SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Waddyou Mean Bad data?
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1689021271

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/23 at 13:34:31

Title: Waddyou Mean Bad data?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/23 at 13:34:31

https://borepatch.blogspot.com/2023/07/climate-data-is-hopelessly-flawed.html

But just LOOK! The Hurricanes are bigger and more frequent!
No

They are not,, nor have ANY of the dire predictions come to be.
But don't let the obvious impede your virtue signaling.

Title: Re: Waddyou Mean Bad data?
Post by Serowbot on 07/10/23 at 14:17:22

So when you seek truth and facts you go here?

http://https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgATBwdtgrw2Oz46qOhelkvwAyCVLmHnvM6RAfhcp4S5A5Drwrs-EuObnxvTEXnVjfub6R0PwfFkOQdZpROEPaBM7am2OG1k437ai5sWtWtEVV9GSiU8ofMjt8D6vQdRXc8_lgc_jIlYwfBCzIuB5x2luqZa2CZwcnsroQFcgiNzCIV3oZlKqEkKFFGUg=s250

Title: Re: Waddyou Mean Bad data?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/23 at 14:24:23

You can't even allow yourself to see that the Dire Predictions have NOT happened.
No, not one.

Title: Re: Waddyou Mean Bad data?
Post by Eegore on 07/10/23 at 14:59:35

Easy fix: Ignore the incorrect parts. Just say "the POINT is" the environment is screwed and when data is wrong just claim "documents don't matter".

If I am assessing this correctly... if "data" claims something that has never happened, we should scrutinize that data? Like if data says 300000 people died from global warming in TX last year for instance.

Or do we ignore the bad parts, only look at the correct parts, and also literally refuse to acknowledge any numbers before the "data" was assembled? For instance if data says a kid in Nebraska died from climate change, no need to see how many kids died in Nebraska before the climate change right?

Title: Re: Waddyou Mean Bad data?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/23 at 15:17:22

Gosh! You're awesome!

Title: Re: Waddyou Mean Bad data?
Post by Serowbot on 07/10/23 at 15:28:25

Ignore these... Nasa, BBC, Science News, NPR...
Listen to the blogger whose blog belches carbon

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/hurricanes-frequency-danger-climate-change-atlantic
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-50380431
https://www.npr.org/2023/02/27/1158969044/why-hurricanes-feel-like-theyre-getting-more-frequent
https://climate.nasa.gov/news/3184/a-force-of-nature-hurricanes-in-a-changing-climate/

Title: Re: Waddyou Mean Bad data?
Post by Eegore on 07/10/23 at 15:28:30

It's just interesting to see the same logic used for global warming suddenly not apply to vaccine claims.

There should be thousands and thousands of dead athletes just in the US by now. Why is that prediction ignored?

Title: Re: Waddyou Mean Bad data?
Post by MnSpring on 07/10/23 at 16:04:31

Which data is correct ?

The data from weather stations that were put in 30 to 50 years ago in rural areas, and now they are in Urban areas ?

Or the data from core samples of ice, from several thousand years ago, that comes from people who do NOT rely on money given to them, by people that want ‘certain’ results ?