SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> The trajectory,,
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1662909747

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 09/11/22 at 08:22:27

Title: The trajectory,,
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/11/22 at 08:22:27

I said it some time back, that IF the left get what they want, they wouldn't be able to afford to run their air conditioning. That is goin to include heat,naturally. Power is power, hot or cold, well, lefties, keep on demanding that dependable power sources be closed down and see what happens.


https://summit.news/2022/09/07/swiss-face-up-to-3-years-in-prison-for-violating-heating-rules/


I'm unable to find the difference between our ability to be in control of our personal comfort being priced out of range or just legislated away.

IDK what it's gonna take,, what do people need to see as consequences for their agenda being pushed forward before they have the big FacePalm moment?
If anyone has not read Agenda21, it's important.

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by WebsterMark on 09/11/22 at 08:32:47

that IF the left get what they want, they wouldn't be able to afford to run their air conditioning

Do you think someone like John Kerry, who literally cries about climate change but flies his private jet from one of his houses to numerous conferences around the world, is actually going to stop running his air conditioning?

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/11/22 at 09:42:06

Well, of course not.. The two tiered JustUs system puts limitations on We,the serfs,not the Important people. Doubt me? Look up who is exempt from laws for we the people.

Congress votes to exempt themselves from …
Last updated: Aug 18, 2022
They vote to exempt themselves and at the same time go after President Trump on tax investigations even after the IRS conducted extensive audits and gave his tax return a clean bill of health. Feminism has robbed women of the natural dignity and grace of their sex, and turned them into inferior men

ar15.com/.../Congress...from-IRS-audits/5-2578255

Aaand the jabs that are so safe and Effective and necessary for YOU to take.
Now Why would they do that?

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Eegore on 09/11/22 at 21:27:40

"They vote to exempt themselves and at the same time go after President Trump on tax investigations even after the IRS conducted extensive audits and gave his tax return a clean bill of health."

 This never happened.  It was a joke that people - who want it to be true - will refuse to acknowledge is a complete lie.  Then they bring it up over and over as fact expecting other people to just forget it is not true, just like the websites that still have this posted for more people to incorrectly see and accept blindly as truth.

 Again I wonder how many things people go through life being angry about that never even happened.

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Serowbot on 09/12/22 at 06:27:58

I'm pretty pissed that black people and Hispanics get to vote twice and also get free Mercedes.

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/12/22 at 08:18:10

Ya Kneaux, they Do enough wrong to have good cause to want to see all of them working, flipping burgers or something. Why would anyone just create a line of bs and stick it out there? Why? I'd sure like to See someone get a beatdown.

And I didn't find One place. There was plenty.
But, you know, all the Russia Russia Russia?
That was a lie, too.

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/12/22 at 09:30:14

How could anyone believe they would Ever exempt themselves from laws that We the People have to obey?

https://archive.humanevents.com/2013/08/07/congress-exempts-itself-from-the-law/

They have been known to put themselves above the law.

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by MnSpring on 09/12/22 at 10:01:01


4D6D6F677A6D080 wrote:
"...   This never happened ..."  

"They vote to exempt themselves"

Wonder if Martha would have anything to say about, "Insider Trading" ?

Wonder if the guy that stole a election, (thanks to ACORN), who moved to DC, rented a house, ate/drank/entertained, flew back and forth,  who was DEEPLY IN DEBT, became a MILLIONAIRE after a year, on a 120,000.00 salary.
Would have anything to say ?

And billery, mush for brains, gore, and on, and on, and on, and on.



Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by MnSpring on 09/12/22 at 10:07:36


3325322F37222F34400 wrote:
I'm pretty pissed that black people and Hispanics get to vote twice and also get free Mercedes.  

I believe you meant that as a Joke.

Do you also believe it is a 'Joke', that many Illegal's  sneaking into this country, get Free Health care, Free Food, Free Lodging, and Free Cell Phones & service ?



Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Eegore on 09/12/22 at 12:49:29


"They have been known to put themselves above the law."


 So truth doesn't matter?  A lie is ok as long as something similar happened years ago.  Why didn't you use a REAL event instead of a lie to support your point?

 How is what you claimed this important Truth thing you say you want?

 The claim you made here is a lie and the source you used lied to you.  You are leveraging a lie in your argument and are upset over an event that is imaginary.

 Why should the rest of us go along with that?

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Eegore on 09/12/22 at 12:52:30

"Wonder if Martha would have anything to say about, "Insider Trading" ?

Wonder if the guy that stole a election, (thanks to ACORN), who moved to DC, rented a house, ate/drank/entertained, flew back and forth,  who was DEEPLY IN DEBT, became a MILLIONAIRE after a year, on a 120,000.00 salary.
Would have anything to say ?

And billery, mush for brains, gore, and on, and on, and on, and on.
"



 None of that changes the fact that the claim made here is a lie.  It's not true, it never happened, but somehow the defense for using a lie and claiming it as fact is that Martha Stewart is a criminal.

 Why should anyone accept lies as supporting evidence?  Just use truth, it's not as easy but at least it's not imaginary events that never happened.  Be mad about real things not lies.

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by WebsterMark on 09/12/22 at 15:02:29


3F293E233B2E23384C0 wrote:
I'm pretty pissed that black people and Hispanics get to vote twice and also get free Mercedes.

I know, right! I’m gonna get one of those DNA test. I bet I’ve got some brother blood in me so I can qualify too!

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by pg on 09/12/22 at 16:18:46

You don't need to do that anymore, just need to identify as whatever you want to be.  Sure works for a lot of people these days...........

Best regards,

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/12/22 at 18:23:31


69494B435E492C0 wrote:
"They have been known to put themselves above the law."


 So truth doesn't matter?  A lie is ok as long as something similar happened years ago.  Why didn't you use a REAL event instead of a lie to support your point?

 How is what you claimed this important Truth thing you say you want?

 The claim you made here is a lie and the source you used lied to you.  You are leveraging a lie in your argument and are upset over an event that is imaginary.

 Why should the rest of us go along with that?


Did you not see what I said? Quit acting like I made it up. I looked, I found it in several places. You somehow have it in your head that I don't care if it is true or not. I do. But some stuff guPAST my efforts to know. You, Fukk, what is it? How do YOU know everything that is not true?  How DO you do that?

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Eegore on 09/13/22 at 05:37:19


You, Fukk, what is it? How do YOU know everything that is not true?  How DO you do that?

 I don't.

 I just scrutinize information I agree with, or think would be true, the exact same way I scrutinize information I think is wrong.  I don't talk about wanting truth then defend lies.

 I am willing to check a source prior to passing it on instead of being "excited" or "lubricated" or "too easy to believe" or "too trusting" or whatever reason comes up for posting obviously incorrect information - Then - defending it as fact after.

 I don't care if you want to post false information all day, I just don't need to hear why I should believe it myself.

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/13/22 at 08:21:36

Tell ya what, you try talking to me with a bit less attitude.
Funny thing about how you couldn't figure out Russia Russia Russia was bullshit while our lefties were pushing it. You don't have a blind eye, do ya?

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by zevenenergie on 09/13/22 at 08:35:24

I think the range of news in America is enormous. And because everyone in America has an opinion or takes a stand, it is practically impossible for me to filter out the truth.

So many people, so many truths.
In addition, many news providers pursue political or business goals. And then I don't even want to say the word propaganda.
When I want to check something for truth, I look to different news sources all over the world. And if they say the same, then I take it for a fact.

Financial news sources also want to go deeper into news facts. And I also hear more insights there.

I have heard a wise man say that thoughts never reflect reality.
And those who claim to know do not know.
And whoever knows and says nothing passes on the truth through being.


Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by MnSpring on 09/13/22 at 09:01:58


7454565E4354310 wrote:
"...   I just scrutinize information I agree with, or think would be true,
the exact same way
I scrutinize information I think is wrong.  ..."


Then after that, if you agree with something, you believe it is correct.
And if you do not agree with something, you believe it is not correct.

OK Got it.




Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by MnSpring on 09/13/22 at 09:09:35


0E2E2C24392E4B0 wrote:
"...   None of that changes the fact that the claim made here is a lie. It's not true, it never happened ..."

Can you explain why some people can openly partake in 'Insider Trading', and other people can not ?

(To name JUST ONE THING)



Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Eegore on 09/13/22 at 10:23:45


"Then after that, if you agree with something, you believe it is correct.
And if you do not agree with something, you believe it is not correct.

OK Got it."


 Incorrect.  If I agree with something and no evidence supports it, then I no longer agree that it is correct.

 The difference is I don't blindly accept any and all information that supports what I think is true.  



"Can you explain why some people can openly partake in 'Insider Trading', and other people can not ?

(To name JUST ONE THING)


 No.  And nothing about insider trading makes the claim the Congress passed a bill exempting them from tax audits true.

 Martha Stewart being a criminal does not change the posted lies about the bills Congress passed.

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Serowbot on 09/13/22 at 10:57:03

Here is video of Trump moving boxes from MaraLardo to Bedminster.
It's been out for a week or two.
I haven't posted it because I don't see confirmation from reliable sources.
This may be true,... or not.
Time will tell.
Accepting reports from unreliable sources is an invitation to scrutiny.
There's plenty of lies on both sides.
The difference is Trumpers are more likely to believe them.


Video shows Trump boarding jet with boxes days after being told of missing docs:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/trump-investigaton-video-boxes-documents-mar-a-lago-raid

You blame Eegore for your susceptibility.
Where would you be without him?
Think about it.
You might be a 1/6'er doin' jail time.
It's ironic that the Right invented the term "sheeple",...
It describes so many of them so well.
Trump LOST... Lather rinse, repeat.

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Eegore on 09/13/22 at 11:15:17

"You blame Eegore for your susceptibility."

