SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> I have found one name and it certainly appears cor
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1658683947

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 07/24/22 at 10:32:27

Title: I have found one name and it certainly appears cor
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/24/22 at 10:32:27

The Kindle is just not lettin me get the whole address in

https://www.hollywoodlanews.com/canadian-doctors-dead-after-booster/

YESSS! Took some serious cut and paste action, but I got it..

https://www.hollywoodlanews.com

But since nobody has Told us why they all died, we dare not allow ourselves to have a suspected cause.

Title: Re: I have found one name and it certainly appears
Post by Eegore on 07/24/22 at 23:28:58

It is not common that 4 doctors would die in a week but it is common to assume things and not need facts if we already think we know the reason.

Obviously these guys died from the vaccine, even though we have no evidence they took the boosters. But this must mean it's true right?:

The province of Ontario started recommending the 2nd booster shots on July 13 and made them available on July 14

Let's ignore this:

There are unconfirmed reports that Doctor Segall’s death is a result of cancer.

Doctor McKenzie had his assistant notify his patients about a month ago that he was closing his practice because he was seriously ill.

So now they died from heart attacks because they got the booster right?

I think this should be looked into, but we need to know if they took the vaccines, when, what batch numbers and their overall health prior to vaccination.

Also ignore the hundreds of thousands of doctors that have been vaccinated with zero issues. That number isn't relevant at all.

Title: Re: I have found one name and it certainly appears
Post by MnSpring on 07/25/22 at 07:43:39

Quote:

49696B637E690C0 wrote:

"... but it is common to assume things and not need facts ..."
... even though we have no evidence they took the boosters.
But this must mean it's true right?...
... Let's ignore this ...

"There are unconfirmed reports that Doctor Segall’s death is a result of cancer."

Just so we all understand.

You saying, “…Let's ignore this…”
Which you are implying one should not.

Are you are saying one should consider,
even though ‘reports’ are UNCONFIRMED,
that cancer is the reason.

If someone says;
“…Unconfirmed reports of Biden doing …, …, …, “
They are to be, ignored, or considered ?

If someone says;
“…Unconfirmed reports of Trump doing …, …, …, “
They are to be, ignored, or considered ?

Title: Re: I have found one name and it certainly appears
Post by Serowbot on 07/25/22 at 07:50:36

The Right accuses media of saying nearly every death is Covid related.... whilst they attribute nearly every death to vaccines.
Stupid battle....

Title: Re: I have found one name and it certainly appears
Post by Eegore on 07/25/22 at 14:57:54

Are you are saying one should consider,
even though ‘reports’ are UNCONFIRMED,
that cancer is the reason.

I am saying do not ignore "There are unconfirmed reports that Doctor Segall’s death is a result of cancer." because you would rather blame the vaccine, which is also unconfirmed.

If someone says;
“…Unconfirmed reports of Biden doing …, …, …, “
They are to be, ignored, or considered ?

Considered.

If someone says;
“…Unconfirmed reports of Trump doing …, …, …, “
They are to be, ignored, or considered ?

Considered.

Do not ignore one aspect of a situation in favor of another without evidence.