SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Plandemic 2.0
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1671098136

Message started by pg on 12/15/22 at 01:55:36

Title: Plandemic 2.0
Post by pg on 12/15/22 at 01:55:36

Do you remember Event 201? Just happen to have an exercise that illustrated public/private partnerships in response to a severe pandemic. Also, a month before the real deal with Bill Gates, WEF, and Johns Hopkins none the less.

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/event201/

They just had another get together.

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/2022-catastrophic-contagion/

Best regards,

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by Eegore on 12/15/22 at 20:39:44

"Do you remember Event 201?"

Yes. Do you remember all the ones before it starting in late 2004?

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by pg on 12/16/22 at 02:31:08

So they have been conducting pandemic planning for nearly 20 years, while participating in the procurement of gain of function viruses in the US and in the totalitarian state of China. Is that correct?

Best regards,

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by Eegore on 12/16/22 at 06:33:03

You call these examples planning. I call these examples exercises.

I do not think this specific Covid outbreak was "planned" for 20 years. I think the exercises you reference here have been applied for decades in multiple ways, for multiple events.

I think it is possible for one group to plan for viral outbreak response without the knowledge of the activities in a lab. it is also possible that they knew. What I do not think is the only possible reason for this exercise is because they absolutely without a doubt knew about the exact strains being developed in Wuhan.

What happens is people look for any connection to reinforce their idea, which is fine, until they expect that everyone ignore the other details. Like that these TTE's have been run for decades, this is nothing new.

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/16/22 at 08:46:18

Knowing who is involved might matter.
Just because something was done and the reasons for it were right and proper
Doesn't mean it Can't fall into the hands of people who have a different set of motives.

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by Eegore on 12/16/22 at 10:43:47

"Knowing who is involved might matter.
Just because something was done and the reasons for it were right and proper
Doesn't mean it Can't fall into the hands of people who have a different set of motives."

I agree.

My thought is that most people don't even know these exercises go on almost every week in some way or another. Now that Covid hit, there is publicity of what would have been unprofitable event coverage.

It's like having "news" coverage of the Deleware intercoastal waterway security and preservation conferences. These are a regular event, that almost nobody cares about, so the "news" source or social media star looking for more ad revenue make no money broadcasting that information.

But if a Super-Covid carrying mosquito started breeding there, all the sudden it's profitable "news", trending social media ad revenue and an outlet to sell more bottled water to preppers. So people will see more coverage of the Delaware waterways and connect what they perceive (inaccurately) to be a recent and suspicious event: The intercoastal waterway conferences - that have been going on since the 60's.

Now those boring conferences seem to be new, and start to become how they planned the Super-Covid mosquito breeding sites with China. The real question will become why would anyone be expected to ignore that the conferences existed for 62 years.

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by pg on 12/16/22 at 16:46:04

69494B435E492C0 wrote:

What happens is people look for any connection to reinforce their idea, which is fine, until they expect that everyone ignores the other details.

This was an extraordinary set of events that is unfathomable that it was merely a series of unrelated occurrences............

Best regards,

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by pg on 12/16/22 at 17:23:38

What are your thoughts on these?

https://openvaers.com/covid-data

https://diedsuddenly.info/

Best regards,

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by Eegore on 12/16/22 at 19:39:52

VAERS is exclusively unverified reporting and they aren't comparing it with the number of unreported events.

No matter who on here says its "FRAUD" to report lies on VAERS, it is not. My cousins in high school entered multiple just to show people how stupid they thought it was.

Look at it this way, if your car insurance used unverified reports of accidents and crimes in your area to adjust your rates, that anyone could enter numbers into, and never compared those numbers to the number of vehicles on the road with no accidents would you be ok with that?

Would it be reasonable for them to say you live in a high accident area based off voluntary reports and not on the percentage of accidents they actually paid out on in your area?

As for the film that should be another thread entirely.

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by pg on 12/17/22 at 03:00:36

My position on vaers is more than enough information exists for a formal investigation.

Best regards,

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by Eegore on 12/17/22 at 07:19:53

"My position on vaers is more than enough information exists for a formal investigation."

What would you consider a "formal" investigation?

It seems to me the option is either an "official" organization that can't be trusted or anecdotal information like interviews that can't be verified.

What I want to know is why people want me to look at VAERS data but not look at the total number vaccinated.

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by Serowbot on 12/17/22 at 07:20:45

Plandemic?
So the entire world (this includes N Korea and S Korea) unite to create a virus?

Maybe aliens did it :P

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by pg on 12/18/22 at 05:24:38

4A5C4B564E5B564D390 wrote:

Plandemic?
So the entire world (this includes N Korea and S Korea) unite to create a virus?
Maybe aliens did it :P

Let's start with Fauci first, why was he funding gain of function in China?

Best regards,

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by pg on 12/18/22 at 05:31:18

1B3B39312C3B5E0 wrote:

[i]
What I want to know is why people want me to look at VAERS data but not look at the total number vaccinated.

I have no problem with that.

If tens of thousands of people were maimed or killed from a vaccine that does not work, it should not have been available.
Moreover, it should not have been compulsory.

Best regards,

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by Eegore on 12/18/22 at 10:04:57

If tens of thousands of people were maimed or killed from a vaccine that does not work, it should not have been available.
Moreover, it should not have been compulsory.

This goes back to emergency authorization and Operation Warp Speed. Had they taken their time and done full clinical trials there would be more information about what demographics have the most risk.

Title: Re: Plandemic 2.0
Post by pg on 12/19/22 at 10:45:01

18383A322F385D0 wrote:

This is a good starting point.

First, he seeks a state grand jury to “investigate crimes and wrongdoing committed against Floridians related to the COVID-19 vaccine.” (emphasis added); second, he demands heightened surveillance of the effects of the vaccine, including the results of autopsies (yikes!); and third (and perhaps most profoundly), he will establish a “Public Health Integrity Committee.”

https://dailycaller.com/2022/12/17/opinion-red-state-rising-desantis-takes-on-big-health-james-pinkerton/

Best regards,