SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Nixon's 18 minutes /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1658617532 Message started by Serowbot on 07/23/22 at 16:05:32 |
Title: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by Serowbot on 07/23/22 at 16:05:32 Trump was constantly tearing up papers, clogging toilets by flushing papers,... took 15 boxes of papers to Mar a Lago. On J6, there are no WH phone records,... the WH photographer was not allowed in the room.... the Secret Service deleted all phone records for that day. ... I'm sure it's nothing. Nothing to see here. Perfectly innocent. Just coincidence :-/ |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by pg on 07/23/22 at 19:03:52 There is a perfectly good explanation for the phone records....... Putin has them all!!! Not really, CNN already said the records were all there. Just a gap existed..... https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/31/politics/mystery-call-gap-trump-jan-6-white-house-phone-logs/index.html Best regards, |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by WebsterMark on 07/24/22 at 05:22:40 6E786F726A7F72691D0 wrote:
Says who? |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by MnSpring on 07/24/22 at 12:22:00 Quote:
Says the people, that tell Bot what, to say. |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by Serowbot on 07/24/22 at 12:50:26 Yes,.. it's called the real world. |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by WebsterMark on 07/24/22 at 13:13:11 Is the real world the same people that told you about Trump and Russia gate? Let me guess, the real world is Robert Mueller? I feel kind of bad about it now but it’s people like you that allowed me to make money selling life insurance when I was a kid. Facts don’t matter, just stay in the other person’s bubble and you can sell them anything you want. |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by Serowbot on 07/24/22 at 13:40:55 Putin would own Ukraine now if Trump were still in power. He'd be moving in on other European allies. He was Putin's puppet. |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by pg on 07/24/22 at 14:37:15 7066716C74616C77030 wrote:
Indisputable proof that wasn't going to happen...... [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1o5FKR_xH1o[/media] Best regards, |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by MnSpring on 07/24/22 at 14:55:49 5A4C5B465E4B465D290 wrote:
Says the people, that tell Bot what, to say. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by WebsterMark on 07/24/22 at 15:08:51 796F78657D68657E0A0 wrote:
Oh honey…… bless your heart. |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/25/22 at 22:25:14 You BELIEVE that because why? How many presidents in the last fifty years DID NOT get us in a war? You think Trump would have helped Putin? Why? |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by WebsterMark on 07/26/22 at 04:35:48 6B747275686F5E6E5E66747833010 wrote:
Because CNN, MSNBC told him to. Our friend Sew does not have an original thought from a political point of view that is. He is hands-down the most partisan person on this board. It’s not even close. You have been critical of Republicans and I certainly have. The only one closest Mnspring , but I have a hard time following all his post with the margin thing going on. Eegore floats in the middle at all times. The drive-by Australian shooter doesn’t count. But our friend Sew steadfastly defends leftist in power no matter who they are, no matter what they’ve done or what they haven’t done. Sew, tell us one negative thing about Puddinhead. Just one. (And tapioca instead of chocolate doesn’t count…) |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by Serowbot on 07/26/22 at 06:34:21 He's not getting rid of the electoral college and the filibuster,... maybe the Senate All heavily advantage the Right, making real democracy impossible Tyranny of the minority |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by WebsterMark on 07/26/22 at 08:06:19 Isn’t protecting minority rights a key feature of our democratic republic? The electoral college, and I think I invented this phrase so I’ll take credit got it, ‘gives the land a voice’. Without it Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, North and South Dakota would be trampled. Regarding the filibuster, if there were a majority Republican house and senate, would you be just as in favor? In 2022, everything could be reversed and Democrats are in the minority. With no filibuster, you have nothing. You relied on the courts all those time to get your policy through but thanks to Donald Trump, you don’t have the Supreme Court in your back pocket anymore. Would you be in favor of adding four seats to the Supreme Court if that was delayed until 2024 with Republican president, house an Senate? |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by Serowbot on 07/26/22 at 08:39:04 The primary tenet of a democratic society is equal representation. One man, one vote. Either way it favoured, I would be in favour of that. How about a family vote on where to go to dinner. Kids,.. you get one vote each,... mommy gets two... ...and I get 20... You win, when I tell you you win. Is that democracy? |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by MnSpring on 07/26/22 at 09:13:57 7F697E637B6E63780C0 wrote:
Do you really understand how the electoral college works ? Only two States really do. Unless you want, the people crowded in one space, which the majority do not pay any taxes, where ‘mail in ballots’, which are collected and filled in by one person’s helpers. to elect a, admitted Socialist and a, even stronger Socialist LG. As well as a LEFT 5% er AG. And all the rest of Minn, contains nothing but; “Rocks and Cows” Then getting rid of the electoral college, would be much faster way to, total Socialism then Communism. |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by Serowbot on 07/26/22 at 15:16:36 Try again,... that one made no sense at all Why do a couple hundred thousand people in Wyoming get more representation than 4 million in LA? |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by MnSpring on 07/26/22 at 17:05:56 2630273A22373A21550 wrote:
A-Yep, Ya just don't understand how it works. |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by WebsterMark on 07/26/22 at 17:06:36 5640574A52474A51250 wrote:
Okay, 5 lions and 3 zebras are taking a vote on what’s for dinner. You’re a zebra. Still want one person, one vote? No, of course not. What if all the white people voted slavery back in? You would be good with that as one person, one vote. The truth is, one person one vote does not work on large scale which is why we have a republic. The elect Oriel College artificially gives more importance to smaller states for a reason. It’s worked very well. Leave it alone. It’s like the filibuster, you’re only against it when you’re on the wrong side. It’s like adding justices to the Supreme Court, you’re only for it when you’re on the other side. |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by WebsterMark on 07/26/22 at 17:10:42 7660776A72676A71050 wrote:
The real reason is because if it was a Blue state, you wouldn’t mind at all. That’s why. |
Title: Re: Nixon's 18 minutes Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/27/22 at 06:59:31 Serowbot wrote on Yesterday at 16:39:04: The primary tenet of a democratic society is equal representation. One man, one vote. Either way it favoured, I would be in favour of that But the overwhelming majority of Americans are being forced to accept perversion taught to their children to make a place in society for perverts,Who make up a miniscule percentage of the population. |
Title: Re: Biden Lying, (again) Post by MnSpring on 07/27/22 at 10:25:51 1305120F17020F14600 wrote:
So when Biden say’s ‘take this pill’, “IT IS FREE” Why Is that not ‘Lying’ ? |
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |