SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> How is the coverage going?
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1670794110

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 12/11/22 at 13:28:30

Title: How is the coverage going?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/11/22 at 13:28:30

Surely someone hits the TV news. Is the release of the Twitter Files getting any coverage? The way I see it, the less coverage it gets, the bigger it is.

Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by Serowbot on 12/11/22 at 13:58:08

RELEASE THE KRAKKEN!

Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by pg on 12/11/22 at 16:51:51

I looked up 3 msm sites;  2 didn't have anything and the other tried to spin it.

Interestedly enough, Elon is suddenly concerned about the phenomenon of arkancide.................


Best regards,

Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/11/22 at 17:06:17

So, would it be accurate to say they are trying to just let it slide quietly by?

Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by Eegore on 12/11/22 at 20:46:54


 Or maybe the information isn't entirely what you think.  

 If the only outcome is a release of information saying what you think happened, OR, it's a cover up, then why even worry about it?

 This way the truth will be only what you want it to be.

 
 

Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/11/22 at 22:00:34

I certainly had no idea how many retired CIA and FBI worked for Twitter. Based on what has been revealed, it would seem like the Nuze Agencies would be all over it. Explain why I am somehow wrong expecting what is coming out to be what it is.  It's Worse than I thought, and I thought it was frikken Bad. So, pretend I'm bad. Does it just drive you mad that I see what Is before it's revealed? I knew it was some Kinda bullshit, and the revelations show I was right, but my cynical bastid ways proved to be a bit naive.
You don't wonder why Twitter needed a buncha spooks working for them? Seriously?

Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by Eegore on 12/11/22 at 22:20:11

 I'm just saying if the only acceptable outcome is the one you want, or it's all a cover up, then why worry about it?

 The news isn't covering a topic I think they should.  The only reason on the planet this can happen is because they are covering up the information I think exists.

 It could be true, but if that's the only outcome I am willing to accept, why would I even care what they cover?

Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by WebsterMark on 12/12/22 at 05:30:52

Jonathan Turley comments on your question this morning. Below is a couple of paragraphs.

The notion of a privately-run state media is reinforced by the response to these disturbing disclosures — a virtual news blackout, with most major media offering little coverage of the disclosures. Just as Twitter suppressed dissenting or opposing views in a myriad of ways, many in the media are minimizing coverage of this scandal.

To use a favorite term of Twitter executives found in these files, the media “amplifies” certain narratives or views while “deamplifying” stories that contradict those accounts.

Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by Serowbot on 12/12/22 at 08:19:42

Did you call out Fox and OAN as privately-run state media when tRump was in office?

Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by MnSpring on 12/12/22 at 09:06:47


3523342931242932460 wrote:
Did you call out Fox and OAN as privately-run state media when tRump was in office?


Those media’s,
did not  “amplify” the Ultra Liberal, Fairy Dust Sprinkling, narratives.

And did not “dismiss” information that came from realistic Conservative experience.


Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by WebsterMark on 12/12/22 at 09:30:56


2C3A2D30283D302B5F0 wrote:
Did you call out Fox and OAN as privately-run state media when tRump was in office?


Did the FBI have regular meetings with management at social media companies and establish a routine whereby requests to remove comments and prevent file transfers for the purpose of influencing an election were enacted? Please, share the details.

Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by MnSpring on 12/12/22 at 09:32:54


4767656D7067020 wrote:
 I'm just saying if the only acceptable outcome is the one you want or it's all a cover up, then why worry about it?

Sounds a lot like the, "Switzerland Syndrome disease"





Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/12/22 at 13:37:16

I've seen attempts at comparing apples to oranges
But watching someone try to make that appear to be some kinda equivalency when it's On its Face a NonSequitur. It's so illogical to put that forward as some kinda
Well, what about Thaaat!? that it made my guts cringe.

non sequitur (nahn sek [as in heck]-kwit-her) n. Latin for "it does not follow." The term usually means that a conclusion does not logically follow from the facts or law, stated: "That's a non sequitur.


Yeah, more than ten retired spooks,picking up a paycheck working for Twitter.

Let that soak a minnit.

Worked over twenty years, got the pension,, and instead of actually Retiring, they go to work at a social media outfit. You really otta think about that.



Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by Serowbot on 12/12/22 at 13:56:56


477572636475625D71627B100 wrote:
Did the FBI have regular meetings with management at social media companies and establish a routine whereby requests to remove comments and prevent file transfers for the purpose of influencing an election were enacted? Please, share the details.

Are you kidding?
tRump spoke personally with Hannity and others most every night.
They nicknamed Hannity "the tRump wisperer"

Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by WebsterMark on 12/12/22 at 14:37:41

That’s not really in the same f’ing ballpark.

Seriously, do you have a clue what we’re talking about?

Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by pg on 12/12/22 at 14:58:59


586A6D7C7B6A7D426E7D640F0 wrote:
That’s not really in the same f’ing ballpark.

Seriously, do you have a clue what we’re talking about?



That isn't the same sport, his TDS hatred runs so deep it is frightening...........

Best regards,

Title: Re: How is the coverage going?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/12/22 at 19:35:12


3E283F223A2F22394D0 wrote:
[quote author=477572636475625D71627B100 link=1670794110/0#10 date=1670866256]

Did the FBI have regular meetings with management at social media companies and establish a routine whereby requests to remove comments and prevent file transfers for the purpose of influencing an election were enacted? Please, share the details.

Are you kidding?
tRump spoke personally with Hannity and others most every night.




For All the WORLD to See.
Pretty Fukkin shady if ya ask me.

They nicknamed Hannity "the tRump wisperer"[/quote]

Trying to compare those things and somehow come out believing they are somehow equivalent is impossible.

Please, if you actually Believe that, just tell me. Then I know how to proceed.

SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.