 I don't think JoG is saying that.  He's indicating that I am saying he is trying to find (hunting for) and pass false information on purpose.  I don't think that he is being intentionally misleading I just think he posts inaccurate information then defends it.  Those are two different things.

 The consistency is concerning, but as I said, other people being upset over things that never happened is fine with me.  I just don't see why anyone thinks I should join in.

 

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by MnSpring on 09/13/22 at 18:57:02

"... you (Eegore) couldn't figure out Russia Russia Russia was bullshit while our lefties were pushing it. You don't have a blind eye, do ya?

Much the same as the 'F ucking Bumbling Idiots' saying:
'Can't Confirm or Deny that information'.





Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Eegore on 09/13/22 at 19:08:20


"... you (Eegore) couldn't figure out Russia Russia Russia was bullshit while our lefties were pushing it. You don't have a blind eye, do ya?"


 I have never commented on this due to a conflict of interest.

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/13/22 at 20:20:06

How do you have a conflict of interest?

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Eegore on 09/14/22 at 05:22:20


"How do you have a conflict of interest?"


 I still have a team member working with the Foreign Policy Advisor (POLAD) through USSTRATCOM.

 To be clear this does not mean I am teaching people how to "shoot guns" even though certain members here might insist I am.

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by MnSpring on 09/14/22 at 06:32:08


5777757D6077120 wrote:
"...   To be clear this does not mean I am teaching people how to "shoot guns"
even though certain members here might insist I am.


OK, so then you do not show/tell them.
How to hold one, carry one, to NEVER point it at anything you don't want to shoot ?
Where the Magazine is, how to load it, if it is removable or not, how to put it in, how to take it out ?
Where the Safety is,  how to put it on, how to take it off ?
Where the trigger is, how to pull it a rifle, vs a shotgun ?
How to adjust the Butt/Cheek piece, Move/use the rear/front sights, which direction to move a front/rear sight to hit the point you are aiming at.
To know and understand the words a RO would use.
Etc., Etc., Etc.

Understand if your, 'teaching', does not include, Breath/Heart beat control, Hand strength, Mental clarity, as well as eye and ear protection.

Yet if your students come to you trained in the basic/fundamentals as above. And your, 'teaching', consists of, 'move left if things are like this, move back if ... do this if ...  go here if ... Etc, etc, etc.

That is TEACHING how to SHOOT a GUN !



Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Eegore on 09/14/22 at 06:59:00

You think I teach people how to shoot guns.  

But you claim I am the one "saying" it.  I am not saying it, you are.




"OK, so then you do not show/tell them.
How to hold one, carry one, to NEVER point it at anything you don't want to shoot ?
Where the Magazine is, how to load it, if it is removable or not, how to put it in, how to take it out ?
Where the Safety is,  how to put it on, how to take it off ?
Where the trigger is, how to pull it a rifle, vs a shotgun ?
How to adjust the Butt/Cheek piece, Move/use the rear/front sights, which direction to move a front/rear sight to hit the point you are aiming at.
To know and understand the words a RO would use.
Etc., Etc., Etc."


 I do not do any of those things.  However you claim I "said" the words I teach people how to "SHOOT a GUN !", I never said that.





Yet if your students come to you trained in the basic/fundamentals as above. And your, 'teaching', consists of, 'move left if things are like this, move back if ... do this if ...  go here if ... Etc, etc, etc.

That is TEACHING how to SHOOT a GUN !



 I don't do that either, but again semantics is irrelevant because you claim I "said" the words I teach people how to "SHOOT a GUN !" and I never said that.  

 You claim I omitted that I teach "marksmanship" when I was near the Ukraine.  I said "training" and you stated the following:

What ?
Did you say, 'training' ?

Oh that's right, you Spun it to say,
you did not do any,
'Target/Marksmanship', 'training'.


 Another example of you claiming I am teaching people how to - SHOOT a GUN ! -  when I was using software hooked to non-weaponized drones.  No guns.  None.  But you insist I am teaching people how to "SHOOT a GUN !, and not saying it.  

 Why is it so important for you to insist every bit of training I do is teaching people to SHOOT a GUN !?  Why insist I "said" that I teach people how to "shoot guns"?  Why would this be so important to you?



Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by zevenenergie on 09/14/22 at 08:22:48

It strikes me that the topics are mainly about whether or not Trump, police, guns and sex with the dead.

;D

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Eegore on 09/14/22 at 10:24:15


 This is more of a complain forum than a discussion forum.

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by WebsterMark on 09/14/22 at 10:43:06

Why are you so hung up on what Eegore’s point of view is?

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Eegore on 09/14/22 at 13:14:03


Why are you so hung up on what Eegore’s point of view is?

 That's what I was wondering.  My opinion is worth nothing.

 

Title: Re: The trajectory,,
Post by Serowbot on 09/14/22 at 16:46:19

Mine's priceless.



... and by that I mean it has no price... :-?

SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.