 12/22/24 at 08:14:39

4157405D45505D46320 wrote:

Not even President yet and the daily shitshow has started

Should have been a daily $hitshow for the past two or more years because we’ve had a semi-vegetable for a President.

So ask yourself why there wasn’t and what basis in reality does your “daily $hitshow” have? Try answering that.

Title: Re: 1st amendment
Post by thumperclone on 12/22/24 at 09:38:38

283E29342C39342F5B0 wrote:

Not even President yet and the daily shitshow has started

I am confident our democracy is strong to survive their shitshow
we survived Nixon, Regan and the Bush's