|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Camping out /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1732540356 Message started by WebsterMark on 11/25/24 at 05:12:36 |
|
Title: Camping out Post by WebsterMark on 11/25/24 at 05:12:36 Of course illegals immigrants disproportionately commit more crimes than native Americans*. I’m not exactly sure how they’re going to deport illegals but clearly some type of holding facility will be needed and the leftist media will have a field day comparing them to concentration camps. Much like cementing the idea that an out of control riot was an actual insurrection, it will be impossible to get leftist lunatics to see reality which is that these are not concentration camps. But I’m not sure how else you could accomplish getting 20 million people out who have broken into the country and stealing our money, out of the country? I think what will almost certainly happen is, if you come in contact with law-enforcement you’re gonna have to provide proof of citizenship. If not, you’re gone. And along with that is this birthright citizenship. I certainly hope Trump does away with that on day two. I think he’s got other stuff to do on day one. * I use the term Native American correctly. I am a Native American, you’re probably a Native American. Anyone who has a multiple generations of family in this country is a Native American. |
|
Title: Re: Camping out Post by JOG on 11/25/24 at 06:08:49 birthright citizenship is Bullschitt. Read the 14th amendment. |
|
Title: Re: Camping out Post by Eegore on 11/25/24 at 06:10:17 I use the term Native American correctly. I am a Native American, you’re probably a Native American. Anyone who has a multiple generations of family in this country is a Native American. Seems pretty open ended but worth examining. What is the cutoff time? "Multiple" is too ambiguous. Is it years, or volume of humans specific to that family? Does marriage count and does divorce change the calculation back to pre-marriage? Does "in this country" mean travel is allowed, as in multiple generations (more than one) that are currently present "in this country" but are born outside the US? Or is it more than one generation that has been born within the US? I assume, but may be incorrect, that Official Citizenship testing, and passing, does not count. |
|
Title: Re: Camping out Post by thumperclone on 11/25/24 at 06:34:32 5560736B7077736076120 wrote:
MR KnowItAll is wrong again 1898 U.S. v Wong Kim Ark |
|
Title: Re: Camping out Post by zevenenergie on 11/25/24 at 06:42:28 Of course illegals immigrants disproportionately commit more crimes than native Americans. I think you have to keep seeing that this is an assumption to their disadvantage and a stigmatization. But there is a much bigger problem: We have reception camps in the Netherlands. Refugees from all over the world are now being accommodated there because of the enormous influx, including asylum seekers and economic refugees. The influx is far too great. and the reception camps are overcrowded and even fuller than legally permitted, the conditions have become inhumane. So there are camps added for when the reception camps are too full. These camps are extremely expensive to set up but even more expensive to operate. People are forced to sleep outside in these camps and the living conditions (food and sanitation, etc.) are far below par. And then to think that the reception camps were intended as an emergency measure because it is too difficult and almost impossible for people to flow into society in a healthy way. Now finally, reports are appearing in the state news that no more can be added because there is simply no money and no capacity to let these people in. I am only talking about a part of the problems here, because I would spend days listing all the problems surrounding this influx. |
|
Title: Re: Camping out Post by Serowbot on 11/25/24 at 06:44:20 Mara Largo is nice We should put them there |
|
Title: Re: Camping out Post by MnSpring on 11/25/24 at 07:07:22 2F392E332B3E33285C0 wrote:
A much better place would be. A place where they are still in the Nation they love. And not Traumatized by being, 'fenced up", in a unfamiliar place. They need to be put in houses that are on ether side, in back, accost the street. As well as IN, BOT's house. |
|
Title: Re: Camping out Post by WebsterMark on 11/25/24 at 08:31:44 3127302D35202D36420 wrote:
No, Martha’s Vineyard. Honestly, the coolest political act ever was when Florida and Texas started sending refugees to sanctuary cities. That was hilarious. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |