SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Hmm,, I dunno,now
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1726629321

Message started by JOG on 09/17/24 at 20:15:21

Title: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by JOG on 09/17/24 at 20:15:21

That's pretty InTerrResting.

https://rumble.com/v5faun1-tiktoker-takes-a-closer-look-at-the-7-degrees-of-separation-between-2nd-ass.html

https://rumble.com/v5faun1-tiktoker-takes-a-closer-look-at-the-7-degrees-of-separation-between-2nd-ass.html

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by MnSpring on 09/18/24 at 07:24:21

ABSOLUTELY no concern to look at ANY kind of connection.

Just like the 'disappearing act', the Secret Service tried to perform on Hunters 4473.

(Wonder who told them to do that ???)

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by Serowbot on 09/18/24 at 08:16:30

http://https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/07/18/16/16161866-7260969-Seven_years_after_this_party_Epstein_s_then_girlfriend_Ghislaine-a-1_1563462247571.jpg

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by JOG on 09/18/24 at 09:37:55

Exactly how does That erase what I posted?
You do know that Trump barred Epstein from his property, right?
Who did Epstein try to kill?
Do you understand the significance of this guy's connections?
How Did he manage to Go the places he went and Not be
On the Radar?
You aren't comparing apples to apples, Row. Rather than do your
So what? Look at who Trump was standing next to!
And allow that to let you feel like this guy's connections are meaningless, or maybe, this time, do a mental exercise. Ask yourself what it means, and do it from a mental position of
Having no loyalty to anyone.
Try to set aside the internal biases we all have and be objective.
What if you were not even an American, living in another country and you were trying to understand the significance of the events in America?

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by Serowbot on 09/18/24 at 10:12:33

You and other MAGAs are on the hunt for a conspiracy to hang your hat on.
Rather than see an obvious nut who's loyalties shift more than a vollyball in play

Any organized effort would not choose this guy for anything

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by zevenenergie on 09/18/24 at 10:22:56

Any organized effort would not choose this guy for anything

And that's why they chose him.

A couple of real top security guards with top marksmen could protect Trump so well that anyone who tried would die. The security around him is a farce. The chances of him making it to November are not very big this way.

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by Eegore on 09/18/24 at 10:32:46

A couple of real top security guards with top marksmen could protect Trump so well that anyone who tried would die.

That's not at all how that works. Maybe in movies, not in real life.

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by MnSpring on 09/18/24 at 11:11:30

' how that works'

In a ‘job’, where marksmanship is part of the job.
There are excellent ones, and poor ones.

Biden, (& his advisors) decide.
Biden gets the best ones,
(And the ones that TRY to STEAL a 4473)

Trump gets the worst ones.

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by Serowbot on 09/18/24 at 11:39:03

0625183B3922252C4B0 wrote:

So maybe he was up that tree on Trump's golf course hunting Kamala?

Maybe he's a radicalized Swifty? ;D

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by zevenenergie on 09/18/24 at 13:20:08

How dit he know Trump was conne be there?
It was a last minute decision.

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by Eegore on 09/18/24 at 16:47:23

Trump gets the worst ones.

They did a good job the first time. Took a few seconds to kill that guy on the roof.

I've never heard of a POTUS deciding SS positions with any advisors. This is a really bad idea and I would be surprise if they actually spent any time with the POTUS going over performance records to "decide" who goes where. SS management could be directed to put so called "worst" ones with Trump, but I doubt anyone verifies.

I think Trump should have counter-snipers, but historically a past POTUS would not even have one.

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by Eegore on 09/18/24 at 16:51:21

How dit he know Trump was conne be there?
It was a last minute decision.

Trump is there consistently on Sundays. This guy was probably going to go multiple times until he had a shot.

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by MnSpring on 09/18/24 at 17:32:33

0C2C2E263B2C490 wrote:

" I've never heard of a POTUS deciding SS positions with any advisors. "

Then, in your opinion,
who made the call
to sent two, SS,
to STEAL Hunters 4473 ?

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by Eegore on 09/18/24 at 18:52:18

Then, in your opinion,
who made the call
to sent two, SS,
to STEAL Hunters 4473 ?

In my opinion, and to be clear just in case people don't know what opinions are, this is one. My opinion is it was probably decided by a DoJ employee, and then they got approval by Biden if that was a requirement. Or maybe for assurance, who knows.

What I do not think happens is the POTUS sits down and goes over performance evals of SS agents then picks who goes to Trump.

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by MnSpring on 09/18/24 at 19:43:55

4565676F7265000 wrote:

"... it was probably decided by a DoJ employee..."

So the DOJ,
Tells the Secret Service,
What To Do ?

Didn't know that.
Thought the SS did,
whatever they deem to do !

And only answered to the POTUS.

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by JOG on 09/18/24 at 20:36:16

His protection has to find and eliminate the threat before anything bad happens.
They have to be Right every time.
The bad guys only have to Get it Right once.
I used to think Nicky Lauda was the bravest Sumbitch alive.
Not anymore.
From crooked courts and prosecutors, and now people lookin to shoot him!!?

Gee, I wonder what the Nuze Channels would be sayin if the Far Right called biden Hitler and The Greatest threat stopped Ahr Dmokrucee until He was dodgin bullets...
I'm betting we would be getting a 24/7 finger waggin on Violent Rhetoric.

Howzabout you lefty fukkers STFU,, Howboutthatschitt?

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by thumperclone on 09/19/24 at 03:19:15

you're right again
your sheet stinks

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by WebsterMark on 09/19/24 at 03:49:35

I’m more likely to believe Secret Service agents are chosen at random, and not the case where lower ranked ones are assigned to Trump. (But given how leftist government works it’s not impossible that they purposely set up Trump. I just think that’s a level of 3-D chess that’s just too deep.)

But it’s obvious that the constant Democratic rhetoric that Trump is a threat to democracy, and must be stopped at all costs, ( that’s an actual phrase I heard) drives lunatics on the left, (which to be fair seems to be the majority of them lately,) to take action. As a result, it just appears Trump’s Secret Service agents are ineffective, but maybe it’s just a case the others don’t face those situations.

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by Eegore on 09/19/24 at 11:48:15

Didn't know that.
Thought the SS did,
whatever they deem to do !

And only answered to the POTUS.

The SS is under the Dept. of Homeland Security after 2003, before that it was part of the Department of Treasury. They "answer to" the Dept. of Homeland Security, most commonly the Secretary of the DHA. I doubt the SS does whatever they want and then "only" answers to the POTUS. Strategically this would make zero sense.

My opinion is the POTUS does not sit down and go over performance reviews, deciding what agent goes where.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3056

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by MnSpring on 09/19/24 at 12:52:58

1A3A38302D3A5F0 wrote:

" it was probably decided by a DoJ employee," ...
"The SS is under the Dept. of Homeland Security..."

So it wasn't a DOJ, employee ?

It was a person, or a group of people, working for 'Homeland Security '

that ordered 2 Secret Service members to try and Steal Hunters 4473 ?

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by Eegore on 09/19/24 at 14:05:38

So it wasn't a DOJ, employee ?

I do not know. My opinion, for anyone that does not know what an opinion is, this is one. My opinion is that a DoJ, or group of intermixed DoJ and DHA employees made the assessment.

It was a person, or a group of people, working for 'Homeland Security '

It might have been a mix, or only DoJ, I do not think it was the POTUS in exclusivity, or the SS. Neither the SS or the POTUS typically conduct the investigations required to gain information of this type on their own. This is an opinion.

Another opinion is that the POTUS typically does not conduct performance reviews of SS agents and assign them himself.

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by MnSpring on 09/19/24 at 15:03:06

7757555D4057320 wrote:

"... Neither the SS or the POTUS typically conduct the investigations required to gain information of this type on their own. ..."

Attempting to Steal a 4473, is not even remotely close to, 'gaining information'.

The SS Thieves, knew full well what they were attempting to Steal.

Removing the proof of Hunter, Illegally purchasing a firearm, and Lying on the 4473, would make the charges go away.

The question is, who told them to do it ?

In My Opinion, it was Daddy, Covering his sons AZZ.

Title: Re: Hmm,, I dunno,now
Post by Eegore on 09/19/24 at 15:54:00

Attempting to Steal a 4473, is not even remotely close to, 'gaining information'.

I meant the process of finding this information. I doubt the POTUS did any of this.

I also doubt the POTUS goes through SS agent performance reviews and assigns them.